Browse site A to Z

Search results

Go To Simple Search

Search Type: Criteria:

Blood loss – what to expect after the birth of your baby - patient information

Description: This factsheet provides information about after pains and postnatal blood loss (lochia) in the days and weeks after your baby's birth so that you know what to expect and when to seek medical advice.
Url: /Media/UHS-website-2019/Patientinformation/Pregnancyandbirth/Blood-loss-what-to-expect-after-the-birth-of-your-baby-743a-PIL.pdf

Papers Trust Board 27 May 2021

Description: Date Time Location Chair Agenda Trust Board – Open Session 27/05/2021 9:00 - 13:00 Microsoft Teams Peter Hollins 1 Chair’s Welcome, Apologies and Declarations of Interest 9:00 To note apologies for absence, and to hear any declarations of interest relating to any item on the Agenda. 2 Staff Story The patient or staff story provides an opportunity for the Board to reflect on the experiences of patients and staff within the Trust and understand what the Trust could do better. 3 Minutes of Previous Meeting held on 30 March 2021 9:15 4 Matters Arising and Summary of Agreed Actions To discuss any matters arising from the minutes, and to agree on the status of any actions assigned at the previous meeting. 5 QUALITY, PERFORMANCE and FINANCE Quality includes: clinical effectiveness, patient safety, and patient experience 5.1 Briefing from the Chair of the Charitable Funds Committee (Oral) 9:25 Dave Bennett, Chair 5.2 Briefing from the Chair of the Finance and Investment Committee (Oral) 9:30 Dave Bennett, Chair 5.3 Briefing from the Chair of the Quality Committee (Oral) 9:35 Tim Peachey, Chair 5.4 Chief Executive Officer's Update (Oral) 9:40 Sponsor: David French, Chief Executive Officer 5.5 Integrated Performance Report for Month 1 10:00 To review the Trust's performance as reported in the Integrated Performance Report Sponsor: David French, Chief Executive Officer 5.6 Equality and Diversity Update (WRES and WDES) 10:45 Sponsor: Steve Harris, Chief People Officer Attendee: Gemma Genco, Head of Equality, Diversity & Inclusivity 5.7 Gender Pay Gap Reporting 2020 11:05 Sponsor: Steve Harris, Chief People Officer Attendee: Kirsty Durrant, Strategic HR Projects Manager 5.8 Freedom to Speak Up Report 11:25 Sponsor: Gail Byrne, Chief Nursing Officer Attendee: Christine Mbabazi, Equality & Inclusion Adviser/Freedom to Speak Up Guardian 5.9 Finance Report for Month 1 11:45 Sponsor: Ian Howard, Interim Chief Financial Officer 6 STRATEGY and BUSINESS PLANNING 6.1 CRN: Wessex 2020/21 Annual Report and 2021/22 Annual Plan 11:55 Sponsor: Paul Grundy, Chief Medical Officer Attendees: Rebecca McKay, Chief Operating Officer, CRN: Wessex/Clare Rook, Deputy COO, CRN: Wessex 7 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, RISK and INTERNAL CONTROL 7.1 Register of Seals and Chair's Actions 12:15 In compliance with the Trust Standing Orders, Standing Financial Instructions, and the Scheme of Reservation and Delegation. Sponsor: Peter Hollins, Trust Chair 7.2 Emergency Planning and Business Continuity Annual Report 2020/21 12:20 Sponsor: Joe Teape, Chief Operating Officer 7.3 Charitable Funds Committee Terms of Reference 12:30 Sponsor: Peter Hollins, Trust Chair Attendee: Karen Flaherty, Associate Director of Corporate Affairs and Company Secretary 7.4 Trust Executive Committee Terms of Reference 12:35 Sponsor: David French, Chief Executive Officer Attendee: Karen Flaherty, Associate Director of Corporate Affairs and Company Secretary 8 Any Other Business 12:40 To raise any relevant or urgent matters that are not on the agenda 9 To note the date of the next meeting: 29 July 2021 Page 2 10 Resolution regarding the Press, Public and Others Sponsor: Peter Hollins, Chair To agree, as permitted by the National Health Service Act 2006 (as amended), the Trust's Constitution and the Standing Orders of the Board of Directors, that representatives of the press, members of the public and others not invited to attend to the next part of the meeting be excluded due to the confidential nature of the business to be transacted. 11 Follow-up discussion with governors 12:45 Page 3 3 Minutes of Previous Meeting held on 30 March 2021 1 Minutes TB 30 March 2021 OS Minutes Trust Board – Open Session Date Time Location Chair Present 30/03/2021 9:00 - 12:05 Microsoft Teams Peter Hollins (PH) Dave Bennett (DB), Non-Executive Director (NED) Gail Byrne (GB), Chief Nursing Officer Cyrus Cooper (CC), NED Keith Evans (KE), NED David French (DAF), Interim Chief Executive Officer Paul Grundy (PG), Interim Chief Medical Officer Steve Harris (SH), Chief People Officer Jane Harwood (JH), NED (until item 5.10) Ian Howard (IH), Interim Chief Financial Officer Tim Peachey (TP), NED and Senior Independent Director/Deputy Chair Joe Teape (JT), Chief Operating Officer In attendance Brenda Carter (BC), Assistant Director of People (for item 5.8) Ellen Copson (EC), Associate Professor of Medical Oncology, University of Southampton and Honorary Medical Oncology Consultant (for item 2) Kirsty Durrant (KD), Strategic HR Projects Manager (for item 5.8) Karen Flaherty (KF), Associate Director or Corporate Affairs and Company Secretary Sarah Herbert (SHe), Divisional Head of Nursing and Professions, Division B (for item 5.9) Sandra Hodgkyns (SHo), Head of Emergency Planning Response and Resilience/Security (for item 5.9) Stephanie Ramsey (SR), Director of Quality and Integration (Chief Quality Officer and Chief Nurse), NHS Southampton City CCG (for item 5.6) 3 governors (observing) 3 members of the public (observing) 5 members of staff (observing) 1 member of the public (for item 2) 1 Chair’s Welcome, Apologies and Declarations of Interest The Chairman welcomed all those attending to the meeting. The following declaration of interests for GB were reported to the Board: • Chair of the Directors of Nursing Group, University Hospital Association; • Chair of the Wessex Patient Safety Collaborative; and • Member of the Policy Board, NHS Employers. The Board also noted that DB was no longer a director of Davox Consulting Limited. 2 Patient Story The patient story was told by the husband of a patient who sadly died in early 2020 following treatment for cancer at the Trust. As a result of the treatment she had received at the Trust following a diagnosis in April 2017, her life had been extended by over three years. In terms of areas for improvement, better communication of his wife’s initial diagnosis would have helped her and her family to come to terms with the diagnosis more quickly. Following their arrival at hospital, they were being asked lots of questions and his wife was being sent for tests and scans without being given information about what concerns the clinicians had or potential diagnoses. The diagnosis was also delivered on the ward just prior to a visit from a relative and with better planning this could have been done more sensitively by providing a better environment in which to have the conversation and more time for his wife to absorb the information. Once his wife met the specialist team, including the specialist nurse, she felt more reassured and was given hope by the availability of different treatment options. The Trust’s appointment of a dedicated specialist nurse for his wife’s particular cancer shortly after her diagnosis made a huge difference. The specialist nurse was always present when his wife met the consultants and would check if there was anything he or his wife needed and provided practical advice and support, which meant that he and his wife were able to spend more time together. GB reiterated the importance of specialist nurses across different patient pathways and the Trust continued to invest in more specialist nurses. While acknowledging that there was a shortage of private spaces to speak with patients and their families, through its End of Life Care Steering Group the Trust had identified a number of rooms across the hospitals to enable clinicians to go somewhere private in situations like these. The cancer service also continued to adapt to changes in cancer care and the needs of patients, with patients now living longer. Maggie’s Southampton had recently opened at the Southampton General Hospital site to provide help and support for those living with cancer, although the services it offered were currently reduced as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. The Board expressed its gratitude for sharing the story with such strength and dignity. 3 Minutes of Previous Meeting held on 28 January 2021 The minutes of the meeting held on 28 January 2021 were approved as an accurate record of that meeting. 4 Matters Arising and Summary of Agreed Actions The updates on the actions were noted. The action relating to cancelled appointments in ophthalmology (reference 354) had been followed up and could be closed, as could the actions relating to patients medically optimised for discharge (reference 351 and 393) and the Ockenden report (reference 395), which were included as items on the agenda later in the meeting. The action relating to patient nutrition (reference 394) would be reviewed at the next meeting of the Quality Committee, which would then report to the Board. The Board agreed that the actions relating to specialty outcomes (reference 350 and reference 326) should be combined, with the paper due to be presented to the Board at its meeting in April 2021. Page 2 5 QUALITY, PERFORMANCE and FINANCE 5.1 Briefing from the Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee KE updated the Board on the meeting of the Audit and Risk Committee held on 15 March 2021: • the external audit work had commenced and there were no issues to report at this early stage; • the internal auditors had reviewed referral to treatment (RTT) data quality and while data inaccuracies had been identified in the sample testing, these had not impacted on patients clinical treatment or on Trust’s the overall performance against the RTT target, and in most instances had resulted in the Trust overreporting on pathways; and • updates had been provided on progress against the recommendations in the board governance review and the ongoing review of the data security and protection toolkit. 5.2 Briefing from the Chair of the Finance and Investment Committee DB provided an overview of the Finance and Investment Committee meeting the previous day, highlighting: • that funding for the loss of other income and additional accruals of annual leave that staff had been unable to take due to the Covid-19 pandemic had been received; • the update on the planning process for 2021/22 following the publication of new national guidance that sought to achieve a balance between restoring services and reducing backlogs while supporting staff recovery; • the review of the most recent operational productivity dashboard, from which it had been difficult to draw any meaningful conclusions given the impact of the Trust’s response to the most recent wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in the previous months; and • the business case for the expansion of the outpatients area in ophthalmology, which would be considered by the Board later in the meeting. 5.3 Briefing from the Chair of the Quality Committee TP provided an update on the meeting of the Quality Committee held on 15 March 2021 focusing on the following areas: • the increase in waiting times for diagnostics and plans to recover performance, with a review of patient harm to be completed once patients who had waited longer than six weeks had been seen; • the review of a ‘never event’ relating to a retained swab including the recommendations for a number of sensible actions that had already been implemented; • the latest update on experience of care including the Trust’s accreditation as a Veteran Aware NHS trust; • the recommendations for reporting on maternity safety following the Ockenden review of maternity services at Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, which would be considered by the Board later in the meeting; • the urgent investigation of aspergillus infections in the intensive care unit to establish whether there was a link to an earlier leak in a pipe above the ceiling in that area; • the latest report on clinical outcomes, with the Board to receive a full Page 3 report at its meeting in April 2021; and • the review of the committee’s effectiveness. 5.4 Chief Executive Officer’s Update The Trust had taken part in the national day of reflection and one minute’s silence on 23 March 2021 to commemorate the anniversary of the first national lockdown due to the Covid-19 pandemic. This had given staff an opportunity to pause and reflect on the loss of life over the previous year, including patients and staff. There were currently 20 patients in the hospital who had tested positive for Covid-19, three of which were in intensive care. An average of three or four patients with Covid-19 were being admitted daily, which highlighted the importance of continuing to follow the rules as lockdown measures were eased. Staff were being encouraged to take annual leave and wellbeing conversations were taking place with every member of staff. Second doses of the Covid-19 vaccine were being administered to Trust staff and staff at health and social care partners. 92% of frontline staff and 90% of all staff had received at least one dose of the vaccine, including 88% of BAME (Black and Minority Ethnic) staff. Staff who had not yet received the vaccination were being contacted individually to understand the reasons for this and provide additional information where appropriate. As well as planning for the recovery of services in the short term, the Trust was carrying out long-term modelling of future demand and capacity supported by external consultants and architects, which would form the basis of the Trust’s estates masterplan for the main hospital site. In advance of this work, the corporate objectives for 2021/22 would be presented to the Board at its meeting in April 2021. The Trust had performed exceptionally well in its recent external accreditation of endoscopy by the Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy (JAG), providing one of the best submissions reviewed by JAG. Each of the executive directors provided an update in turn, covering the following areas: • reopening of theatres in Southampton General and Princess Anne Hospitals, replacing the current additional capacity in the independent sector from 1 April 2021; • four ‘Always Improving’ quality improvement projects relating to the emergency department (ED), discharge of patients medically optimised for discharge (MOFD), theatres and outpatients; • the launch of the ‘Always Improving’ strategy with staff in June 2021; • the review of patients who had been waiting for surgery, in particular those in priority level 2 (surgery that can be deferred for up to four weeks); • modelling of the potential impact on the waiting list of GP referrals returning to more normal levels and patients potentially presenting with more advanced disease than if they had seen their GP earlier; • the business intelligence programme to improve prospective as well as retrospective reporting; • allowing time for teams to readjust to working together as part of the recovery process with additional support from the Trust for those teams experiencing challenges; • plans to safely reopen the hospitals to visitors, particularly while the Page 4 Trust continued to admit patients with Covid-19; • re-energising the COVID ZERO campaign to ensure that the infection control measures continued to be followed rigorously even as the number of cases reduced, with a nosocomial infection the previous week acting as a timely reminder of the risk; • the successful renegotiation of the limit on expenditure (CDEL) for 2020/21 through which the Trust had been able to access additional capital and the negotiation of the allocation of CDEL across the integrated care system (ICS) for 2021/22; and • the current projects in development including theatres, the private patient unit, ophthalmology and the pathology laboratory information system. The Board noted that that the Trust would need to establish how it would balance the needs of those patients who had been waiting longest for treatment with the clinical prioritisation process already in place as it planned for the recovery of activity. 5.5 Integrated Performance Report for Month 11 The integrated performance report (IPR) for month 11 was noted. During February 2021 the direct impact of Covid-19 infections upon the Trust continued to be significant. There were 263 patients in the hospital with Covid19 at the start of February and 129 at the end of the month. The number of patients in intensive care reduced from 67 at the beginning of the month to 39 by the end of February. This compared to the first wave of Covid-19 pandemic, when the number of patients with Covid-19 in the hospital peaked at 173 and 38 in intensive care. This also had an impact on elective activity within the Trust, which was 42% of the level in February 2020. The Board discussed the following areas: Responsive • while the Trust’s ED was performing well comparatively, it was not meeting the performance target on the length of time patients spent in ED, despite attendances at 71% of the normal level; • this was principally due to patients presenting with mental health conditions and surges of high acuity patients, however, new junior doctors had also joined ED in February who were not used to the level of attendances; • leadership in ED was central to managing the department in these situations particularly the effective operation of the consultant of the day model to ensure that decisions regarding patients were made in a timely manner; • performance in ED had improved overall as 87% of patients were currently seen within four hours with an average daily attendance of 345 patients compared to 78% of patients two years ago when the average daily attendance was 350 patients; • to continue to improve performance and the flow of patients through ED the Trust was ensuring that specialties adhered to the one hour standard for referrals; • infection control measures remained in place, including respiratory assessment and rapid testing in ED and the acute medical unit, although it was difficult to establish whether this had a material impact on performance as ED had performed consistently well during the Page 5 period of the pandemic; • activity in ED had increased in March 2021 as lockdown restrictions had eased; • while the number of non-face-to-face outpatient appointments had increased following the first wave of the pandemic, some of these had not been full appointments but rather an opportunity to check in with patients; • the use of non-face-to face outpatient appointments varied by condition and specialty and was more appropriate for some of these than others, however, the Trust was seeking to learn from those clinicians who had used these types of appointment successfully as part of its quality improvement work in outpatients; • feedback from patients non-face-to face appointments had been positive on the basis that their care was continuing, however, limited work had been done to assess effectiveness in terms of the experience and outcome of these appointments; and • although cancer performance measures remained stable, both the Trust and the Wessex Cancer Alliance had performed well comparatively and ranked as second highest performing in their respective peer groups. Safe • • the unusually high number of medication incidents reported with moderate or severe harm in February and the actions taken in response to these; and ensuring that staff continued to report incidents, particularly as they returned to their normal areas of work following the pandemic. Caring • the number of overnight ward moves for non-clinical reasons given that most patient moves during this period would be related to patients admitted with Covid-19; • the percentage of patients with a disability or additional needs reporting that those needs were met had reduced and there were resource challenges in this area currently with a vacancy in one of the two adult learning disabilities nursing roles, although the recruitment process was underway; and • increasing the number of vulnerable women on a continuity of carer pathway given the benefit to all these women in terms of the quality of oversight in maternity. ACTIONS: (1) GB would review the non-clinical reasons for overnight ward moves and provide an overview to the Quality Committee. (2) The Quality Committee would review the resourcing required to increase the percentage of vulnerable women on a continuity of carer pathway and update the Board. Well-led • the impact of research activity on outcomes, more detail of which would be provided in the report on clinical outcomes at the meeting of the Board in April 2021. The Board’s review of the IPR, led by TP, would report to the Board in May 2021 with a candidate IPR. Page 6 5.6 Inpatient Flow - Medically Optimised for Discharge Update SR joined the meeting for this item. The Board noted the current performance against the process improvement trajectories and key performance indicators agreed by the system, system plans in the light of current performance and the Trust’s internal work programme for MOFD. The Board was interested to learn what the Trust could be doing differently or better in order to help improve performance as a system. The work to date had made a significant impact as the system responded to discharge an increased number of patients with more complex needs such as stroke patients, patients with challenging behaviours, patients requiring more intensive therapy and homeless patients. There was a specific issue with discharging to care homes at weekends and providing the necessary clinical support to these care homes to enable discharge. The main areas of focus for the Trust were to speed up processes and ensure patients MOFD were ready to be discharged earlier in the day as this would make it easier for services in the community to respond. While there was a target to get to 40-60 patients MOFD in hospital, no specific timescales had been set. ACTION: JT agreed to include a trajectory for MOFD patients in the regular reports to the Finance and Investment Committee. Funding was also likely to be an issue in the future as additional national funding provided during the Covid-19 pandemic to support the discharge of patients would be withdrawn at the end of June 2021. The Board recognised that system partners were aligned in their aim to address the delays in discharging patients MOFD and prevent potential patient harm as a result. However, the Board suggested a more holistic view of the issue would be beneficial when reviewing future resourcing, taking into account the revenue and capital implications and the consequences in terms of hospital capacity and addressing the current backlog of patients waiting for treatment. This analysis may identify where investment was needed to support discharge, including additional capacity, albeit that the ambition remained ‘home first’ when discharging patients in order to assess ongoing needs more accurately and reduce dependency. The meeting was adjourned briefly to allow for a break. 5.7 Ockenden Review of Maternity Services The Board noted the update on progress on the emerging findings and recommendations of the independent review of maternity services at the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust released on 10 December 2020. The Trust had rated its progress against two of the recommendations as red, with no actions currently in place, and nine of the recommendations as amber, where actions were still in progress. Completion of these recommendations was dependent the Trust’s submission to NHS Resolution’s maternity incentive scheme which would be made by mid-July 2021 and therefore other trusts would be in a similar position. The Trust had received feedback on the information submitted to NHS England and NHS Improvement, which had been positive overall. A template had been designed to report to the Board and the local maternity Page 7 service (LMS) on maternity safety, which would incorporate a summary of serious incidents (SIs) and moderate harm incidents. This report would be submitted to the Board maternity safety champions and LMS on a monthly basis. The Board maternity safety champions would also meet with complainants before the referral of a complaint to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman. It was proposed that reporting to the Board on maternity safety issues including SIs and moderate harm incidents, the perinatal mortality report tool, early notification scheme, red flag incidents, staff concerns and evidence of listening to families including complaints would take place quarterly following review of the information by the Quality Committee. The frequency of reporting to the Board was in line with the recommendations in the Ockenden review although not with the guidance issued subsequently. The Board was keen to ensure it maintained a good understanding of the culture and patient experience in the maternity service given the impact of each on the quality of the service. Proposals to regularly survey staff would be considered later in the meeting. In addition the Board requested that the regular patient story should include maternity at least once annually. ACTION: KF to arrange a patient story from a patient using the maternity service at least once annually. DECISION: The Board agreed: • to receive a quarterly report on maternity safety issues; and • that all SIs and moderate harm incidents would be provided to the Board maternity safety champions and LMS. 5.8 UHS Staff Survey Results 2020 Report BC and KD joined the meeting for this item. The results of the NHS staff survey 2020 were noted by the Board. The survey had been completed by staff between September and November 2020. Overall the Trust’s results were at or above the acute trust average in nine out of ten themes. 77% of staff would recommend the Trust as a place to work and 87% of staff agreed that care of patients was the top priority for the Trust. Performance on health and wellbeing had significantly increased compared to 2019. However, the survey had also identified some areas for improvement. The areas with statistically significant decreases in performance compared to the 2019 staff survey results were: • Equality, diversity and inclusion; • Immediate managers; • Violence; and • Team working. In response to a question from a NED, it was clarified that only a small number of incidents of violence against staff from managers and colleagues reflected in the staff survey results were reported leading to an investigation. The reporting through the Trust’s Freedom to Speak Up processes had identified incidents involving microaggressions rather than acts of violence. Work was also ongoing to improve leadership skills within the organisation, which would set out expectations regarding values and behaviours. Over 1,000 free text comments had been submitted from staff as part of the survey and a national analysis of themes was being prepared, which would Page 8 provide further insight into how staff were feeling following the first wave of the pandemic. The Board supported more regular surveying of staff, particularly around the areas of improvement identified, recognising that things had changed since the survey was carried out six months ago and would continue to change. 5.9 Plan to Address Violence and Aggression against Staff SHe and SHo joined the meeting for this item. The Board noted the update on the progress made since the previous update in September 2020. This included closer working with Hampshire Constabulary, proposed changes to security arrangements, staff training and staff support. These plans aimed to reduce incidents of violence and aggression against staff and provide support to staff in the management of violence and aggression and following any incidents. The Board recognised that violence and aggression against staff would never be eliminated entirely as the Trust provided care to individuals with mental health issues, brain injuries, dementia and who lacked capacity who may find it difficult to control their behaviour. It was important, however, that violent and aggressive behaviour was challenged consistently when appropriate. The Board supported the approach to exclude violent and aggressive individuals from the Trust when they repeatedly displayed unacceptable behaviour that it was not possible to manage through de-escalation, anticipatory care planning and the challenging behaviour protocol. While not formally approving the funding for the plans set out in the paper, the Board noted the importance of investment in this area in order to support staff. A further update on progress would be provided in December 2021. 5.10 Finance Report for Month 11 The finance report for month 11 was noted. The following areas were highlighted: • the Trust has received the payments for the loss of other income, additional accruals of annual leave that staff had been unable to take due to the Covid-19 pandemic and the elective incentive scheme; • the Trust remained on track to achieve a breakeven position for 2020/21 as did the other trusts in the Hampshire and Isle of Wight ICS; and • the Trust’s balance sheet position remained strong, which placed the Trust in a good position to address likely pressures in 2021/22. 6 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, RISK and INTERNAL CONTROL 6.1 Register of Seals and Chair's Actions for ratification DECISION: The Board ratified the application of the Trust seal and the Chair’s actions set out in the report. ACTION: IH would follow up on the Wessex Clinical Research Network and the assisted conception service items in the paper as these were not single tender actions required to be reported in accordance with the Trust’s Standing Financial Instructions. 6.2 Amendment to Constitution for CCG Merger With effect from 1 April 2021, the individual Clinical Commissioning Groups Page 9 (CCGs) within Hampshire and the Isle of Wight were to merge to create a new NHS Hampshire, Southampton and Isle of Wight CCG. The Council of Governors (CoG) included an appointed governor from each of NHS Southampton City CCG and NHS West Hampshire CCG and as a result of the merger these two organisations would cease to exist. It was proposed that the Trust should reflect the merger in the composition of the CoG, by amending the composition of the CoG in Annex 3 of the Trust’s constitution to remove the Appointed Governor from each of NHS Southampton City CCG and NHS West Hampshire CCG and include an Appointed Governor from NHS Hampshire, Southampton and Isle of Wight CCG in their place. A separate review of the composition of the CoG would be undertaken as part of the annual review of the Trust’s constitution to ensure that the overall composition of the CoG remains representative and reflected the changes to NHS governance structures. DECISION: The Board approved the amendment to the Trust’s constitution with effect from 1 April 2021, subject to the approval of the CoG at its meeting on 31 March 2021. 7 Any Other Business There was no other business. 8 To note the date of the next meeting: 27 May 2021 9 Resolution regarding the Press, Public and Others DECISION: The Board resolved that, as permitted by the National Health Service Act 2006 (as amended), the Trust's Constitution and the Standing Orders for the Practice and Procedure of the Board of Directors, representatives of the press, members of the public and others not invited to attend to the next part of the meeting be excluded due to the confidential nature of the business to be transacted. The meeting was adjourned. Page 10 4 Matters Arising and Summary of Agreed Actions 1 List of Action Items List of action items Agenda item Assigned to Deadline Status Trust Board – Open Session 30/03/2021 5.5 Integrated Performance Report for Month 11 426. Caring - overnight ward moves Byrne, Gail Peachey, Tim 27/05/2021 Pending Explanation action item GB would review the non-clinical reasons for overnight ward moves and provide an overview to the Quality Committee. 427. Caring - vulnerable women Byrne, Gail Peachey, Tim 27/05/2021 Pending Explanation action item The Quality Committee would review the resourcing required to increase the percentage of vulnerable women on a continuity of carer pathway and update the Board. Trust Board – Open Session 30/03/2021 5.6 Inpatient Flow - Medically Optimised for Discharge Update 428. Trajectory for MOFD patients Teape, Joe 27/05/2021 Pending Explanation action item JT agreed to include a trajectory for MOFD patients in the regular reports to the Finance and Investment Committee. Trust Board – Open Session 30/03/2021 5.7 Ockenden Review of Maternity Services 429. Patient story Flaherty, Karen 31/03/2022 Pending Explanation action item KF to arrange a patient story from a patient using the maternity service at least once annually. Page 1 of 2 Agenda item Assigned to Deadline Status Trust Board – Open Session 30/03/2021 6.1 Register of Seals and Chair's Actions for ratification 430. Follow up Howard, Ian 27/05/2021 Pending Explanation action item IH would follow up on the Wessex Clinical Research Network and the assisted conception service items in the paper as these were not single tender actions required to be reported in accordance with the Trust’s Standing Financial Instructions. Page 2 of 2 Report to the Trust Board of Directors Title: Agenda item: Sponsor: Date: Purpose Issue to be addressed: Integrated Performance Report 2021/22 Month 1 5.5 David French, Chief Executive Officer 27 May 2021 Assurance Approval or reassurance Y Ratification Information This report is intended to support the Trust Board in assuring that: • the care we provide is safe, caring, effective, responsive and well led in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic • at the same time we continue our journey toward our vision of World Class Care for Everyone. Response to the issue: The Integrated Performance Report reflects the current operating environment and is aligned with the Care Quality Commission Key Lines of Enquiry. Implications: This report covers a broad range of trust services and activities. It is (Clinical, Organisational, intended to assist the Board in assuring that the Trust meets regulatory Governance, Legal?) requirements and corporate objectives. Risks: (Top 3) of carrying This report is provided for the purpose of assurance. out the change / or not: Summary: Conclusion This report is provided for the purpose of assurance. and/or recommendation Page 1 of 1 Integrated KPI Board Report covering up to April 2021 Sponsor - Andrew Asquith, Director of Planning, Performance and Productivity, andrew.asquith@uhs.nhs.uk Chart Type Cumulative Column Example Cumulative Column Year on Year Line Benchmarked Line & bar Benchmarked Control Chart 100% 0% 66.8% Variance from Target Report Guide Explanation A cumulative column chart is used to represent a total count of the variable and shows how the total count increases over time. This example shows quarterly updates. A cumulative year on year column chart is used to represent a total count of the variable throughout the year. The variable value is reset to zero at the start of the year because the target for the metric is yearly. The line benchmarked chart shows our performance compared to the average performance of a peer group. The number at the bottom of the chart shows where we are ranked in the group (1 would mean ranked 1st that month). 66.49% The line shows our performance and the bar underneath represents the range of performance of benchmarked trusts (bottom = lowest performance, top = highest performance) A control chart shows movement of a variable in relation to its control limits (the 3 lines = Upper control limit, Mean and Lower control limit). When the value shows special variation (not expected) then it is highlighted green (leading to a good outcome) or red (leading to a bad outcome). Values are considered to show special variation if they -Go outside control limits -Have 6 points in a row above or below the mean, -Trend for 6 points, -Have 2 out of 3 points past 2/3 of the control limit, -Show a significant movement (greater than the average moving range). Variance from target charts are used to show how far away a variable is from its target each month. Green bars represent the value the metric is achieving better than target and the red bars represent the distance a metric is away from achieving its target. 2 Report to Trust Board in May 2021 Introduction The Integrated Performance Report is presented to the Trust Board each month. The report aims to: • Provide assurance that the care we provide is safe, caring, effective, responsive and well led in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic • Ensure that at the same time we continue our journey toward our vision of World Class Care for Everyone. We adjust / add to these indicators – informing the Board and keeping a comparative narrative – as the situation changes as we work through these unusual circumstances. The structure of the report is currently being reviewed in order that it can better reflect the ambitions within ‘Our Strategy 2025’, and to support the strategic discussions of the Board. April 2021 Summary During April the direct impact of COVID-19 infections upon the Trust reduced further. Patients with a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis during their admission: • Started the month at 48 (11 of which were in intensive care / high care) • Finished the month at 24 (5 of which were in intensive care / high care) The phased resumption of the elective admissions continued within NHS facilities, and the additional access to independent sector theatres and beds that had been secured by NHS England during the pandemic terminated at the end March. 3 Report to Trust Board in May 2021 Key aspects of performance for consideration this month include: • The total number of patients on the RTT waiting list increased by over 1,000 patients to 37,613 in April. There are over 3,000 patients waiting over 52 weeks for treatment and over 500 patients waiting over 78 weeks. Our benchmarking confirms that we are continuing to perform well in comparison to our peer group. • The crude mortality rate and Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio (HSMR) both increased significantly in January (though HSMR remained significantly better than would be expected on average in the NHS). Patient details have been requested in order that the recorded diagnosis can be checked as a first step in investigation. It may be relevant that January saw a peak in COVID-19 occupancy. • UHS 62 day performance (RE 23) improved to 86.5% (better than our local target and the national target applying to the majority of 62 day pathways). UHS was the best performing trust amongst our 10 ‘peer’ teaching hospitals in March. 4 Report to Trust Board in May 2021 RESPONSIVE • Emergency Department timeliness deteriorated slightly to 87% (RE 9) whilst remaining 3rd best amongst 8 benchmark trusts. Attendance numbers increased further to the highest levels since the COVID-19 pandemic started (RE 8). • Elective spell volumes (excluding daycases, at SGH/PAH only) (RE 13) recovered further, yet remained below those in Autumn 2020. Two SGH theatres are currently closed due to building works and are due to reopen in June. • The total number of patients on the RTT waiting list increased by over 1,000 patients this month. The cohort of patients who have waited over 52 weeks (RE 16) reduced by over 300 patients, whilst those waiting over 78 weeks (RE 17) increased by over 100 patients. We remain concerned by this situation and are focussed on improving the situation as soon as possible for our patients. Our benchmarking (in a group of 20 Teaching hospitals) confirms that we are continuing to perform well in comparison to our peer group. • Cancer performance measures for March indicate continued improvement in performance: o UHS 62 day performance (RE 23) improved to 86.5% (better than our local target and the national target applying to the majority of 62 day pathways). UHS was the best performing trust amongst our 10 ‘peer’ teaching hospitals again this month. o 31 day performance (RE 24) was maintained above the target at 97.6%. 5 Report to Trust Board in May 2021 RESPONSIVE RE1 Non-elective Spells (discharged, including CDU) Non Elective LOS RE2-L Rolling 12 months (Solid) Monthly (Dashed) Number of inpatients that were RE3 medically optimised for discharge (monthly average) Monthly Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr target 6,800 6,292 4,000 7.5 6.0 4,128 6.49 - 5.45 - 4.5 250 76 0 122 - Longer LOS Census average RE4-N (Patients with LOS > =21days) 203.38 160.86 118.33 73 145 - RE5-l RE6 RE7 Adult midday bed occupancy Last minute cancelled operations not readmitted within 28 days Last minute cancelled operations 100% 98.2% 84.6% 71.1% 82.6% 40% 55 40 0 150 5 0 79.0% 90-95% - 6 35 - 6 Report to Trust Board in May 2021 RESPONSIVE Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr QTD 12,000 10663 RE8 Total ED Attendances - 5735 5,000 RE9-N Patients spending less than 4hrs in ED SGH Main ED (Type 1 and UCH) 92% 84% Major Trauma Centres (Type 1) 76% 90.2% 87.2% 81.30% 87.2% Rank of 8-> RE10-N Patients spending less than 4hrs in ED UHS Total (includes SGH all types) - 532533422111233 92.22% 85.5% 78.82% 91.1% 91.1% 88.0% 88.0% Q target - 95% 95% RE11-N Total time Total spent in ED - Percentiles UHS RE12 27,000 Accepted Referrals (excluding -initiated by consultant responsible) 0 RE13 2,000 Elective spells (excluding daycase, onsite SGH/PAH only) 0 90th, 4:00 Mean, 2:45 8,013 446 90th, 4:59 - - Mean, 3:04 19,100 - - 1,438 - - 7 Report to Trust Board in May 2021 RESPONSIVE Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 100% % Patients on an open 18 week pathway 66.8% RE14-N (within 18 weeks ) with teaching hospital min-max range and rank (of 20) 18 12 14 14 7 6 7 7 10 10 10 9 30% 38,000 Total number of patients on a waiting RE15-N list (18 week referral to treatment 33106 pathway) 30,000 Patients on an open 18 week pathway 9,000 RE16-N (waiting 52 weeks+ ) with teaching hospital min-max range and rank (of 20) 0 15 154 13 13 13 11 11 11 10 9 6 6 6 1000 RE17 Patients on an open 18 week pathway (waiting 78 weeks+ ) 500 0 0 65,000 RE18 Face to face outpatient attendances 40,105 Feb Mar Apr 66.5% 9 8 37613 3108 5 4 553 34,415 Target > =92% - 0 65,000 RE19 Non-face to face outpatient attendances 15,703 0 RE19 - Latest month is awaiting approx ~3k outpatient attendances to be reported 18,748 - RE20-N Average weeks waited for first outpatient appointment 12.00 10.47 8.89 10.3 7.00 7.30 8.5 - 8 Report to Trust Board in May 2021 7.00 7.30 RESPONSIVE Target Patients to Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar /Apr recover target QTD 11,000 9563 RE21-N Patients waiting for diagnostics - 4317 4,000 80% % of Patients waiting over 6 weeks for RE22-N diagnostics with teaching hospital min- 45.2% 27.2% 90% N = 7 L= L=> 0 of 197 80% 85% 69.1% UHS Total ………………….Rank(of 10)-> 6 5 3 1 1 1 1 1 5 7 4 2 1 1 0.5 31 day cancer wait performance RE24-N (Latest data held by UHS, Combined measure – First and Subsequent Treatments of Cancer) 97.1% 93.2% 89.4% 92.2% 97.6% N=> 96% N=0 of 948 97.41% RE25-N Snapshot of waits > 104 days (from referral on a 62 day pathway) 36 27 29 25 11 17 9 11 25 24 17 13 16 22 - - - RE26-N 28 Day Faster Diagnosis 100% 70% 82.7% 87.5% => 75 % - 84.16% 9 Report to Trust Board in May 2021 RESPONSIVE RE27 My Medical Record - UHS patient logins Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Monthly target 20,000 18,182 10,000 5,566 - 0 2,500 RE28 Number of Estates Help desk requests 900 and percentage completed on time 100% 85% 997 89.6% 1,592 - 84.7% > 85% 50% Elective inpatient activity - % of same month pre COVID-19 100% RE29 UHS Corporate peer average ------------------------------Rank--> 20% Non-elective inpatient activity - % of same month pre COVID-19 100% RE30 UHS Corporate peer average ------------------------------Rank--> 50% 1st outpatient attendances - % of same month pre COVID-19 100% RE31 UHS Corporate peer average ------------------------------Rank--> 30% Follow up outpatient attendances - 110% % of same month pre COVID-19 RE32 UHS Corporate peer average ------------------------------Rank--> 50% RE29-32 corporate peers group size = 7 90.4% 85.1% 35.23% 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 4 4 2 95.0% 66.6% 95.42% 534422232254 96.2% 51.7% 93.77% 47.20%2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 70.3% 108.9% 102.8% - 63.6% 6 3 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 4 5 QTD - 86.2% - 10 Report to Trust Board in May 2021 SAFE • Only a single case of probable hospital associated COVID-19 acquisition > 7 days occurred in April (SA 6). • Our measure related to pressure ulcers was amended this month to distinguish between category 2 and 3 ulcers, regardless of level of ‘harm’ (SA 7/8). Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Target YTD SA1-N Cumulative Clostridium difficile 2 SA2 MRSA bacteraemia 0 100 SA3 Clinical cleaning scores for very high risk areas 95 100 SA4 Serco cleaning scores for very high risk areas 95 Healthcare-acquired COVID 35 SA5 infection: COVID-positive sample taken > 14days after admission (validated) 0 Probable hospital-associated 80 SA6 COVID infection: COVID-positive sample taken > 7 days and 95% - 93.4% YTD target 95% 12 Report to Trust Board in May 2021 CARING • Inpatient feedback (CA 1) continues to be good and significantly better than target. • Maternity patient negative feedback (CA 2) continues to be worse than target; 6.6% compared to the target of =70% 41.5% 65.6% 14 Report to Trust Board in May 2021 0% CARING Monthly Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr target Total vulnerable women (living 100% CA8 within 10% most deprived decile) booked onto a continuity of carer 40.0% pathway 0% 100% % Patients reporting being CA9 involved in decisions about care and treatment 50% 86.0% 85.0% > =90% CA10 100% % Patients reporting finding somebody to talk to about worries and fears 50% 97.0% % Patients with a disability/ 100% additional needs reporting those 81.0% CA11 needs/adjustments were met (total number questioned included at chart base) 30 165 39 50% 57 153 215 133 164 174 178 240 77 CA11 - Performance is a scored metric with a "Yes" response scoring 1, "Yes, to some extent" receiving 0.5 score and other responses scoring 0. Overnight ward moves with a 100 CA12 reason marked as non-clinical (excludes moves from admitting 75.58 44.08 10 wards with LOS =90% 89.0% > =90% 63 110 289 29 - 10.8 - 15 Report to Trust Board in May 2021 EFFECTIVE • The crude mortality rate (EF 4) and Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio (HSMR) (EF 3), both increased significantly in January (though HSMR remained significantly better than would be expected on average in the NHS). More deaths than ‘expected’ are reported in General Medicine, Respiratory Medicine and Medicine for Older People, with a primary diagnosis of ‘viral infection’. Information for 97 patients has been requested in order that the recorded diagnosis can be checked as a first step in investigation. • Measures relating to patients screened for smoking and harmful alcohol consumption (EF 5), with those found to smoke and given brief advice or a medication offer (EF 7), stalled in their recovery following the COVID-19 peak in January and are currently slightly below target. EF1-L Cumulative Specialities with Outcome Measures Developed EF2 Developed Outcomes RAG ratings EF3-N HSMR - UHS HSMR - SGH EF4 HSMR - Crude Mortality Rate Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr 53 54 56 56 57 255 260 285 305 332 100% 75% 80% 81% 79% 77% 76% 50% 85 82.2 81.5 75 3.5% 3.0% 2.5% Monthly target +1 - 80% EF6-N % patients screened & found to 100% have either moderate or high alcohol dependence given advice or referral 80% 96.7% 95.7% > 90% 100% % patients screened & found to EF7-N smoke given brief advice or a medication offer 60% 83.6% 88.9% > 90% 17 Report to Trust Board in May 2021 WELL LED • Non-medical appraisal rates (WL 2) have continued their modest rate of recovery to 81%, but still remain significantly below the target of 92%. • Overall sickness absence (WL 6) reduced to 3%, which is within target, whilst COVID-19 related absence (WL 7) reduced to 1% of employed time during the month of April. WL1-L Substantive Staff - Turnover Monthly Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Target 13.63% 12.92% 12.22% 13.4% 12.3% 92% 95.0% 3.4% 12.4% =76% WL9-N Response rate of - staff recommend UHS 60% as a place to work: UHS Quarterly staff FFT National NHS Staff Survey 20% 50.0% 30% 11% WL10-L % of Band 7+ staff who are Black and Minority Ethnic 9.2% 10.0% 15% by 2023 7% WL11 14% % of Band 7+ Staff who have declared a disability or long term health condition 13.3% 13.6% - 12% WL12- QI training programme, and reporting, is currently temporarily suspended as team members support urgent change programmes as part of our Covid 19 response and recovery WL12-L Statutory & Mandatory Training Achieving Target 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 - 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 100 WL13-L Number of Apprenticeship Starts 44 49 59 23 - 0 19 Report to Trust Board in May 2021 0 WELL LED Monthly Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr target WL14-L Comparative CRN Recruitment Performance by clinical specialty 56% 52% 28% 36% 40% > =70.0% WL15-L Comparative CRN Recruitment Performance - weighted WL16-L Comparative CRN Recruitment - contract commercial WL17-L Proportion of studies closing in FY on time and to recruitment target non-commercial WL18 NIHR CRF & BRC cumulative quarterly publications 2 5 13 88% 13 50% 600 137 120 0 2 17 43% 246 261 7 7 45% 424 329 Top 5 8 2 Top 10 42% 452 562 > =80% 20 Report to Trust Board in May 2021 Changes and Corrections Section Responsive Safe Safe Caring Caring KPI KPI Name Type RE29-32 Activity metrics - % of same month pre COVID-19, UHS and corporate peer average change SA7 Pressure ulcers category 2 per 1000 bed days change SA8 Pressure ulcers category 3 and above per 1000 bed days change CA11 % Patients with a disability/ additional needs reporting those needs/adjustments were met correction (total number questioned included at
Url: /Media/UHS-website-2019/Docs/About-the-Trust/Trust-governance-and-corporate-docs/2021-Trust-document/TB-papers/Papers-Trust-Board-27-May-2021.pdf

Papers Trust Board 28 March 2019

Description: Agenda Group Name: Date of Meeting: Venue: Time: Apologies to: Trust Board – Open Session 28 March 2019 Conference Room, Heartbeat Education Centre, F Level, North Wing, SGH 9.00am Sue Diduch, Corporate Affairs Administrator 9.00 1. Chair’s Welcome, Apologies and Declarations of Interest 2. Minutes of Previous Meeting held on 28 February 2019 3. Matters Arising/Summary of Agreed Actions 9.15 9.30 9.35 9.40 9.45 10.30 10.40 10.50 4. Quality, Performance and Finance 4.1 Patient Story (Derek Sandeman, Medical Director) 4.2 Briefing from Chair of Audit & Risk Committee for review (Simon Porter, Chair, A&RC) 4.3 Briefing from Chair of Quality Committee for review (Mike Sadler, Chair, QC) 4.4 Briefing from Chair of Strategy & Finance Committee for review (Jane Bailey, Chair, S&FC) 4.5 Integrated Performance Report for Month 11 including Quarterly Patient Experience Report (QIF) for review 4.6 Informatics Update for review (Jane Hayward, Director of Transformation & Improvement/ Adrian Byrne, Director of Informatics) 4.7 2018 NHS National Staff Survey Results for review (Paula Head, Chief Executive/Steve Harris, Director of Human Resources) 4.8 Finance Report for Month 11 for review (David French, Chief Financial Officer) Oral Oral Oral Oral 11.00 5. Chair’s and Chief Executive’s Reports 5.1 Chief Executive’s Report for review and Chair’s Actions for ratification (Paula Head, Chief Executive/Peter Hollins, Trust Chair) 11.05 6. Corporate Governance, Risk and Internal Control 6.1 Feedback from Council of Governors’ Meeting 12 March Oral 2019 to note (Peter Hollins, Trust Chair) 11.15 7. Any other business 8. To note the date of the next meeting: Tuesday, 30 April 2019 in the Conference Room, Heartbeat Education Centre, F Level, North Wing, SGH In Attendance: Adrian Byrne, Director of Informatics Steve Harris, Director of Human Resources Vicki Havercroft-Dixon, Head of Patient Relations (shadowing Gail Byrne) EXCLUSION OF PRESS, PUBLIC AND OTHERS The public and representatives of the press may attend all meetings of the Trust, but shall be required to withdraw upon the Board of Directors resolving as follows “that representatives of the press, and other members of the public, be excluded from the remainder of this meeting as publicity would be prejudicial to the public interest by reason of the confidential nature of the business to be transacted” 11.30-11.45 Follow-up discussion with governors Items Circulated: The following items have been circulated to the Board since the last meeting. Executive directors are happy to take questions from individual members, before the meeting, by e-mail or telephone, or to meet separately to discuss in more detail. 25 February 2019 Press Release: Hospital first to offer all patients chance to manage healthcare online 7 March 2019 Press Release: Eight-week breastfeeding supplement prevents weight loss in premature babies after discharge 12 March 2019 Press Release: Leading doctor warns use of blood test to diagnose heart attacks is “flawed” 15 March 2019 Press Release: Healthcare scientists “hamstrung” by lack of awareness and investment Trust Board Minutes – Open Session Minutes of the Open Trust Board meeting held on Thursday 28 February 2019, in the Conference Room, Heartbeat Education Centre, North Wing, University Hospital Southampton, commencing at 0900 and concluding at 1100. Present: Mr P Hollins, Trust Chair Mrs P Head, Chief Executive Mr D French, Chief Financial Officer & Deputy Chief Executive Mrs G Byrne, Director of Nursing & Organisational Development Ms J Hayward, Director of Transformation & Improvement Dr C Marshall, Chief Operating Officer Dr D Sandeman, Medical Director Mr S Porter, Senior Independent Director/Deputy Chair Ms J Bailey, Non-Executive Director Prof C Cooper, Non-Executive Director Ms J Douglas-Todd, Non-Executive Director Ms C Mason, Non-Executive Director Dr M Sadler, Non-Executive Director PTH PHe DAF GB JH CM DS SP JB CC JD-T CMa MS In Attendance: Mr C Helps, Interim Associate Director Corporate Affairs CH Mr N Pearce, Associate Medical Director for Patient Safety NP Mr M Green, Head of Bereavement Care MG Ms V Boland, Corporate Affairs Manager (minutes) VB Ms S Herbert, DHN/P, Division A (shadowing Mrs G Byrne) SH 1 member of staff 2 governors 19/19 20/19 Apologies Apologies were received from Jenni Douglas-Todd, Non-Executive Director. Chair’s Welcome, Opening Comments and Declarations of Interest The Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting, specifically welcoming back VB. The chair congratulated CMa for her successful appointment as Chair at Solent NHS Trust. Action By There were no declarations of a conflict of interest with any items on the agenda. 21/19 Minutes of Previous Meeting (Agenda item 2) The minutes of the meeting held on 31 January 2019 were AGREED as an accurate record subject to amendments to: 6/19c) the last sentence of the second paragraph was deemed inaccurate and should state that the key performance indicator (KPI) for emergency readmissions be reviewed for next year. 6/19g) date of the major incident that occurred on 30th November 2018 to be provided in full. 22/19 22/19 a) Matters Arising/Summary of Agreed Actions (Agenda item 3) Minute Ref 143/18a) Complexity of Employee Relations Cases and Minute Ref 159/18a) Integrated Performance Report (specifically relating to Diabetes) – It was agreed that the Trust Board Study Session forward plan would be discussed during the closed Board session, to include these items. Page 1 of 6 22/19 b) Minute Ref 6/19j) Staffing – GB confirmed that a more detailed update in relation to the appraisal target would be included in the next Human Resources Report. 22/19 c) The Board noted the latest position on the actions in summary of actions. 23/19 Quality, Performance and Finance Patient Story (agenda item 4.1) DS introduced the patient to the Board. The Board heard a first-hand account of their experience of the Trust’s services. It was noted that the patient felt their experience fell short of their expectations and provided specific examples where the standard of care was disappointing. The patient reported a high standard of care from medical staff. The importance of listening to patients and responding appropriately, and ensuring patients basic needs as well as medical needs were met was emphasised. The Board thanked the patient for attending and providing an overview of their experience noting the value of this. It was confirmed that this information would be used to improve the care provided by UHS. 24/19 Integrated Performance Report for Month 10 including Quarterly Infection Prevention & Control Report (Agenda item 4.2) a) Safe GB advised that there was nothing specific to highlight from the report. There were no further comments or questions. 24/19 b) Caring GB provided an update noting the initiatives being introduced to improve the quality of response to patient complaints and concerns. A patient panel has now been introduced to assist in collecting and understanding patient feedback. It was confirmed that this would be discussed in more detail at the March Quality Committee. The decrease in the percentage of patients with a nutrition care plan was noted. GB will be working with the matrons and ward leaders for areas that are not achieving the expected standard. 24/19 c) Effective DS advised that there was nothing specific to highlight from the report. MS sought additional detail in relation to the four national reports with areas of concern within section E1.2. DS gave a brief overview of these reports noting that diabetes will be scheduled for discussion at a future Trust Board Study Session. 24/19 d) Activity CM highlighted the increase in Emergency Department (ED) attendances compared to the previous January, the significant reduction in non-elective length of stay and the reduction in the percentage of elective operations cancelled as a result of this. The increase in ED attendances was attributed to the opening of the Paediatric ED. An increase had been anticipated however data was being reviewed to confirm the cause as increased paediatric attendances. PHe emphasised the importance of ensuring that the increased attendances do not adversely affect the patient experience. MS congratulated those involved in reducing non-elective length of stay. Page 2 of 6 24/19 e) Emergency Access CM provided an overview noting that ED performance was the average of our local peer group despite the significant increase in attendances. The time to initial assessment metric is currently under development following the introduction of a new triage process within ED. JB drew attention to the continued reduction in eye casualty performance noting the difficulties already within Ophthalmology. CM confirmed that this was being addressed and more detail could be provided if required. PHe introduced the “Best March Ever” concept. CM provided an overview of the steps being taken to achieve this including working with community providers to reduce delayed transfers of care and patients referred to ED, for example, by GPs. PHe added that ED targets were being reviewed and new targets were expected. 24/19 f) Referral to Treatment Time (RTT) CM summarised RTT performance noting improvements in the number of patients waiting over 18 weeks and the number of patients on an incomplete pathway. Patients waiting longer than 52 weeks had been reviewed; patient choice was the reason for delay and there were no clinical concerns due to delayed treatment. 24/19 g) Cancer CM provided an overview of Cancer performance noting a number of measures had not been achieved. CM outlined a recent visit to the Imperial group of hospitals to learn about data analysis that enables better forward prediction and therefore providing more insightful information for the organisation/Board. MS noted the 6-8% increase in cancer activity year on year and suggested that the executive team consider a more a transformational change to address this to ensure this does not have an adverse effect on patients. JH emphasised the increased pressure on services due to identification of cancer at an earlier stage and new initiatives such as lung cancer screening. This would provide better outcomes for patients however would increase the number of patients being treated; this therefore needs to be planned for as part of the Trust’s strategy. PHe summarised the work that is ongoing with commissioners and the Cancer alliance to enable providers to achieve the cancer targets with the increased activity. It was agreed that further information be provided to the Board in relation to this. Action: Update in relation to planning for cancer targets to be provided to the PHe Board. GB noted that a process for reviewing harm as a result of patients waiting longer than 104 days for cancer treatment was being agreed with commissioners. CC queried whether there was any data providing a longer term perspective i.e. over the past five years. JH confirmed this could be made available if requested. 24/19 h) Infection Prevention Report GB provided an update noting that there would be a hand hygiene campaign in March/April 2019 which should have a direct impact on infection control. 24/19 i) Staffing GB summarised the challenges currently being experienced with nurse staffing particularly due to vacancy levels and the steps taken to address this on a daily basis. Page 3 of 6 24/19 j) RESOLVED That the Board NOTE the Month 10 Integrated Performance Report including the Quarterly Infection Prevention & Control Report. 25/19 Learning from Deaths Quarter 3 Report (Agenda item 4.3) a) DS and NP introduced the report. MS thanked NP for a clear report and the reassurance provided by the small number of avoidable cases. MS sought clarification of the personnel involved in reviewing cases and whether any audits were undertaken to ensure the process was working effectively. NP described the process in use. A new medical examiner service would commence in April. PTH queried whether the process identified the consequences for patients who had experienced repeated delays in treatment. NP advised that previous admissions were reviewed however a more formal process would be instigated once the medical examiner service was in place. CC asked whether there was potential for external validation and comparison of availability. NP has been working with other Trusts to ensure their processes mirror UHS’ to allow a comparison between organisations. JH informed the Board that the Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio (HSMR) is expected to change from April once Countess Mountbatten Hospital becomes independent from the Trust. 25/19 b) RESOLVED That the Board NOTE the Learning from Deaths Quarter 3 Report. 26/19 Freedom to Speak Up Report (Agenda item 4.4) a) GB presented the report summarising the work undertaken and cases received to date. CC confirmed that all cases appeared to have been dealt with appropriately and had not required his involvement. CMa queried whether any trends had been identified so far. GB advised that some cases were protracted Human Resource cases where action had previously been slow. Learning points were being shared when possible, given the need for confidentiality, and this was encouraging others to speak out. 26/19 b) RESOLVED That the Board NOTE the Freedom to Speak Up Report. 27/19 CRN: Wessex 2018/19 Quarter 3 Performance Report (Agenda item 4.5) a) DS provided an overview of the report noting the good performance of the network. MS asked when the last review by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) had taken place and the outcome of this. DS confirmed that this took place 6 to 8 weeks ago and positive feedback had been received. MS asked that this information be included in future reports. Action: Future reports to include the outcome of NIHR reviews. DS 27/19 b) RESOLVED That the Board Page 4 of 6 28/19 Briefing from Chair of Strategy & Finance Committee (Agenda item 4.6) a) JB provided an overview of items discussed at the February meeting: • Outcome of 2017/18 reference cost index submission. • Review of latest financial position. • Operational plan 2019/20 update. 28/19 b) RESOLVED That the Board NOTE the update. 29/19 Finance Report for Month 10 (Agenda item 4.7) a) DAF presented the month 10 Finance report, noting for January: • The Trust delivered a control total surplus excluding Provider Sustainability Fund (PSF) of £2.8m. Year to date the Trust is on plan. • In month once non-recurrent items were excluded was break-even, against a Plan target of £2.8m surplus. • Under the single oversight framework the Trust delivered a score for Finance and Use of Resource of a ’1’. • Cost Improvement Plan (CIP) delivery in the month was £2.5m against a target of £2.8m. • Pay has increased by £1m since month 9 due to an increase in substantive, bank and agency costs month-on-month. A proportion related to December pay enhancements for bank holidays. PTH highlighted elective income as £2.9m behind plan year to date. This was attributed to gaps in spinal and cardiac surgery; these tend to be high value cases. PHe noted that whilst the Trust performed well against the NHS Improvement temporary staff pay ceiling, the total head count had increased. DAF confirmed that the data will be reviewed to better present the overall position. CMa asked whether the invest-to-save negative variance related to delays in the replacement of Princess Anne Hospital (PAH) windows. DAF advised that this related to delays in some estates projects such as PAH windows and theatre modernisation due to the requirement to close services to enable work to be undertaken. 29/19 b) RESOLVED That the Board NOTE the month 10 Finance Report. Chair’s and Chief Executive’s Reports 30/19 Chief Executive’s Report (Agenda item 5.1) a) PHe provided an overview of the requirement for the Trust to formally report progress with the flu vaccination programme and approve the achievement of 7 day services standards self-assessment. MS drew the Board’s attention to the percentage of staff concerned about possible side effects from the flu vaccine despite the evidence available to support that they are limited and manageable. PHe highlighted the importance of influencing perceptions of the vaccine and the need for the Trust to target its messages. DS plans to target messages by staff group. 30/19 b) RESOLVED That the Board NOTE the Staff Flu Vaccinations Update and APPROVE the Achievement of 7 day Services Standards Self-Assessment. Page 5 of 6 30/19 c) Items for Ratification Actions taken by the Chair as set out in paragraphs 3.1 – 3.2 were ratified. Strategy and Business Planning 31/19 Revised Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) Strategy (agenda item 6.1) a) GB presented the updated strategy which has been consulted upon and comments considered and included where appropriate. MS supported the amended strategy. CMa identified that the ‘white other’ group was classified differently within different sections of the strategy. Action: Ethnic group classifications to be consistent within the Strategy. GB The Board discussed the difference between reducing equality and reducing inequity and how this can be addressed alongside the wider health system. 31/19 b) RESOLVED That the Board APPROVE the Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Strategy subject to one minor amendment as outlined above. 32/19 32/19 a) Any Other Business MS provided an update on the recent Diabetes screening event held at the Southampton FC v Cardiff FC football match. 103 people were tested and 2 cases of undiagnosed diabetes identified. The event raised awareness as well as highlighted the value of co-operation between the organisations involved. PHe thanked those involved for their hard work in organising this event. 33/19 Date and Time of Next Meeting Thursday, 28 March 2019 commencing at 0900 in the Conference Room, Heartbeat Education Centre, F Level, North Wing, SGH. Page 6 of 6 UHSFT – Directors’ Actions Summary for 28 March 2019 Trust Board – Open Session ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Action & Minute Reference By whom Target Date Current Status Trust Board 28 February 2019 Integrated Performance Report for Month 10 (Minute Ref 24/19 g) Cancer - Update in relation to planning for cancer targets to be PHe provided to the Board. CRN: Wessex 2018/19 Quarter 3 Performance Report (Minute Ref 27/19 a) Future reports to include the outcome of NIHR reviews. DS Revised Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) Strategy (Minute Ref 31/19 a) Ethnic group classifications to be consistent within the Strategy. GB as at 18/3/19 Page 1 of 1 Cover sheet for a report to the Trust Board of Directors dated Thursday, 28 March 2019 Title: Integrated Performance Report Month 11 Category Quality, Performance, and Finance Agenda item 4.5 Sponsor Director of Transformation and Improvement Author Trust Performance Manager Provenance Report to the Board provided by the Trust Executive. Purpose The paper is presented for the Board for Review The Board is requested to consider the performance metrics provided, identify any elements, trends or emerging themes it wishes to pursue further. Relevant to Board  Goal 1 – Trusted on  Goal 2 – Delivering for  Goal 3 – Excellence in goals Quality Taxpayers Healthcare Board Assurance This report relates to all of the aims and objectives contained in the Board Framework links Assurance Framework. Equality Impact Assessment The Trust aims to ensure that any change in performance does not affect one or more cohorts of people with specific protected characteristics. This equality monitoring is conducted operationally. Other standards affected NHS Provider Licence and Constitutional standards. Integrated KPI Board Report covering up to Feb 2019 Executive Sponsor - Jane Hayward, Director of Transformation Jane.Hayward@uhs.nhs.uk March 2019 Overview Safe Amber Caring Green Safe remains amber this month as UHS has failed some KPI's yet we have seen continued good performance in other areas. There were no never events reported in February. There were no avoidable high harm falls or MRSA infections/contaminants in February. C.Diff performance remains better than year to date target. In 18/19 the Trust planned to reduce pressure ulcers by 20% compared to last year, this trajectory has not be met in 18/19, however to date the number of pressure ulcers is very similar year on year. The themes are being collated and the learning is being shared through Pressure Ulcer Panel. VTE risk assessments remain an area of focus for the Trust with the new IT solution being piloted in AMU, Surgery and T&O in January 2019. A decision will be made in March by the Thrombosis committee to roll out trust wide. Complaints were low during November, December and January and increased slightly to levels seen previously in February. The rate of complaints against activity level remains consistent and within target range. Negative ratings through the FFT are under the trust threshold with patients continuing to rate their experience positively. Same Sex Accommodation breaches have fallen to under the trust target. Effective Green There were four national reports published and reviewed in Feburary, of these reports one raised an area of concern (National prostate Cancer Audit Annual Report 2018). There are now 218 outcomes being reported to TEC from 46 specialities. Of these the majority are green (78%) and only 7% graded red. Emergency readmissions was at 10.8% in December which is just below the average of last 2 years (11%). HSMR remained stable in November well below the national benchmark and crude mortality dropped slightly to 3.7% Activity Red Flow Amber New referrals recieved are following expected seasonal variation but continue to be higher than 18/19 in the month, quarter and year to date. New urgent cancer referrals in January did not decrease as seen last year instead are showing a 16% increase in the month. Main ED attendances remain exceptionally high in February compared to previous years. This is contrary to the normal seasonal trend which sees a reduction in the volume but not complexity of attendances, paediatric attendances have increased the most, but other streams also have increased compared to 17/18. There have been a number of changes year on year in services provided and how services are recorded that make year on year comparison difficult, this includes the Lymington surgical services and outpatients (up from August 17, impacts electives and outpatients), the change in TrehceoardveinrgagCeDnUucmhbaeirrso(df oDwelnayfreodmTrSaenpstfeemrsboefrC1a7r,eiminptahcetsTrounstnoinnFeelbercutiavreys)r,etmheairneecdoradti9n4g.oTfhtehenuremsbpeirraotofrpyacteiennttrsew(Ahporihla1v8e, dbaeyecnaisnehs otospoituatlpfaotriegnrtesa)t.er than or equal to 7 days / 21 days also increased yet remained lower than February 2018 by 2% and 4% respectively. Emergency Access Main ED (Type 1) performance reduced in February to 71.4%, compared to UHS February 2018 77.2%, and were 4.8% below the average of our local peer group. This performance was impacted by ED attendances significantly exceeding volumes in previous years and the onset of winter pressures in the inpatient service. Red RTT & Diagnostics Both RTT and diagnostic performance improved again in February. The trend of patients waiting greater than 52 weeks continues downwards and the patients waiting at the end of February have now been treated. Amber Diagnostic performance also improved and achieved the target in February. Pleasing to see Average weeks waited for first outpatient appointment continues to reduce. Cancer Red Cancer performance is currently rated red as we are not achieving a number of measures. Recovery of the Treatment started within 62 days of urgent GP referral wait, is likely to be slow and significant challenges are being experienced linked to significant growth in referrals and the number of additional cancers being treated (192 year to date). Improving trends in waiting times for initial appointment, waiting times for radiology and patients waiting for treatment are encouraging. Research & Dev Research and Development has been rated Amber this month. October recruitment benefitted from activity on a high recruiting meningitis prevention study. Whilst recruitment to this study has ended recruitment Amber projections to year end are satisfactory. Complexity (weighted) performance is also satisfactory with UHS ranked 2nd in the UK for a number of consecutive months. Staffing Amber Staffing remains amber overall because some key targets have been missed including those for turnover, non-medical appraisal completion, total nursing and registered nurse vacancy rates. However, UHS has seen improvements in the following: sickness absence (which has never been lower), turnover (the lowest rate since November 2017), decreases in total nursing and registered nurse vacancy rates and percentage of BME staff at Band 7+ (the highest rate it has been). CHPPD is within normal range this month as expected, after seasonal effects in January and it reflects high patient numbers. Estates Green Estates has been rated green this month as we are meeting all targets in February. The target missed on a 3 month rolling average is for percentage of help desk requests completed on time. Digital Green DigiRounds has demonstrated both time saving in reviewing the patient record during ward rounds, but also the quality of the review that is carried out, as clinicians are able to easily see all the significant elements of the record. It saves junior doctors time in preparing information for consultants (transcribing relevant results etc) prior to the ward round. Records accessed using Digirounds increased to 98,573 in February. Also in February the number of alerts sent using Medxnote increased again to 4079. 1 Chart Type Cumulative Column Example Cumulative Column Year on Year Line Benchmarked Line Percentiles Control Chart Variance from Target Report Guide Explanation A cumulative column chart is used to represent a total count of the variable and shows how the total count increases over time. This example shows quarterly updates. A cumulative year on year column chart is used to represent a total count of the variable throughout the year. The variable value is reset to zero at the start of the year because the target for the metric is yearly. The line benchmarked chart shows our performance compared to the average performance of a peer group. The number at the bottom of the chart shows where we are ranked in the group (1 would mean ranked 1st that month). A line percentiles chart is used to represent the distribution of a variable. The 50th percentile shows the median value, we also show the 5th, 25th (lower quartile), 75th (upper quartile) and 95th centiles. A control chart shows movement of a variable in relation to it's control limits (the 3 lines = Upper control limit, Mean and Lower control limit). When the value shows special variation (not expected) then it is highlighted green (leading to a good outcome) or red (leading to a bad outcome). Values are considered to show special variation if they -Go outside control limits -Have 6 points in a row above or below the mean, -Trend for 6 points, -Have 2 out of 3 points past 2/3 of the control limit, -Show a significant movement (greater than the average moving range). Variance from target charts are used to show how far away a variable is from it's target each month. Green bars represent the value the metric is achieving better than target and the red bars represent the distance a metric is away from achieving it's target. 2 March 2019 Safe Safe remains amber this month as UHS has failed some KPI's yet we have seen continued good performance in other areas. There were no never events reported in February. There were no avoidable high harm falls or MRSA infections/contaminants in February. C.Diff performance remains better than year to Amber date target. In 18/19 the Trust planned to reduce pressure ulcers by 20% compared to last year, this trajectory has not be met in 18/19, however to date the number of pressure ulcers is very similar year on year. The themes are being collated and the learning is being shared through Pressure Ulcer Panel. VTE risk assessments remain an area of focus for the Trust with the new IT solution being piloted in AMU, Surgery and T&O in January 2019. A decision will be made in March by the Thrombosis committee to roll out trust wide. MMoonntthhllyy Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Target YTD YTD Target S1.1 Never Events 1 1 1 - 3 0 1 S1.2 Avoidable High Harm Falls =95% 98% > =95% S1.12 % Thromboprophylaxis . Patients Assessed 95% 93.3% 92.8% > =95% 93% > =95% S1.12 - The IT solution within e prescribing was piloted from 24th January. This has demonstrated improvements in compliance particularly in AMU. This will be seen in April's report containing Feb data. There will be a discussion at thrombosis committee on 21st march about whether we can roll out the IT solution trust wide to increase compliance further. 100% S1.13 Patients appropriately . screened for sepsis 76% 76% 85% 98% 98% 60% 90% S1.14 Sepsis Patients Treated in a . timely manner 82% 77% 86% 82% 85% 60% 90% - - 90% - - 4 March 2019 Caring Green Complaints were low during November, December and January and increased slightly to levels seen previously in February. The rate of complaints against activity level remains consistent and within target range. Negative ratings through the FFT are under the trust threshold with patients continuing to rate their experience positively. Same Sex Accommodation breaches have fallen to under the trust target. C1.1 FFT response rate - Inpatients Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 27% 15% 9% Monthly Target > =20% 0% 0.9% C1.2 FFT Negative Score - Inpatients 5% 0.9% =20% 2.4% =95% 75% C1.6 Although we are maintaining above 90% we are still not reaching 95%. Therefore some focus work to drive this is being done with the ward areas that are consistently achieving below this requirement, as this is reflective of a small pocket of areas. C1.7 Total Complaints Received . 37 48 40 33 44 37 43 44 44 32 50 28 31 32 42 - C1.8 Complaints per 1000 units . 0.50 0.42 0.00 500 C1.9 Bereavement Survey Response Count 0 15% C1.10 Bereavement Survey Negative Score Core Questions - % 0% C1.9/C1.10 - Figures will be updated quarterly (next month) 0.42 =7days Census average 550 Extended LOS Census average 300 256 RF1.8 (Patients with LOS > =21days) 94 =30% 20.9% 66.2% > =80% 95.5% 90-95% 2 8 4 44 46 44 41 42 19 1 12 15 29 32 8 56 40 3 - 150 77 84 - 0 YTD 23.84% 63.17% - RF1.13 - currently undertaking investigation to understand cancelled operations figures 55 RF1.14 Last minute cancelled operations not 5 . readmitted within 28 days 0 2 - - RF1.15 % elective operations cancelled and not 5% 6.5% . readmitted within 28 days 2.4% 314445224641146 70% 100% 92.3% 94.9% RE1.2 Eye Casualty (Type 2) 90.4% - RE1.3 Lymington MIU (Type 3) 85% 100% 99.7% 99.4% 99.6% - 95% RE1.4 UHS Total 85% . . 70% 97% RE1.5 Local Delivery System . . 80% 82.1% 87.5% 90.0% 81.5% 77.9% > =90% 95.0% 83.3% 85.9% > =95% UHS Total (RE1.4) includes SGH all types and lymington. Local Delivery System (RE1.5) is UHS Total and Southampton Treatment Centre (RSH MIU). 14 March 2019 Emergency Access Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Target R-3M RE1.6 % patients who left the department 5% 4.7% . before being seen UHS Total 6.8% =92% 80% 4700 4111 3993 RR1.2 Total patients waiting over 18 weeks (in . backlog) - 1700 7 RR1.3 . Patients waiting > 52 weeks for treatment 2 0 RR1.4 Total number of patients on an . incomplete pathway RR1.5 Patients on a surgical waiting List 36000 26000 6900 5900 7,700 RR1.6 Patients waiting for diagnostics RR1.7 . RR1.8 . 5,500 4% % of Patients waiting over 6 weeks for diagnostics 0% Average weeks waited for first outpatient 9.5 appointment 6.5 30978 6541 6651 3.65% 8.44 30037 31297 6701 - 7700 - 0.71% 93% 41 of 1513 90% RC1.2 . Breast symptoms referral seen in 2 weeks 69.1% 25.9% 50.7% => 93% 32 of 75 51% RC1.1 & RC1.2 - Performance has improved significantly in January and February following commencement of a new Consultant Radiologist in post in January. RC1.3 Treatment started within 62 days of . urgent GP referral 89.4% 79.9% 70.5% => 85% 71.4% 18 of 134.5 71% RC1.4 Treatment started within 62 days of . referral (Breast, Cervical & Bowel . Screening) 87.8% 72.0% RC1.4 - All 5 January breaches related to breast surgery RC1.5 62 Day - Consultant Upgrades 86.00% 54.2% => 90% 3 of 24 79% 79.17% 85.71% => 86% 0 of 3.5 86% 17 March 2019 Cancer Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Target no. patients to recover target QTD RC1.6 Treatment started within 31 days of . decision to treat 98.7% 94.9% 91.1% RC1.6 Half of the 41 breaches in January related to either Urology (mainly Prostate) or Breast Surgery => 96% 27 of 341 88% 87.98% Second or subsequent treatment (surgery) RC1.7 started within 31 days of decision to treat 89.5% 76.0% RC1.7 - Approximately 2/3 of the breached pathways in January were for skin surgery, and the remaining pathways were for prostate surgery => 94% 16 of 118 81% 80.51% Second or subsequent treatment (anti 100% RC1.8 cancer drugs) started within 31 days of decision to treat 95% 100% Second or subsequent treatment RC1.9 (radiotherapy) started within 31 days of decision to treat 95% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% => 98% 0 of 172 100% 99.05% => 98% 0 of 211 99% RC1.10 104 day waits (treated in month) 16 16 16 11 18 20 17 23 26 17 - - - Principal reasons impacting RC1.10 are prostate surgery (same as RC1.3 & RC1.7), also late referrals of patients referred from other trusts and extended waits due to patient choice. 18 March 2019 Research and Development Amber Research and Development has been rated Amber this month. October recruitment benefitted from activity on a high recruiting meningitis prevention study. Whilst recruitment to this study has ended recruitment projections to year end are satisfactory. Complexity (weighted) performance is also satisfactory with UHS ranked 2nd in the UK for a number of consecutive months. CRN Recruitment WR1.1 Participants Recruited WR1.2 Weighted Recruitment WR1.3 Weighted National Ranking - All Studies WR1.4 Specialties Recruiting Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 3000 YTD YTD Target 1602 500 13,729 7,501 1,273 10842 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 4 4 4 5 6 57 1236 12073 14473 60396 60217 - Top 5 53 - tbc The number of research active UHS specialties has been introduced as a new metric this year in response to implementing the new research strategy and the aim for all specialties to be research active. Having identified whether a specialty is research active or not, we are now trying to understand levels of activity in relation to size of department for this to be more meaningful. BRC 200 WR1.5 Papers published in partnership with UOS 0 94 99 153 120 112 Number of BRC papers published are in line with expectations and more detailed analysis is informing the next BRC bid preparations. Activity/Staffing Balance £8,000 6531 WR1.6 Income per WTE £4,000 385 400 4878 - - 19 March 2019 Staffing Amber Staffing remains amber overall because some key targets have been missed including those for turnover, non-medical appraisal completion, total nursing and registered nurse vacancy rates. However, UHS has seen improvements in the following: sickness absence (which has never been lower), turnover (the lowest rate since November 2017), decreases in total nursing and registered nurse vacancy rates and percentage of BME staff at Band 7+ (the highest rate it has been). CHPPD is within normal range this month as expected, after seasonal effects in January and it reflects high patient numbers. WS1.1 HR - Turnover - Rolling 12-months Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Monthly Target 13.67% 13.17% 13.1% 13.0% 92% WS1.4 . Nursing Vacancies (Total Clinical Wards) 11% 13.04% =76% WS1.7 Statutory & Mandatory Training . Achieving Target - 5 5 7 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 9 8 8 8 9.5 7 7 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 3 4 4 4 WS1.8 Total nursing staff all inpatient areas - 8.4 . Care hours per patient day (CHPPD) 8.0 8.3 - WS1.8 The CHPPD for ward based areas in the Trust has decreased from last month to RN 3.7 (previously 3.8) HCA 3.3 (previously 3.3) overall 7.0 (previously 7.2). 6.0 WS1.9 Registered nursing staff all inpatient . areas - CHPPD 5.1 5.0 3.5 3.3 WS1.10 Unregistered nursing staff all inpatient . areas - CHPPD 2.5 5.1 - 3.2 - 9% WS1.11 Black & Minority Ethnic Band 7+ . Percentage 7.5% 7% WS1.11 UHS has a target of 15% Band 7+ BME staff by 2023. WS1.12 Quality of practice experience for doctors . in training (annual report with quarterly . qualitative updates) Minor Risk Minor Risk Minor Risk Minor Risk 8.3% - Minor Risk No risk 21 March 2019 Estates Green Estates has been rated green this month as we are meeting all targets in February. The target missed on a 3 month rolling average is for percentage of help desk requests completed on time. Reactive Maintenance Monthly Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Target 2500 R-3M PE1.1 Number of defect work orders and 1300 2197 - - 2078 percentage completed on time 86.2% 86.7% > 85% 89.2% Preventative Maintenance 74.42% 200 PE1.2 Number of statutory maintenance jobs planned and percentage 50 69 - - 131 completed on time 98.6% 94.09% > 95% 98.3% 98.5% 600 308 PE1.3 Number of mandatory maintenance jobs planned and 250 percentage completed on time 98.8% 96.13% 419 - - 99.5% > 95% 99.5% PE1.4 Number of routine maintenance jobs planned and percentage completed on time 125 75 97.7% 92.29% 80 98.8% 88 - 100.0% > 85% 99.7% 2500 PE1.5 Number of Help desk requests and 1000 percentage completed on time 100% 85% Unresolved help desk requests PE1.6 Unresolved help desk requests PE1.7 (over 30 days old) 50% 1500 500 600 1000 200 0 1737 82.3% 1007 498 1640 - 86.6% > 85% 84.3% 569 =95% - - SD1.4 acknowledgment > =95% - - through eQUEST - rolling 3M 85% Release 29 of CHARTS goes live on 23rd January 2019. This includes enhancements to histopathology requesting from the Endoscopy Unit and should result in an increase in both requesting and acknowledgment - this will first appear in the April 2019 data extracts. SD1.5 digiRounds patient records accessed 200000 0 98573 eQuest Results Alerts Sent SD1.6 Decision support notifications (email alerts) 20,000 9345 0 5000 SD1.7 Medxnote 4079 0 SD1.8 InfoQlik (Daily) Activity 50 20.1 35.4 0 100 SD1.9 Sap BI (Daily) Activity 40.0 0 500 351 SD1.10 My Medical Record - UHS patient registrations 0 2,000 SD1.11 My Medical Record - UHS patient logins 968 0 23 March 2019 Changes and Corrections Page Staffing KPI WS1.11 KPI Name Type Black & Minority Ethnic Band 7+ Change - Display Percentage Detail Long term target added 24 • Improvements made to the processes for managing complaints have driven significantly better performance in the timeliness of responses. For January and February, the trust closed 82% of complaints within 35 working days, with an average response time of 30 working days. This is a significant improvement from Q3 where the trust closed just 42% of complaints in the timeframe, with an average response time of 38 working days. • The complaints quality improvement work continues to deliver benefits for patients. The trust has slightly increased the % of complaints being managed informally to 44% of the overall number received (compared to 42% this time last year). There is a plan to return to clearly distinguishing between the PALS function and formal complaints process, and this will likely improve this further and offer patients and families greater access to support in getting early resolution to their concerns. • Good progress is being made in improving how the trust supports patients and carers with disabilities through compliance with the Accessible Information Standard. A flag is now available in ECAMIS, which pulls through into other systems, to alert staff that a patient has information and / or communication support needs. There is also a Staffnet resource to guide staff in how to meet needs. The Experience of Care team are currently working on a number of projects to enable needs to be identified and recorded on the system, while project teams on E2 ward and Princess Anne Outpatients work on embedding and testing the processes and resources. • Patient feedback remains generally high, although with more local variation in FFT feedback scores. Response rates have declined generally, with a significant factor being survey fatigue experienced by both patients and staff. While the FFT remains mandatory, it is often too generic to gain a sense of local ownership. With a new survey contract, the FFT will be augmented with more locally-relevant questions to better empower staff to use feedback to identify improvements, and this sense of ownership will drive better staff engagement and improve responses. Low recommend scores in ED are due to extremely low response rates. • A review of the trust’s provision of interpreting services is underway, with the aim of ensuring that patient needs are being met effectively and that the trust is receiving value for money. Part of this work is looking at the variability of interpreting provision across the trust, identifying areas for piloting efficiency improvement projects. There is a lack of data on how the impact of poor provision of interpreters (as well as other communication support) affects attendance rates, involvement in care, and overall experience- and this review will look at capturing some of this information. • The number of people applying to volunteer increased in Q3 to 98 (from 57 in Q2). Overall for the year to date, the trust has had 242 applications with 115 of these starting and a number of applications still being processed. Retention of volunteers continues to be an issue, with too many new volunteers still leaving within the first 6 months. The team is reviewing its support and supervision processes, but with 824 active volunteers, it remains an ongoing challenge. • The trust successfully bid for funding from the Pears Foundation to develop and grow a youth volunteering programme. The funding will be for two years and will pay for a project worker to lead on collaboration with local schools and colleges to provide short to medium term placements for young volunteers (16-18). • The trust welcomed the first cohort of employee volunteers from the local NHS England team in March. NHSE staff are able to take up to five days each year in order to volunteer within their local community and the trust has agreed a pilot with NHSE to test out new volunteer roles with the group to assess feasibility and value. This includes getting qualitative feedback from patients and carers, a new role in AMU, and supporting the pharmacy team. 25 Complaints PALS Friends & Family Test Volunteers Indicator Complaints received Complex concerns received Complaints closed within 35 days Average working day to close PALS contacts Inpatient positive score Outpatient positive score Maternity positive score ED positive score Applications received New starters Target Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4* n/a 124 120 109 74 n/a 88 91 110 42 = > 66% 64% 59% 42% 82% 95% 97% 97% 96% 97% = > 95% 95% 96% 96% 93% = > 95% 99% 97% 90% NA = > 95% 94% 96% 85% 71% n/a 87 57 98 NA n/a 57 28 30 NA * Data is provisional and for the quarter to date. NA denotes data not yet available. Jan 32 24 81% 31 324 Feb 42 19 78% 30 275 26 Nursing and midwifery staffing hours - February 2019 Report notes Our staffing levels are monitored daily and we will risk assess and fill any gaps to ensure that safe staffing levels are always maintained The total hours planned is our planned staffing levels to deliver care across all of our areas but does not represent a baseline safe staffing level. We plan for an average of one registered nurse to every five or seven patients in most of our areas but this can change as we regularly review the care requirements of our patients and adjust our staffing accordingly. Staffing on intensive care and high dependency units is always adjusted depending on the number of patients being cared for and the level of support they require. Therefore the numbers will fluctuate considerably across the month when compared against our planned numbers. Enhanced Care (also known as Specialling) Occurs when patients in an area require more focused care than we would normally expect. In these cases extra, unplanned staff are assigned to support a ward. If enhanced care is required the ward may show as being over filled. If a ward has an unplanned increase or decrease in bed availability the ward may show as being under or over filled, even though it remains safely and appropriately staffed. CHPPD (Care Hours Per Patient Day) is a measure which shows on average how many hours of care time each patient receives on a ward /department during a 24 hour period - this will vary across wards and departments based on the specialty, interventions, acuity and dependency levels of the patients being cared for. The maternity workforce consists of teams of midwives who work both within the hospital and in the community offering an integrated service and are able to respond to women wherever they choose to give birth. This means that our ward staffing and hospital birth environments have a core group of staff but the numbers of actual midwives caring for women increases responsively during a 24 hour period depending on the number of women requiring care. WARD C4 (Solent ward) C4 (Solent ward) C6 C6 C6 (Teenage Cancer Trust unit) C6 (Teenage Cancer Trust unit) D2 D2 D3 D3 Surgical high dependency unit Surgical high dependency unit Registered nurses Total hours planned Registered nurses Total hours worked Unregistered staff Total hours planned Unregistered staff Total hours worked Registered nurses % Filled Day Night Day Night Day Night Day Night Day Night 1303.5 975.5 2572.1 1850.0 645.0 610.8 1196.0 943.0 1507.9 944.8 1230.8 910.8 2267.3 1740.5 661.3 513.0 1184.8 943.8 1325.9 932.4 915.0 644.0 174.5 0.0 332.2 0.0 1055.5 770.5 731.5 641.3 1281.3 829.0 209.5 99.5 166.2 79.0 1136.4 816.5 799.0 798.8 94.4% 93.4% 88.1% 94.1% 102.5% 84.0% 99.1% 100.1% 87.9% 98.7% Day Night 1962.1 1843.2 1865.4 1831.7 312.4 322.0 374.7 321.0 95.1% 99.4% Unregistered staff % Filled t Comments 140.0% Safe staffing levels maintained; Support workers used to maintain staffing numbers. 128.7% Safe staffing levels maintained; Support workers used to maintain staffing numbers. 120.1% Support workers used to maintain staffing numbers. Shift N/A Safe staffing levels maintained. 50.0% Safe staffing levels maintained; Staffing appropriate for number of patients. Shift N/A Staffing appropriate for number of patients; Staff moved to support other wards. 107.7% Safe staffing levels maintained. 106.0% 109.2% Safe staffing levels maintained. Safe staffing levels maintained. 124.6% Safe staffing levels maintained. 119.9% 99.7% Safe staffing levels maintained. Safe staffing levels maintained. Page 1 of 5 Cardiac intensive care unit Cardiac intensive care unit General intensive care unit A General intensive care unit A General intensive care unit B General intensive care unit B Neuro intensive care unit Neuro intensive care unit E5A E5A E5B E5B E8 E8 F11 F11 F6 F6 F5 F5 Acute medical unit Acute medical unit D5 D5 D6 D6 D7 D7 Day Night Day Night Day Night Day Night Day Night Day Night Day Night Day Night Day Night Day Night Day Night Day Night Day Night Day Night 4911.3 4752.0 4116.4 3848.5 3657.1 3526.0 4334.7 3836.5 1151.2 645.0 1274.0 639.0 1961.3 961.0 1914.6 966.0 2016.5 966.5 1821.0 966.0 3826.1 3202.5 1621.6 972.6 1079.3 667.3 841.7 645.0 4309.8 3986.0 3757.0 3793.5 3438.1 3140.0 4218.1 3649.5 904.2 587.0 1117.0 622.5 1356.9 978.3 1236.9 814.0 1535.9 887.0 1172.9 828.0 3750.9 2871.3 1027.5 794.5 987.0 668.8 816.7 634.0 1123.8 794.3 890.5 644.0 507.8 322.0 694.3 587.0 615.4 322.0 727.5 322.0 1496.0 860.0 726.2 322.0 620.9 644.0 876.4 644.0 3032.7 1808.5 957.0 524.0 1451.7 690.5 949.3 300.0 607.8 472.5 722.9 453.5 373.6 274.5 510.0 545.0 707.0 472.5 724.0 398.2 1592.6 1208.4 629.6 587.5 962.5 736.5 1415.2 1068.0 3772.3 2468.3 1250.1 1077.0 1373.0 777.0 1030.3 323.0 87.8% 83.9% 91.3% 98.6% 94.0% 89.1% 97.3% 95.1% 78.5% 91.0% 87.7% 97.4% 69.2% 101.8% 64.6% 84.3% 76.2% 91.8% 64.4% 85.7% 98.0% 89.7% 63.4% 81.7% 91.5% 100.2% 97.0% 98.3% 54.1% 59.5% 81.2% 70.4% 73.6% 85.2% 73.5% 92.8% 114.9% 146.7% 99.5% 123.7% 106.5% 140.5% 86.7% 182.4% 155.0% 114.4% 161.5% 165.8% 124.4% 136.5% 130.6% 205.5% 94.6% 112.5% 108.5% 107.7% Beds flexed to match staffing; Safe staffing levels maintained. Beds flexed to match staffing; Safe staffing levels maintained. Beds flexed to match staffing; Safe staffing levels maintained. Beds flexed to match staffing; Safe staffing levels maintained. Beds flexed to match staffing; Safe staffing levels maintained. Beds flexed to match staffing; Safe staffing levels maintained. Beds flexed to match staffing; Safe staffing levels maintained. Beds flexed to match staffing; Safe staffing levels maintained. Safe staffing levels maintained; Band 4 staff working to support registered nurse numbers. Safe staffing levels maintained;Additional staff used for enhanced care - Support workers. Support workers used to maintain staffing numbers; Band 4 staff working to support registered nurse numbers. Safe staffing levels maintained; Additional staff used for enhanced care - Support workers. Support workers used to maintain staffing numbers; Band 4 staff working to support registered nurse numbers. Safe s
Url: /Media/UHS-website-2019/Docs/About-the-Trust/Trust-governance-and-corporate-docs/2019/Papers-Trust-Board-28-March-2019.pdf

Annual-report-201617

Description: ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2016/17 incorporating the quality account 2016/17 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Schedule 7, paragraph 25 (4) (a) of the National Health Service Act 2006 University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Annual report and accounts 2016/17 incorporating the quality account 2016/17 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Schedule 7, paragraph 25 (4) (a) of the National Health Service Act 2006 3 ©2017 University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust TABLE OF CONTENTS Performance report Statement from the chief executive 7 Statement of purpose and activities 9 History of UHS 9 Key issues and risks 10 Going concern disclosure 10 Performance reporting 11 Regulatory body ratings 15 Environmental matters 16 Social, community and human rights issues 16 Accountability report Directors’ report 18 Introducing the Board of Directors 20 The people 21 Audit and risk committee 25 Disclosures 28 Council of Governors 32 Annual remuneration statement 39 Remuneration and appointments committee 42 Governors’ nomination committee 44 Staffing data 48 Responding to the staff annual attitude survey 50 Statement of chief executive’s responsibilities as the accounting officer 55 Annual governance statement 56 Review of economy, efficiency and effectiveness of the use of resources 62 Equality, diversity and inclusion 66 Southampton Hospital Charity 67 Developments in informatics 68 Leading research into better care 68 Investing for the future 69 Environmental sustainability and climate change 70 Quality account and report Chief executive’s welcome 119 Our approach to quality assurance 121 Our commitment to safety 122 Our commitment to staff 125 Our commitment to education and training 126 Our commitment to technology to support quality 127 Our commitment to the Care Quality Commission 129 Progress against 2016/17 priorities 127 Priorities for improvement 2017/18 141 Review of quality performance 152 Conclusion 155 Responses to our quality account 156 Statement of directors’ responsibilities 163 Independent auditor’s report 164 Appendices Appendix one: Patient Improvement Framework (PIF) priorities 2017/18 168 Appendix two: Definitions of pressure ulcer grading 169 Appendix three: Quality performance data 170 Appendix four: CQUINS data 177 Appendix five: Clinical audit and confidential enquiries data 179 Appendix six: Outcome measures data 190 Appendix seven: Registration with the Care Quality Commission 191 Appendix eight: Pulse KPIs 192 Appendix nine: Glossary of acronyms 195 Annual accounts Statement from the chief financial officer 75 Foreward to the accounts 76 Independent auditor’s report 77 Financial statements 81 5 Statement from the chief executive More patients than ever before were treated at University Hospital Southampton (UHS) during 2016/17. And despite seeing an extra 41,000 patients than the previous year, we have continued to maintain our patient satisfaction scores with more than 95% recommending UHS. This is just one of many outstanding achievements across our hospitals which we are proud to highlight in this annual report. Our ongoing challenge now is tackling the high numbers of patients who could be at home, but who lack support from either health or social care to move out of hospital. There has been some hard work done in this area and we’re already seeing signs of improvement. The latest Friends and Family Test results - the survey which all UHS staff are asked to complete - said that 92% of staff would recommend UHS as a place to be treated, and 77% would recommend it as a place to work. Both these figures are the highest we have ever achieved, and are much better than the national average. We have been able to invest heavily in improved and expanded facilities for patients and for research. For instance, work has started on the radiotherapy bunker which will house the new linear accelerators used to treat cancer patients and the new Cancer Immunology Centre is also progressing well. The ongoing investment into diagnostics – particularly radiology but also more specific schemes such as hysteroscopy – should help patients right across the hospital. We recently received national recognition as a “global digital exemplar”; an award which we anticipate will bring an additional £10 million of national money. Historically, we have spent very little on information technology but, despite this, much has been delivered.This extra national money will make a real difference to patient care through some large-scale informatics projects and will also improve the day to day IT equipment our staff have available to them. Our new main entrance, which opened last summer, now feels like it has been here forever but I think it is still worth remembering what an improvement it is on the old entrance, and that it was rebuilt without spending any NHS money. We have been successful in renewing our NHS research funding, through both our Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) and Clinical Research Facility (CRF). This was a tough competition, as we were competing against every other academic medical centre in the country, and the rules were clear that only “world class research” would be funded. So the Southampton research team (UHS and the University of Southampton), led by Rob Read for the BRC and Saul Faust for the CRF, should be very proud that we were successful, and that Southampton research will continue to help patients receive better care across the world. Children’s services are very important to us and thanks to a combination of NHS funds and very generous donations, we have been able to refurbish and expand Piam Brown (paediatric cancer) ward and our paediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Despite a challenging time for NHS finances, UHS had a successful financial year, ending it with a surplus of £20.4m. This has enabled us to plan increased investment in our estate, particularly for the most vulnerable patients such as refurbishment of high dependency and intensive care facilities for patients of all ages, and theatre and interventional radiology rooms. This means that we will continue to have the facilities to look after the sickest patients in Hampshire and beyond. 7 In 2016/17 we launched our children’s emergency department campaign, alongside the Murray Parish Trust. We’re now well on our way to raising the £2 million needed, which will be fund matched by the Government. We hope to start building this summer. So, while there have been considerable challenges meeting uplifts in demand and managing discharges, there has also been much to celebrate and we look forward to 2017/18. Fiona Dalton Chief executive 23 May 2017 8 Statement of purpose and activities UHS is a large teaching hospital located on the south coast of England. We have a tripartite mission to provide clinical care, educate current and future healthcare professionals, and undertake research to improve healthcare for the future. Our clinical care encompasses local acute and elective care for 680,000 people who live in Southampton, the New Forest, Eastleigh and Test Valley. We also provide care for the residents of the Isle of Wight for many services. As the major university hospital on the south coast, UHS provides the full range of tertiary medical and surgical specialities (with the exception of transplantation, renal services and burns) to over 3.7 million people in central southern England and the Channel Islands. UHS is a centre of excellence for training the doctors, nurses and other healthcare professionals of the future. We work with the University of Southampton and Solent University to educate and develop staff at all levels, including a large apprenticeship programme, undergraduate and post-graduate education. Our role in research, developed in active partnership with the University of Southampton, is to contribute to the development of treatments for tomorrow’s patients. This work distinguishes us as a hospital that works at the leading edge of healthcare developments in the NHS and internationally. In particular we have nationally-leading research into cancer, respiratory disease, nutrition, cardiovascular disease, bone and joint conditions and complex immune system problems. We are one of the largest recruiters of patients into clinical trials in the country. Over 10,500 people work at the Trust, making it one of the area’s biggest employers. We also benefit from the contributions of over 1,000 volunteers. Our turnover in 2016/17 was more than £760m. History of UHS The Trust has its origins in the 1900s when the Shirley Warren Poor Law Infirmary was built on the site of what is now Southampton General Hospital. In the early half of the century, the site began to expand, including the opening of the school of nursing and the creation of the Wessex Neurological Unit. In 1971 a new medical school was opened in Southampton and the 1970s and 1980s saw a significant building programme encompassing the current footprint of Southampton General Hospital, Princess Anne Hospital and Countess Mountbatten House. During the 1990s, services were increasingly centralised at the general hospital, with the eye hospital and cancer services being relocated from elsewhere in the city. The Wellcome Trust funded a clinical research facility at the hospital in 2001 and this unit remains the foundation for much of the Trust’s groundbreaking medical research. In the last decade, development has continued with the opening of the North Wing Cardiac Centre in 2006, the creation of a major trauma centre with on-site helipad and the opening in 2014 of Ronald McDonald House for the relatives of sick children. Organisationally, Southampton University Hospitals Trust was formed in 1993, creating a single management board for acute services in Southampton. Eighteen years later, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (UHS) was formed (1 October 2011) when Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust was licensed as a foundation trust by the then regulator, Monitor (now known as NHS Improvement (NHSI)). 9 Key issues and risks 1. Failure to deliver national access targets, which impacts patient experience and patient safety. Whilst we are meeting some of the national constitutional standards in waiting times, we are not meeting them all. A number of actions have been taken in relation to improving responsiveness and working with local health and social care partners to reduce delayed transfers of care. The Trust will continue to work to reduce delayed transfers of care as well as reviewing the efficiency of discharge processes during 2017/18. 2. Capacity and occupancy, which impacts on patient flow and to the quality and timeliness of care. Operational risks have been identified across a number of services/specialties linking to issues around increasing referrals, system capacity and delayed transfers of care. We have mitigated this by implementing daily reviews to assess system capacity and escalation requirements aligning capacity plans with the wider system, developing plans to reduce length of stay with strong clinical leadership and oversight and working with local health and social care partners to reduce delayed transfers of care. 3. Staffing, both in terms of recruitment and retention. To mitigate this risk we will continue to focus on making UHS an attractive employer by: • continuing to recruit within Europe and further afield • working with universities to increase student nurses • developing band four posts and apprentices • leveraging the ‘Think UHS’ recruitment brand • enhancing medical overseas fellows posts • reviewing all junior doctor rotas in light of the new contract • using flexible and temporary staff when needed • creating different roles linked to our research agenda • reviewing training and education to enhance retention Going concern disclosure After making enquiries, the directors have a reasonable expectation that the Trust has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. For this reason, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the accounts. 10 Performance reporting Reporting structure As a large NHS university hospital foundation trust, UHS monitors performance within individual teams throughout the year with feedback processes in place to escalate issues to more senior management teams. At a corporate level we have an established executive reporting structure. This begins with the monthly Trust Board meeting where the executive directors of the Trust will present a high level summary to the chairman and non-executive directors, as well as providing greater detail on key performance changes, risks and issues. Below this are a number of executive sub-committees attended by a subset of executive and non-executive directors. These are the audit and risk committee, the strategy and finance committee, and the quality committee. These committees will review issues in greater depth, feeding back to Trust Board as appropriate. In addition, there are regular Trust Board study sessions which focus on specific individual issues with the entire Board present. The Trust executive committee (TEC) meets monthly and is made up of the executive board members and the divisional management teams. Performance and service issues are discussed in greater detail at this meeting. Finally, there are regular performance meetings between the operational management team (led by the chief operating officer) and the division and care group management teams. These meetings focus on the individual patient and service pathways and developing the detailed plans for improvement. Key performance indicators (KPIs) The Trust publishes a monthly Integrated KPI Board Report on its website which provides both the Board and the public with an overview of performance within the Trust. This report is constantly evolving as new areas of monitoring are developed and new areas of national focus become apparent. For the 2016/17 period the most notable development to the monthly report was a restructuring of the format in order to better align the reported metrics to five key Care Quality Commission questions: • Are we safe • Are we effective • Are we caring • Are we responsive • Are we well-led. The monthly report features the following sections: • Executive digest – a textual update on the previous month’s performance across the Trust written by the director of transformation and improvement. • Trust overview – the top KPIs identified by Trust Board, RAG-rates for the previous 13 months (see Appendix eight) • Performance • Activity • Capacity • Emergency department (ED) • Referral to Treatment (RTT/18 weeks) • Cancer waiting times • Finance • Patient experience • Patient safety • Outcomes • Staffing (HR) and estates • Education and training • Research and development 11 This report also includes summary versions of quarterly reports submitted to TEC which go into greater detail about patient experience, patient safety, clinical effectiveness and outcomes, and infection prevention. In addition, a separate Finance Board Report is submitted to Trust Board on a monthly basis. How we monitor performance In addition to reviewing the data submitted to the Trust Board in these papers, we have a suite of tools available to compare UHS performance to that of comparable trusts around the country. Depending on the measures being monitored, UHS has a number of peer groups to benchmark against including other local providers, major trauma centres and university hospital teaching trusts. Each NHS Trust will service a different size and type of population and will offer a slightly different range of services so it is important to understand that this benchmarking provides an initial indication of performance rather than an absolute guide to our position nationally. In 2016/17 we have reviewed the National Model Hospital data published by Lord Carter’s team at NHS Improvement, this includes the Getting it Right First Time Reports. This data and ability to compare our performance has helped to highlight areas of excellent practice and areas where there is potential to improve. This data is reported regularly to the Transformation Board. Detailed analysis and explanation of the development and performance of UHS Over the past three years we have seen significant increases in all types of activity. Some of this is due to an increase in the range of specialist services we offer, becoming a major trauma centre and the building of the helipad, but much of it is due to the increased and aging population in Southampton and the surrounding area. The graphs below demonstrate this increase in activity. Growth iUnHaSctGivritoyw-t2h01in4/A15cttiovi2ty01-62/10714/15 to 2016/17 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 100,000 - Inpatient Spells (inc Outpatient day cases) Appointments ED Attendances (type 1) Referrals 2014/15 Inpatient spells (inc day cases) 144,934 Outpatient appointments 536,949 ED attendance (type one and two) 94,376 Referrals 182,407 2015/16 146,066 562,972 95,217 191,888 2016/17 155,780 596,621 99,493 204,840 Increase 2014/15 to 2016/17 7.5% 11.1% 5.4% 12.3% 12 The hospital alert status is decided by the operations centre after assessing the bed and staffing position, and is recorded twice daily at the Trust bed meetings (though the status may change at any time). Black alert is the highest level of alert and is issued when there are no empty beds available across the Trust with no expected discharges, the emergency department is full, and several ambulances are likely to be delayed for long periods of time, stopping them from responding to 999 calls. In 2014/15 a black alert was recorded 91 times at the twice daily bed meetings. In 2015/16 this was reduced to seven. However, as result of the increasing demand for Trust services this increased to eleven in 2016/17. Contributing to this change has been the increase in Length of Stay (LoS) for elective patients and bed capacity being impacted upon by the increased number of patients requiring a complex package of care after their discharge. These patients can often have their discharges delayed while beds in community care homes are found and supporting community care packages are arranged. The chart below demonstrates the change in LoS for elective and non-elective (emergency) patients over the past three years. 2016/17 saw an increased focus on discharging patients earlier in the day and at the weekend. This will remain a major focus for the Trust in 2017/18. Each of the above metrics will have an impact on the Trust’s performance against the three primary nationally reported targets for Referral to Treatment (RTT, or 18 Weeks) performance, emergency department performance and cancer waiting times performance. Referral to Treatment (18 Weeks) performance Due to a change introduced by the Government in 2015 trusts are only required to achieve the Incomplete Pathways target: 1. Incomplete Pathways – 92% of all patients on 18 week pathway and not yet treated should have waited 18 weeks or less at the end of the month. UHS met the target in quarters one, two, and three of 2016/17. In quarter four the target was met in February and March but performance in January meant that the target was not met for the quarter as a whole. Achievement of this target in 2016/17 should be set against the aforementioned rise in patient referrals, which highlights the increased demands being placed on the Trust. It is only due to the increased efficiency shown by the Trust’s inpatient and outpatient services that it has been possible to meet these targets on an ongoing basis. This is an excellent result and goes against the national trend. 13 Emergency department (ED) performance We did not meet the national target of 95% of all ED attendances being treated and either admitted or discharged within four hours of arrival in any month in 2016/17, but we did achieve our nationally agreed trajectory target. This has been a challenging target nationwide with the winter period being the worst performance the NHS in England has ever recorded. There are three types of ED that can be included in these figures: Type one A consultant led 24-hour service with full resuscitation facilities and designated accommodation for the reception of accident and emergency patients. Type two A consultant led single specialty accident and emergency service (e.g. ophthalmology, dental) with designated accommodation for the reception of patients. Type three Other type of accident and emergency/minor injury unity (MIUs/Walk-in Centres, primarily designed for the receiving of accident and emergency patients. A type three department may be doctor led or nurse led. It may be co-located with a major ED or sited in the community. A defining characteristic of a service qualifying as a type three department is that it treats at least minor injuries and illnesses (sprains for example) and can be routinely accessed without appointment. UHS has type one and type two (ophthalmology) departments. The Trust also had a type three (MIU) department until July 2014. Due to the nature of the activity at the MIU, the transfer of this department to another provider reduced UHS performance against the four hour target by approximately 3%. When comparing performance over the long term, it is important to factor this change in. ED performance improved in quarters one, two, and three of 2016/17 compared to 2014/15 and in quarters one and two over 2015/16, despite the increases in activity. In quarter three performance decreased by 0.6% while activity increased by 1,795 attendances, a 7.5% rise. In quarter four performance was 1.2% better than in 2015/16 and matched 2014/15 performance. The graph below shows UHS performance against the four hour target over the past three years. 96.00% 94.00% 92.00% 90.00% 88.00% 86.00% 84.00% 82.00% 80.00% 78.00% 76.00% Year-On-Year ED Performance by Quarter Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 14 Cancer waiting times There are ten separate cancer waiting times measures that the Trust reports to the Department of Health on a monthly basis, each of which can then be split into tumour site specific performance groups. In 2016/17 the Trust met all but one of these measures. The performance against the targets should be set against the significant rise in activity seen on the cancer pathways. The number of patients referred under the ‘two week wait urgent suspected cancer protocol’ that were seen within two weeks of their referral, rose by 1,058 (6.9%) in 2016/17. The chart below shows the rise in demand for UHS services over the past three years. 18,000 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 - UHS Growth in Cancer Activity - 2014/15 to 2016/17 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 Two Week Waits 62-Day Target Patients 31-Day Target Patients Regulatory body ratings Single Oversight Framework NHS Improvement’s Single Oversight Framework provides the framework for overseeing providers and identifying potential support needs. The framework looks at five themes: 1. Quality of care 2. Finance and use of resources 3. Operational performance 4. Strategic change 5. Leadership and improvement capability (well-led) Based on information from these themes, providers are segmented from one to four where ‘4’ reflects providers receiving the most support, and ‘1’ reflects providers with maximum autonomy. A foundation trust will only be in segments three or four where it has been found to be in breach or suspected breach of its licence. The Single Oversight Framework applied from quarter three of 2016/17. Prior to this, Monitor’s Risk Assessment Framework (RAF) was in place. Information for the prior year and first two quarters relating to the RAF has not been presented as the basis of accountability was different. This is in line with NHS Improvement’s guidance for annual reports. Segmentation During quarter four of 2016/17 the Trust was placed within segment ‘2’ This segmentation information is the Trust’s position as at 31 March 2017. Current segmentation information for NHS trusts and foundation trusts is published on the NHS Improvement website. 15 Finance and use of resources The finance and use of resources theme is based on the scoring of five measures from ‘1’ to ‘4’, where ‘1’ reflects the strongest performance. These scores are then weighted to give an overall score. Given that finance and use of resources is only one of the five themes feeding into the Single Oversight Framework, the segmentation of the trust disclosed above might not be the same as the overall finance score here. Area Financial sustainability Financial efficiency Financial controls Overall scoring Metric Capital service capacity Liquidity Income and expenditure margin Distance from financial plan Agency spend 2016/17 Q3 score 2 2 1 1 1 1 2016/17 Q4 score 2 2 1 1 1 1 The Care Quality Commission (CQC) gave us an overall rating of ‘requires improvement’ as at December 2014. You can see further details on page 128 of the quality account or in full by visiting www.uhs.nhs.uk or www.cqc.org.uk. The CQC returned in January 2017 to conduct a follow up inspection. We are currently awaiting their full report. Environmental matters A number of projects were undertaken in 2016/17 to reduce our impact on the environment. We have replaced a significant proportion of our external lighting and much of our internal lighting with LED technology. A number of ventilation systems have been upgraded to enable heat recovery and we have launched an awareness programme to help staff work in more environmentally sustainable ways. In addition to these developments we have implemented a range of measures to ensure that we are using energy more efficiently. For example, we now review and ensure the efficiency of high energy consumption equipment. More information can be found within the environmental sustainability and climate change section of this report. Social, community and human rights issues We recognise our responsibilities under the European Convention on Human Rights (included in the Human Rights Act 1998 in the UK), which are relevant to health and social care. These rights include the: • right to life • right not to be subjected to torture, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment • right to liberty • right to respect for private and family life The Trust is committed to ensuring it fully takes into account all aspects of human rights in our work. 16 Directors’ report Composition of the Board The Board is currently comprised as follows: Non-executive directors: Peter Hollins chair Simon Porter senior independent director/deputy chair Professor Iain Cameron Lynne Lockyer Dr David Price Dr Mike Sadler Jenni Douglas Todd Executive directors: Fiona Dalton Gail Byrne Jane Hayward Dr Derek Sandeman Dr Caroline Marshall David French chief executive director of nursing and organisational development director of transformation and improvement medical director chief operating officer chief financial officer Each director confirms that at the time the annual report and accounts is approved: • so far as the director is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the NHS foundation trust’s auditor is unaware • the director has taken all the steps they ought to have taken as director in order to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the NHS foundation trust’s auditor is aware of that information. There are no important events since the year end affecting the foundation trust. No political donations have been made. The Trust has no overseas branches. Trust Board declarations of interest Peter Hollins Partner in the Jubilee Film Partnership; Chair of CLIC Sargent Cancer Care for Children (a company limited by guarantee); Council Member of University of Southampton. Iain Cameron Dean, Faculty of Medicine and Member, University Executive Board, University of Southampton; Board Member, Wessex Academic Health Sciences Network; Director (Chair), Medical Schools Council (until 1 July 2016); Director, Medical Schools Council Assessment (until 1 July 2016); Director, UK CAT (Clinical Aptitude Test) (until 1 July 2016); Trustee, Wessex Medical Trust; Joint Chair, University Hospital Southampton/University of Southampton Joint Research Strategy Board; Joint Chair, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) Southampton Executive Board. Simon Porter Former Partner in Ernst & Young LLP; Non-executive Director and Chair of Audit Committee, Radian Group; Non-executive Director and Chair of Audit Committee, Octavia Housing. 18 Lynne Lockyer Board member/trustee of the Brendoncare Foundation. David Price Chair of RTL Materials Ltd; Chair of Telesoft Technologies Ltd; Chair of Optitune Plc; Chair of Symetrica Ltd; Member of Advisory Board, Silverstream Technologies BV; Treasurer, University of Southampton; Chair of Lontra Ltd (from 1 May 2016). Michael Sadler GP Specialist Advisor for the Care Quality Commission (until 31 May 2016); External Clinical Associate for PricewaterhouseCoopers. Jenni Douglas-Todd Managing Director, Diversa Consultancy Limited; Member of the Judicial Conduct Investigative Office; Non-Executive Director, Hampshire Cricket Board (from 2 May 2016). Fiona Dalton NHS representative on Office for the Strategic Co-ordination of Health Research (OSCHR) Board; Director, Southampton Commercial Estates Development Partnership (CEDP) Project Company Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHSFT. Gail Byrne Husband is a consultant surgeon in the Trust; Trustee of Naomi House Children’s Hospice. Caroline Marshall Nil. Jane Hayward Director, UHS Estates Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHSFT; Father is Mental Health Act Manager, Southern Health Foundation Trust (voluntary position), member of Assessment Committee for Clinical Excellence Awards South and Public Health England (lay member), a UHSFT Simulated Patient (voluntary position); Mother is a UHSFT Simulated Patient (voluntary position). Derek Sandeman Director of UHS Pharmacy Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHSFT. David French Non-executive director and chair of audit and risk committee, Sentinel Housing Association (renamed Vivid Housing Limited on 23 April 2017); Governor and chair of Audit Committee, South Wilts Grammar School for Girls (until 8 December 2016); Chair of Hampshire and Isle of Wight NHS Counter Fraud Board; Director, UHS Estates Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHSFT; Director, Southampton Commercial Estates Development Partnership (CEDP) Project Company Limited, a joint venture between UHS and Interserve Prime. Approved by the Trust Board 23 May 2017. Chief executive 23 May 2017 19 Introducing the Board of Directors Trust Board The Board is made up of the chair, six non-executive directors and six executive directors including the chief executive. Together they bring a wide range of skills and experience to the Trust, such that the board achieves balance and completeness at the highest level. The non-executive directors, including the chair, are people who live or work in the local area and have shown a genuine interest in helping to improve the health of local people. The non-executive directors are determined by the Board to be independent in both character and judgement. The chair, executive directors and non-executive directors have declared any business interests that they have. The Board is satisfied that no conflicts of interest are indicated in any external involvement. The register of Board members’ interests is updated at least annually and is maintained by the company secretary and associate director of corporate affairs. It is available for public inspection from the company secretary and associate director of corporate affairs. The ‘reservation of powers to the Board and delegation of powers policy’ sets out the business to be conducted by the Board, or by one of its committees. Any enquiries should be made to: company secretary and associate director of corporate affairs, Trust Headquarters, Mailpoint 18, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD or telephone 023 8120 6829. Senior independent director The senior independent director role provides a channel through which foundation trust members and governors are able to express concerns, other than the normal route of the chair or chief executive. Appointments Non-executive directors are appointed via open advertisement in accordance with the ‘Appointment of a foundation trust non-executive director good practice guide’ procedure adopted by the Trust. The process is managed through the governors’ nomination committee, a sub-committee of the Council of Governors. This committee also determines the remuneration and terms and conditions of the non-executive directors. For further details on the appointment of non-executive directors please see page 42-43. Development of the Board The Board held monthly study sessions during 2016/17 where strategic issues, along with emerging issues, were discussed. Meetings of the Board The Board meets once a month in public. Additional private meetings with only the Board, and associated employees of the Trust making presentations to the Board in attendance, are held as required. Other committees of the Board include: remuneration and appointment committee; audit and risk committee, strategy and finance committee; quality committee and charitable funds committee. Generally the other committees of the Board meet monthly with the exception of the audit and risk committee, which meets five times a year and the appointments and remuneration committee which meets every other month. The frequency of the meetings is set out in each committee’s terms of reference. These terms of reference are reviewed at least annually. The performance of individual Board members is reviewed as set out on page 24 of this report. 20 Engagement with Council of Governors The Trust Board engages with the Council of Governors through the chair and senior independent director. Non-executive and executive directors engage with sub-groups of the council where these are related to their portfolios. Board members meet regularly with governors and have an open invitation to attend formal Council of Governor meetings. The people Non-executive directors Peter Hollins, chair Peter graduated in chemistry from Hertford College, Oxford. Joining Imperial Chemical Industries in 1973, he undertook a series of increasingly senior roles in marketing and then general management. Following three years in the Netherlands as general manager of ICI Resins BV, he was appointed in 1992 as chief operating officer of EVC in Brussels – a joint venture between ICI and Enichem of Italy. He played a key role in the flotation of the company in 1994, returning in 1998 to the UK as chief executive officer of British Energy where he remained until 2001. From 2001, he held various chairmanships and non-executive directorships. In 2003, he decided to return to an executive role as chief executive of the British Heart Foundation in which post he remained until retirement in March 2013. He joined Southampton University Hospital Trust as a Nonexecutive director in 2010, became senior independent director and deputy chairman of UHS in 2014, and was appointed chair in April 2016. He has also been the chair of CLIC Sargent Cancer Care for Children and Young People, and a Council Member of Southampton University, since 2014 and 2016 respectively. Simon Porter, senior independent director and deputy chair Simon was born and educated in Southampton and then Oxford, graduating with a degree in modern languages (Italian and French). He is a qualified chartered accountant, having spent most of his career with the London office of Ernst & Young, where he specialised first in audit, then in transactions and finally risk management. He was a partner with Ernst & Young from 1994 to 2010. He joined the Trust Board on 1 January 2011 as a designate non-executive director and became non-executive director from 1 June 2011. He is chair of the audit and risk committee and a member of the strategy and finance committee. He also holds non-executive board positions in the social housing sector. Professor Iain Cameron Iain is professor of obstetrics and gynaecology and dean of the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Southampton. After graduating in medicine at the University of Edinburgh, he underwent postgraduate clinical and research training in Edinburgh, Melbourne and Cambridge. He held the regius chair of obstetrics and gynaecology at the University of Glasgow from 1993 and moved to Southampton in 1999. His main clinical and research interests are reproductive endocrinology and investigation of the impact of the maternal environment on early pregnancy. Iain was chair of Medical Schools Council from 2013-16 and is a member of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration board and the Wessex Academic Health Science Network board. He was appointed as a non-executive director of the MDDUS (Medical and Dental Defence Union Scotland) in April 2017. Lynne Lockyer Lynne’s background is in human resource management and strategic management. She became a nonexecutive director for Southampton and South West Hampshire in 1996 and the vice chair in 2000. She was chair of Eastleigh and Test Valley South PCT from its inception in 2002 until its disestablishment in 2006. She has taken many roles in the local health economy including being a member of Hampshire’s Local Area Agreement Board and nationally was a member of the NHS Confederation Council and the National NHS Leaders Steering Group. She was until recently a course director at the University of Portsmouth and is now an organisation development consultant. She is a trustee of the Brendoncare Foundation. 21 Dr David Price David is a former chief executive of a FTSE-250 company with broad experience within the electronics, chemical, aerospace, defence, marine, and nuclear industries. He has a successful track record of developing highly complex companies in international markets. He is currently non-executive chairman of Symetrica Ltd, Telesoft Technologies Ltd, RTL Materials Ltd, Lontra Ltd and Optitune Plc. He is treasurer of the University of Southampton and a member of the advisory board of Silverstream Technologies BV. David is a chartered engineer and chartered scientist. He has a degree in electronic engineering, a PhD from University College London and, in 2001 he was awarded an honorary doctorate by Cranfield University for his services to science and engineering. David was made a Commander of the Order of the British Empire (CBE) for his services to industry. Dr Mike Sadler Mike joined us as a clinical non-executive director in September 2014, from a similar position at an NHS Foundation Trust providing mental health, learning disability and community services. He has chaired our quality committee since June 2016. He works as an advisor and consultant on health and social care services, recently advising on health reform in the Middle East, and in Ireland. He has been chair and technical adviser to the Diabetes Professional Care Conference since 2015, and also worked for the CQC as a specialist adviser in primary care. Mike graduated from Nottingham University, and was a GP principal in Hampshire before moving into public health medicine. Having achieved an MSc with distinction at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, he joined Portsmouth and South East Hampshire Health Authority, holding the joint posts of deputy director of public health and medical adviser. He has since held a series of senior clinical leadership roles in national organisations in both the public and private sector, including as a chief operating officer at NHS Direct and Serco’s health division. His last full time role, up until July 2013 when he commenced his portfolio career, was as director of health and social care at West Sussex County Council. Jenni Douglas-Todd Jenni is a former chief executive of Hampshire Police Authority and the office of the Hampshire police and crime commissioner. After beginning her career in the probation service, she was headhunted into the civil service, at the Home Office, where she spent four years before being becoming director of policy and research for the Independent Police Complaints Commission. In the latter role she was responsible for establishing governance of the new police complaints system. She then spent two-and-a-half years as a resident twinning adviser for the UK, based in Turkey to help set-up a law enforcement complaints system before taking up the role of chief executive of the county’s Police Authority. During her three years in the post, she supported the authority in developing effective governance processes to increase accountability and transparency. She also helped the organisation deliver cost-savings whilst still improving performance and developing closer working relations with neighbouring forces. In 2012, she became chief executive and monitoring officer for the Hampshire police and crime commissioner, where she led the development of the office’s vision, mission, values and organisational strategy. She took on the role of investigating committee chair for the general dental council in 2014 and, in April that year, founded the Diversa Consultancy, which supports organisations with changes in business, culture and behaviour. She is also a member of the Judicial Conduct Investigating Office, a public appointment. Executive directors Fiona Dalton, chief executive Fiona was appointed as chief executive in 2013. Prior to re-joining the Trust she held the combined position of deputy chief executive and chief operating officer at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children. Fiona joined the NHS management training scheme after graduating from Oxford University with a degree in human sciences and began her career in hospital management at Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust in 1996. She then spent four years at UHS as director of strategy and business development before moving to Great Ormond Street Hospital. 22 Gail Byrne, director of nursing and organisational development Gail joined the Trust in 2010 as deputy director of nursing and head of patient safety. Prior to this, she has worked at the Strategic Health Authority as head of patient safety, and director of clinical services at Portsmouth Hospital. Gail has also worked in Brisbane, Australia as a hospital Macmillan nurse, and as general manager of a special purpose vehicle company for the private finance initiative at South Manchester Hospitals. Jane Hayward, director of transformation and improvement Jane joined the Trust in 2000 as a clinical services manager for the cardiothoracic directorate after spending two years in Hertfordshire as director of performance and 11 years at Barts and the London Hospitals in various roles including planning, finance and commissioning. Jane has led on human resources, information management and technology, improvement and modernisation and has been chief operating officer. Jane joined the Trust Board in February 2008 and became director of transformation and improvement in January 2014. Dr Derek Sandeman, medical director Derek was appointed to the Trust as a consultant physician in 1993 and went on to develop a regional endocrine service. Throughout his career he has had extensive clinical leadership experience, most recently serving eight years as clinical director. Derek’s leadership roles have also included programme director for postgraduate education and the Wessex Endocrine Royal College representative. He has a strong history of wider system engagement, working collaboratively with partners to improve systems resilience and pathways. Dr Caroline Marshall, chief operating officer Caroline joined the Trust in 1997 as a consultant hepatobiliary and neuroanaesthetist. She has held the posts of college tutor for the Royal College of Anaesthetists and UHS mentoring and coaching lead. In 2008, she became clinical service director for critical care, and then divisional clinical director for division A between 2010 and 2013. Caroline served as interim chief operating officer between January to December 2014, and was then appointed to the substantive post. Her portfolio includes the Executive lead for cancer and the executive lead for major trauma. David French, chief financial officer David joined the Trust in February 2016 and leads on finance, procurement, estates and commercial development. He read Economics and Social Policy at the University of London before joining ICI plc, where he qualified as a chartered management accountant. David has extensive healthcare experience from the pharmaceutical industry, mostly Eli Lilly and Company where he held many commercial and financial roles in the UK and overseas. He joined the NHS in 2010 as chief financial officer of Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. He also serves as a non-executive director for Vivid Housing Limited, a social housing provider across Hampshire and the Solent. Board effectiveness On the basis of the expertise and experience described above, the Trust is confident that the necessary range of knowledge and skills exists within the Board of Directors and that its balance, completeness and appropriateness to the requirements of the NHS Foundation Trust constitutes a high performing and effective Board. A register of interests of Board members is outlined within this report and is also available from the associate director of corporate affairs. The effectiveness of the Board of Directors meetings is reviewed at the end of each meeting. Effectiveness of Board sub-committees is monitored through monthly board reports and annual evaluation/review of the terms of reference and work programmes. Schedule of Decisions Reserved to the Board The NHS Foundation Trust Code of Governance requires that there should be a formal schedule of matters specifically reserved for decision by the Board. The Scheme of Delegation shows the ‘top level’ of delegation within the Trust. The Scheme should be read in conjunction with Trust’s Standing Financial Instructions and Standing Orders. A copy of the Schedule of Matters Reserved for the Board can be obtained from the associate director of corporate affairs. 23 Attendance at board meetings in 2016/17 Board member 12 28 24 Apr Apr May Extra Extra CS CS 26 May 20 Jun Extra CS 28 26 27 11 27 29 16 26 28 28 Jun Jul Sep Oct Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Extra CS CS only Peter Hollins chair 3 33 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 Simon Porter 3 non-executive director 33 3 telecon 3 333 3 telecon 3 3 3 33 3 Iain Cameron 3 non-executive director 35 35 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 5 Lynne Lockyer 3 33 55 non-executive director telecon 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 David Price 5 non-executive director 33 3 telecon 3 333 3 telecon OS only 3 3 5 33 3 Mike Sadler 3 non-executive director 33 3 telecon 3 333 5 telecon 3 3 3 33 5 OS OS only only Jenni Douglas-Todd 3 non-executive director 33 3 telecon 3 3 53 3 telecon OS only 3 3 3 53 3 Fiona Dalton Chief executive 3 33 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 David French 3 Chief financial officer 33 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 Derek Sandeman Medical director 5 33 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 Gail Byrne Director of nursing and organisational development 3 33 35 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 Caroline Marshall 3 Chief operating officer 33 33 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 33 5 Jane Hayward Director of transformation and improvement 3 35 33 333 3 telecon 3 3 3 33 3 Telecon = telephone conference OS only = open session only 24 Audit and assurance committee (until May 2016) Board member Peter Hollins NED chair Simon Porter non-executive director senior independent director and deputy chair Iain Cameron non-executive director Lynne Lockyer non-executive director David Price non-executive director Mike Sadler non-executive director May 2016 3 5 3 5 3 3 Audit and risk committee (formerly audit and assurance committee) (from June 2016) Board member Simon Porter non-executive director senior independent director and deputy chair David Price non-executive director Mike Sadler non-executive director David French Chief financial officer 18 Jul 3 3 3 3 17 Oct 3 16 Jan 3 20 Mar 3 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 Audit and risk committee The audit and risk committee (formerly known as the audit and assurance committee) is a non-executive committee of the Trust Board with delegated authority to review the establishment and maintenance of an effective system of integrated governance, risk management and financial and non-financial control, which supports the achievement of the Trust’s objectives. As part of the Trust’s on-going commitment to continuous improvement the role and responsibilities of the audit and risk committee were subject to in-year review and revision. The principle change arising from the review was the transfer of responsibilities with regards to ‘clinical quality assurance’ to the quality committee. Composition and meetings There are three non-executive director members of the committee. The committee is chaired by Simon Porter. Further information on the chair is available on pages 21. Executive directors attend by invitation, and there is a standing invitation to the chief financial officer. Other executive directors and staff with specialist expertise attend by invitation. The audit and risk committee met five times between May 2016 and March 2017 in relation to matters covered in this annual report. 25 Purpose and remit The committee purpose is the remit of a ‘traditional’ audit committee, including an oversight function in relation to financial reporting, systems of internal control, risk management, effective use of resources, appointment and effectiveness of external and internal auditors. Major topics considered by the committee
Url: /Media/UHS-website-2019/Docs/About-the-Trust/Annual-reports-and-quality-accounts/annual-report-2016171.pdf

PDF document

Description: Originally uploaded to http://cdn.flamehaus.com/Valve_Handbook_LowRes.pdf Handbook courtesy of Valve HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEES ============================================================ HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEES ======================================================== A fearless adventure in knowing what to do when no one’s there telling you what to do FIRST EDITION 2012 Dedicated to the families of all Valve employees. Thank you for helping us make such an incredible place. Table of Contents Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii How to Use This Book . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viii Part 1: Welcome to Valve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Your First Day Valve Facts That Matter Welcome to Flatland Part 2: Settling In . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Your First Month What to Work On Why do I need to pick my own projects?, But how do I decide which things to work on?, How do I find out what projects are under way?, Short-term vs. long term goals, What about all the things that I’m not getting done?, How does Valve decide what to work on? Can I be included the next time Valve is deciding X? Teams, Hours, and the Office Cabals, Team leads, Structure happens, Hours, The office Risks What if I screw up?, But what if we ALL screw up? Part 3: How Am I Doing? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Your Peers and Your Performance Peer reviews, Stack ranking (and compensation) Part 4: Choose Your Own Adventure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Your First Six Months Roles, Advancement vs. growth, Putting more tools in your toolbox Part 5: Valve Is Growing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 Your Most Important Role Hiring, Why is hiring well so important at Valve?, How do we choose the right people to hire?, We value “T-shaped” people, We’re looking for people stronger than ourselves, Hiring is fundamentally the same across all disciplines Part 6: Epilogue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 What Is Valve Not Good At? What Happens When All This Stuff Doesn’t Work? Where Will You Take Us? Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 © 2012 Valve Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Printed in the United States of America. This handbook does not constitute an employment contract or binding policy and is subject to change at any time. Either Valve or an employee can terminate the employment relationship at any time, with or without cause, with or without notice. Employment with Valve is at-will, and nothing in this handbook will alter that status. First edition: March 2012 Valve Corporation Bellevue, Washington USA www.valvesoftware.com Designed by Valve Typeface: ITC New Baskerville 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Preface In 1996, we set out to make great games, but we knew back then that we had to first create a place that was designed to foster that greatness. A place where incredibly talented individuals are empowered to put their best work into the hands of millions of people, with very little in their way. This book is an abbreviated encapsulation of our guiding principles. As Valve continues to grow, we hope that these principles will serve each new person joining our ranks. If you are new to Valve, welcome. Although the goals in this book are important, it’s really your ideas, talent, and energy that will keep Valve shining in the years ahead. Thanks for being here. Let’s make great things. – vii – VALVE: HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEEs How to Use This Book This book isn’t about fringe benefits or how to set up your workstation or where to find source code. Valve works in ways that might seem counterintuitive at first. This handbook is about the choices you’re going to be making and how to think about them. Mainly, it’s about how not to freak out now that you’re here. ================================================== For more nuts-and-bolts information, there’s an official Valve intranet (http://intranet). Look for stuff there like how to build a Steam depot or whether eyeglasses are covered by your Flex Spending plan. This book is on the intranet, so you can edit it. Once you’ve read it, help us make it better for other new people. Suggest new sections, or change the existing ones. Add to the Glossary. Or if you’re not all that comfortable editing it, annotate it: make comments and suggestions. We’ll collectively review the changes and fold them into future revisions. ================================================== 1 Welcome to Valve – viii – VALVE: HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEEs Your First Day WELCOME TO VALVE Valve Facts That Matter Fig. 1-1 So you’ve gone through the interview process, you’ve signed the contracts, and you’re finally here at Valve. Congratulations, and welcome. Valve has an incredibly unique way of doing things that will make this the greatest professional experience of your life, but it can take some getting used to. This book was written by people who’ve been where you are now, and who want to make your first few months here as easy as possible. –2– Fig. 1-2 Valve is self-funded. We haven’t ever brought in outside financing. Since our earliest days this has been incredibly important in providing freedom to shape the company and its business practices. Valve owns its intellectual property. This is far from the norm, in our industry or at most entertainment contentproducing companies. We didn’t always own it all. But thanks to some legal wrangling with our first publisher after Half-Life shipped, we now do. This has freed us to make our own decisions about our products. Valve is more than a game company. We started our existence as a pretty traditional game company. And we’re still one, but with a hugely expanded focus. Which is great, because we get to make better games as a result, –3– VALVE: HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEES and we’ve also been able to diversify. We’re an entertainment company. A software company. A platform company. But mostly, a company full of passionate people who love the products we create. Welcome to Flatland Hierarchy is great for maintaining predictability and repeatability. It simplifies planning and makes it easier to control a large group of people from the top down, which is why military organizations rely on it so heavily. But when you’re an entertainment company that’s spent the last decade going out of its way to recruit the most intelligent, innovative, talented people on Earth, telling them to sit at a desk and do what they’re told obliterates 99 percent of their value. We want innovators, and that means maintaining an environment where they’ll flourish. That’s why Valve is flat. It’s our shorthand way of saying that we don’t have any management, and nobody “reports to” anybody else. We do have a founder/president, but even he isn’t your manager. This company is yours to steer—toward opportunities and away from risks. You have the power to green-light projects. You have the power to ship products. A flat structure removes every organizational barrier –4– Fig. 1-3 VALVE: HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEEs between your work and the customer enjoying that work. Every company will tell you that “the customer is boss,” but here that statement has weight. There’s no red tape stopping you from figuring out for yourself what our customers want, and then giving it to them. If you’re thinking to yourself, “Wow, that sounds like a lot of responsibility,” you’re right. And that’s why hiring is the single most important thing you will ever do at Valve (see “Hiring ,” on page 43). Any time you interview a potential hire, you need to ask yourself not only if they’re talented or collaborative but also if they’re capable of literally running this company, because they will be. ================================================== Why does your desk have wheels? Think of those wheels as a symbolic reminder that you should always be considering where you could move yourself to be more valuable. But also think of those wheels as literal wheels, because that’s what they are, and you’ll be able to actually move your desk with them. You’ll notice people moving frequently; often whole teams will move their desks to be closer to each other. There is no organizational structure keeping you from being in close proximity to the people who you’d help or be helped by most. The fact that everyone is always moving around within the company makes people hard to find. That’s why we have http://user—check it out. We know where you are based on where your machine is plugged in, so use this site to see a map of where everyone is right now. ================================================== –6– 2 Settling In VALVE: HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEEs Your First Month So you’ve decided where you put your desk. You know where the coffee machine is. You’re even pretty sure you know what that one guy’s name is. You’re not freaking out anymore. In fact, you’re ready to show up to work this morning, sharpen those pencils, turn on your computer, and then what? This next section walks you through figuring out what to work on. You’ll learn about how projects work, how cabals work, and how products get out the door at Valve. What to Work On Why do I need to pick my own projects? We’ve heard that other companies have people allocate a percentage of their time to self-directed projects. At Valve, that percentage is 100. Since Valve is flat, people don’t join projects because they’re told to. Instead, you’ll decide what to work on after asking yourself the right questions (more on that later). Employees vote on projects with their feet (or desk wheels). Strong projects are ones in which people can see demonstrated value; they staff up easily. This means there are any number of internal recruiting efforts constantly under way. –8– S ettling in If you’re working here, that means you’re good at your job. People are going to want you to work with them on their projects, and they’ll try hard to get you to do so. But the decision is going to be up to you. (In fact, at times you’re going to wish for the luxury of having just one person telling you what they think you should do, rather than hundreds.) But how do I decide which things to work on? Deciding what to work on can be the hardest part of your job at Valve. This is because, as you’ve found out by now, you were not hired to fill a specific job description. You were hired to constantly be looking around for the most valuable work you could be doing. At the end of a project, you may end up well outside what you thought was your core area of expertise. There’s no rule book for choosing a project or task at Valve. But it’s useful to answer questions like these: • Of all the projects currently under way, what’s the most valuable thing I can be working on? • Which project will have the highest direct impact on our customers? How much will the work I ship benefit them? • Is Valve not doing something that it should be doing? • What’s interesting? What’s rewarding? What leverages my individual strengths the most? –9– VALVE: HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEEs How do I find out what projects are under way? There are lists of stuff, like current projects, but by far the best way to find out is to ask people. Anyone, really. When you do, you’ll find out what’s going on around the company and your peers will also find out about you. Lots of people at Valve want and need to know what you care about, what you’re good at, what you’re worried about, what you’ve got experience with, and so on. And the way to get the word out is to start telling people all of those things. So, while you’re getting the lay of the land by learning about projects, you’re also broadcasting your own status to a relevant group of people. Got an idea for how Valve could change how we internally broadcast project/company status? Great. Do it. In the meantime, the chair next to anyone’s desk is always open, so plant yourself in it often. Short-term vs. long-term goals Because we all are responsible for prioritizing our own work, and because we are conscientious and anxious to be valuable, as individuals we tend to gravitate toward projects that have a high, measurable, and predictable return for the company. So when there’s a clear opportunity on the table to succeed at a near-term business goal with a clear return, we all want to take it. And, when we’re faced with a – 10 – S ettling in problem or a threat, and it’s one with a clear cost, it’s hard not to address it immediately. This sounds like a good thing, and it often is, but it has some downsides that are worth keeping in mind. Specifically, if we’re not careful, these traits can cause us to race back and forth between short-term opportunities and threats, being responsive rather than proactive. So our lack of a traditional structure comes with an important responsibility. It’s up to all of us to spend effort focusing on what we think the long-term goals of the company should be. Someone told me to (or not to) work on X. And they’ve been here a long time! Well, the correct response to this is to keep thinking about whether or not your colleagues are right. Broaden the conversation. Hold on to your goals if you’re convinced they’re correct. Check your assumptions. Pull more people in. Listen. Don’t believe that anyone holds authority over the decision you’re trying to make. They don’t; but they probably have valuable experience to draw from, or information/data that you don’t have, or insight that’s new. When considering the outcome, don’t believe that anyone but you is the “stakeholder”. You’re it. And Valve’s customers are who you’re serving. Do what’s right for them. – 11 – VALVE: HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEEs ================================================== There are lots of stories about how Gabe has made important decisions by himself, e.g., hiring the whole Portal 1 team on the spot after only half of a meeting. Although there are examples, like that one, where this kind of decision making has been successful, it’s not the norm for Valve. If it were, we’d be only as smart as Gabe or management types, and they’d make our important decisions for us. Gabe is the first to say that he can’t be right nearly often enough for us to operate that way. His decisions and requests are subject to just as much scrutiny and skepticism as anyone else’s. (So if he tells you to put a favorite custom knife design into Counter-Strike, you can just say no.) ================================================== Whatever group you’re in, whether you’re building Steam servers, translating support articles, or making the tenthousandth hat for Team Fortress 2, this applies to you. It’s crucial that you believe it, so we’ll repeat it a few more times in this book. What about all the things that I’m not getting done? It’s natural in this kind of environment to constantly feel like you’re failing because for every one task you decide to work on, there will be dozens that aren’t getting your attention. Trust us, this is normal. Nobody expects you to devote time to every opportunity that comes your way. Instead, we want you to learn how to choose the most important work to do. – 12 – S ettling in How does Valve decide what to work on? The same way we make other decisions: by waiting for someone to decide that it’s the right thing to do, and then letting them recruit other people to work on it with them. We believe in each other to make these decisions, and this faith has proven to be well-founded over and over again. But rather than simply trusting each other to just be smart, we also constantly test our own decisions. Whenever we move into unknown territory, our findings defy our own predictions far more often than we would like to admit. We’ve found it vitally important to, whenever possible, not operate by using assumptions, unproven theories, or folk wisdom. This kind of testing takes place across our business, from game development to hiring, to selling games on Steam. Luckily, Steam is a fantastic platform for business learning. It exists to be an entertainment/service platform for our customers, and as such it also is a conduit for constant communication between us and them. Accepted truisms about sales, marketing, regionality, seasonality, the Internet, purchasing behavior, game design, economics, and recruiting, etc., have proven wrong surprisingly often. So we have learned that when we take nearly any action, it’s best to do so in a way that we can measure, predict outcomes, and analyze results. – 13 – VALVE: HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEEs Recruiting can be a difficult process to instrument and measure. Although we have always tried to be highly rational about how we hire people, we’ve found much room for improvement in our approach over the years. We have made significant strides toward bringing more predictability, measurement, and analysis to recruiting. A process that many assume must be treated only as a “soft” art because it has to do with humans, personalities, language, and nuance, actually has ample room for a healthy dose of science. We’re not turning the whole thing over to robots just yet though(see “Hiring ,” on page 43). Can I be included the next time Valve is deciding X? Yes. There’s no secret decision-making cabal. No matter what project, you’re already invited. All you have to do is either (1) Start working on it, or (2) Start talking to all the people who you think might be working on it already and find out how to best be valuable. You will be welcomed— there is no approval process or red tape involved. Quite the opposite—it’s your job to insert yourself wherever you think you should be. – 14 – S ettling in Teams, Hours, and the Office Cabals Fig. 2-1 Cabals are really just multidisciplinary project teams. We’ve self-organized into these largely temporary groups since the early days of Valve. They exist to get a product or large feature shipped. Like any other group or effort at the company, they form organically. People decide to join the group based on their own belief that the group’s work is important enough for them to work on. ================================================== For reference, read the article on cabals by Ken Birdwell. It describes where cabals came from and what they meant to us early on: http://tinyurl.com/ygam86p. ================================================== – 15 – VALVE: HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEEs Team leads Often, someone will emerge as the “lead” for a project. This person’s role is not a traditional managerial one. Most often, they’re primarily a clearinghouse of information. They’re keeping the whole project in their head at once so that people can use them as a resource to check decisions against. The leads serve the team, while acting as centers for the teams. Structure happens Project teams often have an internal structure that forms temporarily to suit the group’s needs. Although people at Valve don’t have fixed job descriptions or limitations on the scope of their responsibility, they can and often do have clarity around the definition of their “job” on any given day. They, along with their peers, effectively create a job description that fits the group’s goals. That description changes as requirements change, but the temporary structure provides a shared understanding of what to expect from each other. If someone moves to a different group or a team shifts its priorities, each person can take on a completely different role according to the new requirements. Valve is not averse to all organizational structure—it crops up in many forms all the time, temporarily. But problems show up when hierarchy or codified divisions of – 16 – S ettling in labor either haven’t been created by the group’s members or when those structures persist for long periods of time. We believe those structures inevitably begin to serve their own needs rather than those of Valve’s customers. The hierarchy will begin to reinforce its own structure by hiring people who fit its shape, adding people to fill subordinate support roles. Its members are also incented to engage in rent-seeking behaviors that take advantage of the power structure rather than focusing on simply delivering value to customers. Hours While people occasionally choose to push themselves to work some extra hours at times when something big is going out the door, for the most part working overtime for extended periods indicates a fundamental failure in planning or communication. If this happens at Valve, it’s a sign that something needs to be reevaluated and corrected. If you’re looking around wondering why people aren’t in “crunch mode,” the answer’s pretty simple. The thing we work hardest at is hiring good people, so we want them to stick around and have a good balance between work and family and the rest of the important stuff in life. If you find yourself working long hours, or just generally feel like that balance is out of whack, be sure to raise the (cont’d on page 19) – 17 – Fig. 2-2 Method to move your desk 1. 2. 3. 4. step 1. Unplug cords from wall step 2. Move your desk step 3. Plug cords back into wall step 4. Get back to work VALVE METHOD DIAG. 1 A Timeline of Valve’s History 1996 1997 Valve is formed in Kirkland, WA, by Gabe Newell and Mike Harrington. Formation papers are signed on the same day as Gabe’s wedding. Quake engine license is acquired from id Software. Production commences on the game soon to be known as Half-Life (HL). Production commences on Valve’s second game, Prospero. Valve recruits and hires two game teams, including the ﬁrst international employee from the UK. Gabe promises that if HL becomes the #1- selling game, the company will take everyone on vacation. After internal review, HL deemed not good enough to ship. HL team returns to the drawing board and essentially starts over. Prospero permanently shelved. – 19 – HFNE:96:97::01 VALVE 19 9 8 Half-Life: Day One OEM demo is released. Released as a demo bundled with the Voodoo Banshee graphics card, the OEM release circulates far beyond its original intended audience. Valve realizes the level of anticipation for the full game. Half-Life is released. Following a certain Black Mesa Incident, the world is never the same again. TeamFortress Software Pty. Ltd. is acquired. Creators of Team Fortress (TF) join Valve and commence work on Team Fortress Classic. Valve’s ﬁrst company vacation to Cabo San Lucas, Mexico. # of employees: 30 # of children: 0 VALVE HFNE:98::02 1999 2000 2001 Valve establishes a pattern of supporting the best mods and occasionally acquiring them. Mike Harrington amicably dissolves his partnership with Gabe Newell, leaving Newell as the sole head of Valve Corporation. Half-Life: Opposing Force is released. Expansion pack follows events in Black Mesa from the viewpoint of an invading soldier. Counter-Strike (CS) is released. CS soon becomes the world’s #1 premier online action game. Team Fortress Classic is released. Ricochet is released. Robin Walker demonstrates to the mod community how a game can be created quickly and easily with Valve’s SDK. Half-Life: Deathmatch Classic is released. Half-Life: Blue Shift is released. HFNE:99:00:01::03 VALVE 2002 2003 Valve outgrows its original Kirkland ofﬁce space and moves to downtown Bellevue, WA. Steam is announced at GDC. Valve’s Steam offers to third parties its new suite of tools and services, which it had originally built to service its own games like HL and CS. Valve Anti-Cheat (VAC) is released. In a ﬁeld where rampant online cheating ruins the experience for many customers, Valve aggressively addresses the issue. Half-Life 2 (HL2) source code is stolen. A thief inﬁltrates Valve’s network to steal and disperse the code base for the still-in-production HL2. Years of speculation regarding the Borealis and Kraken Base begin… Steam is released. CS is released as Valve’s first Xbox title. Day of Defeat is released. A popular mod gets full Valve support, becoming one of its stalwart products. VALVE HFNE:02:03::04 2004 Source engine is unveiled. Half-Life 2 (HL2) is released. The world’s ﬁrst (legal) look at the Source engine, along with the game it powers: HL2. HL2 appears as the ﬁrst game available both through Steam and in retail locations. HL2 also becomes Valve’s second Xbox title. Counter-Strike: Source (CSS) is released. Years of work on Valve’s new Source engine technology ﬁnally come to light. Counter-Strike: Condition Zero is released. Half-Life: Source is released. The original HL gets a visual upgrade. HFNE:04::05 VALVE 2005 2006 2007 First third-party games are released on Steam. A landmark in digital distribution, Steam gives PC developers an alternative to retail for their games. Half-Life 2: Episode One is released. Valve’s ﬁrst experiment in episodic storytelling. The Orange Box is released with two previously-released titles and three new products: Half-Life 2: Lost Coast tech demo is released. Supported by the ﬁrst version of Valve’s popular developer commentary. Day of Defeat: Source is released. Valve hires six students from DigiPen Institute of Technology after seeing their demo of the game, Narbacular Drop. Half-Life Deathmatch: Source is released. Team Fortress 2 (TF2), the long-awaited sequel to the classic multiplayer game. Half Life 2: Episode Two— raising the bar for emotional storytelling. Portal—hailed worldwide as an instant classic. Steam Community is released with the first wave of features designed to help friends connect and socialize via the Steam platform. Steam reaches 15 million active users, playing over 200 games. VALVE HFNE:05:06:07::06 2008 Left 4 Dead is released. 2009 LEFT 4 DEAD 2 is released. Presale numbers are the biggest yet for a Valve game. Steamworks is unveiled, making the business and technical tools of the Steam platform available to thirdparty developers free of charge. Steam hits over 20 million users and over 500 games. TF2 gets major class updates for Medic, Pyro, and Heavy characters. These updates are delivered via Steam to all TF2 customers. Steam ships its ﬁrst downloadable content update for indie game The Maw. Steam Cloud is released, offering seamless online storage of any ﬁle types, including saved games, conﬁguration ﬁles, etc. Steam hits over 25 million users and over 1,000 games. TF2 releases The Sniper vs Spy Update, followed by outright WAR! After this release, the TF2 updates increase rapidly: more than 280 have shipped in total. TF2 ships its ﬁrst hat. HFNE:08:09::07 VALVE 2010 2011 2012 Portal 2 debuts on multiple platforms to critical acclaim. Valve’s 44th international hire clears immigration—this time from Germany. Valve moves to a more expansive location in Bellevue, WA. Valve announces that Steam and Source will be available for Macintosh. Dota 2 premieres at Gamescom in Cologne, Germany, with the first annual Dota 2 championship. In 2012, Valve heads to the Big Island of Hawaii for its 10th company vacation. # of employees: 293 # of children: 185 Valve announces Portal 2 is launching in 2011. Valve begins development of Dota 2. VALVE HFNE:10:11:12::08 Q1: New employee handbook rolls off press. What’s next? You tell us… S ettling in issue with whomever you feel would help. Dina loves to force people to take vacations, so you can make her your first stop. The office Sometimes things around the office can seem a little too good to be true. If you find yourself walking down the hall one morning with a bowl of fresh fruit and Stumptown-roasted espresso, dropping off your laundry to be washed, and heading into one of the massage rooms, don’t freak out. All these things are here for you to actually use. And don’t worry that somebody’s going to judge you for taking advantage of it—relax! And if you stop on the way back from your massage to play darts or work out in the Valve gym or whatever, it’s not a sign that this place is going to come crumbling down like some 1999-era dot-com startup. If we ever institute caviar-catered lunches, though, then maybe something’s wrong. Definitely panic if there’s caviar. – 19 – VALVE: HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEEs Risks What if I screw up? Nobody has ever been fired at Valve for making a mistake. It wouldn’t make sense for us to operate that way. Providing the freedom to fail is an important trait of the company— we couldn’t expect so much of individuals if we also penalized people for errors. Even expensive mistakes, or ones which result in a very public failure, are genuinely looked at as opportunities to learn. We can always repair the mistake or make up for it. Screwing up is a great way to find out that your assumptions were wrong or that your model of the world was a little bit off. As long as you update your model and move forward with a better picture, you’re doing it right. Look for ways to test your beliefs. Never be afraid to run an experiment or to collect more data. It helps to make predictions and anticipate nasty outcomes. Ask yourself “what would I expect to see if I’m right?” Ask yourself “what would I expect to see if I’m wrong?” Then ask yourself “what do I see?” If something totally unexpected happens, try to figure out why. There are still some bad ways to fail. Repeating the same mistake over and over is one. Not listening to customers or peers before or after a failure is another. Never ignore the evidence; particularly when it says you’re wrong. – 20 – S ettling in Fig. 2-3 – 21 – Fig. 2-4 Methods to find out what’s going on 1. 2. S ettling in But what if we ALL screw up? 3. 4. step 1. Talk to someone in a meeting step 2. Talk to someone in the elevator step 3. Talk to someone in the kitchen step 4. Talk to someone in the bathroom VALVE METHOD DIAG. 2 Fig. 2-5 So if every employee is autonomously making his or her own decisions, how is that not chaos? How does Valve make sure that the company is heading in the right direction? When everyone is sharing the steering wheel, it seems natural to fear that one of us is going to veer Valve’s car off the road. Over time, we have learned that our collective ability to meet challenges, take advantage of opportunity, and respond to threats is far greater when the responsibility for doing so is distributed as widely as possible. Namely, to every individual at the company. We are all stewards of our long-term relationship with our customers. They watch us, sometimes very publicly, – 23 – VALVE: HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEEs make mistakes. Sometimes they get angry with us. But because we always have their best interests at heart, there’s faith that we’re going to make things better, and that if we’ve screwed up today, it wasn’t because we were trying to take advantage of anyone. 3 How Am I Doing? – 24 – VALVE: HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEES Your Peers and Your Performance We have two formalized methods of evaluating each other: peer reviews and stack ranking. Peer reviews are done in order to give each other useful feedback on how to best grow as individual contributors. Stack ranking is done primarily as a method of adjusting compensation. Both processes are driven by information gathered from each other—your peers. Peer reviews We all need feedback about our performance—in order to improve, and in order to know we’re not failing. Once a year we all give each other feedback about our work. Outside of these formalized peer reviews, the expectation is that we’ll just pull feedback from those around us whenever we need to. There is a framework for how we give this feedback to each other. A set of people (the set changes each time) interviews everyone in the whole company, asking who each person has worked with since the last round of peer reviews and how the experience of working with each person was. The purpose of the feedback is to provide people with information that will help them grow. That means that the best quality feedback is directive and – 26 – H ow am I doing ? prescriptive, and designed to be put to use by the person you’re talking about. The feedback is then gathered, collated, anonymized, and delivered to each reviewee. Making the feedback anonymous definitely has pros and cons, but we think it’s the best way to get the most useful information to each person. There’s no reason to keep your feedback about someone to yourself until peer review time if you’d like to deliver it sooner. In fact, it’s much better if you do so often, and outside the constraints of official peer reviews. When delivering peer review feedback, it’s useful to keep in mind the same categories used in stack ranking because they concretely measure how valuable we think someone is. Stack ranking (and compensation) The other evaluation we do annually is to rank each other against our peers. Unlike peer reviews, which generate information for each individual, stack ranking is done in order to gain insight into who’s providing the most value at the company and to thereby adjust each person’s compensation to be commensurate with his or her actual value. Valve pays people very well compared to industry norms. Our profitability per employee is higher than that of Google or Amazon or Microsoft, and we believe strongly that the right thing to do in that case is to put a maximum – 27 – Fig. 3-1 Method to working without a boss 1. 2. 3. 4. step 1. Come up with a bright idea step 2. Tell a coworker about it step 3. Work on it together step 4. Ship it! VALVE METHOD DIAG. 3 H ow am I doing ? amount of money back into each employee’s pocket. Valve does not win if you’re paid less than the value you create. And people who work here ultimately don’t win if they get paid more than the value they create. So Valve’s goal is to get your compensation to be “correct.” We tend to be very flexible when new employees are joining the company, listening to their salary requirements and doing what we can for them. Over time, compensation gets adjusted to fit an employee’s internal peer-driven valuation. That’s what we mean by “correct”—paying someone what they’re worth (as best we can tell using the opinions of peers). ================================================== If you think your compensation isn’t right for the work you do, then you should raise the issue. At Valve, these conversations are surprisingly easy and straightforward. Adjustments to compensation usually occur within the process described here. But talking about it is always the right thing if there’s any issue. Fretting about your level of compensation without any outside information about how it got set is expensive for you and for Valve. ================================================== The removal of bias is of the utmost importance to Valve in this process. We believe that our peers are the best judges of our value as individuals. Our flat structure eliminates some of the bias that would be present in a peer-ranking system elsewhere. The design of our stack-ranking process is meant to eliminate as much as possible of the remainder. – 29 – VALVE: HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEEs Each project/product group is asked to rank its own members. (People are not asked to rank themselves, so we split groups into parts, and then each part ranks people other than themselves.) The ranking itself is based on the following four metrics: 1. Skill Level/Technical Ability How difficult and valuable are the kinds of problems you solve? How important/critical of a problem can you be given? Are you uniquely capable (in the company? industry?) of solving a certain class of problem, delivering a certain type of art asset, contributing to design, writing, or music, etc.? 2. Productivity/Output How much shippable (not necessarily shipped to outside customers), valuable, finished work did you get done? Working a lot of hours is generally not related to productivity and, after a certain point, indicates inefficiency. It is more valuable if you are able to maintain a sensible work/life balance and use your time in the office efficiently, rather than working around the clock. – 30 – Fig. 3-2 VALVE: HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEEs 3. Group Contribution How much do you contribute to studio process, hiring, integrating people into the team, improving workflow, amplifying your colleagues, or writing tools used by others? Generally, being a group contributor means that you are making a tradeoff versus an individual contribution. Stepping up and acting in a leadership role can be good for your group contribution score, but being a leader does not impart or guarantee a higher stack rank. It is just a role that people adopt from time to time. 4. Product Contribution How much do you contribute at a larger scope than your core skill? How much of your work matters to the product? How much did you influence correct prioritization of work or resource trade-offs by others? Are you good at predicting how customers are going to react to decisions we’re making? Things like being a good playtester or bug finder during the shipping cycle would fall into this category. – 32 – H ow am I doing ? By choosing these categories and basing the stack ranking on them, the company is explicitly stating, “This is what is valuable.” We think that these categories offer a broad range of ways you can contribute value to the company. Once the intra-group ranking is done, the information gets pooled to be company-wide. We won’t go into that methodology here. There is a wiki page about peer feedback and stack ranking with some more detail on each process. – 33 – Fig. 3-3 Method to taking the company trip 1. 2. 3. 4. step 1. Find someone to watch your cats step 2. Board our chartered flight step 3. Relax by the pool step 4. Relax by the pool some more VALVE METHOD DIAG. 4 4 Choose Your Own Adventure VALVE: HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEEs Your First Six Months You’ve solved the nuts-and-bolts issues. Now you’re moving beyond wanting to just be productive day to day—you’re ready to help shape your future, and Valve’s. Your own professional development and Valve’s growth are both now under your control. Here are some thoughts on steering both toward success. Roles Fig. 4-1 By now it’s obvious that roles at Valve are fluid. Traditionally at Valve, nobody has an actual title. This is by design, to remove organizational constraints. Instead we have things we call ourselves, for convenience. In particular, people – 36 – CHOOSE YOUR OWN ADVENTURE who interact with others outside the company call themselves by various titles because doing so makes it easier to get their jobs done. Inside the company, though, we all take on the role that suits the work in front of us. Everyone is a designer. Everyone can question each other’s work. Anyone can recruit someone onto his or her project. Everyone has to function as a “strategist,” which really means figuring out how to do what’s right for our customers. We all engage in analysis, measurement, predictions, evaluations. One outward expression of these ideals is the list of credits that we put in our games—it’s simply a long list of names, sorted alphabetically. That’s it. This was intentional when we shipped Half-Life, and we’re proud to continue the tradition today. Advancement vs. growth Because Valve doesn’t have a traditional hierarchical structure, it can be confusing to figure out how Valve fits into your career plans. “Before Valve, I was an assistant technical second animation director in Hollywood. I had planned to be a director in five years. How am I supposed to keep moving forward here?” Working at Valve provides an opportunity for extremely efficient and, in many cases, very accelerated, career – 37 – VALVE: HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEEs growth. In particular, it provides an opportunity to broaden one’s skill set well outside of the narrow constraints that careers can have at most other companies. So the “growth ladder” is tailored to you. It operates exactly as fast as you can manage to grow. You’re in charge Fig. 4-2 of your track, and you can elicit help with it anytime from those around you. F Y I , we usually don’t do any formalized employee “development” (course work, mentor assignment), because for senior people it’s mostly not effective. We believe that high-performance people are generally self-improving. – 38 – CHOOSE YOUR OWN ADVENTURE Most people who fit well at Valve will be betterpositioned after their time spent here than they could have been if they’d spent their time pretty much anywhere else. Putting more tools in your toolbox The most successful people at Valve are both (1) highly skilled at a broad set of things and (2) world-class experts within a more narrow discipline. (See “T-shaped” people on page 46.) Because of the talent diversity here at Valve, it’s often easier to become stronger at things that aren’t your core skill set. Engineers: code is only the beginning If you were hired as a software engineer, you’re now surrounded by a multidisciplinary group of experts in all kinds of fields—creative, legal, financial, even psychological. Many of these people are probably sitting in the same room as you every day, so the opportunities for learning are huge. Take advantage of this fact whenever possible: the more you can learn about the mechanics, vocabulary, and analysis within other disciplines, the more valuable you become. Non-Engineers: program or be programmed Valve’s core competency is making software. Obviously, – 39 – VALVE: HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEES different disciplines are part of making our products, but we’re still an engineering-centric company. That’s because the core of the software-building process is engineering. As in, writing code. If your expertise is not in writing code, then every bit of energy you put into understanding the code-writing part of making software is to your (and Valve’s) benefit. You don’t need to become an engineer, and there’s nothing that says an engineer is more valuable than you. But broadening your awareness in a highly technical direction is never a bad thing. It’ll either increase the quality or quantity of bits you can put “into boxes,” which means affecting customers more, which means you’re valuable. 5 Valve Is Growing – 40 – VALVE: HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEEs Your Most Important Role Concepts discussed in this book sound like they might work well at a tiny start-up, but not at a hundreds-of-people-plusbillions-in-revenue company. The big question is: Does all this stuff scale? Well, so far, yes. And we believe that if we’re careful, it will work better and better the larger we get. This might seem counterintuitive, but it’s a direct consequence of hiring great, accomplished, capable people. Getting this to work right is a tricky proposition, though, and depends highly on our continued vigilance in recruiting/hiring. If we start adding people to the company who aren’t as capable as we are at operating as high-powered, selfdirected, senior decision makers, then lots of the stuff discussed in this book will stop working. One thing that’s changing as we grow is that we’re not great at disseminating information to everyone anymore (see “What is Valve not good at?,” on page 52). On the positive side, our profitability per employee is going up, so by that measure, we’re certainly scaling correctly. Our rate of hiring growth hovered between 10 and 15 percent per year, for years. In 2010, we sped up, but only to about 20 percent per year. 2011 kept up this new pace, largely due to a wave of hiring in Support. – 42 – Valve is growing We do not have a growth goal. We intend to continue hiring the best people as fast as we can, and to continue scaling up our business as fast as we can, given our existing staff. Fortunately, we don’t have to make growth decisions based on any external pressures—only our own business goals. And we’re always free to temper those goals with the long-term vision for our success as a company. Ultimately, we win by keeping the hiring bar very high. Hiring Fig. 5-1 – 43 – VALVE: HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEEs Hiring well is the most important thing in the universe. Nothing else comes close. It’s more important than breathing. So when you’re working on hiring—participating in an interview loop or innovating in the general area of recruiting—everything else you could be doing is stupid and should be ignored! When you’re new to Valve, it’s super valuable to start being involved in the interview process. Ride shotgun with people who’ve been doing it a long time. In some ways, our interview process is similar to those of other companies, but we have our own take on the process that requires practice to learn. We won’t go into all the nuts and bolts in this book—ask others for details, and start being included in interview loops. Why is hiring well so important at Valve? At Valve, adding individuals to the organization can influence our success far more than it does at other companies —either in a positive or negative direction. Since there’s no organizational compartmentalization of people here, ================================================== Bring your friends. One of the most valuable things you can do as a new employee is tell us who else you think we should hire. Assuming that you agree with us that Valve is the best place to work on Earth, then tell us about who the best people are on Earth, so we can bring them here. If you don’t agree yet, then wait six months and ask yourself this question again. ================================================== – 44 – Valve is growing adding a great person can create value across the whole company. Missing out on hiring that great person is likely the most expensive kind of mistake we can make. Usually, it’s immediately obvious whether or not we’ve done a great job hiring someone. However, we don’t have the usual checks and balances that come with having managers, so occasionally it can take a while to understand whether a new person is fitting in. This is one downside of the organic design of the company—a poor hiring decision can cause lots of damage, and can sometimes go unchecked for too long. Ultimately, people who cause damage always get weeded out, but the harm they do can still be significant. How do we choose the right people to hire? An exhaustive how-to on hiring would be a handbook of its own. Probably one worth writing. It’d be tough for us to capture because we feel like we’re constantly learning really important things about how we hire people. In the meantime, here are some questions we always ask ourselves when evaluating candidates: • Would I want this person to be my boss? • Would I learn a significant amount from him or her? • What if this person went to work for our competition? Across the board, we value highly collaborative people. That means people who are skilled in all the things that are – 45 – VALVE: HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEEs integral to high-bandwidth collaboration—people who can deconstruct problems on the fly, and talk to others as they do so, simultaneously being inventive, iterative, creative, talkative, and reactive. These things actually matter far more than deep domain-specific knowledge or highly developed skills in narrow areas. This is why we’ll often pass on candidates who, narrowly defined, are the “best” at their chosen discipline. Of course it’s not quite enough to say that a candidate should collaborate well—we also refer to the same four metrics that we rely on when evaluating each other to evaluate potential employees (See “Stack ranking,” on page 27). We value “T-shaped” people. That is, people who are both generalists (highly skilled at a broad set of valuable things—the top of the T) and also experts (among the best in their field within a narrow discipline—the vertical leg of the T). This recipe is important for success at Valve. We often have to pass on people who are very strong generalists without expertise, or vice versa. An expert who is too narrow has difficulty collaborating. A generalist who doesn’t go deep enough in a single area ends up on the margins, not really contributing as an individual. – 46 – Valve is growing Fig. 5-2 We’re looking for people stronger than ourselves. When unchecked, people have a tendency to hire others who are lower-powered than themselves. The questions listed above are designed to help ensure that we don’t start hiring people who are useful but not as powerful as we are. We should hire people more capable than ourselves, not less. In some ways, hiring lower-powered people is a natural response to having so much work to get done. In these conditions, hiring someone who is at least capable seems (in the short term) to be smarter than not hiring anyone at all. But that’s actually a huge mistake. We can always bring – 47 – VALVE: HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEES on temporary/contract help to get us through tough spots, but we should never lower the hiring bar. The other reason people start to hire “downhill” is a political one. At most organizations, it’s beneficial to have an army of people doing your bidding. At Valve, though, it’s not. You’d damage the company and saddle yourself with a broken organization. Good times! Hiring is fundamentally the same across all disciplines. There are not different sets of rules or criteria for engineers, artists, animators, and accountants. Some details are different—like, artists and writers show us some of their work before coming in for an interview. But the actual interview process is fundamentally the same no matter who we’re talking to. “With the bar this high, would I be hired today?” That’s a good question. The answer might be no, but that’s actually aw
Url: /Media/UHS-website-2019/Docs/Zengenti-Mock/PDF-document.pdf

Recipe book - For toddlers who need to make the most of every mouthful

Description: RECIPE BOOK For toddlers who need to get the most out of every mouthful Contents 04 Acknowledgements & introduction 06 Questions, tips & answers 12 Table 01: Foods which can be used for extra calories and protein 13 Table 02: Examples of exercise and the benefits 14 Food & feeding advice for young children (table) 16 Simple week meal planner 18 Shopping list 20 Recipes: Contents 22 Recipes: Breakfasts � Marvelous nut dust � Granola � Breakfast porridge � Prunes, dates & ground almonds � Peaches, sultanas & ground almonds � Mango & almond butter � Raspberry, banana & almonds 28 Recipes: Power energy balls � Date & apricot power balls 29 Recipes: Warming soups � Dino soup � Super hero orange soup 31 Recipes: Bento boxes � Fusilli, ham, peas & cheese � Ham & cheese pitta & fresh fruit � Ham & cheese sandwich, broccoli, cucumber, orange & nutty chocolate balls � Falafel & hummus pitta, red pepper, cucumber, figs, strawberries � Cream cheese & smoked salmon wheels, avocado & melon � Pitta strips, avocado, hummus, chickpeas, orange peppers � satsumas � Tuna, lettuce, mayo, peas, cucumber, & pepper � Boiled eggs, brown pitta pockets, avocado, watermelon, melon & raspberries � Avocado & raspberries snack fest � Peanut butter, salad & berries � Chicken & BBQ sauce, corn on the cob, cucumber, clementine, & whole wheat wrap � Chicken & cous cous rainbow salad 43 Recipes: Snack boxes 44 Recipes: Meals for sharing � family favourites � Fish fingers & sweet potato chips � Pasta bolognaise � Lasagne � Mild chicken curry � Chicken bunny � Pesto � Salmon, pasta & peas 57 Recipes: Sweet things � Chocolate & almond cup cakes � Apricot, almond & chocolate cereal bars � Nutty flapjacks � Fruit pots � Chocolate peanut butter smoothie � Raspberry & almond smoothie 66 A last note... enjoy... 02 Acknowledgements This book has been written by Dr Luise Marino (RD, PhD) Clinical Academic Paediatric Dietitian at Southampton Children's Hospital. This book is part of independent research arising from (Dr Luise Marino, Health Education England/NIHR Clinical Lectureship (ICA-CL-2016-02-001)) supported by the National Institute for Health Research. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research, Health Education England or the Department of Health. In writing this book we have received the generous help and feedback from the following people: � Parents of children who need to make the most of every mouthful � thank you for your time and feedback, without which this book would not be possible � Paediatric Dietitians � Catherine Kidd, Natalie Davies � for your expertise and invaluable comments � Dr Rosan Meyer � for sharing your immense knowledge and skills � Paediatric Speech and Language Therapist � Julia Robinson � for your guidance and practical instruction � Specialist Paediatric Cardiac Liaison Nurses � Gill Harte, Colette Cochran, Cate Anson, Hannah Carver � for your unfailing support, feedback and advice � Dr Tara Bharucha, Consultant Paediatric Cardiologist � for supporting this initiative � Members of the British Dietetic Association Paediatric Cardiology Interest group for their generous help and feedback; in particular Neam Al Mossawi (HCA Healthcare), David Hopkins (Yeovile Hospital) � Dominic and Helen Hoile (info@Shootingpeas.com) � for their generosity opening up their studio and giving of their time to take the photographs. � Heather Pierpoint (headfudgedesign.co.uk) � Graphic designer, for bringing the publication to life � Southampton Children's Hospital Charity and the publishers � Michelle Wheeler, Judith Stephens, Amy McBrayne, Alanna Lee for making it all possible � Nutricia Medical � for supporting the project with an educational grant Dedication For all the families and their children who we are privileged to meet � your stories and journeys inspire us to do better. RECIPE BOOK For young children who need to get the most out of every mouthful Who is this book intended for? This book is intended for children between 1 and 5 years of age. Some children need a little bit longer with puree or fork mashed food so don't worry if your child is not quite at the age stages in this book. Some children are born with medical conditions which means they need to get the most out of everything they eat and drink. For some, whose medical issues may not be such a problem as they were when they were babies, they may now develop feeding difficulties, causing parents just as much concern. This recipe book is part of a series, published by Southampton Hospital Charity, to provide practical advice on how children can get the most of every mouthful. The advice within this booklet may not be suitable for those with delayed oral motor skills, inherited metabolic disorders, kidney problems or food allergies and should not replace individualised medical or nutritional advice. If you are unsure as to whether the advice in this book is suitable for your child, please check with their health care team first. The information in this book was correct, at the time of publishing, and undergoes periodic reviews to ensure up-to-date evidence is used. You should seek advice from your local health care professional if your child is not gaining weight well or is having feeding difficulties. Dr Luise Marino (RD, PhD) Clinical Academic Paediatric Dietitian HEE/NIHR ICA Clinical Lectureship thank you Ask for help If your child is showing signs of feeding difficulties (sensory or oro-motor disorders) which can include coughing, gagging or vomiting at the sight or smell of food or drink, food refusal, eating less than 10 different types of food in a week or you are in any way worried about how your child eats, then ask your child's team to refer you to Dietitian and Speech & Language Therapist for extra support. How will this book help me and my child? The aim of this book is to try and provide some useful tips and advice as well as some finger licking food to tempt your little one with. This book will help give you ideas about: � � � � � � How much to expect your child to eat How often should you expect your child to eat What textures can you expect your child to eat How to create a positive mealtime experience How to cope with stressful mealtimes How to cope with fussy eating 05 Questions, tips & answers... How much should I expect my child to eat? The amount of food young children eat varies from one meal to the next � this is normal. There are lots of resources available providing portion size ranges � with some examples below: � British Nutrition Foundation: https://www.nutrition.org.uk/ attachments/article/734/BNF%20 Toddler%20Eatwell%20Leaflet_OL.pdf � Infant and Toddler Forum https://www.infantandtoddlerforum. org/portion-sizes-table-2015 How often should I offer my child food? Try to have: � Regular mealtimes � aiming for breakfast, lunch and supper � Have at least a 3 hour break between each main meal � this will give them enough time to get hungry, but not too hungry � Try not to offer too many snacks between meals as they may then not be able to eat as much at a main meal � If your child is too tired they may find it difficult to eat, so sometimes lunch may be better after a nap � Offer water to drink at mealtimes � It is alright for your child still to prefer puree food � but continue to try to introduce lumpier and soft finger foods too � This will let children practice their chewing skills try to slowly increase the amount of texture in the meal e.g. 5p � 10p amount of a coarser texture until you have moved onto chunkier and lumpier food � Always give some finger food and a spoon at each mealtime so new skills can be practiced � bite and dissolve foods are good as are other finger foods (see the table at the end of this section for more tips) � Remember all of the senses are involved in eating and drinking; touch, sounds, sight and smells; - We eat food with our eyes, so it is important to make food look good - Touching food is as important as eating, so let your little one get messy - Smells of delicious food can encourage children to eat � Try not to compare how much your little one eats with siblings or other children of the same age � Try not to comment on how much or how well your little one is eating, some children get put off eating by all of the attention and focus on them � Don't follow your child around with a spoon begging them to eat; meals happen as a picnic or at a table not walking around � Encourage your little one to feed themselves; sometimes children like the attention of being fed, but it is good to encourage their feeding skills by letting them do it themselves � Children of all ages like food in boxes � Bento boxes, sandwich boxes or little bags or boxes of food appeal to their growing sense of independence � Food that little fingers can easily pick up is good as they can be more independent � don't worry if they play with it and get messy as this is all part of their learning experience � Eat with them � have a meal or snack at the same time; children learn about eating from those around them so if they see their carers or siblings enjoying the same food as them, they are more likely to try it. It is important that mealtimes are seen as a sociable activity to be enjoyed � If your child gets up from the table then calmly end the meal � there is always the next meal � After a main meal offer a small dessert such as fresh fruit and full fat yogurt, small cup cake and custard Have short mealtimes of up to 20 minutes How do I know when my child has had enough to eat? Let your child tell you when they've had enough � it is really important that you listen to their cues. � As when they were babies, they will start closing their mouth, trying to get down from the table, turn their head away, splay their hands or start spitting, shouting or crying, stop at this point � they are finished � If they say they have had enough to eat � try not to ask them to have a few more mouthfuls, you are teaching them to overeat. Respect their fullness � even if they have only have 1 mouthful Keep offering new food � it will take time before a new food is accepted and liked It can take a while before children will eat new foods � so long in fact that many parents give up! Children are often wary of trying new foods or foods they like that look slightly different e.g. different type of yogurt or packet of pitta bread. Children can take up to 15 tries (or even just looking at something) before they will like something new � for some it can take even longer. Offer regular meals and eat together as this helps children learn that food can be delicious and sociable What general advice is there for encouraging positive mealtimes? � Keep calm and don't rush � some days are better than others � Keep offering new foods � they will eventually try them � Children eat in colour � think of a rainbow when you are making their meals � Children like fun � so make their food look fun � Children like to help and want to please � involve them in the buying, preparing and cooking � Offer small portions and give your child lots of praise and attention when they finish it. You can then offer a second helping What texture should I expect my little one to eat? � Children who are weaned late during the first year of life may have missed some of the milestones for accepting new foods and textures, which can make moving on from smooth puree's harder (but not impossible) � Continue to offer your child lots of different kinds of foods, try not to get put off if they reject new foods If you are finding it difficult to get your little one to accept new textures speak to your child's team Children find sitting still very difficult and get bored quickly � Have short mealtimes of not more than 20 minutes or shorter if your child gets upset and does not want to eat � Use a stop watch on your phone or buy a 15 � 20 minutes sand timer � children like to watch the sand going down and it helps to put a limit on the length of mealtimes � Limit the amount of distractions at mealtimes e.g. electronic devices, television � chatting while you eat is good Mealtimes should be fun! Young children usually live to play, not eat. For many they would much rather be listening to a story or playing than sit down and eat. Therefore, it is important to make mealtimes fun and enjoyable, for the whole family! Don't enter into food battles � if they don't want to eat, don't bargain or bribe them You could try reading books with vegetable and fruit characters such as "mighty broccoli and cheeky cherry", this has been shown to increase young children's interest in tasting new foods. All children are unique � as is their appetite and how much they will eat 06 07 Don't enter into food battles � if they don't want to eat � don't bargain or bribe them Try not to enter into food battles with your little one � they will win! It is important to ensure you serve up child size portions � remember the size of their clenched fist; � If your delicious lovingly prepared mini dish of food is greeted with a "yuk � I am not eating that" � Respect your little ones decision with a "that's fine � you don't have to eat it... but you do have to sit here as it is dinnertime" � The family � even if it is just you and your little one then sit down to a meal � Respect them not eating anything or only eating the thing they like � Always offer a dessert � don't use dessert as a bribe as you are reinforcing the fact the main meal is so "yuk" that a bribe is needed to eat it Fussy eating is really common amongst young children and up to 40% of parents report their child has refused food at some point. Between 12 � 18 months of age, all young children develop "neophobia" � the fear of new food or familiar food offered in a different way. As fussy eating is such a common problem there are lots of tips and advice available � importantly: � Children like to eat with others and will often eat more in a group or when there is a relaxed family environment � Try to eat similar food at meals times to your little one e.g. fork mashed or squares of sandwich � Always, always make some part of the meal you know they will eat, then you know they won't go hungry � Eat with them at the same time � encouraging your child with smiles and positive sounds change or copy other children, so eating with others may not help them to accept new foods or textures � Some children may also have sensory issues and refuse to wear certain clothes or colours. They may also not like to get messy or sticky and dislike seeing people eating food they do not like � which can make them gag or vomit. For these children encourage messy play � This can be done with different kinds and textures of food � Shaving foam is also good fun for your child to put their hands in � Jelly is a great food to play with � wibbly and wobbly � Chocolate pudding on a chopping board for cars to drive through At mealtimes: � Be sensitive to what your child likes and dislikes If this is you: � It is easier said than done, but try to have a relaxed approach to mealtimes � Put the radio on and sing along or listen to a radio programme as it will distract you from the mealtime � Have something to eat at the same time, so your attention is not just on your child. They can also learn to enjoy their food by watching you enjoy it too choking risk children should be sitting whilst eating � Children should not have whole nuts under the age of 5 years � Other hard food, including Granola, should be ground into a finer crumb and not have any hard bits in it � it should also be mixed into food before serving � Always keep crumbed or hard food out of children's reach and always supervise snack or mealtimes � Sometimes doing a child first-aid course can help with any anxiety around mealtimes and choking risks. Ask your Health Visitor to find out what is available near home Most children love to get messy � however, some find it really stressful � so start slowly � outside of mealtimes � Try not to put really disliked food on the same plate as food which is liked � as some children will refuse the whole plate � Away from a mealtime offer tiny tastes of foods that your child might be willing to try � Offer your child different things to smell zest of lemon, herbs, melted chocolate � make a chart and together tick off the smells they like or don't like Children pick up on your non-verbal cues � if they feel you are tense about mealtimes � Don't worry if your child doesn't eat anything � sometimes children aren't hungry for their meals and this is normal � Invite a friend or family member to come and have a few meals with you � as having someone else to talk to can help � Have a picnic instead of eating at the table � you can have an indoor picnic if it is too cold to eat outside � Go out to a caf� and have a drink � offering your child food in a new environment can help My child is really fussy � what shall I do? For some parents feeding their baby has always been easy, but for others their little one's feeding journey has been really challenging � with vomiting, reflux and poor weight gain. As a result of these negative experiences associated with eating, some young children may have developed feeding difficulties or fussiness around food. Some children are fussier than others, but the good news is that with the right encouragement most children will have outgrown being fussy by 6 years of age. Most children love to get messy � however, some find it really stressful � so start slowly � outside of mealtimes � First start with general play with sand and water or paint � Play-doh, kinetic sand and painting are also good tactile games � Once they are comfortable with this take some dry uncooked pasta and place a top on top of the pasta for your child to pick up � Let them see you do it too � Once they are happy with this step, hide the toy in the dry pasta for them to find � Moving on to cool cooked pasta, hide the toy For children who need to gain weight � add nut butters to main meals Children have small tummies (about the size of their fist) so it is tricky to fit a lot in without either making them feel ill, or be sick. Examples of ways to get the most out of each mouthful are as follows; Snacking between meals does not suit all children as it can impact on their hunger and willingness to eat at a main meal. All children are different, so work out whether your child would prefer to have just 3 meals a day or 3 meals and one or two snacks. Snacks can be a useful back up if your child does not eat that well at mealtimes, but don't use snacks to replace main meals. Toddlers usually develop "neophobia", which simply means they don't like new foods � Change only one thing at a time � don't offer too many new foods at once, it can be overwhelming � Do not let new foods touch a favourite food as this can put them off their favourite food � Children who have very strong opinions about food are less likely to accept HELP: I feel really stressed about mealtimes! How can I relax? Our children know us really well. They read our body language and pick up on how tense we are through our faces and the way we sit or stand. For some parents, mealtimes are really stressful and even though they try to smile, their child senses something is wrong... I worry my child will choke � are there any foods I need be careful of? � Peel all fruit and vegetables. Cut round slippery foods length ways into quarters e.g. cherry tomatoes, grapes. As this is a 08 09 For children who need to catch up in terms of growth aim to provide; � Ages 1 � 3 years: an extra 200 � 300kcal, 7.5g protein per day � Ages 4 � 5 years: an extra 300 � 500kcal, 12.5g protein per day Table 1 can be used to plan ways in which to provide extra calories. It is important to use energy-nutrient dense foods e.g. nut butters. For example 6 teaspoons of peanut butter a day is almost 200kcal and 7.5g protein. We do not recommend the addition of extra oil or cream to food � if you have a heavy rich meal it can make you feel sick, children have the same feeling. Instead try to use a teaspoon of smooth nut butters, coconut cream, smooth plain cream cheese or a small pinch of grated cheese. Breakfast: � Add 1 � 2 teaspoons of smooth nut butter (almond, cashew, peanut) to warm porridge or � Toast with 1 � 2 teaspoons of nut butter and marmite or chocolate spread � Add 1 � 2 teaspoons of a nut butter to a home-made fruit smoothie � Add Marvelous nut dust (finely ground) to other breakfast options � mixing it in before serving Lunch and supper: � Offer protein at both main meals such as meat, boneless fish, chicken or beans/lentils with a starch (rice/ potatoes/pasta) and vegetables � add 1 � 2 teaspoons of a smooth nut butter or Marvelous nut dust � A small amount of grated cheese/ cream cheese can be added to mashed potato or meat dishes, instead of a smooth nut butter � Following a meal offer - Fruit or full cream yogurt - Full cream custard with a small cup cake - Rice pudding with 2 teaspoons of chocolate nut butter - Mashed avocado with toasted pistachio dust mixed into the avocado Eating veggies � children need to see you eating them too We all like sweet foods, so for many people veggies may not be their first choice of food. We should all eat 5 or more portions of fruit and vegetables a day. Some children really struggle with veggies, so here are some tried and tested tips; � Children need to see you enjoying veggies � so cook your favourites and eat them as a snack or with your meal � Most children 3 years and above like frozen peas � put a small amount in a pot and offer them whilst they are still frozen � Chop leafy veg such as kale and cabbage into really small bits � Cook leafy veggies with some chicken, pancetta or add a little gravy to give it a more savoury taste � Eat the same veggies as your children � Put mayo or tomato ketchup on salad � Don't insist they try it � all you can do is make it look yummy � Make up fun names � rocket man, pirate peas, beautiful butternut � Look for video clips of other children eating vegetables � Play with veggies � getting them to tear it, wash it, mash it � Take veggies selfies � Start with 1 teaspoon of a new veggie on their plate or side plate Continue with positive touch, massage and encouraging smiles � this all helps to reinforce positive messages about food. It is a good idea to start brushing your child's gums and teeth from when you see the first tooth. � Try not to let young children fall asleep with a bottle of milk in their mouth � offer milk before they go to bed, brushing their teeth afterwards � Use a toothpaste containing fluoride � it should have 1,350�1,500 parts per million (ppm) fluoride � Below the age of three years, children only need just a smear of toothpaste � Children aged 3 to 6 should use a peasized blob of toothpaste � Under the age of 7 years old you should brush your child's teeth for about two minutes twice a day: once just before bedtime and at least one other time during the day � Make tooth brushing as fun as possible by using an egg timer to time it for about two minutes � Don't let children run around with a toothbrush in their mouth, as they may have an accident and hurt themselves STEP 1 If your child is gagging or retching at new food on their plate, to begin with put a small amount e.g. 1 cooked carrot finger stick on a plate in the kitchen STEP 2 Encourage your children to be active � do activities as a family All children and young people should engage in `moderate to vigorous' physical activity for at least 60 minutes every day. You should also try to include some `light' activity and some `strength' activity.' It is important when doing sport that you exercise your whole body in a fun way! Why is it important to be active for at least 60 minutes each day? When they are able to look at it away from the table � put the new food on a plate in the middle of the table Don't comment on the food, just leave it there STEP 3 Once this has been accepted, move the plate closer to their plate � again don't comment or ask them to try it Make food fun Green soup can become "super hero" soup � add crispy croutons on top, serve it in little tea cups and just leave it for them to look at. If children see you eating something and enjoying it � they will eventually try it. Role playing about food outside of mealtimes, shopping games, helping with cooking such as passing vegetables is a good way of engaging children. Watching cooking programmes and talking about food, describing the smell and taste whilst you watch can help. Making colourful meal boxes � Pick a colourful Bento box/food container STEP 4 As they get more comfortable with the idea of a new food, then put a small amount on their plate e.g. 1 broccoli stem � they don't need to try it Brush your child's teeth at least twice per day � Helps keep our hearts and muscles healthy � Helps us keep a healthy weight � Improves bone health � Improves self-confidence and self-esteem � Develops new social skills and meet new people STEP 5 Once they are happy with the new food on their plate � ask them if they would pick it up and smell it Help teach your child how to brush their teeth properly � There are some fun clips on brushing children's teeth https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=kuLxz5IrZ6Y � Guide your child's hand so they can feel the correct movement � Use a mirror to help your child see exactly where the brush is cleaning their teeth STEP 6 After smelling, move to licking � then a small bite, they are allowed to spit it out � then to progress to swallow It can take weeks to get to this point � after a while the process will get easier and it will be quicker Make food fun � give dishes fun names... � Use colourful food picks to make a mealtime fun � Add edible cartoon eyes to food � Use a brightly coloured silicone muffin cup 10 11 Table 1: Foods which can be used for extra calories and protein Food item < 50 kcal 1 teaspoon chocolate spread 1 heaped teaspoon cream cheese 50�100 kcal 2 teaspoons smooth peanut butter Bacon � lean rasher Fruit smoothie 1 tablespoon Marvelous nut dust (see page 22) 100�150 kcal Egg, (1) scrambled with milk Chicken, drumstick Cubes of cheese 150�200 kcal Avocado, half 75g 183 1 Yogurt, full fat 175ml 180 7.7 60g 40g 45g 105 110 150 6.2 11 10 Meatball, small Milk, full cream Baked beans 60g 200ml 125g 125 125 116 16 6.4 6 10g 40g 150ml 15g 100 2.3 58 69 2.4 12.9 Egg, boiled Raisins � small box Banana Olives (cut in half lengthways) 60g 27g 100g 10 88 88 92 60 7.6 0.86 1.3 <0.5g 5g 10g 15 34 0.8 0.6 1 teaspoon peanut butter Cheese (pinch) 5g 10g 29 35 1.2 2 Table 2: Examples of exercise and the benefits Amount Energy (kcal) Protein (g) Exercise Light Amount Energy (kcal) Protein (g) Food item What is it and how does it help your body? This won't make you hot or sweaty. It gets your body moving and is a great way to get into doing more physical activity if at the moment you don't do very much. This will make you feel warmer and breathe harder. You should feel your heart beating faster, but still be able to carry on a conversation. This exercise is good for your heart. Examples � Walking � Playground activities Moderate � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Walking Playground activities Slow swimming or playing in the water Riding a scooter Skateboarding Roller blading Riding a bike on flat ground or with very few hills Riding a horse Running or playing running games such as `stuck in the mud' Swimming Team sports such as Hockey / Basketball / Football Fast cycling or on hilly terrain Swinging on playground equipment Hopping and skipping Sports such as gymnastics or tennis Playground games such as `tug of war' Rock, rope or tree climbing Vigorous * This will make you out of breath and possibly red in the face, making it more difficult to carry on a conversation. This type of exercise is good for your heart. Strength This helps to make your bones and muscles strong. * if you are not sure check with your health care team before you do anything that is very vigorous HELP: none of this advice is working If you are finding any aspect of introducing food difficult or your little one is showing signs of not wanting to eat at all � don't suffer in silence � your child's team can help. 12 13 Food & feeding advice for young children Food and Feeding Advice Type of food to offer If you are making food at home, try some of our recipes in this book. From 12�18 months of age � Continue with your child's usual milk or a nutrient energy dense infant formula around 12 � 16oz � Main meals should include protein e.g. chicken, fish, beans, lentils, meat along with veggies and starch e.g. potato, rice, pasta � If your child needs to gain weight add 2 teaspoons of smooth nut butter to each meal including porridge at breakfast � Keep offering new foods � although it should not touch any favourite food � At this age children start not to need as many calories to gain weight as they did when they were babies � Eats ground, mashed, or chopped table foods (including soft pieces of meat chopped cut up very small) by 15 months � All finger food should still be soft, must fit easily into your child's hand and be just the right size to easily fit into your child's mouth � Know when your child has had enough � signs include starting to play with food, tries to get out of their high chair From 19�24 months of age � Continue with your child's usual milk or a nutrient energy dense infant formula around 10 � 12 oz � Main meals should include protein e.g. chicken, fish, beans, lentils, meat along with veggies and starch e.g. potato, rice, pasta � If your child needs to gain weight add 2-3 teaspoons of smooth nut butter to each meal including porridge at breakfast � Keep offering new foods � although it should not touch any favourite food � Food refusal of favourite or new foods is common around this age � your child will start to show clear likes and dislikes � Chopped texture, small soft pieces including adult style foods � Offer foods with a firmer texture to promote chewing skills � At this age children chew with up/ down and side to side action � All finger food must fit easily into your child's hand and be just the right size to easily fit into your child's mouth � Know when your child has had enough � signs include starting to play with food, tries to get down from the table � Encourage sitting at the table � children should not be walking/running when eating � Encourage the use of small child size utensils e.g. fork, spoon � Is able to feed themselves using a spoon � with less spills � Able to keep their mouth closed when chewing and swallowing � Start to stab food with a fork and get it to the mouth � Should have adult supervision at meal/ snack times � Some young children start to eat very fast � encourage them to eat slowly chewing their food � Mealtimes should last for up to 20 minutes From 2 years to 5 years of age � Continue with your child's usual milk or a nutrient energy dense infant formula around 10 � 12oz � Main meals should include protein e.g. chicken, fish, beans, lentils, meat along with veggies and starch e.g. potato, rice, pasta � If your child needs to gain weight add 2�4 teaspoons of smooth nut butter to each meal including porridge at breakfast � Keep offering new foods � although it should not touch any favourite foods � May become a "fussy eater" refusing foods that were previously liked � By three years of age your child should be able to eat the same foods as the rest of the family � All finger food must fit easily into your child's hand and be just the right size to easily fit into your child's mouth � Know when your child has had enough � signs include starting to play with food, tries to get down from the table Food and Feeding Advice Finger foods From 12�18 months of age � The best types of foods to start off with are ones that dissolve easily e.g. sweetcorn puffs. � Dissolving foods melt evenly in the mouth without leaving lumps e.g. wotsits � These types of food help with chewing skills as your little one needs enough skill to be able to hold the food in the mouth until it melts � Other good finger foods to then move onto are steamed well cooked carrots sticks, banana, avocado, soft pear, soft flaky fish, toast finger, pasta shells All finger food should be soft, easily fit into your child's hand and be just the right size to easily fit into their mouth. Cooked soft finger shaped foods are helpful rather than round shapes. From 19�24 months of age � Even with finger foods children should be sat down � they should never eat and walk/run � As your child's skills increase they will be able to manage different types of soft food � It is sometimes useful to offer these foods as in between meals snacks so you and your little one can enjoy them exploring new foods and textures together All finger food should be soft, easily fit into your child's hand and be just the right size to easily fit into their mouth. Cooked soft finger shaped foods are helpful rather than round shapes. From 2 years to 5 years of age � Always sit with your children when they are eating any food including finger foods � As a snack offer soft cooked vegetables and dips in small pots � It is sometimes useful to offer these foods as in between meals snacks so you and your little one can enjoy them exploring new foods and textures together All finger food should be soft, easily fit into your child's hand and be just the right size to easily fit into their mouth. Cooked soft finger shaped foods are helpful rather than round shapes. Textures Choking hazards Mealtimes � Should sit on a high chair � Is able to feed themselves using a spoon � although expect some food to drop off � It is common for a little bit of food or saliva to still fall out of their mouth � Encourage self feeding � Should have adult supervision � Offer drinks from a sippy cup � Should have adult supervision at meal/ snack times � Mealtimes should last for up to 20 minutes � Encourage sitting at the table � children should not be walking/running when eating � Your child will have definite food likes and dislikes and may refuse certain foods � Continue to encourage new foods � which may take 15 tries before being accepted � Drinks from a cup or beaker � Encourage independent feeding using small child size utensils e.g. fork, spoon � A spoon and fork should be held between the fingers palm up. Introduce a child size knife for practice � Should have adult supervision at meal/ snack times � encourage slow eating � Mealtimes should last for up to 20 minutes � Some types of food are a choking hazard and should be avoided in babies and young children � This list may not included everything � so it is important that you sit with your little one at each meal & snack time � Young children should be encouraged to sit down and eat rather than run around � Hard lumps of any size should be avoided � Raw vegetables are often hard � so offer soft cooked sticks e.g. carrot, courgette and celery � Hard pieces of raw fruit such as apple and pear should not be given � Avoid slippery foods such as pieces of canned fruit � cut them up into small pieces or mashed e.g. sweet corn kernels; � Hard lumps of any size should be avoided in children under the age of 3 years, as they require very developed chewing skills. � Raw vegetables, hard or stringy meat, hard peas and beans, hard dried fruit, toasted or hard sugar syrup coated cereals and `granola' type products and hard crisp or chip products are all examples of foods that should be avoided. � For toddler and young children all finger foods should be cut in short thin stick e.g. lengthways rather than then being round in shape, as this reduces the risk of choking - Mini sausages / mini scotch egg balls - Cut whole grapes, berries, cherries, melon balls, cherry / plum tomatoes lengthways into quarters - Cut orange / satsuma segments into quarters � take the pips out - Chunks of fish flaked should be checked for bones * Suggested feeding times: 8-9 am, 11-1 pm, 4-5pm with milk before or with breakfast and just before bedtime (ensure you brush you little children's teeth at least twice a day e.g. after breakfast and before bed) 14 15 Simple week meal planner From 12 months of age Day With or before breakfast Child's usual milk Breakfast Mid morning Lunch Evening meal Before bed Child's usual milk MONDAY Porridge with milk, peaches & granola (ground into a fine crumb) Vegetable sticks & hummus Mini packed lunch* Meat, chicken or fish based ready prepared child's food Fruit pot Meat, chicken or fish based ready prepared child's food Yogurt Meat, chicken or fish based ready prepared child's food Oat based pudding Meat, chicken or fish based ready prepared child's food Fruit pot Meat, chicken or fish based ready prepared child's food Fruit pot Meat, chicken or fish based ready prepared child's food Oat based pudding Meat, chicken or fish based ready prepared child's food Custard TUESDAY Child's usual milk Toast with smooth peanut butter & banana Porridge with milk, peaches & ground almonds Toast with smooth almond butter & jam Grated cheese, cherry tomatoes & grapes Asparagus wrapped in ham Mini packed lunch* Child's usual milk WEDNESDAY Child's usual milk Mini packed lunch* Child's usual milk THURSDAY Child's usual milk Broccoli, olives & breadsticks Mini packed lunch* Child's usual milk FRIDAY Child's usual milk Porridge with milk & dates, prunes Baby sweetcorn, mange tout & avocado Baby sweetcorn, mange tout & avocado Vegetable sticks & mashed avocado Mini packed lunch* Child's usual milk SATURDAY Child's usual milk Toast with smooth peanut butter & marmite Porridge with milk, raspberry & ground almonds Mini packed lunch* Child's usual milk SUNDAY Child's usual milk Mini packed lunch* Child's usual milk NOTES: A. Children between the ages of 1 and 3 need to have around 350mg of calcium a day. About 300ml of milk will provide this. Non-dairy calcium enriched drinks may also be used. B. All round or slippery foods e.g. olives, cherry tomatoes, grapes, cucumber should be cut lengthways into thirds or quarters. Where possible they should also be peeled. C. Children should eat sitting down and be supervised at all times whilst eating D. Hard foods such as carrots should be lightly cooked E. *Mini packed lunch � see the recipes for lunch boxes below � these can be adapted for the age of your child and what textures of food they can eat e.g. fork mashed F. If your child needs to gain weight add: 1 � 2 teaspoons of Marvelous nut dust or smooth peanut butter to each main meal 16 17 Shopping list For the recipes you can buy fresh, frozen or tinned fruit and vegetables. All of these ingredients are available in budget as well as other supermarkets. Fr ui t & Ve gg ies � Frozen pe as ixe d pe pp ers � Frozen /f re sh m rn � Frozen swee t co rrot s � Frozen /f re sh ca sh, ge m sq ua sh � Bu tter nu t sq ua swee t po tato � Swee t po tato, ble Ka le, ca bb age, � Al l gree n ve ge ta urge tte, gree n Br us se l Spro uts, co ga r sn ap pe as, be ans, cucum be r, su li, runner be ans m ange to ut, broc co pa rs ni ps � Swede, tu rn ip s, s , pi ne apple , ch er rie � Banana, m ango es ache s, ne ctar in (withou t stones), pe � Av oc ado spbe rr ies � Frozen /f re sh ra ue be rr ies � Frozen /f re sh bl ango � Frozen /f re sh m in ju ice � Ti nned pe ache s ju ice � Ti nned pr unes in ric ot s � Re ad y to eat ap � Su lta na s Nut bu tters (n o adde d suga r va rie tie s) � Smoo th pe an ut bu tter � Smoo th ca sh ew bu tter � Smoo th almon d bu tter Pu ls es & grai ns � Ch ic kp ea, be an or gram flo ur � Ti nned ch ic kp ea s � Le nt ils � gree n an d re d � Grou nd almon ds � Q ui no a Oi ls � Co co nu t crea m � Ol ive oi l Fi sh & meat � Whi te or oi ly fish � Lam b � Be ef � Ch ic ke n He rb s & sp ice s in t � Frozen /f re sh m ri an de r � Frozen /f re sh co nger � Frozen /f re sh gi ic � Grou nd tu rmer namon � Grou nd cin 18 19 Recipes � Breakfasts � Power energy balls � Warming soups � Bento boxes � Family favourites � Sweet things 20 21 Marvelous nut dust This Marvelous nut mix is bursting with goodness � nutritious nuts are rich in protein, fats, energy and micronutrients. For those who are trying to make the most out of every mouthful use the Marvelous nut dust on cereal in the morning, an added crunch to a pitta pocket or sprinkled on pasta and rice dishes to provide an unexpected flavour burst. The Marvelous nut dust can be spiced up with some dried chili flakes. Granola Ingredients � � � � � 100g Pistachios 100g Almonds 100g Pecan nuts 100g Walnuts 100g Brazil nuts Other kinds of nuts that can be included: � � � � Macadamia Hazelnuts Chestnuts Peanuts Ingredients � � � � � � 300g oats 200g chopped nuts (almonds, pistachio, hazelnuts) 50g dried apricots 45g (3 tablespoons) golden syrup 2 tablespoons of olive oil � teaspoon vanilla extract Method 1. Where possible buy ground nuts e.g. ground almonds 2. For whole nuts, use a hand held blender or mini food processor to blitz the nuts into a fine dust. For larger nuts such as Brazils cut into pieces before blitzing 3. Store in an airtight container Method 1. Heat the oven to 200oC / 180oC fan / gas mark 6 2. Add all of the ingredients to a mixing bowl and stir until everything is covered in golden syrup/oil � it may be easier to mix using your hands 3. Spread the mixture in a thin layer on a baking sheet (use greaseproof paper) 4. Bake for 10 minutes until lightly toasted 5. Cool before storing then crumble into small pieces 6. Store in an airtight container for up to 2 weeks Nutrition content per 100g 655 kcal / 14.5g protein Serving suggestion 1 tablespoon = 15g � 100kcal / 2.3 protein Serving suggestion Important to note: � For children under the age of 5, nut dust should be ground into a fine crumb with no hard lumps or chunks of nuts which may be a choking hazards � As there is a choking risk with crumbs, it is also important the nut dust is mixed well into food and not offered only as dust � The nut dust should be kept in a sealed container out of the reach of young children � If your child has a nut allergy do not use the Marvelous nut dust in food. If there is a history of nut allergies in the family and you are unsure if your child can tolerate nuts, please discuss nut introduction with your Health Care Professional. Add 2 � 3 tbsp to your usual cereal and milk Important to note: � For children under the age of 5, Granola is not suitable and should be ground into a fine crumb with no hard lumps or chunks which may be a choking hazards � As there is a choking risk with fine crumbs, it is also important the granola crumb is mixed well into food. � The granola should be kept in a sealed container out of the reach of young children. 22 23 Breakfast porridge Ingredients � 50g rolled oats � 300ml full cream milk or your child's usual milk � Pinch of salt Prunes, dates & ground almonds Ingredients � 150g tinned prunes in juice � 30g ready to eat apricots � 20g (2 tablespoons) ground almonds Method 1. Place the tinned prunes and ready to eat apricots (approximately 8) with the prune juice in a pan and simmer on a low heat for 5 minutes or until the fruit is soft 2. Add in 20g or 2 tablespoons of ground almonds 3. Using a stick blender, puree ingredients until smooth 4. Portion into ice cube trays Method 1. Add the oats and full cream milk to a pan 2. Place on a medium heat 3. As the mixture starts to bubble, stir well 4. Once it is thick, take off the heat and serve in a bowl 5. Add your favourite topping (from the following pages) and eat whilst warm Serving suggestion 2 � 3 cubes added to your porridge Important to note: � Instant porridge can be used following manufacturer's instructions, rather than making your own � If you don't like hot porridges you can add one more of the toppings below to your usual cereal with milk, to which you can add a dollop of yogurt 24 25 Peaches, sultanas & ground almonds Ingredients � 150g tinned peaches in juice � 30g sultanas � 40g (4 tablespoons) ground almonds Mango & almond butter Ingredients � 200g fresh mango � 30g (6 level teaspoons) almond butter Method 1. Peel and chop the fresh mango into chunks 2. Place in a bowl along with 30g smooth almond butter (6 level teaspoons) 3. Using a stick blender, puree until smooth 4. Portion into ice cube trays Method 1. Place the tinned peaches, juice and sultanas in a pan and simmer on a low heat for 5 minutes 2. Add in 40g or 4 tablespoons of ground almonds 3. Using a stick blender, puree until smooth 4. Portion into ice cube trays Serving suggestion (both) Serving suggestion 2 � 3 cubes added to your porridge 2 � 3 cubes added to your porridge Raspberry, banana & almonds Ingredients � 200g fresh or frozen raspberries � 200g banana � 50g ground almonds Method 1. Peel and chop the banana into chunks 2. Put the raspberries into a bowl along with the banana and ground almonds 3. Using a stick blender, puree until smooth 4. If the puree is a little thick add a splash of almond milk/whole milk 5. Portion into ice cube trays 26 27 POWER ENERGY BALLS Date & apricot power balls These are great for little mouths as between meal snacks or as part of a dessert with some fresh fruit. Dino soup Ingredients � � � � � � � WARMING SOUPS Method � � � � � 500ml water 150ml single cream 1 tablespoon of olive oil Salt and pepper Home made croutons e.g. soft bread cut into small cubes 1. Heat the oil in a large saucepan over a medium heat 2. Add in the finely chopped celery, onion and cook until soft 3. Add in the broccoli, courgettes, peas, basil, chicken stock and water 4. Bring to the boil and cook until the vegetables are tender (5 minutes) 5. Using a stick blender carefully blend until the soup is smooth 6. Add in the single cream and seasoning 7. Serve the soup in bowls or teacups, sprinkle with croutons � this makes a great between meal snack Ingredients � 250g walnuts or ground almonds, or other nut/seed of choice � 250g shredded unsweetened coconut � 320g soft Medjool dates, pitted � 2 tablespoons sunflower oil � � teaspoon sea salt � 1 teaspoon vanilla extract 400g broccoli 400g frozen peas 400g courgettes 2 sticks of celery 2 onions finely chopped Small packet of basil 500ml chicken stock Important to note: � For children between the ages of 1 � 3 years of age, offer small cubes of soft bread dipped in the soup instead of ready to eat croutons which are too are too hard for young children and may pose a choking risk. Method 1. Roughly chop the dates 2. Keep � of the coconut to one side in a bowl for rolling the balls in, to coat them in coconut 3. Put all of the ingredients into a bowl. Using a hand held whisk or food processor blitz until it is a smooth paste 4. Take a teaspoon or tablespoon of mixture (depending on the size of ball you want) and roll into a ball 5. Roll the ball in the coconut 6. Place on parchment or greaseproof paper 7. When finished rolling the balls, put them in a greaseproof paper lined container and put them in the freezer 8. Pop a few in a snack box or as a dessert � can be eaten frozen! 28 29 Super hero orange soup Ingredients � � � � � � � � 800g butternut squash 400g sweet potatoes 2 sticks of celery 2 onions finely chopped Small packet of coriander 500ml chicken stock 500ml water 50ml orange juice � 150ml coconut cream � 2 tablespoons nut butter � Small pinch of chili (optional) � 1 tablespoon of olive oil � Salt and pepper � Home made croutons e.g. soft bread cut into small cubes WARMING SOUPS Bento boxes Method 1. Heat the oil in a large saucepan over a medium heat 2. Add in the finely chopped celery, onion and cook until soft 3. Add in the butternut squash, basil, chicken stock, orange juice, coconut cream, chili (optional), seasoning and water 4. Bring to the boil and cook until the vegetables are tender (25 � 30 minutes) 5. Using a stick blender carefully blend until the soup is smooth 6. Serve the soup in bowls or teacups, sprinkle with home-made croutons � this makes a great in between meal snack Important to note: � Use home made croutons using small cubes of soft bread. Ready to eat croutons are too hard for young children and may pose a choking risk. 30 31 BENTO BOXES Fusilli, ham, peas & cheese Ingredients � � � � � � Photo 1 Ham & cheese pitta & fresh fruit Ingredients � Small toasted wholemeal pitta, cut into strips � Handful of grated cheese � Slice of ham � Olives � Red pepper � Passion fruit, figs, grapes (or other seasonal fruit) BENTO BOXES � Edamame or green beans 50g fusilli � Pomegranate seeds 1�2 slices of ham � Grapes 25g frozen peas � Pear 30g grated cheese Carrots ribbons 1 teaspoon Marvelous nut dust Method 1. Cook some fusilli in boiling water until al dente (has a bite to it), add the peas and cook for a further 1 � 2 minutes 2. Whilst the pasta is cooking shred the ham and grate the cheese 3. To the hot drained pasta add the ham, Marvelous nut dust and grated cheese mixing well 4. Using a vegetable peeler make some carrot ribbons 5. Take 10 � 15 edamame beans and thread onto a food pick or plastic skewer 6. Cut the fruit lengthways, add a few pomegranate seeds 7. Put into the bento box Photo 3 Photo 2 Method 1. Arrange the pitta strips in the Bento box with the ham and grated cheese 2. Put the olives, cut length ways in half or quarters with the lightly steamed red pepper pieces 3. Arrange the fresh fruit in the other side of the Bento box, peel and cut grapes length ways in half or quarters 4. Use a child size soft teaspoon to scoop the inside of a fig or passion fruit (Photo 3) Photo 4 Important to note: � All vegetable and fruit should be washed before eating � Lightly steam hard vegetables � All vegetables and fruit should be cut length ways into small pieces, and some will need to be peeled � Recipes can be change to inclu
Url: /Media/UHS-website-2019/Docs/Services/Child-health/DietaryAdvice/Recipe-book-For-toddlers-who-need-to-make-the-most-of-every-mouthful.pdf

Surgeon calls for all patients to be offered music therapy during procedures

Description: A leading surgeon has said all patients should be offered the chance to listen to music during their procedures to reduce pain and anxiety.
Url: /AboutTheTrust/Newsandpublications/Latestnews/2017/December-2017/Surgeon-calls-for-all-patients-to-be-offered-music-therapy-during-procedures.aspx

Hospital bosses thank staff for "amazing effort" and urge people to stay at home

Description: Bosses at Southampton's university hospitals have thanked staff for a "truly amazing effort" over the past 24 hours and are now urging people to stay at home where possible to prevent additional pressure on stretched services.
Url: /AboutTheTrust/Newsandpublications/Latestnews/2018/March-2018/Hospital-bosses-thank-staff-for-amazing-effort-and-urge-people-to-stay-at-home.aspx

Pre-eclampsia - patient information

Description: This factsheet explains what pre-eclampsia is, what causes it, and the steps you and your maternity team can take to prevent and manage it.
Url: /Media/UHS-website-2019/Patientinformation/Pregnancyandbirth/Pre-eclampsia-4046-PIL.pdf

Segmentectomy (VATS or RATS) - patient information

Description: This booklet explains what a segmentectomy is, what the procedure involves, and the benefits and risks.
Url: /Media/UHS-website-2019/Patientinformation/Cardiovascular-and-thoracic/Segmentectomy-VATS-or-RATS-3205-PIL.pdf

1 to 10 of 161

Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … Next

Browse site A to Z

Search results

Blood loss – what to expect after the birth of your baby - patient information

Papers Trust Board 27 May 2021

Papers Trust Board 28 March 2019

Annual-report-201617

PDF document

Recipe book - For toddlers who need to make the most of every mouthful

Surgeon calls for all patients to be offered music therapy during procedures

Hospital bosses thank staff for "amazing effort" and urge people to stay at home

Pre-eclampsia - patient information

Segmentectomy (VATS or RATS) - patient information

Site policies

Contact details

Useful links