Browser does not support script.
Browser does not support script.
Browser does not support script.
Browser does not support script.
Browser does not support script.
Browser does not support script.
Browser does not support script.
Browser does not support script.
Browser does not support script.
Clinical Research in Southampton
Southampton Children's Hospital
A
A
A
Text only
| Accessibility | Privacy and cookies
"Helpful, informative, polite and friendly staff put my mind at ease"
Patient feedback
Home
About the Trust
Our services
Patients and visitors
Our hospitals
Education
Research
Working here
Contact us
You are here:
Home
>
Search results
Search
Browse site A to Z
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
Search results
Go To Advanced Search
Search
Enquiry form
Description
Trials and facilities Auto Generated Title
Url
/ClinicalResearchinSouthampton/Public-and-patients/Enquiry-form.aspx
STHW869 Antibiotic Guideline Ranges 2021 - 2022
Description
Antimicrobial Reference Laboratory GUIDELINE RANGES FOR TDM 2021 - 2022 Alan Noel Antimicrobial Reference Laboratory North Bristol NHS Trust Southmead Hospital Bristol
Url
/Media/SUHTExtranet/DepartmentOfInfection/STHW869-Antibiotic-Guideline-Ranges-2021-2022.pdf
Papers Trust Board 6 June 2024
Description
Date Time Location Chair Apologies Agenda Trust Board – Open Session 06/06/2024 9:00 - 13:00 Conference Room, Heartbeat/Microsoft Teams Jenni Douglas-Todd Diana Eccles, Tim Peachey (from 12:00) 1 Chair’s Welcome, Apologies and Declarations of Interest 9:00 Note apologies for absence, and to hear any declarations of interest relating to any item on the Agenda. 2 Patient Story The patient or staff story provides an opportunity for the Board to reflect on the experiences of patients and staff within the Trust and understand what the Trust could do better. 3 Minutes of Previous Meeting held on 28 March 2024 9:15 Approve the minutes of the previous meeting held on 28 March 2024 4 Matters Arising and Summary of Agreed Actions To discuss any matters arising from the minutes, and to agree on the status of any actions assigned at the previous meeting. 5 QUALITY, PERFORMANCE and FINANCE Quality includes: clinical effectiveness, patient safety, and patient experience 5.1 Briefing from the Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee (Oral) 9:20 Keith Evans, Chair 5.2 Briefing from the Chair of the Finance and Investment Committee (Oral) 9:25 Dave Bennett, Chair 5.3 Briefing from the Chair of the People and Organisational Development 9:30 Committee (Oral) Jane Harwood, Chair 5.4 Briefing from the Chair of the Quality Committee (Oral) 9:35 Tim Peachey, Chair 5.5 Chief Executive Officer's Report 9:40 Receive and note the report Sponsor: David French, Chief Executive Officer 5.6 Performance KPI Report for Month 1 10:00 Review and discuss the report Sponsor: David French, Chief Executive Officer 5.7 Finance Report for Month 1 10:30 Review and discuss the report Sponsor: Ian Howard, Chief Financial Officer 5.8 Break 10:45 5.9 People Report for Month 1 10:55 Review and discuss the report Sponsor: Steve Harris, Chief People Officer 5.10 Infection Prevention and Control 2023-24 Annual Report 11:10 Receive and discuss Sponsor: Gail Byrne, Chief Nursing Officer Attendees: Julian Sutton, Interim Lead Infection Control Director/Sue Dailly, Infection Prevention Matron 5.11 Learning from Deaths 2023-24 Quarter 4 Report 11:20 Review and discuss the report Sponsor: Paul Grundy, Chief Medical Officer Attendee: Jenny Milner, Associate Director of Patient Experience 5.12 Freedom to Speak Up Report 11:30 Review and discuss the report Sponsor: Gail Byrne, Chief Nursing Officer Attendee: Christine Mbabazi, Equality & Inclusion Adviser/Freedom to Speak Up Guardian 5.13 Fuller Inquiry Report 11:45 Receive and note the report Sponsor: David French, Chief Executive Officer Attendee: Gavin Hawkins, Divisional Director of Operations, Division B 6 STRATEGY and BUSINESS PLANNING 6.1 CRN Wessex 2023-24 Annual Performance Report 11:55 Receive and note the annual report Sponsor: Paul Grundy, Chief Medical Officer Attendee: Clare Rook, Chief Operating Officer, CRN: Wessex 6.2 Board Assurance Framework (BAF) Update 12:10 Review and discuss the update Sponsor: Gail Byrne, Chief Nursing Officer Attendees: Craig Machell, Associate Director of Corporate Affairs and Company Secretary/Lauren Anderson, Corporate Governance and Risk Manager Page 2 7 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, RISK and INTERNAL CONTROL 7.1 Feedback from the Council of Governors' (CoG) Meeting 1 May 2024 12:25 (Oral) Sponsor: Jenni Douglas-Todd, Trust Chair 7.2 Register of Seals and Chair's Actions Report 12:30 Receive and ratify In compliance with the Trust Standing Orders, Financial Instructions, and the Scheme of Reservation and Delegation. Sponsor: Jenni Douglas-Todd, Trust Chair 8 Any other business 12:35 Raise any relevant or urgent matters that are not on the agenda 9 Note the date of the next meeting: 25 July 2024 10 Resolution regarding the Press, Public and Others Sponsor: Jenni Douglas-Todd, Trust Chair To agree, as permitted by the National Health Service Act 2006 (as amended), the Trust's Constitution and the Standing Orders of the Board of Directors, that representatives of the press, members of the public and others not invited to attend to the next part of the meeting be excluded due to the confidential nature of the business to be transacted. 11 Follow-up discussion with governors 12:45 Page 3 Minutes Trust Board – Open Session Date Time 28/03/2024 9:00 – 13:00 Location Chair Microsoft Teams Jenni Douglas-Todd (JD-T) Present Dave Bennett, NED (DB) Gail Byrne, Chief Nursing Officer (GB) Jenni Douglas-Todd, Chair (JD-T) Keith Evans, Deputy Chair and NED (KE) David French, Chief Executive Officer (DAF) Paul Grundy, Chief Medical Officer (PG) Steve Harris, Chief People Officer (SH) Jane Harwood, NED/Senior Independent Director (JH) Ian Howard, Chief Financial Officer (IH) Tim Peachey, NED (TP) Joe Teape, Chief Operating Officer (JT) In attendance Martin De Sousa, Director of Strategy and Partnerships (MDeS) Craig Machell, Associate Director of Corporate Affairs and Company Secretary (CM) Lauren Anderson, Corporate Governance and Risk Manager (LA) (item 6.1) Ceri Connor, Director of OD and Inclusion (CC) (item 4.12) Diana Hulbert, Guardian of Safe Working Hours and Emergency Department Consultant (DH) (item 4.14) Sophie Limb, HR Project Manager (SL) (item 4.12) 1 member of the public (item 5) 6 governors (observing) 5 members of staff (observing) 1 members of the public (observing) Apologies Diana Eccles, NED (DE) 1. Chair’s Welcome, Apologies and Declarations of Interest The Chair welcomed attendees to the meeting. There were no interests to declare in the business to be transacted at the meeting. It was noted that apologies had been received from Diana Eccles. The Chair provided an overview of her activities since February 2024, including visits to hospital departments, meetings with peers and other key stakeholders. 2. Minutes of the Previous Meeting held on 30 January 2024 The draft minutes tabled to the meeting were agreed to be an accurate record of the meeting held on 30 January 2024, subject to amending a reference to ‘radiology’ on page four to ‘radiotherapy’. 3. Matters Arising and Summary of Agreed Actions It was noted that all actions had been completed or were not yet due. Page 1 In terms of action 1102, the service was provided by NHS Blood and Transfusion, and funding had been removed. 4. QUALITY, PERFORMANCE and FINANCE 4.1 Briefing from the Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee The chair of the Audit and Risk Committee was invited to provide an overview of the meeting held on 18 March 2024. It was noted that: • The committee had reviewed the losses and special payments report and noted that although the individual size of each occurrence was not material, these instances nonetheless did have a significant impact on individual patients. • The committee reviewed the Board Assurance Framework (item 6.1). • The committee reviewed an internal audit report on data quality and noted that there were only some minor matters to address. In addition, there were no outstanding actions from previous reports. • The committee reviewed the internal audit plan for 2024/25, which would include examination of long waiters, the discharge process and rostering. • The external audit plan for the 2023/24 financial year was agreed. 4.2 Briefing from the Chair of the Charitable Funds Committee Steve Harris was invited to provide an overview of the meeting held on 27 March 2024. It was noted that: • The charity was in a position to transfer to the new charitable company. • Gail Byrne would be appointed as a director of the new charitable company on a temporary basis to represent the Trust. • The annual report and accounts for 2023/24 would be the final item of business requiring Board approval. 4.3 Briefing from the Chair of the Finance and Investment Committee The chair of the Finance and Investment Committee was invited to provide an overview of the meeting held on 25 March 2024. It was noted that: • The committee reviewed the Finance Report for Month 11 (item 4.10) and the planning for 2024/25, noting that the underlying position presented a challenge for 2024/25. • The committee reviewed the Trust’s productivity assessed against that in 2018/19. The NHS England formula showed a 18% decline in the Trust’s performance. However, the basis of the formula was open to debate and the perception in the organisation was different given the demands on the Trust’s capacity. The Trust’s modified formula showed a lower decline in productivity and work was ongoing with the central team. • The committee reviewed the maintenance requirements in the Trust’s estate, which were significant owing to its age. • The committee reviewed the proposed capital prioritisation for 2024/25 and 2025/26. 4.4 Briefing from the Chair of the People and Organisational Development Committee The chair of the People and Organisational Development Committee was invited to provide an overview of the meeting held on 20 March 2024. It was noted that: • The committee reviewed the People Report for Month 11 (item 4.11) and noted that the additional recruitment controls were having an impact. Page 2 • The committee reviewed the Staff Survey results (item 4.12), noting that key themes were staff burnout and morale. 4.5 Briefing from the Chair of the Quality Committee The chair of the Quality Committee was invited to provide an overview of the meeting held on 18 March 2024. It was noted that: • The committee reviewed the patient safety and experience reports for the third quarter and noted some concerns regarding infection prevention control and pressure ulcers. In addition, there was some concern about overcrowding in the resuscitation area. • The committee had carried out a thematic review of never events, especially in Dermatology. • The committee reviewed the Trust’s performance in terms of its quality priorities for 2023/24. The Trust had achieved all its objectives, except one, which had been partially achieved. It was intended that there would be eight quality priorities in 2024/25. • It had been confirmed that the Integrated Care Board would fund the tobacco dependency programme in 2024/25. • Work was also taking place to provide additional capacity in the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit. 4.6 Chief Executive Officer’s Report David French was invited to present the Chief Executive Officer’s Report, the content of which was noted. It was further noted that: • The Hampshire and Isle of Wight Integrated Care Board (HIOW ICB) had launched a consultation on how it will re-shape itself for the future. The ICB had been required to reduce its running costs by 20% during 2024/25 and by a further 10% during 2025/26. • Junior doctors had voted to continue industrial action for a further six months. • In the Spring Budget, the Chancellor announced additional funding for the NHS, although, once inflation had been taken into account, the NHS budget would remain broadly flat. • The NHS England Workforce Race Equality Standard data report showed some improvements, but further work was required. • Steve Brine, the Member of Parliament for Winchester and Chandler’s Ford had been hosted by the Trust on a visit the week before. This afforded an opportunity to discuss the Hampshire County Council consultation, social care and non-criteria to reside. • The latest NHS patient survey showed a reduction in satisfaction, but this was largely due to waiting to get into the system. • There was significant pressure from NHS England for trusts to achieve the targets set. The Trust has demonstrated strong performance during 2023/24 across the six targets. • A nurse from the Trust has received a national recognition award based on their work on the ‘Diabasics’ initiative and the first episode of ‘Surgeons at the Edge of Life’, filmed at Southampton General Hospital, had been broadcast on BBC2. • Thanks were expressed to all staff for their performance during the year. 4.7 Performance KPI Report for Month 11 Joe Teape was invited to present the Performance KPI Report for Month 11, the content of which was noted. It was further noted that: • In terms of the Trust’s performance compared with comparators, the Trust was top quartile for the majority of indicators and top half for others. Page 3 • There were 19 patients who would breach the 78-week wait target at year end, 18 of which were corneal patients where materials were unavailable. It was noted that there was a national shortage of materials. • There were expected to be about 50 breaches of the 65-week wait target, of which around 30 were corneal patients. • The Trust had achieved diagnostic performance of 92% achieving the sixweek target. • There had been high volumes of patients in the Emergency Department during February and March 2024. However, the Trust had achieved 70.6% for type 1 performance and expected to achieve the 76% target by the end of March 2024. • The Trust’s Referral To Treatment metric was beginning to improve and there were some examples of very good waiting list management in Trauma and Orthopaedics and in Women and New Born. • The key point to emphasise was that, although it might not seem so at times, the Trust was out-performing most other comparable organisations. It was considered appropriate that staff communications should be worked on to reinforce this message. In terms of the Trust’s Key Performance Indicators: • The Quality Committee had seen significant improvements in diagnostic performance. • The two-week wait cancer target performance had also improved since April 2023. • Unfortunately, due to significant challenges with flow, overnight ward move performance had dropped significantly during the month, leading to poor patient experience. • In addition, the rate of pressure ulcers appeared to be increasing. 4.8 Non-Criteria to Reside Spotlight Report Joe Teape was invited to present the Non-Criteria to Reside Spotlight Report, the content of which was noted. It was further noted that: • Management of non-criteria to reside patients was one of the Trust’s biggest risks in terms of its operational and financial performance and achievement of its targets. • The Trust has seen 20%+ of beds occupied by patients without criteria to reside, which significantly impacted patient flow in the Emergency Department and has led to ambulance handover delays. • In addition, stays in hospital of longer duration were known to lead to worse patient outcomes. • The Trust was unable to have a significant impact on this issue, as the main driver was insufficient funding availability in local authorities. • In terms of what the Trust could do, work was ongoing to improve the discharge process by having conversations about care needs early on as part of the Trust’s flow transformation programme. 4.9 Break 4.10 Finance Report for Month 11 Ian Howard was invited to present the Finance Report for Month 11, the content of which was noted. It was further noted that: Page 4 • The Trust had received £24.6m of cash support from NHS England and £5m in funding in relation to the impact of industrial action between December 2023 and February 2024. • A year-end deficit of £1.4m was forecast. • The Trust’s underlying monthly deficit was currently £4m, and the Trust’s underlying deficit had been £4-5m a month during 2023/24. • Cost Improvement Programme delivery was expected to be £62m at year end, an increase of £17m compared to the previous year. 4.11 People Report for Month 11 Steve Harris was invited to present the People Report for Month 11, the content of which was noted. It was further noted that: • Total workforce had reduced by 20 whole-time equivalents (WTE) during the month, although the Trust remained 266 WTE above plan. • Use of bank staff had reduced, although it was expected that more bank staff would be used in March 2024 as substantive staff used leftover annual leave before year end. • Average turnover was 11%, below the target of 13.6%. The Board discussed the report and noted that it was necessary to review training expectations in order to make best use of staff time. In addition, it was noted that funding for internationally recruited nurses was likely to reduce and that apprentice and student nurse numbers had reduced. 4.12 UHS Staff Survey Results 2023 Report Ceri Connor, Sophie Limb and Steve Harris were invited to present the UHS Staff Survey Results 2023 Report, the content of which was noted. It was further noted that: • The Trust scored above average in all of the People Promise areas and there had been an improvement in the areas regarding managers and appraisals. • However, the overall NHS average had increased, thus narrowing the gap. • The participation rate was lower than in the previous year and the overall scores hid pockets of concern. The Board discussed the results of the Staff Survey. It was noted in particular that the Trust had invested significant sums into wellbeing, but that morale was low. It was considered that this demonstrated the importance of local management to staff morale. In addition, the Board discussed the impact of the change in approach from granting significant autonomy during the pandemic to increasing levels of control, which had been received negatively by staff. However, it was noted that, whilst in some areas, such as with regard to patients, there was a general culture of accountability, there appeared to be less of a general culture of accountability with respect to finances and budgets. The possibility of ‘earned’ autonomy was considered as a means of mitigating against those who had acted properly being penalised by the actions of others. Page 5 4.13 Maternity and Neonatal Perinatal Quality Surveillance Dashboard Report The Maternity and Neonatal Perinatal Quality Surveillance Dashboard Report was noted. It was further noted that the additional information in respect of post-partum haemorrhage data (action 1101) was contained within the report and had been discussed at a maternity safety champions’ meeting. 4.14 Guardian of Safe Working Hours Quarterly Report Diana Hulbert was invited to present the Guardian of Safe Working Hours Quarterly Report, the content of which was noted. It was further noted that: • There had been seven exception reports constituting a breach and resulting in a financial penalty, which were due to exceeding the maximum 13-hour shift duration. All reports were from General Surgery. • There were also concerns in Gynaecology due to the complicated rotas, inadequate rest provision and facilities. • The position of a junior doctor was a difficult one due to a lack of patient contact during the pandemic, industrial action and changes in the assignment of foundation posts. Action: Paul Grundy and Diana Hulbert agreed to include an item regarding junior doctors on a future Trust Board Study Session agenda. 5. Patient Story David Livermore was invited to relate his experience of attending an appointment at the Eye Unit in October 2023 and, in particular, the difficulties he encountered as a wheelchair user. It was noted that his treatment had been carried out in a room inappropriate for his needs and that he had been asked personal questions in the waiting room. Following discussion with the Board of his experiences, David Livermore offered his services to the Trust to advise on disability access as an ‘expert patient’. 6. STRATEGY and BUSINESS PLANNING 6.1 Board Assurance Framework (BAF) Update Lauren Anderson was invited to present the Board Assurance Framework (BAF) update, the content of which was noted. It was further noted that: • The Trust’s Risk Management Policy and Strategy had been updated, with the main changes being in relation to the Trust’s risk appetite following the Trust Board Study Session held in December 2023. • Work was being carried out to improve the Board’s visibility of operational risks and to improve links between operational risks and the BAF. Page 6 7. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, RISK and INTERNAL CONTROL 7.1 Register of Seals and Chair’s Actions Report The paper ‘Register of Seals and Chair’s Actions Report’ was presented to the meeting, the content of which was noted. Decision: The Board agreed to ratify the application of the Trust Seal to the documents listed in the ‘Register of Seals and Chair’s Actions Report’. 7.2 Remuneration and Appointment Committee Terms of Reference It was noted that the Remuneration and Appointment Committee had reviewed its terms of reference at its meeting held on 28 March 2024. It was further noted that some minor changes were proposed, largely to update references to documentation and NHS organisations, and, in terms of the executive pay guidance, to better reflect current practice and the available frameworks. Decision: Having reviewed the Remuneration and Appointment Committee terms of reference tabled to the meeting, it was agreed to approve these terms of reference. 8. Any other business There was no other business. 9. Note the date of the next meeting: 6 June 2024 10. Resolution regarding the Press, Public and Others Decision: The Board resolved that, as permitted by the National Health Service Act 2006 (as amended), the Trust’s Constitution and the Standing Orders of the board of directors, that representatives of the press, members of the public and others not invited to attend to the next part of the meeting be excluded due to the confidential nature of the business to be transacted. The meeting was adjourned. Page 7 List of action items Agenda item Assigned to Deadline Status Trust Board – Open Session 28/03/2024 4.14 Guardian of Safe Working Hours Quarterly Report 1127. Junior Doctors Grundy, Paul Hulbert, Diana 27/06/2024 Pending Explanation action item Paul Grundy and Diana Hulbert agreed to include an item regarding junior doctors on a future Trust Board Study Session agenda. Page 1 of 1 Report to the Trust Board of Directors Title: Agenda item: Sponsor: Date: Purpose: Issue to be addressed: Response to the issue: Chief Executive Officer’s Report 5.5 David French, Chief Executive Officer 6 June 2024 Assurance Approval or reassurance Ratification Information X My report this month covers updates on the following items: • Infected Blood Inquiry • General Election • Industrial Action • HEFMA Award • Capital Funding • 2024/25 Planning The response to each of these issues is covered in the report. Implications: Any implications of these issues are covered in the report. (Clinical, Organisational, Governance, Legal?) Summary: Conclusion The Board is asked to note the report. and/or recommendation Page 1 of 9 Infected Blood Inquiry On 20 May 2024, the Infected Blood Inquiry published its report into more than 30,000 people becoming infected with HIV and hepatitis C after being given contaminated blood products in the 1970s and 1980s. The report said that: • Too little was done to stop importing blood products from abroad, which used blood from high- risk donors such as prisoners and drug addicts; • In the UK, blood donations were accepted from high-risk groups until 1986; • Blood products were not heat treated to eliminate HIV until the end of 1985, although the risks were known in 1982; and • There was too little testing to reduce the risk of hepatitis from the 1970s onwards. The UK Government has established a compensation scheme for those impacted. The report can be read at: http://www.infectedbloodinquiry.org.uk/reports NHS England’s formal response to the report is attached as Appendix 1. During the Inquiry, the Trust was made aware of patient cases which would be cited in the report and was offered an opportunity to comment. We chose not to comment in detail on individual cases, primarily due to the time elapsed since they happened. NHS England has commissioned an ongoing patient support service for those affected and it is likely that UHS will be one of two providers in the region offering this service. Funding for a fiveyear period has been confirmed. General Election The Prime Minister has announced that a general election will be held on 4 July 2024. There are a number of practical implications for the Trust as a public body to maintain political impartiality and to ensure that public resources are not used for the purposes of political parties or campaign groups during the pre-election period which commenced on 25 May 2024 and will continue until the day after the election. During this period, the following key principles should apply: • No activity should be undertaken which could be considered politically controversial or influential. • NHS trusts have discretion in their approach, but must be able to demonstrate the same approach for every political party, official candidate and designated campaign group. • The NHS may be under media spotlight, locally and nationally, so it is advisable to have a plan in place for how the organisation will manage the pre-election period and the potential for the organisation to be singled out in the media. Normal business and regulation needs to continue during the pre-election period. However, where a board meeting needs to take place, the agenda should be confined to those matters requiring a board decision or oversight. Matters of future strategy or future deployment of resources may be construed as favouring one party over another and should be avoided. Use of the confidential part of the agenda to discuss matters which may be politically controversial is not recommended. Care should be taken not to comment on the policies of political parties or campaign groups. Page 2 of 9 Organisations should not start long-term initiatives or undertake major publicity campaigns unless time critical (such as a public health emergency). Public consultations should not be launched during the pre-election period, and it is advisable to extend the period for those already running to take into account the pre-election period. The timing of the election means that formal Secretary of State approval for the Solent / Southern transaction is unlikely to happen before the election and therefore the formation of the new Trust, previously scheduled for 1 June, is likely to be delayed. Industrial Action On 29 May 2024, it was announced that junior doctors would stage a five-day strike, commencing on 27 June 2024 and ending on 2 July 2024. This will be the eleventh walkout by junior doctors since March 2023. As during previous periods of industrial action, the Trust will seek to minimise any impact on patient care by organising consultant cover wherever possible. HEFMA Award Paula Melhuish, Deputy Director of Estates and Capital Development, received the Outstanding Service Award from the Health Estates and Facilities Management Association on 13 May 2024. Paula has been a long-serving and esteemed colleague at UHS and has recently announced her retirement. Capital Funding Due to its Emergency Department performance at the end of 2023/24, the Trust was awarded an additional £2m in capital departmental expenditure limit (CDEL) as part of a scheme to reward high-performing trusts. There were several categories where the top-10 performing trusts received additional CDEL, including absolute ED 4-hour % performance and most improved ED 4-hour performance. NHS England agreed that the type 3 Urgent Treatment Centre attendances at RSH and Lymington should be included in the overall UHS performance and that, combined with significantly improved 4-hour performance at SGH, this meant that UHS was in the national top-10 for absolute ED 4-hour performance. terms of using the CDEL allowance, plans are being developed to increase the department’s same day emergency care (SDEC) capacity. The additional CDEL is not cash-backed so we are in discussions with NHSE regarding the cash funding. 2024/25 Planning The CFO and I will update the Board on the status of the 2024/25 planning round which is not yet finalised. At a meeting in London with NHS England executives, the ICS was asked to improve its position further in return for some financial incentives. This challenge was accepted, although the allocation of this further stretch to individual providers has not yet been agreed. The structure and leadership of the ICS-wide transformation programmes has been reviewed and changed. The structure of the programmes was considered by CEO, Chairs and ICB colleagues and it was agreed there should be six programmes for 2024/25, as set out below. The Board should note that I requested to retain the leadership role on the Planned Care programme, mostly because we have an agreed way forward, have good traction and can now see improvement happening. In addition, I was asked to take on leadership of the Workforce programme which, following discussion with the Chair, I have agreed to do. Page 3 of 9 Programme Mental Health Discharge Urgent and Emergency Care Local Care Planned Care Workforce CEO lead Ron Shields, SHFT Penny Emerit, PHU David Eltringham, SCAS Alex Whitfield, HHFT David French, UHS David French, UHS Each programme has been asked to set out its objectives and deliverables for the year ahead by 18 June 2024. I will share the results of this exercise with the Board in due course. Page 4 of 9 Appendix 1 Classification: Official To: • All integrated care boards and NHS trusts: - chairs - chief executives - medical directors - chief nurses - chief operating officers - chief people officers - heads of primary care - directors of medical education • Primary care networks: - clinical directors cc. • NHS England regions: - directors - chief nurses - medical directors - directors of primary care and community services - directors of commissioning - workforce leads - regional heads of nursing - regional heads of communications NHS England Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG 20 May 2024 Dear colleagues, Publication of the Infected Blood Inquiry final report Earlier today, the Infected Blood Inquiry published its final report at: www.infectedbloodinquiry.org.uk/reports. The Prime Minister has subsequently issued an apology on behalf of successive Governments and the entire British state. On behalf of the NHS in England, now and over previous decades, Amanda Pritchard issued a public apology, saying: Publication reference: PRN01368 Page 5 of 9 “Today’s report brings to an end a long fight for answers and understanding that those people who were infected and their families, should never have had to face. “We owe it to all those affected by this scandal, and to the thorough work of the Inquiry team and those who have contributed, to take the necessary time now to fully understand the report’s conclusions and recommendations. “However, what is already very clear is that tens of thousands of people put their trust in the care they got from the NHS over many years, and they were badly let down. “I therefore offer my deepest and heartfelt apologies for the role the NHS played in the suffering and the loss of all those infected and affected. “In particular, I want to say sorry not just for the actions which led to life-altering and lifelimiting illness, but also for the failures to clearly communicate, investigate and mitigate risks to patients from transfusions and treatments; for a collective lack of openness and willingness to listen, that denied patients and families the answers and support they needed; and for the stigma that many experienced in the health service when they most needed support. “I also want to recognise the pain that some of our staff will have experienced when it became clear that the blood products many of them used in good faith may have harmed people they cared for. “I know that the apologies I can offer now do not begin to do justice to the scale of personal tragedy set out in this report, but we are committed to demonstrating this in our actions as we respond to its recommendations.” The report is sobering reading, documenting failings over multiple decades, and making recommendations across a wide range of areas, including recognition, support and compensation; education and training; monitoring of and testing for Hepatitis C; the safety of blood transfusions; preventing future harm, via duty of candour and regulation; as well as giving patients a voice. We write now to set out the initial steps we are taking in response. Support for those affected The Department of Health and Social Care is providing £19 million over five years to provide a bespoke Infected Blood Psychological Support Service which is expected to be rolled out later this summer. We have listened to the experiences of those involved, including patients, their families and staff, and are working with them to design and develop this service, which will provide dedicated support for those affected, located around the country. Copyright © NHS England 2024 2 Page 6 of 9 This service will include talking therapies, peer support, and psychosocial support, as well as access to other treatments or support for physical or mental health needs where appropriate. In the interim, the existing England Infected Blood Support Service remains available here: www.nhsbsa.nhs.uk/england-infected-blood-support-scheme. Further information about existing testing and support services, including those commissioned by the Government, can be found at: www.nhs.uk/infected-blood-support. Supporting affected staff It is important to also recognise that some of our colleagues may be affected by the publication of today’s report in some way, whether through personal or professional connection to the issue. Employers may therefore wish to increase promotion of their local health and wellbeing support for staff. Details of nationally-commissioned routes of support, including the 24/7 text helpline Shout and NHS Practitioner Health, can be found at NHS England - Support available for our NHS People. Continuing to find and treat people with blood-borne viruses Although it is likely that the majority of those who were directly affected have now been identified and started appropriate treatment given the time that has elapsed since the last use of infected blood products, there may be people who have not yet been identified, particularly where they are living with asymptomatic Hepatitis C. We ask that systems continue to work with partners, including community groups and charities, as well as Hepatitis C Operational Delivery Networks, to promote local testing options for anyone at risk, or anyone who is concerned. This should include promotion of the new national service for at-home Hepatitis C self-testing kits, available via hepctest.nhs.uk. For those who are concerned about the risk of HIV infection, further information can be found here: information on HIV diagnosis and the HIV testing services search tool. Hepatitis B, another infection that can be linked to infected blood, usually clears up on its own without treatment; however, people concerned about Hepatitis B infection should be directed towards relevant hepatitis B information or their local sexual health clinic or GP practice. Today's report highlights that in some cases those affected by infected blood products were told of their diagnosis in ways which were insensitive and inappropriate. We would therefore ask you to ensure that patients and their families are supported through the process of receiving test results – of whatever kind - in a compassionate and considerate way. Copyright © NHS England 2024 3 Page 7 of 9 Ensuring patients can access the right information. We recognise following the publication of this report, some patients may raise questions directly with their primary and/or secondary care teams, or through other points of contact with the NHS. We will be sharing materials with relevant service providers to ensure frontline clinicians and other colleagues in patient-facing roles are able to provide appropriate information or signposting. We expect that this will be particularly relevant to: • Providers of NHS 111 services • GP practices and community pharmacies • Trusts providing services where blood products are used • Mental health providers Maintaining confidence in current blood and blood products and related treatment The infected blood and blood products that have been the subject of this Inquiry were withdrawn in 1991. In the intervening decades, comprehensive systems have been put in place to ensure the safety of both donors and recipients of blood and blood-derived products. Today, blood and blood products are distributed to NHS hospitals by NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), which was established in 2005 to provide a national blood and transplantation service to the NHS. NHSBT’s services follow strict guidelines and testing to protect both donors and patients. NHS Blood and Transplant has published clear information about these processes here: Infected Blood Inquiry - NHS Blood and Transplant (nhsbt.nhs.uk). Nationally, NHS England will work with NHS Blood and Transplant and others to communicate the safety of current blood products. Assessing further recommendations and next steps As set out above, the final Inquiry report includes a number of important recommendations for the NHS. NHS England will be considering these in detail alongside the Department for Health and Social Care and other relevant bodies. In addition, an Extraordinary Clinical Reference Group is being convened to inform any immediate actions which should be taken. The next steps from this work will be shared as soon as possible, including through relevant clinical networks. Copyright © NHS England 2024 4 Page 8 of 9 Yours sincerely, Amanda Pritchard NHS Chief Executive NHS England Professor Sir Stephen Powis National Medical Director NHS England Dame Ruth May Chief Nursing Officer England Dr Emily Lawson DBE Chief Operating Officer NHS England Copyright © NHS England 2024 5 Page 9 of 9 Report to the Trust Board of Directors Title: Agenda item: Sponsor: Author Date: Purpose Issue to be addressed: Performance KPI Report 2024-25 Month 1 5.6 David French, Chief Executive Sam Dale, Associate Director of Data and Analytics 6 June 2024 Assurance or reassurance Y Approval Ratification Information The report aims to provide assurance: • Regarding the successful implementation of our strategy. • That the care we provide is safe, caring, effective, responsive, and well led. Response to the issue: The Performance KPI Report reflects the current operating environment and is aligned with our strategy. Implications: (Clinical, Organisational, Governance, Legal?) Risks: (Top 3) of carrying out the change / or not: Summary: Conclusion and/or recommendation This report covers a broad range of trust performance metrics. It is intended to assist the Board in assuring that the Trust meets regulatory requirements and corporate objectives. This report is provided for the purpose of assurance. This report is provided for the purpose of assurance. Page 1 of 24 Report to Trust Board in June 2024 Performance KPI Board Report Covering up to April 2024 Sponsor – David French, Chief Executive Officer Author – Sam Dale, Associate Director of Data and Analytics Page 2 of 24 Report to Trust Board in June 2024 Report guide Chart type Example Cumulative Column Cumulative Column Year on Year Line Benchmarked Line & bar Benchmarked Control Chart Variance from Target Explanation A cumulative column chart is used to represent a total count of the variable and shows how the total count increases over time. This example shows quarterly updates. A cumulative year on year column chart is used to represent a total count of the variable throughout the year. The variable value is reset to zero at the start of the year because the target for the metric is yearly. The line benchmarked chart shows our performance compared to the average performance of a peer group. The number at the bottom of the chart shows where we are ranked in the group (1 would mean ranked 1st that month). The line shows our performance, and the bar underneath represents the range of performance of benchmarked trusts (bottom = lowest performance, top = highest performance) A control chart shows movement of a variable in relation to its control limits (the 3 lines = Upper control limit, Mean and Lower control limit). When the value shows special variation (not expected) then it is highlighted green (leading to a good outcome) or red (leading to a bad outcome). Values are considered to show special variation if they -Go outside control limits -Have 6 points in a row above or below the mean, -Trend for 6 points, -Have 2 out of 3 points past 2/3 of the control limit, -Show a significant movement (greater than the average moving range). Variance from target charts is used to show how far away a variable is from its target each month. Green bars represent the value the metric is achieving better than target and the red bars represent the distance a metric is away from achieving its target. Page 3 of 24 Report to Trust Board in June 2024 Introduction The Performance KPI Report is presented to the Trust Board each month to provide assurance: • regarding the successful implementation of our strategy; and • that the care we provide is safe, caring, effective, responsive, and well led. The content of the report includes the following: • The ‘Spotlight’ section, to enable more detailed consideration of any topics that are of particular interest or concern. The selection of topics is informed by a rolling schedule, performance concerns, and requests from the Board. • An ‘NHS Constitution Standards’ section, summarising the standards and performance in relation to service waiting times; and • An ‘Appendix,’ with indicators presented monthly, aligned with the five themes within our strategy. Due to the timing of the April 2024 Board meeting, the following referral to treatment data points were not included in the March KPI report. They have now been updated for March 2024 and April 2024: - • 31 - Patients on an open 18 week pathway (within 18 weeks) • 33 - Patients on an open 18 week pathway (within 52 weeks) • 34 - Patients on an open 18 week pathway (within 65 weeks) • 35 - Patients on an open 18 week pathway (within 78 weeks) • 35a - Patients on an open 18 week pathway (within 104 weeks) • 32 - Total number of patients on a waiting list (18 week referral to treatment pathway) Changes of note within the report itself: • 53 – The digital metric monitoring page loading time for the CHARTS system has been tightened from under five seconds to under three seconds • 55 – The metric monitoring the rollout of inpatient noting for nurses has been removed as this is now considered complete. This will be revisited when the noting solution is rolled out for doctors • 39 - The 2024/25 national cancer target changes will be reflected next month when April 2024 data is made available • 40 - The 2024/25 national cancer target changes will be reflected next month when April 2024 data is made available • 37 - The metric now reflects the published 2024/25 national year-end target of 5% of patients waiting over 6 weeks for diagnostics Page 4 of 24 Report to Trust Board in June 2024 Summary This month’s spotlight report covers diagnostic performance. It highlights that UHS consistently increased the volume of elective diagnostic tests delivered throughout the 2023/24 financial year and into the start of the 2024/25 financial year. The diagnostic waiting list reduced by 12% in 2023/24 and in April 2024, 89.6% of patients received their diagnostics within six weeks. The national performance target has been set at 95% by March 2025 and the organisation is working with all services to ensure we maintain waiting times for services that are compliant and address any demand and capacity barriers preventing achievement. The paper describes the activity and performance trends for the hospital and explores modality sites in more detail. Areas of note in the appendix of performance metrics include: 1. The Emergency Department (ED) four hour performance position reduced to 66.0% (April 2024) from 71.7% (March 2024) for type 1 attendances, however UHS remain in the top quartile when compared to peer teaching hospitals across the country. 2. In April, the overall RTT waiting list increased by 2.4% to 59,485. 3. The trust continues to report zero patients waiting over 104 weeks and reported 15 patients waiting over 78 weeks for April 2024. All 15 patients are within ophthalmology and impacted by the ongoing national shortage of corneal graft tissue which is being overseen by NHS Blood and Transplant service. The longest waiting patients will be booked for surgery as soon tissue has been confirmed. 4. The trust reported 66 patients waiting over 65 weeks which predominantly reflects corneal transplant patients again and low volumes within gynaecology and several surgical specialties. The trust is committed to achieving the national target of zero patients waiting over 65 weeks by September 2024 and the ambition to achieve zero patients waiting over 52 weeks by March 2025. 5. The volume of patients not meeting the Criteria to Reside in hospital decreased in April averaging 216 which is a 10% reduction compared to March 2024, yet this remains a significant impact on patient flow through the organisation. 6. There were zero never events reported for April 2024. 7. The volume of medication errors reduced to two in April 2024 which is now below the monthly target following the increase seen in March 2023. 8. The number of Gram-negative bloodstream infections continues to be marginally above the monthly target of 19. The increased incidence in cases continues to be reported both nationally and locally across the Hampshire and Isle of Wight integrated care system. 9. The digital metric to monitor page loading times on CHARTS system has successfully remained at 99% despite increasing the time target by 40%. Ambulance response time performance The latest unvalidated weekly data is provided by the South Coast Ambulance Service (SCAS). In the week commencing 13th May 2024, our average handover time was 16 minutes 56 seconds across 725 emergency handovers and 22 minutes across 52 urgent handovers. There were 44handovers over 30 minutes, and six handovers taking over 60 minutes within the unvalidated data. The volume of weekly handovers over 60 minutes increased by 73% from March 2024 (averaging 7.5 per week) to April 2024 (averaging 13 per week). Page 5 of 24 Report to Trust Board in June 2024 Spotlight Report Spotlight: Diagnostic Performance The following report is based on the validated April 2024 submission. Introduction Diagnostics are a critical component of a patient’s pathway, facilitating an accurate and complete diagnosis, personalised treatment plans and the appropriate monitoring of a patient’s condition. Timely access to diagnostic tests is essential for ensuring that patients re ceive an early diagnosis whilst improving patient experience and delivering an efficient use of NHS resources. The 2024/24 NHS priorities and operational planning guidance confirmed that “systems are asked to continue to work towards the elective care recovery plan target of 95% of patients receiving their tests within 6 weeks”. The national ambitions acknowledged that the NHS delivered record diagnostic activity in 2023, but also highlighted that additional capacity in community diagnostic centres had been partly offset by an unprecedented increase in unscheduled diagnostic activity in acute trusts. This national diagnostic target applies to 15 different diagnostic tests, although performance is measured at a Trust level. These tests are broadly divided into three categories: • endoscopy (e.g. gastroscopy, cystoscopy); • imaging (e.g. CT, MRI, barium enema); • physiological measurement (e.g. echocardiogram, sleep studies). Our teams prioritise diagnostic procedures based on clinical urgency (for example patients with cancer) but aligned to this is a continual review of the longest waiting diagnostic patients. This spotlight paper highlights the current diagnostic performance position for UHS against the national targets and other hospitals. It also describes the current volumes of activity being delivered and the impact on the waiting list. We explore any performance concerns across the different modalities, outlining the challenges that services are facing and the steps being taken to achieve the 2024/25 target. In summary, there was an overall reduction in the diagnostic waiting list across the 2023/24 financial year as UHS successfully increased the delivery of diagnostic activity to manage current levels of demand. The diagnostic waiting list currently stands at 8,849 patients (April 2024) which is a reduction of 12% since April 2023 (10,033 patients) and 24% since the peak levels seen in June 2022 (11,671 patients). The April 2024 performance position is 89.6% for the percentage of patients receiving diagnostic tests within six weeks. The latest comparison data available (March 2024) placed the hospital 5th when ranked against peer teaching hospitals across the country. All organisations are facing challenges due to high demand, workforce shortages and equipment limitations and funding, but the organisation is striving to achieve the 95% target set for 2024/25. Page 6 of 24 Report to Trust Board in June 2024 Spotlight Report Activity and Waiting List Elective diagnostic activity being delivered at UHS consistently increased throughout 2023/24 and into 2024/25 helping to manage the waiting list despite high referral volumes and the complications caused by industrial action throughout the previous year. Graph 1 illustrates that diagnostic activity levels delivered in 2023/24 were 6% higher than 2022/23 and 17% higher than pre-pandemic levels. Overall there was a 12% reduction in the diagnostic waiting list across the 2023/24 financial year (graph 2) despite some levelling off in winter months and a small recent increase which is being closely monitored. The waiting list stands at 8849 patients for April 2024 which breaks down into
Url
/Media/UHS-website-2019/Docs/About-the-Trust/Trust-governance-and-corporate-docs/2024-Trust-documents/Papers-Trust-Board-6-June-2024.pdf
UHS AR 21-22 Quality Account
Description
QUALITY ACCOUNT 2021/22 Part 1: QStaUteAmeLnItToYn qAuaClitCy fOroUm NtheTchief executive 2021/22 1.1 Chief executive’s statement and welcome Welcome to the quality report for University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (UHS) for 2020/21, which incorporates the quality accounts. 2020/21 has been a year of unprecedented change for healthcare, and as might be expected this year’s account has a strong focus on our ongoing r QUALITY ACCOUNT 2021/22 Part 1: Statement on quality from the chief executive 1.1 Chief executive’s statement and welcome Welcome to the 2021/22 quality account which I am pleased to present on behalf of University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (UHS). 2021/22 has been another year of unprecedented challenge for healthcare, and this year’s quality account continues to have a strong focus on our ongoing response to the COVID-19 pandemic. It also includes information about how we are working to restore services for our patients as we move out of the pandemic. It demonstrates that despite the difficulties, we have supported each other and have never been distracted from our commitment to quality. The challenges of the last year may have been enormous, but there have also been some real positives from the experience. We are working differently and more collaboratively as a health and care system, developing integrated care and rapidly introducing major change across our services, which helps us to focus on and continue to develop the high quality of our services. As we recuperate and recover from the pandemic, we will be a team of people that together is stronger than ever before. The professionalism of the team and all those involved across UHS has been inspiring in the face of significant adversity. I am grateful for the care, compassion and kindness shown by all colleagues to our patients and to each other during the most difficult of years. This is a great platform from which to seize all the opportunities we have before us to continue improving the quality of our services and care. As we begin to move forward, the Trust faces another set of challenges as our services have inevitably been affected over the last couple of years. We remain hugely concerned about the national growth in waiting lists for diagnosis and treatment, and for the people who may not have come forward for vital tests or treatment due to the pandemic. We will continue to do everything possible to maximise the number of patients that we can safely treat, and to ensure that patients on our waiting lists are regularly risk assessed and seen according to clinical priority. We are building capacity as quickly as we can and are recruiting more staff so we can treat the patients who need us. I have no doubt that the staff at UHS will continue to keep their focus on the quality of the services and care we give to ensure everyone who comes to UHS will have the best possible experience as they work tirelessly to put patients first. Quality assurance has remained a cornerstone of our care despite this period of intense pressure. We have consolidated the work we started last year to embed a different approach to governance, reporting and assurance requirements, and our approach as an acute provider has continued to flex and adapt. We are hugely proud to be playing an important role in the national response to COVID-19, not only through the delivery of essential healthcare, but also through the many research programmes that are helping us globally to understand and better treat the virus, and as the lead provider for the delivery of the COVID-19 vaccine programme to our population. We are investing significantly in our research and development infrastructure to secure our future as leading-edge university teaching hospital. Equally, we are investing in other significant areas such as refurbishing the hospital, developing innovative digital solutions. We have also launched a sustainability initiative to make the hospital greener, recognising the influence it has on impacting the environment and population we serve. We aim to achieve carbon net zero, resulting in healthier lives for our community and people. 2 QUALITY ACCOUNT 2021/22 During 2021/22 the Board has been working on our strategy for the next five years, which sets out our ambition for our quality standards and what we want the hospital to be in 2025 for patients and staff. I’m excited to be the person leading UHS to achieve these ambitions, knowing success with be a collective effort. There is so much to do, but I know that working together we will overcome all the challenges because that is what the UHS family does. The pandemic has challenged us, but it has also driven change, and it has shown what we can do together with the people of our city and region. In spite of the immense pressures we continue to face, our patients are hugely appreciative and grateful for the outstanding quality of care and treatment they receive here at UHS. This is testament to the dedication and hard work of everyone in the UHS family. The information contained within this report has been subject to internal review and, to the best of my knowledge presents a true and accurate picture of the performance of the Trust. David French Chief Executive Officer 21 June 2022 3 QUALITY ACCOUNT 2021/22 1.2 Introduction to this report Each year all NHS hospitals in England must prepare and publish an annual report for the public about the quality of their services. This is called the quality account and makes us at UHS more accountable to our patients and the public and helps drive improvement in the quality of our services. Quality in healthcare is made up of three core dimensions: • Patient experience – how patients experience the care they receive. • Patient safety – keeping patients safe from harm. • Clinical effectiveness – how successful is the care we provide? This report tells you how well we did against the quality priorities and goals we set ourselves in each domain for 2021/22 (last year). It sets out the priorities we have agreed for 2022/23 (next year) and how we plan to achieve them. The quality account incorporates all the requirements of The National Health Service (Quality Accounts) Regulations 2010 (as amended) as well as additional reporting requirements. 4 QUALITY ACCOUNT 2021/22 Part 2: Priorities for improvement and statements of assurance from the board 2.1 Priorities for improvement This section provides a look back over the 2021/22 quality priorities at UHS and sets out our quality priorities for 2022/23. 2.1.1 Progress against 2021/22 priorities Last year we set our quality priorities to ensure we delivered the highest quality of care shaped by a range of national and regional factors as well as local and Trust‐wide considerations. We recognised the overriding issues of significant operational pressures being felt right across the health and social care system and the pressures associated with the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic. We acknowledged that many of the aims of our priorities could be disrupted by the ongoing pandemic and that we might need to be flexible in adapting the priorities in changing circumstances. We limited ourselves to four priorities in recognition of these pressures and to allow UHS to focus on responding to them. This year our retrospective review reflects how we addressed the four priorities in the context of our organisational response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the pressing need to work towards restoration of our services. Our challenge was to deliver the highest quality care in the context of these combined pressures. Overview of success Figure 1: Priority 1 PRIORITY 1 Introduction of Midwifery continuity of carer (MCoC) for women at risk of complications in pregnancy. Core Dimension: Patient safety, patient experience and clinical effectiveness Achieved Why was this a priority? We recognise that the relationship between care giver and receiver leads to better safety and outcomes for women and babies in our care. Being cared for and supported through their pregnancy by the same midwifery team helps ensure safer care based on a relationship of mutual trust and respect and offers a more positive and personal experience. Midwifery continuity of carer (MCoC) is a model of care that aims to limit the number of different healthcare professionals a woman sees during her pregnancy. Its aim is for the pregnant woman to receive intrapartum care from a midwife she has met previously during her current pregnancy, thereby providing greater continuity. 5 QUALITY ACCOUNT 2021/22 This approach was the single biggest request of women heard during the NHS England 2015 National Maternity Review ‘Better Births’. The model has proven beneficial clinical outcomes for women including: 16% less likely to lose their baby and 19% less likely to lose their baby before 24 weeks. 24% less likely to experience pre-term birth. 15% less likely to have regional anaesthesia (e.g., an epidural). 16% less likely to have an episiotomy. The model organises midwives into teams of eight or fewer. Each midwife aims to provide antenatal, labour and postnatal midwifery care to approximately 36 women per year (pro rata), with support from the wider team for out-of-hours care. The ‘Better Births’ report published in 2016 set out a clear recommendation that the NHS should work towards a shared ambition for the NHS in England of MCoC being the default model of care available to all pregnant women. To ensure equity in maternity health outcomes the report recommended that roll-out should be prioritised by March 2023 for those most likely to be at greater risk of complications in pregnancy and experience poorer outcomes. NHS England identified this group as woman from Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) backgrounds, those who live in the most deprived decile (IMD-1/Indices of multiple deprivation-1) or those with increased vulnerability (e.g., poor perinatal mental health, history of substance misuse, history of domestic violence). What have we achieved in 2021/22? Our service was quick to adopt the model of MCoC. We used a variety of communication forums to engage our staff and patients, including involvement in national and local public MCoC events, staff team meetings, use of digital platforms, newsletters and dedicated time at midwifery study days for education and discussion. We rapidly established five MCoC teams with each team caring for their own caseload of women in the antenatal, labour and postnatal period. Three are ‘‘caseloading’’ teams meaning they care for their women in labour with an ‘’on call’’ commitment night and day and are based in the east, west and centre of Southampton. The remaining two teams are integrated teams who are available for women in labour when they are on a set shift for labour care and are based in the centre and west of the city. All our teams have a linked consultant obstetrician to ensure continuity of obstetric involvement, and a statement of purpose was agreed to describe the roles and responsibilities required to support the delivery of the model. Before the publication of the ‘Better Births’ report we had already identified the need for a focus on the needs of Black and Asian women and those living in IMD-1 areas. Following publication of the report we accelerated our work, and since July 2020 Black and Asian women and those living in IMD-1 areas have been included for care in our MCoC teams. NHS England Ambition target recommendations 2020/21 Percentage achieved by UHS 2021/22 35% of women will be booked to receive care in a continuity of carer team 41.7% 35% of Black, Asian and minority ethnic women booked to receive care in a 75% continuity of carer team 35% of women living in an IMD-1 area booked to receive continuity of carer 80% 6 QUALITY ACCOUNT 2021/22 How improvements are measured and monitored MCoC compliance is reviewed at monthly service delivery meetings, at bimonthly maternity safety champion peer review meetings and through the local maternity and neonatal system (LMNS) by analysing data on the regional maternity services dashboard. We monitor the data, which tracks our performance using key performance indicators (KPIs), and report performance and strategic plans to our quality committee and Trust Board. Our statement of purpose is reviewed every six months by the programme’s senior matron to ensure it is responsive and continues to be fit for purpose. We actively seek feedback from our patients and their families and from our staff. What our patients told us: ‘‘‘I was under X’s care from around 19 weeks into my pregnancy after moving to Southampton. She came to visit us at home on most occasions and stayed in regular contact throughout my pregnancy; she also came to visit us at home after I’d given birth too. This was invaluable throughout the pandemic and I felt really reassured having a familiar face throughout.’’ ‘’My midwife always instilled confidence in me and I felt able to contact her and other members of the team with any worries or concerns no matter how small. I’m extremely grateful for the care I received, Thank you.’’ ‘‘I had my third baby in August and due to my fear of hospitals and anything medical I opted for my first home birth. X from the homebirth team was incredible right from the moment she happened to appear (out of nowhere like a fairy godmother) into my midwife appointment just as I was saying I wanted a homebirth but was worried about it… she told me she would contact me to arrange a Zoom call where we could chat and she could answer all questions.’’ ‘’My midwife seemed to have this sixth sense where she could tell when I was anxious about something and all of a sudden was telling me it was all going to be okay. She continued my care at my home each time, which was the first time I’d had any pre-natal care at home and it made me so much more relaxed!’’ ‘’Even in the two weeks after birth if I needed anything for me or for the baby, I just had to call my midwife, and it would either go through to her or a homebirth midwife on call day or night.’’ ‘’I would like to say huge thanks to you and your team for the care you have provided. I am so glad that I was under your team. Your advice at each stage of pregnancy helped me to deliver a healthy baby.’’ ‘’You have always gone above and beyond to make me feel comfortable (as you were aware of my past history). Whenever I started panicking, you calmed me by your friendly support. You had clarified things by providing more information and clarity …. as we were not sure about the options we had.’’ ‘’You made sure that I will get full support from my consultant and GP where I needed. I cannot imagine my pregnancy journey without you.’’ ‘’I didn’t know them (the midwife team) earlier but they made me feel like they were my sisters.’’ ‘’I do not think you could have done more than what you did.’’ ‘’My overall experience is so positive with the support I got from your team.’’ 7 QUALITY ACCOUNT 2021/22 What our staff told us: ‘’Working in the team has been the most rewarding thing I have done during my time as a midwife.’’ ‘’The role is so varied day to day and the fluidity it allows encourages you to constantly learn new skills and broadens your outlook on what defines being a midwife.’’ ‘’I have supported families throughout their pregnancy, birth, postnatal period and beyond and because of the relationships you nurture with these families they trust you completely.’’ ‘’My self-confidence at work has grown massively and I now feel happy to facilitate birth at home, in a birth centre or on Labour Ward, wherever my woman wishes.’’ ‘’This has given me exposure to new experiences, which can feel challenging at times, but by having a supportive team around you, advice is never far away. Caseloading has meant I’ve been part of the woman’s wider support network and understand the challenges she may face during her day-to-day life. This enables strong working relationships with other members of the multi-disciplinary team working with the family, such as safeguarding teams/family nurses/health visitors/obstetric team/social workers and more.’’ ‘’You really are at the centre of that family, coordinating their care, to improve their outcomes and their experience whilst accessing maternity care.’’ Key areas identified of opportunities for further improvement Originally our aspirations for 2022/23 were to grow our teams to ensure we had enough resource to offer MCoC to all Black and Asian women and women living in IMD-1 areas. Two new integrated teams came online in January 2022, with plans to develop staff incentives to increase this during the year. We agreed to develop a MCoC team for those in IMD-2 and IMD-3 areas in the west Hampshire area where there are currently no IMD-1 areas. When COVID-19 restrictions relaxed, we had also planned to increase face-to-face engagement with the local maternity workforce and continue to engagement with and sharing good practice across the Southeast region. On 30 March 2022 the final report of the independent review of maternity services at The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust (the Ockenden Report 2022) was published. The report recommended: ‘’All trusts must review and suspend, if necessary, the existing provision and further roll out of Midwifery Continuity of Carer (MCoC) unless they can demonstrate staffing meets safe minimum requirements on all shifts. This will preserve the safety of all pregnant women and families, which is currently compromised by the unprecedented pressures that MCoC models place on maternity services already under significant strain. The reinstatement of MCoC should be withheld until robust evidence is available to support its reintroduction.’’ Following this recommendation UHS has taken the decision to maintain current levels of provision but cease any further roll out. 8 QUALITY ACCOUNT 2021/22 Figure 2: Priority 2 PRIORITY 2 To support staff wellbeing and recovery Core Dimension: Patient safety and patient experience Achieved Why was this a priority? The health and wellbeing of our people and promoting a healthy work environment is one of our top priorities. Since the start of the pandemic we have focussed on what really makes a difference in supporting people to stay well and healthy and have continued to build on this work during 2021/22. During year we have actively listened to our staff and responded to their feedback by including more “in the moment” support, more regular morale initiatives and creating easier ways to access wellbeing support every day. We have become more flexible and responsive as the year has progressed, provided a range of support and options tailored to the needs of individuals. We have recognised that wellbeing is very personal, and everyone’s approach to promoting and sustaining their own wellness may be different. We appreciated many people were mentally and physically exhausted after the demands of responding to the pandemic. We recognised they would need time, space and support to develop resilience while the pandemic continued, and to recover as pressures eased. We saw that while the overall health and wellbeing scores in the NHS Staff Survey had improve significantly in 2020, the proportion of staff reporting work-related stress had also increased. What have we achieved in 2021/22? During the year we continued to introduce programmes, interventions and wider support offerings. The goal of our model is to ensure our staff can access the most appropriate support at the time and place that they need it. In 2021 we employed a staff wellbeing lead/programme manager and a wellbeing administrator as part of our organisational development (OD) team and tasked them with leading on the development and delivery of the wellbeing programme and interventions. A key area of growth and strength for staff wellbeing during the pandemic and beyond is the joined up working of the wellbeing, psychology, spiritual care, occupational health services and peer practitioner communities. During the early part of 2021 a series of interventions to support reflection and wellness were introduced aiming to provide safe spaces for people to talk, listen, be heard and give feedback on where things could be improved. The OD team worked alongside our psychologists to introduce a variety of different ways that people could be engaged. We invested in the training of peer practitioners called ‘safe space practitioners’ to be able to provide on-site, in the moment, interventions when people needed them. Strengthening that safe space practitioner peer network means we have trained more staff in safe space coaching and support techniques to enable people to access support when needed. The team are open to any suggestions of other areas where staff would find peer support valuable and to deliver thinking environments. 9 QUALITY ACCOUNT 2021/22 We also trained appreciative inquiry facilitators to work with staff in self-determined change to enable them to take a positive approach to their own wellbeing, appreciate the things that are going well and adopt a mindset of appreciation and hope. After a successful pilot in May 2021, we recruited over 100 wellbeing champions working all over the Trust across a range of professions and seniority. Wellbeing champions have been given training, tools and resources to lead on championing wellbeing in their areas. They offer signposting to support, monthly champion meetings sharing ideas and practice and regular updates on wellbeing. They are important links on the ground for the wellbeing team and have their own workplace champion pages on Staffnet (our intranet) for sharing information and mutual support. They carry out regular wellbeing walkabouts wearing pink scrubs to make them highly visible. They are often accompanied by our executive directors and senior clinical leaders who are also available to listen, support and generally help raise morale. In the latter part of 2021 as the COVID-19 pandemic continued, staff resilience was tested by challenges around increasing staff shortages and the ability for staff to take regular breaks away from clinical areas for rest. We recognised a need for boosting staff morale and devised a wellness and appreciation programme, which took refreshments out to staff including lunch grab bags, fruit boxes, hot drinks and wellbeing treats. To make it quicker and easier for staff to access wellbeing information we launched Windows onto Wellbeing (WoW), a one-stop page on Staffnet consisting of various wellbeing windows each outlining a variety of aspects of wellbeing information and available support, with links and resources. This is being supplemented by wellbeing leaflets with QR codes, posters and video information. A staff Facebook wellbeing page was set up, populated by the wellbeing team and any staff who wish to post. This shows the latest wellbeing information, support and training opportunities updated in real time as well as being a platform for inspirational quotes and for people to share wellbeing practice and thoughts. During 2021/22 we tried to ensure, where possible, that wellbeing was included as an automatic element of all our initiatives and ‘‘business as usual’’. Staff wellbeing was incorporated into many of our educational streams, with wellbeing awareness sessions being included in induction training, team study days and our UHS advocates study day. Team and personal wellbeing action plan templates have been created for use across the organisation, and when our chief nursing officer (CNO) introduced daily ward huddles (‘stop for support’) for our nursing teams, a key element was the opportunity to check on staff wellbeing and offer support. 10 QUALITY ACCOUNT 2021/22 Teaching on stress management and post-traumatic stress is delivered by various groups and individuals including the wellbeing programme manager, the OD team, the psychology team and the wellbeing team. Wellbeing conversation workshops have been offered with good uptake and more are being rolled out in 2022/23. Mindfulness and mindful self-compassion workshops were commissioned in 2021/22 and have proved popular. Other initiatives led by our wellbeing programme manager include our domestic abuse project which works with our partners Standing Together to support staff impacted by domestic abuse, our suicide prevention support advisory group, facilitating reflective practice guidance and a small working group which is supporting the patient safety incident response framework (PSIRF) agenda by exploring the impact of being involved in adverse incidents. We have an embedded peer support service to provide psychological support to our staff in the context of traumatic events at work. The service is modelled on an evidence-based approach using a trauma risk management (TRiM) methodology which helps to identify risks for people who may suffer poor mental health following traumatic experiences. Our TRiM practitioners support those who have experienced traumatic events and we have increased the number of our practitioners during 2021/22. UHS is part of a regional mental health first aid (MHFA) faculty which works in partnership across Hampshire and the Isle of Wight and is currently in the process of training peer practitioners as MHFA champions. Our ambition is that our practitioners will go on to participate in ‘train the trainer’ sessions, sharing training across the integrated care system (ICS). We also looked at ways to demonstrate how much we value our staff. We wanted to celebrate the hard work, commitment and dedication consistently shown in rising to the challenges of the pandemic. We have promoted our long service awards, which recognise continuous service to the Trust, and our retirement gift scheme, which rewards employees after completing 20 years or more service in the NHS. In December 2021, a festive card containing a gift token from the CEO and Chair was given to all substantive UHS staff in recognition and appreciation of every person’s effort and dedication to our patients and families during the year. We have asked our staff for feedback about our initiatives and used their insights to help shape ongoing work. We have developed a UHS Insights document which summarised how staff were feeling and how the feedback they have given will support people to move forward This is illustrated in the infographics below. 11 QUALITY ACCOUNT 2021/22 What our staff tell us: “It all means I can allow myself time, space and kindness to deal with the difficulties during/post [pandemic] knowing that others felt/are feeling the same way I am.’’ ‘’I really appreciate the way the hospital has prioritised staff wellbeing. It has made us feel as though we are a priority and really valued.’’ ‘’I have been impressed with how many different options there have been to help us all get through this and help us look after ourselves.’’ ‘’I’ve never known staff health be so important to the Trust, and it’s made a big difference to how I’ve coped.’’ “I don’t know if you ever get to hear how people you’ve seen through TRiM are getting on or not... so I thought I’d give you a little update. I’m back at work on week 2 of a phased return… I’m delighted to say that so far it seems to have worked wonders!’’ 12 QUALITY ACCOUNT 2021/22 ‘’The main reason for this email is to say thank you. You were pivotal in the whole journey ensuring I got on the right track to restore my head health early. Without you it’s highly likely I’d have probably gone back to work and have ended up in a much worse position and the whole process would have been a lot longer and arduous to get back to where I am today.” “Listening to other staff members’ struggles and realising that we are not on our own, we are part of a big team.” “Hearing the different stories but appreciating we were united in suffering, learning, confusion and hope has been helpful.” ‘’I can see senior leaders are human with the same insecurities as us; they’ve been in our shoes at some point.’’ ‘Listening to the situations that others have faced was a real reminder that we have had a shared experience which makes things feel easier. The honesty and openness of others was both enriching and humbling. I left feeling like my faith in humanity had been restored.’’ “I found that listening to others’ experiences was extremely valuable. Although I was obviously aware that we have ‘all been in this together’ it has at times felt quite lonely and difficult.” How improvements will be measured and monitored The decision-making, measurement, monitoring and governance of the wellbeing programme is managed by the healthy workplace and wellbeing group which reports into the UHS people board, and then into the people and OD committee. Membership includes representation from occupational health, psychology, spiritual care, peer practitioner groups, HR and health and safety teams and works to support the NHS health and wellbeing framework (2021/22). The people and OD committee reports into Trust Board. Key areas identified of opportunities for further improvement It is important to us that we continue to lead compassionately and inclusively, so our people are involved in decision-making, feel hopeful for the future and are confident in bringing their whole selves to work no matter who they are. We want the culture at UHS to reflect our commitment to prioritising the health and wellbeing of all staff so that it is a consideration in every decision we make. We are working to build confidence and trust in the vast array of support we have developed over the last two years, to drive uptake now awareness is high and to help people find effective help. Risk of burnout due to exhaustion remains a concern and efforts will be focussed in this area for 2022/23. We have identified temporary wellbeing hub space for staff while we wait for the new staff wellbeing building, which has been made possible with the funding from the proceeds of the auction of the donated Banksy ‘Game Changer’ artwork. This new building will house a gym, café and space for reflective groups to meet as well as being a base from which the wellbeing team will provide its support. In 2022/23 several UHS staff will taking part in the first regional diploma in health and wellbeing and a regional wellbeing festival is planned for July 2022, in which we will be taking an active lead. Our 2021/22 annual NHS staff survey results are positive with our scores relating to wellbeing being above the benchmark average. Contributing factors to wellbeing such as staff engagement, morale, staff experience in areas such as kindness and respect, feeling valued and trusted to do their job were all above the benchmark average. Our staff experience scored related to violence and aggression at work, bullying, and harassment have also improved and are close to the benchmark average. Our score relating to staff experiencing work-related stress has remained the same at 42%, which has not declined since 2017. We will continue to work towards improving our staff survey results during 2022/23. 13 QUALITY ACCOUNT 2021/22 Figure 3: Priority 3 PRIORITY 3 Managing risks to patients delayed for treatment and restoring elective programmes Core Dimension: Clinical effectiveness Partially achieved Why was this a priority? The pandemic had a significant impact on waiting times as elective activity reduced to focus on treating patients with COVID-19. In March 2020 only 29 patients were waiting over 52 weeks for treatment, but by March 2021 this had increased to 3,311 patients. These delays clearly have a significant impact on people’s quality of life and, at times, outcomes. During the first wave of the pandemic elective activity reduced substantially, with only 35% of April 2019 levels of activity taking place in April 2020. By 2021 there was a real imperative to move towards managing the pandemic while continuing to treat as many other patients as possible and making sure we communicated effectively with those waiting to help manage the uncertainty and to reduce the backlog where possible. What have we achieved in 2021/22? During the first year of the pandemic the Trust set up a clinical prioritisation process, led by the chief medical officer (CMO) that focused on prioritising all patients waiting for surgery to ensure we continued to treat people based on need and urgency. The Trust also implemented a clinical assurance framework (CAF), designed to measure and mitigate risks across the specialities as well as ensuring that resources (e.g., theatres) were allocated in line with anticipated levels of potential harm. During 2021/22 our hospitals continued to see significant levels of COVID-19 demand with the end of the first wave lasting into May 2021. From September 2021 the number of COVID-19 patients started to increase again, rising to approximately 100 in December 2021 before gradually decreasing. A further wave followed in March 2022, with over 100 COVID-19 patients being cared for in the Trust. Despite this, the Trust continued to see more elective patients in 2021/22 than in 2020/21: Figure 4: Number of elective patients seen April 2020-March 2022 This was despite more stringent and time-consuming infection control measures than prior to the pandemic and reducing theatre capacity to support intensive care staffing. At times, we had up to seven wards repurposed for caring for patients with COVID-19. 14 QUALITY ACCOUNT 2021/22 Cancer care We are proud to have maintained all our cancer services throughout the pandemic and believe that we continue to offer clinically effective services to patients. Despite the number of patients being treated for cancer increasing throughout 2021/22 due to a rise in referrals that occurred after each COVID-19 wave, we were able to respond to this increase. Figure 5: Cancer care patient tracking list July 2020- March 2022 When COVID-19 restrictions in England were relaxed, both in September 2021 and again in February 2022, we saw higher volumes of referrals and two week waits (2WW) performance for urgent referrals has been affected. This is mainly in the breast service with other tumour site performance being broadly maintained. We have seen a relatively stable level of 31-day performance (the target for at least 96% of patients to start a first treatment for a new primary cancer within 31 days of the decision to treat) and 62-day performance (the target that there is no more than 62 days wait between the date the hospital receives an urgent referral for suspected cancer and the start of treatment). We note that our 62-day performance shows us to be in line with other tertiary teaching hospitals, which illustrates that other hospitals are seeing similar challenges to UHS in relation to cancer. When benchmarking against similar trusts (other large teaching hospitals), we have continued to perform well, and we continue to prioritise cancer services to reduce the number of patients awaiting treatment, including reducing those waiting more than 62 days. Outpatient services At the start of the pandemic in 2020 we saw a seismic shift towards non-face-to-face outpatient appointments. The national aspiration was to maintain 25% of patients seen non-face-to-face in 2021/22. Figure 6: proportion of face to face and non-face to face appointments at UHS 15 QUALITY ACCOUNT 2021/22 Although the proportion of virtual appointments has naturally reduced compared to levels seen during the pandemic (as some clinics have reverted to a face-to-face service), we have continued to offer virtual outpatient appointments through 2021/22. We recognise that in some cases this provides a more convenient service for patients. We have also rolled out a patient texting programme, which provided an additional safety net. For the specialties with the highest number of long waiting patients we text patients to ask whether their symptoms have worsened and whether they need to speak to a clinician. If they confirm that they do need to speak to a clinician, an outpatient appointment is scheduled for them. We have also used technology to continue to offer virtual appointments where appropriate and are conducting approximately 30% of our appointments virtually. The Trust has maintained this as a target, and although we have returned to face-to-face appointments where necessary, virtual appointments continue to be a core part of our strategy with our outpatient clinical activity increased to achieve the target. Figure 7: Proportion of virtual appointments Diagnostics During 2021/22 UHS significantly increased the volume of diagnostic activity as the pandemic eased and services adjusted their ways of working, focussing on reducing the longest diagnostic waits first. Despite an increase in diagnostic referrals, the size of the diagnostic waiting list has been held steady, alongside an improved performance. Alongside community partners in Solent NHS Trust and Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, the Trust successfully bid for phase one funding to develop a community diagnostic hub. The main hub will be based at the Royal South Hants Hospital (RSH), with other targeted diagnostics being delivered in Lymington New Forest Hospital and Hythe Hospital. These hubs will support a one-stop approach for conditions, delivering tests closer to home and releasing acute diagnostic capacity for the support of inpatients and complex patients. In late 2021 the Trust completed a Trust-wide patient-led waiting list validation of all patients waiting 33 weeks or longer. Discussions as to how best to continue this as part of a rolling programme rather than a standalone exercise are ongoing. The Trust worked with third party supplier partners to survey patients by text message or email linked to a secure portal, backed up by paper letters where patient details for digital contact were not available. This saved administrative time, as well as generating a far higher response than traditional methods of validating waiting lists. The purpose of this initiative was to reassure every patient and confirm if patients were ready to attend (and ask them to indicate a timescale if not), as well as indicate whether COVID-19 concerns were a factor in their wish to delay. We also wanted to know if patients’ circumstances had changed, to offer the opportunity of contact with the Trust about their specific circumstances and offer practical and holistic services from the patient support hub. 16 QUALITY ACCOUNT 2021/22 As well as following up patients whose responses did not match their clinical status, or whose responses flagged concern, all patients requesting contact were followed up by care group administrative and/or clinical teams. Referral to treatment (RTT) During 2021/22 UHS has had to continue to manage the impact of COVID-19 on patients on the elective waiting list. We are conscious that some patients have waited a long time from referral to treatment. As referrals have increased post-lockdown ( peaking in Summer 2021) , the total number of patients waiting has grown. However, we have reduced and held steady the total number of patients waiting over 52 weeks through 2021/22 Figure 8: RTT Patient treatment list Figure 9 : Patients waiting over 52+ weeks for treatment In 2021/22 we noted a small, but growing, cohort of patients who had waited more than 104 weeks for treatment due to pressures and constraints associated with the pandemic. This grew from 13 in March 2021, peaking at 171 in December 2021. Throughout 2021/22, our operational teams developed clear plans to address these longest waiters. At the end of March 2022, besides patients who had requested delay of their treatment, we only had five patients who had waited more than 104 weeks for their treatment. Actions to increase capacity and treat these patients include use of the independent sector for specific cohorts of patients (e.g., in the ear, nose and throat (ENT) service) and additional weekend capacity through waiting list initiatives (e.g., Urology ‘super weekends’). 17 QUALITY ACCOUNT 2021/22 We have continued to make good progress against our target and, when we remove the patients who are choosing to wait, we are ahead of the plan. While patients wait for surgery, we have continued to assess them using the CAF, where patients are clinically reviewed based on their previous clinical priority. We use a rating system where priority is given to patients most likely to deteriorate clinically, with P1 being the highest and P4 the lowest risk. Triage takes account of vital signs, pre-hospital clinical course, mechanism of injury and other medical conditions and is a dynamic process and patients are reassessed frequently (e.g., P2 patients every eight weeks, P3 patients every three months, P4 patients every six months). Based on this clinical review patients may be invited for an outpatient review. What our patients tell us: ‘’I was very worried about not getting my surgery because of the pandemic, but the hospital was good at keeping in touch so I felt I knew what was going on’’ ‘’The news was so bad my dad didn’t want to go to the hospital for his tests because he thought the people with covid should have the beds, but he was phoned and the lady was really good at reassuring him that he was important too so he had his tests’’ ‘’I was going to wait until the pandemic was over to have my operation, but they got in touch and said they could do it and got me in and did it anyway and I was so pleased’’ ‘’Not having to go to the hospital for my outpatient appointment was so much easier. No parking problems, and the doctor was just as good as if I’d been there. I hope this carries on‘’ ‘’I was so scared my cancer treatment was going to be stopped, but they sent me to another hospital to have it. I’ve read in the papers about people not getting their treatment, so I am so relieved my hospital could still do it’’. How improvements will be measured and monitored We have a robust reporting processes monitoring this activity which runs from care group and divisional governance and operational reporting through our Trust executive committee (TEC), quality committee and Trust Board. We work closely with our chief operating officer (COO) and executive team to maintain a constant focus. Key areas identified of opportunities for further improvement We will continue to work to restore elective activity and reduce waits during 2022/23. 18 QUALITY ACCOUNT 2021/22 Figure 11: Priority 4 PRIORITY 4 Reducing healthcare associated infection (HCAI) Core Dimension: Patient safety Achieved Why was this a priority? Healthcare associated infections (HCAIs) are among the most significant causes of morbidity and mortality in healthcare settings. We know prevention of HCAIs is central to providing safe and high- quality healthcare, good patient experience and maintaining safety. It also improves length of stay and helps with our financial and operational management. According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), HCAIs are common with an estimated 1.4 million affected at any given time and prevalence varying in the developed world from 5.1% to 11.6%. The most recent point prevalence survey of HCAIs in acute hospitals in England (2016), reported the prevalence of HCAIs as 6.6%, and a tertiary care hospital like UHS will be at risk from high levels as it treats many vulnerable patients needing complex support and procedures. In addition, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has also been identified by the WHO as one of the top ten major threats to public health. Indiscriminate use of antibiotics in health and farming has led to significant challenges of multi-drug resistant bacteria in certain parts of the world. No new classes of antibiotics have been discovered since 1980, and we are facing the possibility of a world where antibiotics may no longer be effective. The UK five-year national action plan for tackling antimicrobial resistance (2019-2024) outlines key actions for focusing on infection prevention and control (IPC) and addressing AMR. Consequently, AMR and IPC are important for any healthcare organisation, and a system-wide approach to promoting and monitoring the judicious use of antimicrobials to preserve their future effectiveness is essential. At UHS we have a dedicated infection prevention team (IPT) committed to supporting the organisation in preventing and reducing HCAIs. The team is made up of a diverse set of professionals with significant experience in infection control, with leadership and oversight from the CNO and director of infection prevention and control. The team drives improvements in patient outcomes by supporting reductions in HCAIs. What have we achieved in 2021/22? Unsurprisingly the COVID-19 pandemic has remained a key area of focus for UHS in 2021/22, with a continued emphasis on preventing transmission of infection while supporting the recovery and restoration of services. In-hospital transmission of COVID-19 Throughout 2021/22 our COVID ZERO campaigns promoting safety across the workforce and services throughout the pandemic (wash, walk, wear, test and fresh air), and our follow-up #DontGoViral 2021 campaigns continued to be prioritised. Our COVID ZERO campaign has earned award-winning recognition for ‘Best crisis comms’ at the 2022 PRWeek UK Corporate, City & Public Affairs Awards. 19 QUALITY ACCOUNT 2021/22 What have we achieved in 2021/22? Strategies to prevent and reduce the risk of in-hospital transmission of COVID-19 have remained a priority and have been subject to ongoing review, with actions and improvements taken to reduce the ongoing risk of hospital onset infection and outbreaks. The figure below shows the trend of hospital-onset cases of COVID-19 from April 2021 to March 2022 and follows similar trends as the local and national prevalence of COVID-19. Figure 10: Cases of Hospital onset COVID-19*. *Classified as “hospital onset-definite hospital acquired” (HO. dHA) when the first positive test is at least 15 days following admission and “hospital onset-probable hospital acquired” when a first positive specimen occurred on days eight to 14 (HO. pHA) following admission Where cases of hospital acquired infection have occurred, they have been investigated using a root cause analysis (RCA) investigation process either as individual case reviews or part of a wider outbreak investigation. Hospital outbreaks of COVID-19 are robustly managed by the IPT using a formal incident/ outbreak management process and reported in the national outbreak management system with ongoing monitoring until 28 days following the last confirmed case. Learning from individual case investigations or outbreaks is shared promptly across the Trust and used to inform ongoing IPC actions and strategies. Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) UHS has seen wide fluctuations in the monthly number of C. diff cases with evidence of cases rising a few months after a major wave of COVID-19 infections. Reasons for the increase are not clear, but are likely to be multifactorial, and possibly related to the use of high-risk antibiotics during the first waves of the pandemic. This increase is being reported nationally with increases in rates of both community onset and hospital onset cases according to UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) surveillance data. 20 QUALITY ACCOUNT 2021/22 Figure 11: Trends in hospital acquired C. diff * *Is classified into community-onset (COHA) and Hospital onset (HOHA) depending on identification of C. diff in community or hospital respectively. MRSA In 2021/22, UHS recorded cases of hospital acquired MRSA bloodstream infection as illustrated in the figure below. Figure 12: Number of patients who acquired MRSA (non-bloodstream infection) during their hospital stay The downward trend is representative of the trend that has been seen over the last few years. 21 QUALITY ACCOUNT 2021/22 Blood stream infections (BSI) All BSI cases are reviewed by the IPT to identify contributing factors or gaps in practice which may have contributed to infection occurring. They are investigated in detail to identify any learning that may drive improvements. Overall our reviews have noted that cases are complex with multiple risk factors for infection. A proportion of cases of BSI are assessed as unavoidable, but where infection is thought to have been preventable (e.g., occurred because of the presence of an invasive device such as an intravenous line or urinary catheter), this is followed up with appropriate investigation to identify emerging trends/themes, organisational learning and targeted improvement actions. The NHS Standard Contract 2021/22 includes quality requirements for NHS trusts and NHS foundation trusts to minimise rates of defined Gram-negative bloodstream infections to threshold levels set by NHS England and NHS Improvement. This includes klebsiella species, pseudomonas and E-coli. Monitoring of MSSA bloodstream infections is also undertaken. Hospital BSIs are defined as those that occur after the first 48 hours of admission (post 48-hour BSI). Figure 13: The number of cases of hospital acquired E coli BSI Figure 14 : The number of cases of hospital acquired klebsiella BSI 22 QUALITY ACCOUNT 2021/22 Figure 15 : The number of cases of hospital acquired pseudomonas BSI Figure 16 : The number of cases of hospital acquired MSSA BSI Vigorous focus and attention to IPC strategies targeted at reducing the risk of hospital transmission of COVID-19 has been central to our ongoing response to the pandemic, whilst at the same time focusing on restoring operational activity. Despite the challenges, UHS has one of the lowest rates of MRSA BSI in the country, and hospital-acquired COVID-19 infection is lower than in comparable hospitals. The health, safety and wellbeing of our patients, communities and staff has remained a priority,
Url
/Media/UHS-website-2019/Docs/About-the-Trust/Annual-reports-and-quality-accounts/UHS-AR-21-22-Quality-Account.pdf
Annual report 2021-2022
Description
2021/22 Incorporating the quality report University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Annual Report and Accounts 2021/22 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Schedule 7, paragraph 25(4)(a) of the National Health Service Act 2006 © 2022 University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Table of contents Welcome from our chair and chief executive 6 Overview and performance 8 Performance report 9 Overview 10 Accountability report 36 Directors’ report 37 Remuneration report 59 Staff report 72 Annual governance statement 94 Quality report 105 Statement on quality from the chief executive 106 Priorities for improvement and statements of assurance from the board 109 Other information 182 Annual accounts 210 Statement from the chief financial officer 211 Auditor’s report 212 Auditor’s report including audit certificate 218 Foreword to the accounts 220 Statement of Comprehensive Income 221 Statement of Financial Position 222 Statement of Changes in Taxpayers’ Equity 223 Statement of Cash Flows 224 Notes to the accounts 225 5 Welcome from our chair and chief executive As we emerged from the most severe phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, 2021/22 was another challenging year for everyone at University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (UHS). It was also a year on which we can look back with pride at what we achieved together in unprecedented circumstances. Amongst many notable achievements over the past twelve months, we have: • Led on globally ground-breaking research trials to inform the country’s COVID-19 vaccine booster strategy, including the world’s first COVID-19 vaccine booster study of mixed schedules. • Successfully managed infection prevention and control, putting us amongst the best in the country for minimising nosocomial spread. This was against a backdrop of, at times, R-rates in our local community that were amongst the highest in the country. • Published new strategies for digital and sustainability, which respectively set out how we are revolutionising our technical capability to meet changing patient needs and responding to the growing threat posed by climate change as part of the NHS-wide commitment to reaching carbon net zero by 2045. The pandemic also highlighted the vital importance of our staff’s wellbeing so we could continue to meet the needs of the most vulnerable and sick within our community and beyond. In response, we launched and have sustained a comprehensive programme of support to help our staff recognise and address the physical and emotional burden of the last two years. In financial terms, the Trust achieved its forecast breakeven position in 2021/22 on a turnover of £1.15 billion. Our strong, long-term financial performance meant we could continue investing in the capacity and condition of our estate. During the last year we have welcomed patients into our new ophthalmology outpatients area, expanded the majors area of our emergency department, built Hamwic House for treating cancer patients and opened four new operating theatres. Our ambition remains to increase capacity and improve facilities so that we can meet rising demand for our services, treating more people in improved settings than ever before. The momentum we are building is informed and driven by our five-year strategic plan, which describes our collective ambitions on our journey to becoming a world-class organisation. Our successes over the last twelve months were set against a backdrop of exceptional pressure on our services, unlike anything we have seen before. Like most hospital trusts, the lifting of COVID-19 restrictions in the wider community saw significant increases in attendances at our emergency department and increased referrals for treatments including surgery and cancer care. Everyone at UHS is working hard to restore services and bring waiting times down, although there are headwinds impacting our elective recovery. As we write this report, we have more than 200 patients in the hospital who no longer need our care but are waiting for discharge, either to a care home or to their own home with domiciliary care packages. Like many sectors, our local authority partners are struggling to buy or directly provide the capacity that is needed due primarily to workforce shortages. On occasion, the number of patients stranded in our hospitals means we have had to cancel scheduled surgery patients due to a lack of beds. Despite this, we are making good progress on recovering our elective performance, for example the number of elective surgery procedures in May 2022 was over 8% higher than in May 2019, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. 6 Looking back over the year, our achievements would not have been possible without every single one of our 13,000 staff, who have gone above and beyond to put patients first. As a Trust Board we recognise that our people are our greatest asset. The results of this year’s NHS annual staff survey are encouraging, with the percentage of staff recommending UHS as a place to work being the sixth highest across all NHS trusts in England. However, we know we can do even better and our new people strategy will help us achieve this by introducing programmes which enable our people to thrive, excel and belong in a diverse and inclusive environment. We ended the year by saying farewell to Peter Hollins, who completed his second and final term as chair on 31 March 2022. In the six years of his leadership, the Trust has undergone a huge transformation to the benefit of both patients and staff. Peter has been a trusted and respected colleague whose outstanding leadership has set UHS on course to be a world-class organisation with world-class people delivering worldclass care. We welcome the formation of the Hampshire and Isle of Wight integrated care system on 1 July 2022, which will facilitate increased integration and collaboration across health and social care partners. We look forward to continuing strong relationships with all our partners as we work to develop an NHS of which all the communities we serve can be proud. Jane Bailey Interim Chair June 2022 David French Chief Executive Officer June 2022 7 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE Performance report Introduction from our chief executive 2021/22 is the second year that the ways in which the Trust has worked, and the performance it has achieved, have been strongly influenced the COVID-19 pandemic. Our circumstances varied significantly through the year, however, by March 2022: • COVID-19 related restrictions had been removed across the wider community, but remained necessary within healthcare settings; • a combination of partial immunity and improved treatments had reduced the numbers of patients experiencing the most severe symptoms of COVID-19, but the total numbers of people being infected remained very high; and • the numbers of patients attending, or being referred to, healthcare services for other conditions had returned to pre-pandemic levels or higher. Our challenges and priorities have varied through the year in a similar manner, and have included: • providing sufficient urgent care capacity for patients with COVID-19 alongside those with other illnesses or injuries; • running our services with significantly increased levels of COVID-19 related absence amongst our staff, as infection rates have increased in the wider community; and • increasing the numbers of elective treatments provided, back to pre-pandemic levels and higher, to start to reduce patient waiting times and reverse the increases in waiting list sizes caused by COVID-19. Our performance this year has often been impacted by the adversity of the circumstances. We have not always been able to achieve the targets established prior to the pandemic, nor to deliver the standard of service that we would aspire to for our patients. The Trust is proud to have performed well in comparison to other hospital trusts across many performance measures, however, I would like to thank our patients for their understanding and patience, and all our staff for their resilience, commitment and dedication to care for patients and their colleagues. As we begin to emerge from the pandemic, and consider the year ahead, we look forward to working with patients, hospital colleagues, and partners across health and social care to: • continue the recovery from the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic; • improve our performance against key measures, continuing to perform well in comparison with other hospitals and moving closer to the national targets; and • continue to adapt and improve services such that the outcomes and results achieved for patients will be better than ever before. 9 Overview About the Trust Our services University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust is one of the largest acute teaching trusts in England with a turnover of more than £1 billion in 2021/22. It is based on the coast in south east England and provides services to over 1.9 million people living in Southampton and south Hampshire and specialist services, including neurosciences, respiratory medicine, cancer care, cardiovascular, obstetrics and specialist children’s services, to more than 3.7 million people in central southern England and the Channel Islands. The Trust is also a designated major trauma centre, one of only two places in the south of England to offer adults and children full major trauma care provision. As a leading centre for teaching and research, the Trust has close working relationships with the University of Southampton, the Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Wellcome Trust and Cancer Research UK. The Trust is consistently one of the UK’s highest recruiting trusts of patients to clinical trials and in the top ten nationally for research study volumes as ranked by the NIHR Clinical Research Network. 12,000 Every year over staff at UHS: treat around 160,000 inpatients and day patients, including about 75,000 emergency admissions see over 650,000 people at outpatient appointments deal with around 150,000 cases in our emergency department deliver more than 100 outpatient clinics across the south of England, keeping services local for patients The Trust provides most of its services from the following locations: • Southampton General Hospital – the Trust’s largest location, where a great number of specialist services are based alongside emergency and critical care and which includes Southampton Children’s Hospital. • Princess Anne Hospital – located across the road from Southampton General Hospital and providing maternity care and specialist care for women with medical problems during pregnancy and babies who need extra care around birth across the region. • Royal South Hants Hospital – although the Trust does not operate this site near the centre of Southampton it provides a smaller number of services from this location. • New Forest Birth Centre – located at Ashurst on the edge of the New Forest and run by experienced midwives and support staff it offers a safe, ‘home away from home’ environment for women having a healthy pregnancy and expecting a straightforward birth. The NHS patient services provided by the Trust are commissioned and paid for by local clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) and, in the case of more specialised services (such as treatments for rare conditions), by NHS England. Just under half of the Trust’s NHS patient services are paid for by CCGs and just over half are paid for by NHS England. We provide these under a standard NHS contract, which incorporates ongoing monitoring of the Trust and the quality of the services provided. 10 Our structure UHS gained foundation trust status on 1 October 2011. A foundation trust is a public benefit corporation providing NHS services in line with the core NHS principles: that care should be universal, comprehensive and free at the point of need. The Trust is licensed as a foundation trust to provide these services by Monitor (the independent regulator, now part of NHS England and NHS Improvement) and the healthcare services we provide are regulated by the Care Quality Commission. Being a foundation trust has enabled greater local accountability and greater financial freedom and has supported the delivery of the Trust’s mission and strategy over a number of years. The Trust has been a university teaching hospital since 1971. The diagram below provides an overview of the overall organisational structure of the Trust. Division A Surgery Critical Care Opthalmology Theatres and Anaesthetics Public and foundation trust members Council of Governors Board of Directors Executive Directors Division B Division C Division D Cancer Care Emergency Medicine Helicopter Emergency Medical Services Medicine and Medicine for Older People Pathology Specialist Medicine Women and Newborn Maternity Child Health Clinical Support Cardiovascular and Thoracic Neurosciences Trauma and Orthopaedics Radiology 11 Trust Headquarters Division Always Improving Central Operations Clinical Outcomes Commercial Development Communications Contracting Corporate Affairs Data and Analytics Education and Workforce Estates, Facilities and Capital Development Finance Health and Safety Human Resources Informatics Medical Examinerss Service Occupational Health Organisational Development Quality Patient Safety Planning and Productivity Procurement and Supply Research and Development Safeguarding Strategy and Partnerships The Trust is also part of an integrated care system in Hampshire and the Isle of Wight, which is a partnership of NHS and local government organisations working together to improve the health and wellbeing of the population across Hampshire and the Isle of Wight. Our values Our values describe how we do things at UHS and act as a guide to all staff working with colleagues to deliver high quality patient care and a great patient experience every day. Our values are: Patients, their families and carers are at the heart of what we do. Their experience of our services will be our measure of success. Partnership between clinicians, patients and carers is critical to achieving our vision, both within hospital teams and extending across organisational boundaries in the NHS, social care and the third sector. We will ensure we are always improving services for patients through research, education, clinical effectiveness and quality improvement. We will continue to incorporate new ideas, technologies and create greater efficiencies in the services we provide. 12 Our strategy 2021-25 The Trust’s strategy was updated during 2020/21 to take account of everything our staff had experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic and what we had learnt from this. The vision for UHS is to continue on its journey to become an organisation of world class people delivering world class care. Our strategy is organised around five themes and for each of these it describes a number of ambitions we aim to achieve by 2025. Theme Ambitions Outstanding patient outcomes, • We will monitor clinical outcomes, safety and experience of our experience and safety patients regularly to ensure they are amongst the best in the UK By 2025 we will strengthen our and the world. national reputation for outstanding • We will reduce harm, learning from all incidents through our patient outcomes, experience and proactive patient safety culture. safety, providing high quality care • We will ensure all patients and relatives have a positive experience and treatment across an extensive of our care, as a result of the environment created by our people range of services from foetal and our facilities. medicine, through all life stages and conditions, to end-of-life care Pioneering research • We will recruit and enable people to deliver pioneering research in and innovation Southampton. We will continue to be a leading teaching hospital with a growing, reputable and innovative research and development portfolio • We will optimise access to clinical research studies for our patients. • We will enable innovation in everything we do, and ensure that ‘cutting edge’ investigations and treatments are delivered in Southampton. that attracts the best staff and efficiently delivers the best possible treatments and care for our patients. World class people • We will recruit and develop enough people with the right Supporting and nurturing our knowledge and skills to meet the needs of our patients. people through a culture that values • We will provide satisfying and fulfilling roles, growing our talent diversity and builds knowledge and through development and opportunity for progression. skills to ensure everyone reaches • We will empower our people, embracing diversity and embedding their full potential. We must provide compassion, inclusion and equity of opportunity. rewarding career paths within empowered, compassionate, and motivated teams. Integrated networks and collaboration We will deliver our services with partners through clinical networks, collaboration and integration across geographical and organisational boundaries. • We will work in partnership with key stakeholders across the Hampshire and Isle of Wight integrated care system. • We will strengthen our acute clinical networks across the region, centralising when necessary and supporting local care when appropriate. • We will foster local integration with primary and community care as well as mental health and social care services for seamless delivery across boundaries. • We will build on our successful partnership with University of Southampton (UoS), growing our reputation as a national leading university teaching hospital. 13 Theme Foundations for the future Making our enabling infrastructure (finance, digital, estate) fit for the future to support a leading university teaching hospital in the 21st century and recognising our responsibility as a major employer in the community of Southampton and our role in broader environmental sustainability. Ambitions • We will deliver best value to the tax payer as a financially efficient and sustainable organisation. • We will support patient self-management and seamless care across organisational boundaries through our ambitious digital programme, including real time data reporting, to inform our care. • We will expand and improve our estate, increasing capacity where needed and providing modern facilities for our patients and our people. • We will strengthen our role in the community as an employer of choice, a partner in delivery of services to our population and by leading the Greener NHS agenda locally. During each year of the strategy the Trust sets out a more detailed series of objectives to achieve and progress towards the delivery of its ambitions. In 2021/22 these objectives included: • Recovery restoration and improvement of clinical services • Introducing a robust and proactive safety culture • Empowering and developing staff to improve services for patients • Implementing the ‘Always Improving’ strategy • Delivering the first year of the research and investment plan • Restoring a full research portfolio and preparing for future growth • Delivering joint research and innovation infrastructure with UoS and Wessex partners • Increasing our people capacity (recruitment, retention, education) • Great place to work including focus on wellbeing • Building an inclusive and compassionate culture • Working in partnership with the integrated care system and primary care networks • Integrated networks and collaboration • Creating a sustainable financial infrastructure • Making our corporate infrastructure (digital, estate) fit for the future to support a leading university teaching hospital in the 21st century • Recognising our responsibility as a major employer in the community of Southampton and our role in delivering a greener NHS. Performance against these objectives will be monitored and reported to the Trust’s board of directors on a quarterly basis. Principal risks to our strategy and objectives The board of directors has identified and manages the principal risks to the delivery of its strategy and objectives through its board assurance framework. The principal risks to the delivery of its strategy and objectives identified by the Trust during 2021/22 were that: • It would have insufficient capacity to respond to emergency demand, reduce waiting lists for planned activity and provide diagnostics results in avoidable harm to patients • It would not be able to provide service users with a safe, high quality experience of care and positive patient outcomes • It would not effectively plan for and implement infection prevention and control measures that reduce the number of hospital-acquired infections and limit the number of nosocomial outbreaks of infection • It would not secure the required ongoing investment to support our pioneering research and innovation, driving clinical services of the future 14 • It would not realise the full benefits of being a University teaching hospital through working with regional partners to accelerate research, innovation and adoption; increasing the number of studies initiated and the patients recruited to participate in these studies and the delivery of new treatments and treatments that would not otherwise be available to patients • It would not be able to increase the UHS workforce to meet current and planned service requirements through recruitment to vacancies and maintaining annual staff turnover below 12% and develop a longerterm workforce plan linked to the delivery of the Trust’s corporate strategy • It would not develop a diverse, compassionate and inclusive workforce, providing a more positive staff experience for all staff • It would not create a sustainable and innovative education and development response to meet the current and future workforce needs • It would not implement effective models to deliver integrated and networked care, resulting in suboptimal patient experience and outcomes, increased numbers of admissions and increases in patients’ length of stay. • It would be unable to deliver a financial breakeven position and support prioritised investment as identified in the Trust’s capital plan within locally available limits (CDEL). • It would not adequately maintain, improve and develop our estate to deliver our clinical services and increase capacity. • It would fail to introduce and implement new technology and expand the use of existing technology to transform our delivery of care through the funding and delivery of the digital strategy. • It would fail to prioritise green initiatives to deliver a trajectory that will reduce our direct and indirect carbon footprint and reach net zero direct carbon emissions by 2040 and net zero indirect carbon emissions by 2045 While the COVID-19 pandemic presented the Trust with new risks as it introduced more stringent infection control processes, stopped certain types of activity and responded quickly to care for large numbers of seriously ill patients who had tested positive for COVID-19, it also prompted innovation across a wide range of areas. However the ongoing impact of the pandemic on both our staff, patients who have had COVID-19 and patients who have waited longer than expected for treatment as a result, have added to the risks facing the Trust. This risk has continued into 2021/22 and has been coupled with increases in referrals for cancer and increased attendances to our emergency department and non-elective activity. National targets for performance have not been amended as a result of the pandemic, although the national plan has focussed on the recovery of activity levels as the first stage in a restoration of elective services. Capacity – The initial and subsequent waves of the COVID-19 pandemic have led to increases in the waiting times for patients and the number of patients waiting more than 52, 78 and 104 weeks has increased significantly. While there was a significant reduction in the number of patients waiting over 104 weeks in 2021/22, with the Trust expecting that no patients will be waiting more than 104 weeks by July 2022, its ability to reduce the overall waiting list and the length of time patients are waiting for treatment remains one of the key risks for the Trust. This may be compounded by future waves of the COVID-19, a continuation of the sustained demand for urgent non-elective activity and an ongoing number of referrals, often requiring more complex treatment due to delays in people visiting their GPs for the first time and presenting with more advanced disease. The Trust utilised the support available from the independent sector to continue cancer treatment and surgery for those patients at highest risk and continues to make use of independent capacity for cardiac surgery. It also increased the number of outpatient attendances which took place by telephone or video call. The Trust developed a clinical assurance framework during the year to better assess the risk of harm to patients as a result of delays in treatment and this has been utilised in decision-making around the allocation of resources to those areas where there is the greatest risk of potential harm to patients. In addition to opening additional capacity during 2021/22 (described in the Estates section below), the Trust also committed expenditure in 2021/22 to open further wards and operating theatres during 2022/23 and 2023/24. These initiatives will contribute to further improvements in elective waiting times in coming years. 15 Quality and compliance – The Trust continued to monitor the quality of care delivered throughout 2021/22. During the COVID-19 pandemic the primary focus became infection prevention and control, with the launch of an award-winning COVID ZERO campaign that saw the Trust reduce the transmission of the virus in hospital (nosocomial transmission). While the Trust continued to perform well overall, the Trust exceeded its annual threshold for Clostridium difficile infections and there was one MRSA bacteraemia during March 2022, the only such event in 2021/22. The Trust continued to develop its proactive patient safety culture during 2021/22 with changes to the way in which patient safety incidents are investigated and the launch of its Always Improving strategy and transformation initiatives in theatre efficiency, patient flow and outpatients. Reporting and investigation of incidents continued during 2021/22. The Trust continues to prepare for the implementation of the new patient safety incident response framework in June 2022/23. Partnerships – During 2021/22, the Trust and its partners continued to work together to discharge patients safely, to ensure patients requiring urgent cancer treatment and surgery were able to continue their treatment in the independent sector and to develop the regional COVID-19 saliva testing programme for local schools, hospitals and other employers. The new arrangements for integrated care systems will be implemented in July 2022. This is expected to reinvigorate work with partners at a system, place and provider level in Hampshire and Isle of Wight. The Trust is already part of an acute provider collaborative with other acute trusts in Hampshire and the Isle of Wight and is progressing a number of projects including the development of an elective hub at Winchester Hospital, diagnostics, pathology, endoscopy and imaging networks. The Trust also continued to progress research activity and opportunities with the University of Southampton and Wessex health partners. Workforce – The Trust continued to recruit nurses from overseas and through targeted recruitment campaigns during 2021/22 meaning that the number of nursing vacancies has remained relatively stable. Vacancies in other areas have increased reflecting a more competitive job market, particularly for lower band roles. The Trust also continued to work with its staff networks and specific focus groups to increase diversity in leadership roles. Staff turnover remained above the 12% target during 2021/22 and retention is a key element of the people strategy. While workforce capacity continues to be one of the biggest challenges faced by the Trust, during 2021/22 we have also focused on supporting our staff to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic and operational pressures by providing both the tools and time to help staff recovery. We are incredibly proud of the way that staff responded to the pandemic and continue to recognise this in whatever ways we can, however, we also want to ensure that staff continue to be able to contribute to patient care at their best and want to stay and develop with the Trust. Technology was also used at levels not previously achieved to continue to deliver training to staff and enable staff to work from home where possible, ensuring a safer environment for patients and staff in the hospitals. Estate – The Trust continued to invest in and develop its estate during 2021/22 including opening a new ophthalmology outpatient area, expansion of the majors area of the emergency department and four new operating theatres. These were part of £65 million of capital expenditure in 2021/22 that also included equipment, digital and the backlog maintenance programme. Innovation and technology – There have been exceptional levels of achievement in relation to COVID-19 related research activity, including in partnership with the universities. You can read more about these in part three of the quality account. The board of directors has also supported the funding of an expansion of research and innovation activity to allow the continued delivery of the Trust’s ambitions to innovate and improve and transform its services. 16 The Trust and its partners also been successful in securing external funding including one of only four successful NHSX awards to test the concept of federated trusted research environments with its Wessex health partners and core funding of £10.5 million for the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Southampton Clinical Research Facility (CRF) for the period between September 2022 and August 2027. Sustainable financial model –The Trust achieved its forecast breakeven position in 2021/22. Income was more predictable in 2021/22 as block contract arrangements remained in place in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and ensured that costs were covered, however, funding from the elective recovery fund, particularly, in the first half of 2021/22 introduced a degree of income volatility as did changes to the framework for the elective recovery fund half way through the year. The Trust continues to maintain a strong cash position and to implement improvements and efficiency savings, allowing it to continue to invest in its services. The financial outlook across the NHS looks extremely challenging going into 2022/23 due to the reductions in non-recurrent funding and efficiency targets. The Trust currently has an underlying deficit, with pressures on energy prices and drugs cost growth within block contract arrangements, which had been supported with non-recurrent funding in previous years. While specific funding has been provided to address inflationary pressures there is a risk that inflation could exceed this funding and raw material and supply shortages could also impact on costs. Performance overview The Trust monitors a very wide range of key performance indicators within its departments, divisions, directorates and executive committee. Assurance for our board of directors and executive committee includes an integrated performance report which is reviewed monthly and contains a variety of indicators intended to provide assurance regarding implementation of our strategy and that the care we provide is safe, caring, effective, responsive and wellled. The integrated performance report also includes a monthly ‘spotlight’ section, to enable more detailed consideration of any topics that are of particular interest or concern. The selection of topics is informed by a rolling schedule, any performance concerns and requests from the board of directors. Assurance for our council of governors includes a quarterly Chief executive’s performance report, which includes a range of non-financial and financial performance information. 17 Performance analysis COVID-19 Impacts In 2021/22, the most prominent impacts of COVID-19 have been in relation to occupancy of inpatient beds by patients with a COVID-19 diagnosis and increased levels of staff sickness absence associated with COVID-19, in addition to normal levels of absence due to other causes. The impact of COVID-19 has varied significantly through the year, linked primarily to the prevalence of the disease within the wider community. In comparison to 2020/21: • bed occupancy (all types) did not reach the same exceptional peaks, however, it exceeded 50 patients between August 2021 and March 2022 and reached an average of 83 in March 2022; • the number of patients requiring treatment in intensive care and high care were much reduced, though still significant; • fewer patients were admitted requiring hospital treatment for COVID-19 alone, and greater numbers were admitted requiring treatment for other medical conditions who were also infected with COVID-19 at the same time; • staff sickness absence levels were typically higher, particularly in the second half of the year when national restrictions had been removed and COVID-19 infections in the community increased – the sickness absence rate (from all causes) peaked at 6% in March 2022 All bed types Intensive care/higher care beds 18 Staff sickness absence Emergency access through our emergency department Following a reduction during the first year of the pandemic, the numbers of patients who presented to receive care at our emergency department increased exponentially in 2021/22. Attendance levels exceeded the higher levels seen prior to the pandemic by approximately 10%. All patients presenting to the emergency department This exceptional increase in the clinical demand upon our department has had a significant adverse impact upon the timeliness of care, particularly for those patients who have a less urgent condition. The department has also continued to deliver services separately for those patients who have respiratory symptoms and those who do not, and to implement additional infection control measures. Emergency access performance is measured as the percentage of patients discharged from emergency department care or admitted to a hospital bed within four hours of arrival to the department. The national target of 95% was not achieved and the Trust experienced a large deterioration in our own performance to 64% (main ED/Type 1 attendances) by March 2022. Our performance compared favourably with other acute trusts in England despite this, however. 19 Emergency access four hour performance The number and duration of any ambulance handover delays are another important performance indicator. Ensuring that ambulance staff can ‘hand over’ the patients they convey to our emergency department without delay is important because this releases the staff and their vehicle to meet the needs of other medical emergencies in the community. We are very proud to have an exceptionally good record in this regard, working with colleagues in ambulance services to transfer arriving patients into our emergency department and the care of our staff even when the hospital is already fully occupied. 20 Elective Waiting times Demand 2021/22 has seen a continuation of the trend of increasing elective referrals, following a major reduction which occurred at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Referral rates to our services are now typically at, or above, the levels seen before the pandemic. Feedback from clinicians is that they are also seeing more patients with advanced disease than they would normally, because of delays in referral to the service/diagnosis. Accepted referrals The number of patients referred to hospital with suspected cancer increased exceptionally during 2021/22; the number of patients seen for a first consultant-led appointment was 27% higher than in 2020/21 and 18% higher than in 2019/20. Performance remained below the national target of 93% throughout the year, with a deterioration to 74% in December 2021 prior to a recovery to 90% in March 2022. Our performance also declined in comparison with other acute trusts in England. Most of the patients who waited longer than two weeks for their first appointment were within our breast service, which sees a very large number of referrals for suspected cancer and experienced a 22% increase in the number of patients seen compared to 2019/20. Additional consultants who specialise in breast cancer have now been recruited and performance in this service returned to target in April 2022. 21 Performance following ‘Two week wait’ urgent referral for suspected cancer 22 Activity The number of UHS hospital appointments, diagnostic tests and elective admissions all increased significantly during 2021/22. The number of appointments undertaken, and diagnostic tests performed, exceeded activity levels in both 2019/20 and 2020/21. The number of elective and day case admissions increased significantly compared to 2020/21 (the first year of the pandemic) yet remained approximately 10% below the levels achieved between April 2019 and February 2020 (prior to COVID-19). There were a wide range of factors influencing these activity levels, and the lower levels of admitted activity specifically, including: • the availability of beds for the admission of elective patients after emergency patients with COVID-19 and other conditions had been accommodated; • the availability of staff to deliver elective care, during periods of increased COVID-19 bed occupancy, and during periods of increased staff absence related to COVID-19; • additional infection prevention measures which were maintained, particularly within inpatient treatment settings where risks of COVID-19 transmission are otherwise increased. Most of the activity has been delivered within NHS hospitals in 2021/22 (local independent sector hospitals were used to replace NHS elective capacity in 2020/21), and we have recruited additional staff and invested in an additional ward, theatres and outpatient rooms in order to be able increase our treatment activity. The graphs below show 2021/22 activity levels as a percentage of those achieved prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Elective admissions (including day case) 23 Outpatient attendances Diagnostics Our performance measures for diagnostics report on a total of 15 different frequently used tests. At the end of March 2022, 20% of patients were waiting more than six weeks to receive their investigation. This is a significant improvement compared to 28% of patients waiting more than six weeks at the end of March 2021, yet still significantly worse than the national target (1%) and UHS performance prior to pandemic. At the end of March 2022, the total waiting list size (including patients waiting less than six weeks) had increased by 14% compared to March 2021 and was 34% larger than before the pandemic. These trends reflect a combination of large reductions in diagnostic activity in the first year of the pandemic, followed by record levels of diagnostic tests being performed during 2021/22 (7% higher than before the pandemic) combined with very high levels of referrals for diagnostic testing over the same period. 24 The tests with largest numbers of longer waiting patients are non-obstetric ultrasound, peripheral neurophysiology, MRI and CT. Initiatives to improve performance include the recruitment of additional staff in the relevant professions and investment in additional equipment, in the context of NHS forecasts that diagnostic demand will continue to increase over the longer term. Patients waiting for a diagnostic test to be performed (sum of 15 different frequently used tests) Percentage of patients waiting over 6 weeks for a diagnostic test to be performed 25 Referral to Treatment Our waiting list from referral to treatment increased in size by 27% (9,768 patients) during 2021/22 and is now 36% larger than before the pandemic. Both referrals and hospital activity declined steeply at the start of the pandemic, but referral levels increased more quickly than hospital activity following this. The rate at which the waiting list is increasing has however reduced in the most recent six months. Number of patients waiting between referral and commencement of a treatment for their condition The national target is that at least 92% of patients should be waiting for treatment no more than 18 weeks from their referral to hospital. Our performance has deteriorated from 80% immediately before the pandemic, to 68% at the end of March 2022. Our performance continues to be typical of the major teaching hospital trusts that we benchmark with, and the trend has been similar to that experienced across trusts in England. Percentage of patients waiting up to 18 weeks between referral and treatment 26 The fact that some patients wait significantly longer than the 18 week target is a particular concern. In 2020/21 NHS England targeted the stabilisation of the numbers of patients waiting more than 52 weeks and the elimination of waiting times more than 104 weeks (except when patients choose to wait longer). The percentage of patients waiting more than 52 weeks at UHS reduced from 9% to 4%. The number of patients waiting more than 104 weeks reduced, from a maximum of 171, to 59 at the end of March 2022 (of whom only five were wishing to proceed with treatment at that time). The patients who typically wait longest for treatment continue to be those who require admission for surgical procedures in specialities such as ear nose and throat, orthopaedics and oral surgery. The Trust opened four additional operating theatres during 2020/21 and is working in collaboration with partners in the Hampshire and Isle of Wight integrated care system to implement further elective recovery plans. Percentage of patients waiting more than 52 weeks, between referral and commencement of a treatment for their condition 27 Cancer Waiting Times The timeliness of urgent services for patients with suspected cancer has unfortunately declined during 2021/22. The Trust continues to perform well in comparison with the teaching hospitals that we benchmark with and deliver a similar range of services, however. We have faced a range of challenges including: • a large increase in the number of new patients referred for investigation; • delays in the onward referral (for specialist investigation or treatment) of patients from other trusts which have also experienced increases in referrals; • the need to provide capacity to investigate and treat the full range of other conditions, alongside those patients with suspected cancer; and • an increase in the complexity of treatment required by new and existing patients, potentially because of delays in referral or treatment during the first year of the pandemic The national target is to provide the first definitive treatment to at least 85% of patients with cancer with 62 days of referral to hospital. UHS exceeded this level of performance in April 2021 but has not done so since then, performance deteriorated to 66% in January 2022 before recovering somewhat to 72% by March 2022. Treatment for Cancer within 62 days of an urgent GP referral to hospital The national target is to provide the first definitive treatment to at least 96% of patients within 31 days of a decision to treat being made and agreed with the patients. Trust performance has been very variable in 2021/22, ranging from 89% to 98% in individual months. Likewise, performance has ranged from below average in some months, to amongst the best in the group of teaching hospitals that we benchmark with. 28 First definitive treatment for cancer within 31 days of a decision to treat A range of initiatives are being pursued to maintain and improve the timeliness of our cancer services including: • changes to some of the processes for the referral and initial assessment of patients with suspected cancer, for example the inclusion of high quality photographs within referrals for suspected skin cancer; • projects to refine processes and procedures for the investigation of suspected gynaecological and urological cancers; • an operating services improvement programme designed to improve the flow of patients, and the numbers of patients treated, through our existing theatre facilities; and • staffing level increases and recruitment to clinical roles in specialities where the increases in demand require this. Quality priorities The Trust set four quality priorities in 2021/22, which were aimed at ensuring we continued to deliver the highest quality of care. The quality priorities were shaped by a range of national and regional factors as well as local and Trust‐wide considerations. We recognised the overriding issues of significant operational pressures being felt right across the health and social care system, including those associated with the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic, by limiting the number of priorities to four. We also acknowledged the risk that the delivery of our priorities could be disrupted by the ongoing pandemic and that we needed to be flexible in adapting the priorities to changing circumstances. The Trust set the following four priorities: 1. Introduction of midwifery continuity of carer for women at risk of complications in pregnancy. 2. To support staff wellbeing and recovery. 3. Managing risks to patients delayed for treatment and restoring elective programmes. 4. Reducing healthcare associated infection (HCAI) 29 The Trust achieved three of the quality priorities and partially achieved one priority. In relation to midwifery continuity of carer, the Trust’s performance exceeded the ambition that had been set by NHS England in 2020/21 following its national review of maternity services in 2015 as shown below. NHS England ambition set in 2020/21 35% of women will be booked to receive care in a continuity of carer team 35% of black and minority ethnic women booked to receive care in a continuity of carer team 35% of women living in an IMD-1 area (most deprived areas measured using indices of deprivation) Percentage achieved 41.7% 75% 80% The Trust continued to introduce programmes, interventions and wider support offerings to promote staff wellbeing and recovery in 2021/22. Our 2021/22 annual NHS staff survey results are positive with our scores relating to wellbeing above the benchmark average. Contributing factors to wellbeing such as staff engagement, morale, staff experience in areas such as kindness and respect, feeling valued and trusted to do their job were all above the benchmark average. More information about staff health and wellbeing is included in the staff report below. The Trust only partially achieved the priority relating to managing the risks to patients delayed for treatment and restoring elective programmes. The Trust’s performance against elective waiting time standards are described in more detail above. While the Trust focused on prioritising all patients waiting for surgery to ensure we continued to treat people based on need and urgency, we continue to recognise the impact of delays on people’s quality of life and, at times, outcomes. COVID-19 remained a key area of focus for the Trust in 2021/22 in terms of infection prevention. The Trust implemented a number of awareness campaigns, including its award-winning COVID ZERO campaign, and strategies to reduce in-hospital transmission of COVID-19 and kept these under review throughout the year. The chart below shows the trend of hospital-onset cases of COVID-19, which has broadly followed local and national prevalence of the virus, and the Trust’s performance compared very favourably with its local and national peers. 30 The table below provides an overview of the Trust’s performance against national and other infection prevention standards and limits to minimise infections, the majority of which have been achieved by the Trust. Category National Objectives: MRSA bacteraemia Clostridium difficile infection E coli Bacteraemia End of year RAG Action /Comment R One MRSA bloodstream infection attributable to UHS 2021/22 in March 2022. R 74 cases against a threshold of 64 for the year. G 138 cases in 2021/22 against a threshold of 151. Klebsiella Bacteraemia A 64 cases in 2021/22 against a threshold of 64. Pseudomonas Bacteraemia MSSA G 30 cases in 2021/22 against a threshold of 34. 43 cases in 2021/22 after 48 hours in hospital. Other: Hospital onset, healthcare associated COVID-19 103 hospital-onset probable healthcareassociated cases in 2021/22. 125 hospital onset definite healthcare associated cases in 2021/22. Prudent antibiotic Antimicrobial prescribing Stewardship G The standard contract requirement for reduction in antibiotic usage for 2021/22 was waived, as in 2020/21. Had it been applied as anticipated, the Trust would very likely have met this. Provide Assurance of Infection G The annual infection prevention audit assurance of Prevention Practice programme was reinstated in April 2021 for basic infection Standards the monitoring and assurance of infection prevention prevention and control practices but practice: subsequently suspended in September 2021. You can find more information about how the Trust delivered and measured its quality priorities, including feedback from patients and staff and improvement aims and quality priorities for 2022/23, in the Trust’s quality account for 2021/22, incorporated in the Trust’s annual report and accounts. 31 Financial performance The Trust delivered a surplus of £0.048 million from a revenue position of over £1.2 billion, once items deemed as “below the line” by NHS England and NHS Improvement, su
Url
/Media/UHS-website-2019/Docs/About-the-Trust/Annual-reports-and-quality-accounts/Annual-report-2021-2022.pdf
Annual-report-and-quality-account-2019-20
Description
ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2019/20 Incorporating the quality account 2019/20 Page 2 University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Annual report and accounts 2019/20 incorporating the quality account 2019/20 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Schedule 7, paragraph 25 (4) (a) of the National Health Service Act 2006 Page 4 ©2020 University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Page 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview and performance report Welcome from our chair A word from the chief executive Overview of the Trust Statement of purpose and activities History of UHS Our executive team structure Structure of our services Our vision and values Our priorities, key issues and risks Voluntary disclosures Equality, diversity and inclusion 92 8 9 Environmental sustainability and climate chan ge 95 Quality account 10 Chief executive welcome 101 10 11 Annual accounts 12 Statement from the Chief financial officer 183 13 Independent Auditors report 185 14 Foreword to accounts 192 Performance report Going concern disclosure 16 Reporting structure 16 Key performance indicators 18 How we monitor performance 19 Overview of performance of UHS 18 Regulatory body ratings 19 Environmental matters 23 Social, community, anti-bribery and human rights issues 23 Accountability report Members of the Trust Board 25 Trust Board purpose and structure 30 Board meeting attendance record 2018/19 31 Well-led framework 32 Finance and investment committee 34 Quality committee 33 Audit and risk committee 35 External auditors 36 Governance code 36 Performance evaluation of Trust Board and its committees 36 Remuneration 36 Countering fraud and corruption 37 Independence of external auditor 37 Internal audit service 37 Better payment practice code 37 Statement as to the disclosures to auditors 38 Disclosures 38 Income disclosures 38 Governance disclosures 38 Approach to quality governance 38 Council of Governors 41 Annual remuneration statement 51 Remuneration and appointments committee 54 Governors’ nomination committee 57 Staffing report 61 Staff survey results 65 Trade union facility time 68 Statement of chief executive’s responsibilities as the accounting officer 72 Annual governance statement 73 Page 6 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Page 7 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Welcome from our chair 2019/20 was another challenging year for University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (UHS). Demand for our services continued to rise rapidly, partly because of the ageing of the population we are here to serve and partly because of challenges in the external environment, but also because of our ability to offer exciting innovations for a range of conditions. As a result, we were not always able to offer treatment as rapidly as we wished. A major challenge towards the end of the year was the need to prepare the Trust for the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in the need to re-engineer services on an unprecedented scale. The response of UHS staff to these challenges has, from start to finish, been magnificent. We saw major innovation in improved patient pathways to accommodate rising demand, and the creativity of colleagues in readying the Trust for COVID-19 was truly breath-taking in its scope and energy. UHS has had a long record of effective financial management. By constantly seeking operational innovation and better value for money in procurement, the Trust has been able to generate the funds necessary to make a number of capital investments which will provide huge patient benefit in future. There has been rapid progress in our major project to refurbish and extend our general intensive care unit. Our £2.2m investment in our new urology unit was completed this year; it will transform our patients’ experiences. We have continued wherever possible to work with partners and we are delighted that work on the £5m Maggie’s Centre has started. Quite apart from the need to navigate our way through the COVID-19 crisis and into the world beyond it, the Trust needs to prepare to play its full role in the Hampshire and Isle of Wight healthcare system as it develops in a way consistent with the NHS Long Term Plan. The responsibility for this falls of course to the Trust Board and I believe that even after having had more change on the Board this year than for some time, we continue to have a strong and committed leadership team. Following the retirement of Caroline Marshall, our long-serving chief operating officer, in September 2019 we welcomed Joe Teape into the position. Joe had not been at the Trust long before we were thrust into the COVID-19 pandemic and got to grips with it impressively rapidly. During the year we said farewell to three non-executive directors (NEDs); Catherine Mason who left us to become chair of Solent Healthcare, Mike Sadler our clinical NED and Simon Porter. After a series of rigorous selection processes, we were delighted to welcome Dave Bennett, Dr Tim Peachey and Keith Evans as replacements. Simon had been both deputy chair and senior independent director (SID) and on his departure Jenni Douglas-Todd succeeded him in both roles. The work of the Board is supported, stimulated and, quite correctly, challenged by the Council of Governors (COG) whose enthusiasm is of huge value to the proper governance of UHS. All of the elections to the COG were competitive, in some cases by a multiplicity of candidates. Unfortunately, one of those vacancies resulted from the death of Edward Osmond. Although Edward had only recently been elected as a governor, he had shown huge commitment to the role and I am sure would have gone on to make a major contribution to UHS. We welcomed nine new governors and one new young governor. I look forward to working with them and all the other governors as we move through and beyond the COVID-19 world. Peter Hollins Chair Page 8 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT A word from the chief executive My first full year as chief executive officer of UHS has been exciting, inspiring, and extremely rewarding but not, as you would expect, without a considerable degree of challenge! The pressures on the NHS have been well publicised as we strive to provide the highest possible standard of care at a time when demand for our services escalates rapidly. At the same time, at UHS we need to play our full part in working out how we shape and deliver the health and care provision for our community into the future. During the year we have done a great deal of work on how we turn our vision for the Trust, world-class care for everyone, into what happens on the front line every day. While the vision may be new it is built firmly on our long-standing values; patients first, working together, and always improving, which together describe who we are as an organisation. These values were central to the development of our new clinical and corporate strategy which sets out an exciting future for UHS over the coming decade. It includes how we will deliver the safest care, delivering the best outcomes, as well as how we will focus on improving the health of our population, supporting both health and wellbeing. The values also provided the basis for our CQC rating of ‘Good’ awarded during the year as were some other fantastic accolades. These included a prestigious British Medical Journal award for improving care for older patients with the development of our frailty unit and activity hub. Our women’s and maternity care at the Princess Anne Hospital was named as being among the best in the world. In addition, we adopted prehabilitation for cancer patients, a pioneering service. There are countless other examples of innovation which have sprung from the creativity and innovative spirit at UHS. Some of these have involved better outcomes for patients, some an improved patient experience and others simply lower the cost of doing things, liberating money which we can then invest in improving other services. I’d like to thank every one of our staff for creating the spirit of UHS which means that the extraordinary happens every day. The world of health and social care is changing dramatically and we continue to be integral to the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Sustainability and Transformation Partnership (STP). UHS will have a leading part to play in ensuring that, with our partners, we forge a pattern for the provision of healthcare across the local system and beyond, delivering the highest possible standards of care on an enduring basis. As we entered 2020, we began preparing to face COVID-19, the largest pandemic we have seen. Some areas of the hospital are truly unrecognisable as we have adapted to the fight against this virus. The loss of life as a result of COVID-19 has been utterly devastating and it has, I am sure, touched us all personally. It has also challenged the health and wellbeing of all our staff, but particularly our frontline staff, in a unique way. I am not sure whether I am prouder of the spirit with which our staff have responded to the challenge or of the fact that they made us by common consent one of the best prepared trusts in the country. Finally, I’d like to recognise the acts of kindness I see throughout the Trust on a daily basis. It is one of the things that has struck me the most as I have got to know this organisation and the people within it. I watch how they support one another through challenging times, how they support patients and visitors in their own time and in work time, and how they go above and beyond every day for the people they’re caring for. Every day they make me hugely privileged to lead this amazing organisation. Paula Head Chief executive officer Page 9 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Overview of the Trust Statement of purpose and activities UHS is a large teaching hospital located on the south coast of England. We have a tripartite mission to provide clinical care, educate current and future healthcare professionals, and undertake research to improve healthcare for the future. Our clinical care encompasses local acute and elective care for 680,000 people who live in Southampton, the New Forest, Eastleigh and Test Valley. We also provide care for the residents of the Isle of Wight for many services. As the major university hospital on the south coast, UHS provides the full range of tertiary medical and surgical specialities (with the exception of transplantation, renal services and burns) to over 3.7 million people in central southern England and the Channel Islands. UHS is a centre of excellence for training the doctors, nurses and other healthcare professionals of the future. We work with the University of Southampton and Solent University to educate and develop staff at all levels, including a large apprenticeship programme, undergraduate and postgraduate education. Our role in research, developed in active partnership with the University of Southampton, is to contribute to the development of treatments for tomorrow’s patients. This work distinguishes us as a hospital that works at the leading edge of healthcare developments in the NHS and internationally. In particular we have nationally-leading research into cancer, respiratory disease, nutrition, cardiovascular disease, bone and joint conditions and complex immune system problems. We are one of the largest recruiters of patients into clinical trials in the country. Over 12,000 people work at the Trust, making it one of the area’s biggest employers. We also benefit from the contributions of over 1,000 volunteers. Our turnover in 2019/20 was £912m. History of UHS The Trust has its origins in the 1900s when the Shirley Warren Poor Law Infirmary was built on the site of what is now Southampton General Hospital. In the early half of the century, the site began to expand, including the opening of the school of nursing and the creation of the Wessex Neurological Unit. In 1971 a new medical school was opened in Southampton and the 1970s and 1980s saw a significant building programme encompassing the current footprint of Southampton General Hospital, Princess Anne Hospital and Countess Mountbatten House. During the 1990s, services were increasingly centralised at the general hospital, with the eye hospital and cancer services being relocated from elsewhere in the city. The Wellcome Trust funded a clinical research facility at the hospital in 2001 and this unit remains the foundation for much of the Trust’s groundbreaking medical research. In the last decade, development has continued with the opening of the North Wing Cardiac Centre in 2006, the creation of a major trauma centre with on-site helipad and the opening in 2014 of Ronald McDonald House for the relatives of sick children. Organisationally, Southampton University Hospitals Trust was formed in 1993, creating a single management board for acute services in Southampton. Eighteen years later, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (UHS) was formed (1 October 2011) when Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust was licensed as a foundation trust by the then regulator, Monitor (now known as NHS Improvement (NHSI)). Page 10 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Our executive team structure Executive team structure as at 31/03/2020 Page 11 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Structure of our services Our organisation is split into five areas, with our clinical services grouped into four divisions. Within each division there are care groups. Each division, with the exception of Trust headquarters, is led by a divisional management team consisting of: • divisional clinical director (DCD) • divisional director of operations (DDO) • divisional head of nursing/professions (DHN) • divisional research and development lead • divisional finance manager • divisional planning and business development (or strategy) manager • divisional education lead • division HR business partner • divisional governance manager (DGM) The diagram below outlines the five divisions and care groups/services within each. Each care group has a clinical lead, care group manager and matron/s for specific services as a minimum. Page 12 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Our vision and values Our vision outlines who we are and what we stand for, as well as describing the current challenges we face and our priorities for the future. It also provides an in-depth review of our three Trust values, which are summarised below: Patients first Patients and families will be at the heart of what we do and their experience within the hospital, and their perception of the Trust, will be our measure of success. Working together Our clinical teams will provide services to patients and are crucial to our success. We have launched a leadership strategy that ensures our clinical management teams are engaged in the day-today management and governance of the Trust. Always improving Our growing reputation in research and development and our approach to education and training will continue to incorporate new ideas, technologies and greater efficiencies in the services we provide Page 13 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Our priorities, key issues and risks Our goals 1. Improving patient journeys (system focus, integration) We will: • Write a strategic plan for integrated ‘front door; services to address capacity and demand mismatch and enable flow • Secure influence in primary care by establishing the hospital’s role in supporting primary care networks • Promote value-based healthcare, particularly: Introduce ‘advanced decision making’ • Redesign services to provide timely safe care and meet constitutional access trajectories • Deliver priorities relevant to UHS in the first year of the long-term plan including commissioning and long-term changes 2. Delivering value-based health and care We will: • Deliver the Trust financial plan and maximise any national funding • Prepare UHS for the new NHS financial regime • Deliver the Trust Quality Improvement plan to improve safety/experience and outcomes • Build capability for change by embedding quality improvement, innovation and transformation at a leadership level • Deliver the Cost Improvement Plan (CIP) without compromising on quality 3. Supporting health lives (prevention, wellbeing inequalities, outcomes and experience) We will: • Improve staff health and wellbeing • Improve population health, maximising the impact of UHS touch points • Develop an early warning tool to identify any deterioration in quality 4. Building an expert and inclusive workforce (diversity, engagement, leadership) We will: • Close the staffing supply gap in priority groups/services to provide high quality and timely care • Manage overall workforce cost to meet CIP challenge • Measure improvement in staff engagement by increasing participation in staff survey • Increase representation of diverse groups in leadership and decision making • Improve the staff engagement score 5. Being agile in meeting people’s needs (organisational elegance/design/flexibility) We will: • Reset organisational structure as necessary, responding to changes outlined in the NHS long-term plan • Leverage digital capability to support patient empowerment and self-care • Measure staff user satisfaction with the Trust IT systems and use this to support the digital strategy • Be agile in flexing resources, responding to fluctuating demand • Secure strategic influence by establishing UHS role in the transition from STP to ICS 6. Leading edge research, education and innovation (research and outcomes) We will: • Identify the capacity constraints to expand research and plan to address • Identify priority areas without a research base and set strategy • Improve quality and breadth of education and training programme Page 14 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) will continue to have a significant impact on public health, morbidity and mortality if adequate prevention and control is not in place. The Trust put rapid and robust arrangements in place early on to prepare for the potential surge in COVID-19 patients. As the government now announces the easing of the lockdown restrictions, the COVID-19 challenge continues to unfold and still represents a very significant future risk to the organization. Our response and mitigations will continue to evolve through 2020/21. Further details on our response to the COVID-19 challenge are in included in the Annual Governance Statement on page 73.. Key issues and risks 1. Inability to develop partnerships and redesign services innovatively renders the Trust unable to meet the expectations of the NHS long-term plan, our strategic plan, and sustainable elective and non-elective pathways. UHS continues to actively develop partnerships across the region and work within the Integrated Care System whilst promoting value-based healthcare and delivering priorities relevant to UHS in the first year of the longterm plan. 2. Failure to deliver regulatory requirements results in license breach and loss of local control with an enforced change in leadership, impacting on Goals 1 to 6. UHS continues to monitor progress against NHSI Performance framework at committee and Board level and build capability for change by embedding quality improvement, innovation and transformation at a leadership level. 3. Failure to achieve financial targets results in a shortfall in cash required to deliver the capital programme. A robust cost improvement programme is in place, continuously monitored through governance processes with a focus on delivery of the Trust’s financial plan. 4. Reduced access to resources compromises the quality of services. We will implement the Trust Quality Improvement plan to improve safety/ experience and outcomes. 5. Capacity and capability gaps in the workforce lead to an inability to provide safe and timely care. To mitigate this risk, we will continue to develop initiatives to improve staff health and wellbeing with proactive recruitment and retention initiatives in place. Staff engagement is monitored through staff survey and leadership and development training in place. 6. Lack of inclusion and diversity results in the failure to get the best from every individual. UHS has an equality, diversity and inclusion strategy, with established Trust networks and inclusive talent management programmes. Page 15 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Performance report Going concern disclosure After making enquiries, the directors have a reasonable expectation that the Trust has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. For this reason, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the accounts. Reporting structure As a large NHS university hospital foundation trust, UHS monitors performance within individual teams throughout the year with feedback processes in place to escalate issues to more senior management teams. At a corporate level we have an established executive reporting structure. Page 16 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Monthly Trust Board Public meeting where executive directors present high level summary to chairman and non-executive directors. Audit andrisk committee Finance and Investment committee Quality Committee People & Organisational Development Committee Trust executive committee (TEC) Review performance/issues/risks in greater depth For further detail on role of these committees please refer to the annual governance statement section. Trust Board study sessions Trust Board members meet to focus on a specific issue. Performance meetings Operational management team (led by chief operating officer) and division and care group management teams focus on individual patient and service pathways to develop improvement plans. Page 17 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Key performance indicators (KPIs) The Trust publishes a monthly integrated KPI Board report on our website which provides both the Board and the public with an overview of our performance. This report is constantly evolving as new areas of monitoring are developed and new areas of national focus become apparent. The format of the monthly report follows our six strategic goals: • Improve patient journeys • Value-based health and care • Healthy lives • An expert and inclusive workforce • Being agile in meeting people’s needs • Leading edge research, education and innovation The monthly report features the following sections: • Overview – Aggregation of commentary supporting all sections of the report • Safe • Effective • Caring • Activity • Emergency access • Referral to treatment and diagnostics • Cancer waiting times • Flow • Staffing • Research and development • Estates • Digital This report also includes summary versions of quarterly reports submitted to the Trust executive committee, which go into greater detail about patient experience, patient safety, clinical effectiveness outcomes, and infection prevention. In addition, a separate finance Board report is submitted to Trust Board on a monthly basis. The Emergency Access, Activity and Flow section has several KPIs that are relevant to the key risk of delivering the national access target. Some of the KPIs are: • Number of attendances • Time to initial assessment • Delayed transfers of care • Non-elective length of stay The Activity and Flow sections have several KPIs that are relevant to the key risk of capacity and occupancy. Some of the KPIs are: • Length of stay • New referrals • Number of attendances • Bed occupancy The Staffing (HR) section has several KPIs that are relevant to the key risk of Staffing. Some of the KPIs are: • Staff turnover • Nursing vacancies • Friends and Family Test – percentage of staff who recommend UHS as a place to work You can see full copies of the monthly report by visiting www.uhs.nhs.uk Page 18 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT How we monitor performance In addition to reviewing the data submitted to the Trust Board in these papers, we have a suite of tools available to compare UHS performance to that of comparable trusts around the country. Depending on the measures being monitored, UHS has a number of peer groups to benchmark against, including other local providers, major trauma centres and university hospital teaching trusts. Each NHS trust will service a different size and type of population and will offer a slightly different range of services so it is important to understand that this benchmarking provides an initial indication of performance rather than an absolute guide to our position nationally. In 2020/21 we continue to review the National Model Hospital data as it is published from NHS Improvement. The data and ability to compare our performance has helped to highlight areas of excellent practice and areas where there is potential to improve. The Trust is engaging with the model hospital team and has a member of staff on the ‘model hospital ambassador program’, as well as reviewing areas highlighted as having potential opportunities alongside finance and operational teams. Overview of performance Improving patient journeys 2019/20 was a challenging year in which we made only modest progress against some objectives to ‘Improve Patient Journeys’, and deteriorated in performance against others. • Inpatient length of stay remained stable but didn’t reduce as significantly as we had intended. The percentage of bed days used due to ‘Delayed Transfers of Care’ to other settings increased to nearly twice the national target. This, combined with growth in non-elective admissions (2.8% YTD excluding M12), resulted in occupancy rates which often exceeded our target, and an increase in patients cared for as ‘outliers’ away from their own speciality wards. • Emergency Access Performance (patients spending less than four hours in the emergency department) remained below both the national and local targets, though performance did show modest improvement during the year. There has been a further substantial increase in the volume of emergency department attendances. • The number of ‘elective’ patients waiting for treatment, the percentage of patients waiting within 18 weeks, and also the waiting time for first outpatient appointments, deteriorated significantly during the year. This has, in part, been impacted upon by reduced availability of clinical capacity due to staff concerns about the impact of new pension/tax regulations. There are, however, good indications that service changes are being implemented to increase consultation capacity in an efficient way as we had aimed to. There has been a substantial increase in consultations provided through ‘non-face-to-face’ routes, and a small decrease in the number of more traditional face-to-face consultations. • Urgent GP referrals for suspected cancer seen within two weeks saw a substantial and sustained improvement compared to the previous year, exceeding that target. • Performance against treatment within 62 days measures also demonstrated modest improvement during the year. Significant improvement in cancer performance continues to be required in order for UHS to deliver the national targets for timeliness of treatment. Page 19 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Delivering value-based healthcare • Complaints about UHS care have remained low, with the percentage of complaints ‘closed’ within 35 days above target for the first 11 months of 2019/2020. • Pleasingly, the availability of nursing care to our inpatients (expressed as care hours per patient per day) has increased progressively through the year from 8.6 to 8.9. An active overseas nursing recruitment and induction process has supplemented domestic recruitment and training. • The Trust has formed a 50/50 joint venture company with Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust called Wessex NHS Procurement Limited (WPL). From 1 December 2019, WPL is providing procurement, supply chain and materials management services to the Trust. The objectives of this innovative partnership include the consolidation of supplies purchases for both Trusts (combined revenue £1.4bn) to leverage better prices from suppliers and increased productivity through the elimination of previously duplicated procurement activity. Supporting healthy lives • There was very good performance on the Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio. The standard is 100 and we are consistently below this (83 in December, results are reported nationally retrospectively). This measure includes all patients in England with the same condition and compares those who have died with those that have survived. Being below 100 is a strong indicator of good care. • We continue to receive feedback, which is largely positive, through the national ‘Friends and Family’ survey for both our inpatient and maternity care. • The Board monitors a range of quality indicators. Of these, exceeding the target number of patients infected with clostridium difficile by six is of some concern, we are pleased that the number of severe/moderate medication errors has been maintained well below our target level, and following an increase in the number of Serious Incidents Requiring Investigation (SIRI) that were reported to Board in the early part of the year both the number of SIRIs has reduced and the timeliness of investigation has significantly improved. • Staff sickness levels were on target through the summer months, but significantly in excess of this through the winter months. As a whole, this is a cause for some concern. Building an expert and inclusive workforce • Very pleasingly, nursing vacancies were reduced significantly during the year, from 18% to 15%. Though still a challenge, this supports increases in the treatment capacity we can make available in the Trust, in our ability to open additional bed capacity to reduce our inpatient occupancy rates, and increases the care hours provided per patient per day. • Turnover rates have been in excess of our target throughout the year and there has also been a reduction in the percentage of staff who would recommend UHS as a place to work, though we remain above our target of 76%. The percentage of non-medical appraisals taking place within 12 months remains below target and is declining. • We have made steady progress this year towards our target of 15% of staff at Band 7 and above being from Black and Minority Ethnic backgrounds by 2023 (above 9% in March 2020). Being agile in meeting people’s needs • 2019/2020 has seen further progress in the implementation of digital tools that enable patients and clinicians to review and discuss patient specific clinical information in new ways, for example, large increases in usage of ‘My Medical Record’ and ‘digi-rounds’, modest further progress in electronic requesting and acknowledgement of tests, and stable usage of other tools. Page 20 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Leading edge research, education and innovation • The majority of recruitment targets have been achieved during 2019/20. • In Q4 UHS ranked 13th for contract commercial study recruitment, which is the same position achieved in the previous year and thus did not achieve our target of Top 10, with a constraint on pharmacy research capacity being a contributing factor. • The proportion of commercial studies closing in the 2019/20 financial year on time and to recruitment target ended the year below the 80% target at 68%, though the year-end target for the proportion of non-commercial studies closing on time and to recruitment target was exceeded at 88% compared to 80% target. Details of UHS performance can be found in the Integrated Performance report which is available in the Trust Board papers section of our website www.uhs.nhs.uk. UHS performance is scrutinised by the Board on a monthly basis. Paula Head, chief executive officer 22 June 2020 Regulatory body ratings Single Oversight Framework NHS Improvement’s Single Oversight Framework provides the framework for overseeing providers and identifying potential support needs. The framework looks at five themes: 1. Quality of care 2. Finance and use of resources 3. Operational performance 4. Strategic change 5. Leadership and improvement capability (well-led) Based on information from these themes, providers are segmented from one to four where ‘4’ reflects providers receiving the most support, and ‘1’ reflects providers with maximum autonomy. A foundation trust will only be in segments three or four where it has been found to be in breach or suspected breach of its licence. Segmentation During 2019/20 the Trust was confirmed as being placed within segment ‘2’. This segmentation information is the Trust’s position as at 31 March 2020. Current segmentation information for NHS trusts and foundation trusts is published on the NHS Improvement website. Finance and use of resources The finance and use of resources theme is based on the scoring of five measures from ‘1’ to ‘4’, where ‘1’ reflects the strongest performance. These scores are then weighted to give an overall score. Given that finance and use of resources is only one of the five themes feeding into the Single Oversight Framework, the segmentation of the Trust disclosed above might not be the same as the overall finance score here. The Trust was on track to deliver a use of resources score of ‘2’. However, as a direct result of COVID-19 our staff were unable to take their full complement of annual leave. The Trust was required Page 21 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT to allow for this additional cost, which was an unfunded cost pressure allowable by NHS Improvement. This had the impact of moving the distance from financial plan score to a ‘4’ and subsequently the overall use of resources score to a ‘3’. Area Financial sustainability Financial sustainability Financial sustainability Overall scoring Metric Capital service cover Liquidity Income and expenditure margin Distance from financial plan Agency spend Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 3 3 Care Quality Commission ratings: Overall rating for this trust Are services at this trust safe? Are services at this trust effective? Are services at this trust caring? Are services at this trust responsive? Are services at this trust well-led? Good Requires improvement Outstanding Good Requires improvement Good In December 2018, the CQC inspected four core services; urgent and emergency care, medicine, maternity and outpatients. It also looked at management and leadership, and effective and efficient use of resources. The CQC report (published on the 17 April 2019) rated the Trust as ‘good’ overall and ‘outstanding’ for providing effective services. All sites and services across the organisation are now rated as ‘good’ in the effective and caring domains, with Southampton General Hospital rated as ‘outstanding’ in these areas. The Well-Led section of this report provides further details of the inspectors’ findings. “Our inspectors found a strong patient-centred culture with staff committed to keeping their people safe, and encouraging them to be independent. Patients’ needs came first and staff worked hard to deliver the best possible care with compassion and respect. Inspectors saw many areas of outstanding practice, with care delivered by compassionate and knowledgeable staff. Several teams led by example with a continuous focus on quality improvement. The Trust did face some challenges especially with the ageing estates. Some patient environments were showing significant signs of wear and tear – but again staff were doing their utmost to deliver compassionate care”. Dr Nigel Acheson Deputy chief inspector of hospitals (South) Page 22 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Environmental matters We recognise that the Trust’s business has an impact on the environment. As a large hospital, we undertake a wide range of activities and use a large amount of resources. We are committed to environmental sustainability and consider it as part of the business culture. We continue to invest in energy saving initiatives and staff awareness campaigns that focus on promoting sustainability. We acknowledge that reducing waste and minimising the consumption of scarce resources is consistent with financial sustainability. Our sustainability disclosure section on pages 86 and 95 provides greater detail on the steps we are taking to reduce our activities’ impact on the environment. Social, community, anti-bribery and human rights issues We recognise our responsibilities under the European Convention on Human Rights (included in the Human Rights Act 1998 in the UK), which are relevant to health and social care. These rights include the: • right to life • right not to be subjected to torture, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment • right to liberty • right to respect for private and family life The Trust is committed to ensuring it fully takes into account all aspects of human rights in our work. At University Hospital Southampton we value our reputation for top quality care and financial probity and conduct our business in an ethical manner. The Bribery Act 2010 was introduced to make it easier to tackle the issue of bribery which is a damaging practice. Bribery can be defined as ‘giving someone a financial or other advantage to encourage them to perform their duties improperly or reward them for having done so’. To limit our exposure to bribery we have in place an Anti-Fraud, Bribery and Corruption Policy, a Standards of Business Conduct Policy and a Freedom to Speak Up (formerly Raising Concerns) Policy. These apply to all staff and to individuals and organisations who act on behalf of UHS. We also employ a local counter-fraud specialist who will investigate, as appropriate, any allegations of fraud, bribery or corruption. The success of our anti-bribery approach depends on our staff playing their part in helping to detect and eradicate bribery. Therefore, we encourage staff, service users and others associated with UHS to report any suspicions of bribery and we will rigorously investigate any allegations. In addition, we hold a register of interest for directors, staff, and governors, and ask staff not to accept gifts or hospitality that will compromise them or the Trust. The Board of Directors carries out its business in an open and transparent way. We are committed to the prevention of bribery as well as to combating fraud, and expect the organisations we work with to do the same. Doing business in this way enables us to reassure our patients, members and stakeholders that public funds are properly safeguarded. There are no important events since the year end affecting the Foundation Trust. No political donations have been made. The Trust has no overseas branches. Page 23 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Page 24 ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT Members of the Trust Board Board member Name Title Paula Head Chief executive officer David French Deputy chief executive officer and chief financial officer Gail Byrne Director of nursing and organisational development Biography Paula joined the Trust as chief executive in September 2018, having been chief executive at the Royal Surrey County NHS Foundation Trust in Guildford and before that at Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust. She began her career as a pharmacist working in the community, in hospitals and at health authorities before moving into general management and her first board position at Kingston Hospital. Since then she has spent time on the boards of commissioners and providers, including director of transformation at Frimley Park Hospital NHS FT. Paula lives in Hampshire and has a daughter studying medicine at the University of Southampton. David joined the Trust in February 2016 and served as interim chief executive officer from April to September 2018. He read Economics and Social Policy at the University of London before joining ICI plc, where he qualified as a chartered management accountant. David has extensive healthcare experience from the pharmaceutical industry, mostly Eli Lilly and Company where he held many commercial and financial roles in the UK and overseas. He joined the NHS in 2010 as chief financial officer of Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. He also serves as a non-executive director for Vivid Housing Limited, a social housing provider across Hampshire and the Solent. Gail joined the Trust in 2010 as deputy director of nursing and head of patient safety. Prior to this, she has worked at the Strategic Health Authority as head of patient safety, and director of clinical services at Portsmouth Hospital. Gail has also worked in Brisbane, Australia as a hospital Macmillan nurse, and as general manager of a special purpose vehicle company for the private finance initiative at South Manchester Hospitals. Declarations Daughter is a medical student at University of Southampton; Member of Hampshire & Isle of Wight Sustainability and Transformation Partnership Executive Delivery Group Non-executive director and chair of audit and risk committee, Vivid Housing Limited; Director, UHS Estates Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHSFT; Director, Southampton Commercial Estates Development Partnership (CEDP) Project Company Limited, a joint-venture company owned 50/50 by UHSFT and Prime plc; Member of Hampshire & Isle of Wight Counter Fraud Board; Member of Hampshire & Isle of Wight Sustainability and Transformation Partnership Capital Planning Panel; Director of Wessex NHS Procurement Limited (WPL), a joint venture company owned 50/50 by UHSFT and Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (from December 2019) Husband is a consultant surgeon at UHS; Daughter is a midwife at UHS (from March 2019) Dr Derek Sandeman Joe Teape Medical director Chief operating officer Derek was appointed to the Trust as a consultant physician in 1993 and went on to develop a regional Director of UHS Pharmacy Limited, endocrine service. Throughout his career he has had a wholly-owned subsidiary of extensive clinical leadership experience, most recently serving eight years as clinical director. Derek’s leadership roles have also included programme director for postgraduate education and the Wessex Endocrine Royal College representative. He has a strong history of wider system engagement, working collaboratively with partners to improve systems resilience and pathways. UHSFT; Member of Hampshire & Isle of Wight Sustainability and Transformation Partnership Clinical Executive Group Joe joined the Trust as chief operating officer in December Nil 2019. Previously he was deputy chief executive and director of operations of a large health board in Wales which managed integrated services across three counties including four district general hospitals as well as mental health, learning disability and community services. Prior to this, Joe worked in director roles across finance and strategy within provider acute trusts across the south west of England. Joe is passionate about providing leadership and support for all staff, whatever their profession, and contributing to excellent patient care. He is committed to open and ongoing engagement with the general public and often uses social media to engage with colleagues and with those who have an interest in healthcare. Page 25 ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT Non-executive directors Name Title Peter Hollins Chair Dr Tim Peachey Non-executive director David Bennett Non-executive director Biography Declarations Peter graduated in chemistry from Hertford College, Chair of CLIC Sargent Cancer Care Oxford. Joining Imperial Chemical Industries in 1973, for Children (a company limited by he undertook a series of increasingly senior roles in guarantee) (until December 2019); marketing and then general management. Following Council member of University of three years in the Netherlands as general manager of Southampton ICI Resins BV, he was appointed in 1992 as chief operating officer of EVC in Brussels – a joint venture between ICI and Enichem of Italy. He played a key role in the flotation of the company in 1994, returning in 1998 to the UK as chief executive officer of British Energy where he remained until 2001. From 2001, he held various chairmanships and non- executive directorships. In 2003, he decided to return to an executive role as chief executive of the British Heart Foundation in which post he remained until retirement in March 2013. He joined Southampton University Hospital Trust as a non- executive director in 2010, became senior independent director and deputy chairman of UHS in 2014, and was appointed chair in April 2016. Tim qualified as a doctor from Kings College Hospital Director, TP Medcon Ltd; Clinical School of Medicine in 1983. For nearly 20 years, he Safety Officer, Block Solutions Ltd; worked as a consultant anaesthetist at the Royal Free Non-executive director and Quality Hospital in London, specialising in pancreatic cancer Committee chair, Isle of Wight NHS surgery, liver surgery and liver transplantation. He also Trust developed an interest in medical leadership and management and has held positions such as clinical director, divisional director and medical director at the Royal Free. In 2012, Tim moved into full-time management as chief executive of Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals NHS Trust until its acquisition by the Royal Free. He then worked as the London associate medical director at the NHS Trust Development Authority before moving to Barts Health NHS Trust as improvement director and subsequently became deputy chief executive. Tim now holds two NHS non-executive posts. In addition to his role at University Hospital Southampton, Tim also serves on the board for Isle of Wight NHS Trust as deputy chair. He is a practicing mediator specialising in the healthcare sector. He also consults for companies in the medical information technology industry. Dave graduated in chemistry from the University of Director, Davox Consulting Limited; Southampton before entering management consulting, Non-executive director, Faculty of becoming a partner in Accenture’s strategy practice. Leadership and Medical In 2003 he joined Exel Logistics (later bought by DHL), Management (from November managing the company’s healthcare business across 2019); Director Royal College of Europe and the Middle East. During this time, he General Practitioners (RCGP) established NHS Supply Chain, a UK organisation Enterprises Ltd and RGCP responsible for procuring and delivering medical Conferences Ltd (from November consumables for the NHS in England, as well as sourcing 2019) capital equipment. Dave joined the board of Cable & Wireless as sales director in 2008. He later set up his own strategy consulting practice serving the healthcare sector, completing numerous projects in the UK and the US. Dave has also served as a non-executive director at The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust between 2009 and 2016. He chaired the Trust’s quality committee. Page 26 ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT Board member Name Title Jenni DouglasTodd Senior independent director/deputy chair (from 01/02/2020) Biography Jenni is a former chief executive of Hampshire Police Authority and the office of the Hampshire police and crime commissioner. After beginning her career in the probation service, she was headhunted into the civil service, at the Home Office, where she spent four years before becoming director of policy and research for the Independent Police Complaints Commission. In the latter role she was responsible for establishing governance of the new police complaints system. She then spent two and a half years as a resident twinning adviser for the UK, based in Turkey to help set up a law enforcement complaints system before taking up the role of chief executive of the county’s police authority. During her three years in the post, she supported the authority in developing effective governance processes to increase accountability and transparency. She also helped the organisation deliver cost-savings whilst still improving performance and developing closer working relations with neighbouring forces. Declarations Independent chair, Dorset Integrated Care System. Managing director, Diversa Consultancy Limited; Member of the Judicial Conduct Investigative Office; Nonexecutive director, Hampshire Cricket Board; Trustee, NACRO; Member of English Cricket Board’s Regulatory Committee. Professor Non-executive Cyrus director Cooper In 2012, she became chief executive and monitoring officer for the Hampshire police and crime commissioner, where she led the development of the office’s vision, mission, values and organisational strategy. She took on the role of investigating committee chair for the General Dental Council in 2014 and, in April that year, founded the Diversa Consultancy, which supports organisations with changes in business, culture and behaviour. She is also a member of the Judicial Conduct Investigating Office, a public appointment. Cyrus Cooper is professor of rheumatology and director of the MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit. He’s also vicedean of the faculty of medicine at the University of Southampton and professor of epidemiology at the Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics (rheumatology and musculoskeletal sciences, University of Oxford). He leads an internationally competitive programme of research into the epidemiology of musculoskeletal disorders, most notably osteoporosis. His key research contributions have been: • discovery of the developmental influences which contribute to the risk of osteoporosis and hip fracture in late adulthood • demonstration that maternal vitamin D insufficiency is associated with sub-optimal bone mineral accrual in childhood • characterisation of the definition and incidence rates of vertebral fractures • leadership of large pragmatic randomised controlled trials of calcium and vitamin D supplementation in the elderly as immediate preventative strategies against hip fracture. Director and professor of rheumatology, Medical Research Council (MRC) Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit; Vice-D
Url
/Media/UHS-website-2019/Docs/About-the-Trust/Annual-reports-and-quality-accounts/annual-report-and-quality-account-2019-202.pdf
Annual-report-2018-19
Description
ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2018/19 incorporating the quality account 2018/19 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Schedule 7, paragraph 25 (4) (a) of the National Health Service Act 2006 University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Annual report and accounts 2018/19 incorporating the quality account 2018/19 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Schedule 7, paragraph 25 (4) (a) of the National Health Service Act 2006 3 ©2019 University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview and performance report Welcome from our Chair 7 A word from the chief executive 8 Overview of the Trust Statement of purpose and activities 9 History of UHS 9 Our executive team structure 10 Structure of our services 11 Our vision and values 12 Our priorities, key issues and risks 13 Performance report Going concern disclosure 16 Reporting structure 16 Key performance indicators 17 How we monitor performance 18 Detailed analysis and explanation of the development and performance of UHS 18 Regulatory body ratings 23 Environmental matters 24 Social, community, anti-bribery and human rights issues 25 Accountability report Members of the Trust Board 27 Trust Board purpose and structure 31 Board meeting attendance record 2018/19 32 Well-led framework 33 Strategy and finance committee 34 Quality committee 34 Audit and risk committee 35 External auditors 36 Governance code 36 Performance evaluation of Trust Board and its committees 36 Remuneration 36 Countering fraud and corruption 36 Independence of external auditor 37 Internal audit service 37 Better payment practice code 37 Statement as to the disclosures to auditors 37 Disclosures 37 Income disclosures 38 Governance disclosures 38 Approach to quality governance 38 Council of Governors 40 Annual remuneration statement 49 Remuneration and appointments committee 52 Governors’ nomination committee 54 Staffing report 58 Staff survey results 62 Trade union facility time 66 Statement of chief executive’s responsibilities as the accounting officer 69 Annual governance statement 70 Voluntary disclosures Equality, diversity and inclusion 78 Environmental sustainability and climate change 80 Southampton Hospital Charity 84 Developments in informatics 85 Leading research into better care 85 Investing for the future 86 Quality account and quality report 2018/19 Chief executive’s welcome 88 Our approach to quality assurance 90 Our commitment to safety 90 Duty of candour 91 Our commitment to staff 91 Freedom to speak up 94 Our commitment to education and training 95 Our commitment to staffing rota gaps 96 Our commitment to technology to support quality 97 Our commitment to the Care Quality Commission 98 Our commitment to improving the environment for our patients 100 Review of quality performance 101 Clinical research 101 Review of services 102 CQUIN payment framework 103 Data quality 103 Participation in national clinical audits and confidential enquiries 104 How we are implementing the priority clinical standards for seven day hospital services 105 Learning from deaths 106 Progress against 2018/19 priorities 109 Priorities for improvement 2019/20 128 Conclusion 132 Responses to our quality account 133 Statement of directors’ responsibilities 138 Independent auditor’s report 139 Quality account appendix Appendix 1: Our quality priorities 2019/20 143 Appendix 2: Quality performance data 144 Appendix 3: CQUIN data 151 Appendix 4: Clinical audit and confidential enquiries data 154 Appendix 5: British Society of Urogynaecology 156 Appendix 6: National clinical audit: actions to improve quality 157 Appendix 7: Local clinical audit: actions to improve quality 161 Appendix 8: Shared decision making 173 Appendix 9: Registration with the Care Quality Commission 174 Annual accounts Statement from the chief financial officer 177 Foreword to the accounts 178 Independent auditor’s report 179 Financial accounts and notes 186 5 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Welcome from our chair 2018/19 was a year of change in the leadership of UHS. Following the departure of Fiona Dalton in March 2018 to run a hospital group in Canada, David French took on the role of interim chief executive officer. On behalf of the Trust Board I would like to thank David for agreeing to do so and also for doing such an outstanding job. During the year we welcomed three new non-executive directors to the Trust; Jane Bailey, Professor Cyrus Cooper and Catherine Mason. Catherine’s talents were also recognised by Solent NHS Trust and she has since left to help lead their organisation as chair. We were delighted to welcome Paula Head as chief executive in September after a rigorous and robust recruitment process. Paula’s experience as chief executive of Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Trust and, prior to that of Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, shone through and we were confident that under her leadership UHS would continue to develop, grow and improve. Demand for our services continues to rise rapidly as the result of a changing demographic and other factors, and at a rate far greater than our income. Despite this our staff continue to deliver exceptional care. I was delighted that this was recognised by the Care Quality Commission in their recent inspection when they again rated us as Good. The revised NHS Long Term Plan will inevitably require us to adapt to the changing pattern of healthcare, but we do so with enthusiasm. This year has shown just how adept we are as an organisation at responding positively to change, not only rising to the challenges it presents, but thriving with it. This is evident in the significant investments we have made in the Trust’s estate this year. Phase one of our new children’s emergency department is complete thanks to the continued support of the Murray Parish Trust. We also approved one of the largest capital investments in our history with the updating and expansion of our general intensive care unit. We recognised that it was as crucial to invest, not just in the physical environment within which we provide healthcare, but within the digital environment too, acknowledging that UHS is an NHS digital exemplar. We have invested significantly in information technology to enhance accessibility and improve both patient and staff experience. We look forward with confidence to helping lead the NHS into a new phase of delivering health and care for the United Kingdom into 2019/20. Peter Hollins Chair 7 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT A word from the chief executive Since arriving at UHS to take up my position as chief executive officer, I have heard and witnessed some incredible achievements by staff at the Trust. Dr Joanne Horne was named biomedical scientist of the year at the Advancing Healthcare Awards for her work in histopathology; Dr Beth McCausland, quality improvement fellow in dementia care, was named foundation doctor of the year by Royal College of Psychiatrists; Sarah Charters, consultant nurse and mental health lead for the emergency department was awarded an MBE for services to vulnerable adults and her vulnerable adult support team were also winners of a Nursing Times Award in the emergency and critical care category. The medicine for older people therapy team led by Hannah Wood was named most inspiring team at the national #EndPJParalysis awards while Marie Nelson, matron in research and development, and senior research sisters Jane Forbes and Kirsty Gladas won the silver award for clinical research site of the year at the PharmaTimes International Clinical Researcher of the Year Awards. Jean Piernicki, senior nurse manager in occupational health, was awarded the title of Queen’s Nurse in recognition of her high level of commitment to patient care and nursing practice. Fiona Chaâbane, a senior clinical nurse in neurosciences was named winner of the nursing and midwifery award at the BBC’s The One Show Patients Awards. The medicines advice service, led by Dr Simon Wills, picked up the HSJ Value Award for training and development for its medicines learning portal and Matthew Watts, head of news, was named operational services support worker of the year for the south of England at the Our Health Heroes Awards 2018. We were also delighted that the energy and sustainability team collected the clinical NHS Sustainability Award for its green wards project. These are just a few of the individual and team successes achieved this year. Our entire organisation can also be incredibly pleased and encouraged by the outcome of the recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspection, which rated UHS ‘good’ overall, with many individual areas being recognised as outstanding by the CQC. You can find full details of the inspection on page 98 of the quality account. Such positive inspection results link to equally positive staff survey results which saw UHS ranked as the second highest acute trust for staff satisfaction and fifth highest for staff recommending the Trust as a place to work and receive treatment. It’s made me incredibly proud to be able to say that I am part of such a driven team and it’s clear that the UHS team share my drive and determination to improve things for patients and staff every day. This is evident in both the successes I have already mentioned, but also in the pioneering work that is taking place across every department. Informatics has been pioneering new digital initiatives which they recently shared with Hadley Beeman, chief technology adviser to the secretary of state and social care. Surgeons Bhaskar Somani and Stephen Griffin have created a ‘twin surgeon’ model that has revolutionised the treatment of kidney stones in children. Dr John Paisey, consultant cardiologist, and his team were among the first in the world to implant and programme a pacemaker using Bluetooth technology. They performed four of the first five procedures in the world. While Professor Mike Grocott and his team created ‘surgery school’ which is transforming the fitness of patients prior to their operations and thereby reducing length of stay. These are by no means the entirety of our achievements this year and I would like to take the opportunity to thank every single member of staff at the Trust who continues to make UHS one of the leading trust’s in the UK. Paula Head Chief executive officer 8 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Overview of the Trust Statement of purpose and activities UHS is a large teaching hospital located on the south coast of England. We have a tripartite mission to provide clinical care, educate current and future healthcare professionals, and undertake research to improve healthcare for the future. Our clinical care encompasses local acute and elective care for 680,000 people who live in Southampton, the New Forest, Eastleigh and Test Valley. We also provide care for the residents of the Isle of Wight for many services. As the major university hospital on the south coast, UHS provides the full range of tertiary medical and surgical specialities (with the exception of transplantation, renal services and burns) to over 3.7 million people in central southern England and the Channel Islands. UHS is a centre of excellence for training the doctors, nurses and other healthcare professionals of the future. We work with the University of Southampton and Solent University to educate and develop staff at all levels, including a large apprenticeship programme, undergraduate and post-graduate education. Our role in research, developed in active partnership with the University of Southampton, is to contribute to the development of treatments for tomorrow’s patients. This work distinguishes us as a hospital that works at the leading edge of healthcare developments in the NHS and internationally. In particular we have nationally-leading research into cancer, respiratory disease, nutrition, cardiovascular disease, bone and joint conditions and complex immune system problems. We are one of the largest recruiters of patients into clinical trials in the country. Over 11,900 people work at the Trust, making it one of the area’s biggest employers. We also benefit from the contributions of over 1,000 volunteers. Our turnover in 2018/19 was more than £878m. History of UHS The Trust has its origins in the 1900s when the Shirley Warren Poor Law Infirmary was built on the site of what is now Southampton General Hospital. In the early half of the century, the site began to expand, including the opening of the school of nursing and the creation of the Wessex Neurological Unit. In 1971 a new medical school was opened in Southampton and the 1970s and 1980s saw a significant building programme encompassing the current footprint of Southampton General Hospital, Princess Anne Hospital and Countess Mountbatten House. During the 1990s, services were increasingly centralised at the general hospital, with the eye hospital and cancer services being relocated from elsewhere in the city. The Wellcome Trust funded a clinical research facility at the hospital in 2001 and this unit remains the foundation for much of the Trust’s groundbreaking medical research. In the last decade, development has continued with the opening of the North Wing Cardiac Centre in 2006, the creation of a major trauma centre with on-site helipad and the opening in 2014 of Ronald McDonald House for the relatives of sick children. Organisationally, Southampton University Hospitals Trust was formed in 1993, creating a single management board for acute services in Southampton. Eighteen years later, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (UHS) was formed (1 October 2011) when Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust was licensed as a foundation trust by the then regulator, Monitor (now known as NHS Improvement (NHSI)). 9 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Our executive team structure Associate director of corporate affairs (interim) Charlie Helps Constitution; Council of governors; legal services; insurance; risk management; policy management; freedom of information (FOI) general data protection regulations (GDPR) Chief executive Paula Head Director of HR Steven Harris Employee relations; pay and reward; resourcing and temporary staffing; staff engagement; staff performance and appraisal; occupational health and wellbeing; childcare services; communications Medical director Dr Derek Sandeman MD for research & development; clinical effectiveness; clinical practices and outcomes; professional regulation & standards; GP relationships Director of nursing & organisational development Gail Byrne Chief financial officer & deputy chief executive David French Clinical governance & patient safety; education; patient experience; clinical practice & outcomes; professional regulation & standards; complaints/PALS; HR/workforce; voluntary services; fundraising Caldicott Guardian Financial management; financial strategy; investment & ROI; audit; procurement; capital programme management; estates; Commercial development Division A Surgery Cancer care Critical care & theatres Chief operating officer Caroline Marshall Major incident planning; security Division B Division C Emergency medicine Women & newborn Specialist medicine/ ophthalmology Pathology Child health Support services Director of transformation & improvement Jane Hayward Division D Cardiovascular & thoracic Neurosciences Trauma & orthopaedics Cost improvement & transformation; information technology; information governance; core platform systems; informatics development; strategy; commissioning; business & capacity planning Senior Information Risk Owner (SIRO) Radiology 10 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Structure of our services Our organisation is split into five areas, with our clinical services grouped into four divisions. Within each division there are care groups. Each division, with the exception of Trust headquarters, is led by a divisional management team consisting of: • divisional clinical director (DCD) • divisional director of operations (DDO) • divisional head of nursing/professions (DHN) • divisional research and development lead • divisional finance manager • divisional planning and business development (or strategy) manager • divisional education lead • division HR business partner • divisional governance manager (DGM) The diagram below outlines the five divisions and care groups/services within each. Each care group has a clinical lead, care group manager and matron/s for specific services as a minimum. Division A Surgery Cancer care Critical care Theatres Division B Emergency medicine Medicine for older people Pathology Specialist medicine and ophthalmology Genetics Division C Child health Women and newborn Support services Division D Cardiovascular and thoracic Neurosciences Trauma and orthopaedics Major trauma centre Radiology TRUST HQ Corporate affairs Communications Finance Human resources Informatics Patient support services Claims and litigation Cost improvement and transformation Estates and capital developments Research and development 11 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Our vision and values Our Forward vision outlines who we are and what we stand for, as well as describing the current challenges we face and our priorities for the future. It also provides an in-depth review of our three Trust values, which are summarised below: putting patien putting patien putting patien putting patien putting patien putting patien putting patien putting patien putting patien king together king together king together king together king together king together king together king together king together ts first ts firwsotr ts firwsotr wor ts first ts firwsotr ts firwsotr wor ts first ts firwsotr ts firwsotr wor always imparlwovaiynsg imparlwovaiynsg improving always imparlwovaiynsg imparlwovaiynsg improving always imparlwovaiynsg imparlwovaiynsg improving ts first ts first ts first wor wor wor putting patien putting patien putting patien king together king together king together always imparlwovaiynsg imparlwovaiynsg improving Patients and families will be at Our clinical teams will provide the heart of what we do and services to patients and are their experience within the crucial to our success. hospital, and their perception We have launched a leadership ofmtheeasTurruensgtop,aftwiesnuitlslcfbcnigreesptsaosti.euntrs fnigrsptatients first clsintrrikacintageltgomgyetahtnherkraianggtteoegmnetsehuernkrrintegstteoogaeumthresr are engaged in the day-to-day management and governance of the Trust. alw alw alw Our growing reputation in research and development and our approach to education and training will continue ays improtvoinagiyns icmoprropvionagrysaitmeprnoveinwg ideas, technologies and greater efficiencies in the services we provide tients first tients first tients first together together together mproving mproving mproving putti putting pa putti putting pa putti putting pa wo working wo working wo working always i always i always i 12 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Our priorities, key issues and risks Our top eight priorities 1 Promote and live our values. We will: • be clearer about the behaviours we expect from our staff • recruit, train and promote people who demonstrably share our values in everything they do 2 Improve safety, quality and productivity. We will: • Sign up to safety and deliver on our promises to patients as part of this campaign • Focus on improving outcomes by measuring and publishing clinical outcomes for all specialties • Focus on improving the whole patient experience, so that patients feel treated with compassion by all staff in every contact • Develop the concept of excellent administrative care, organising our services well so that the patient journey runs smoothly • Commit to productivity improvement across all areas • Develop innovative solutions that allow us to deliver services more efficiently while making better use of our capacity 3 Our staff and education mission. We will: • Attract the best staff by offering them a better deal and the best place to work • Continue to invest in education and training opportunities for our staff including leadership development • Ensure that our leaders and staff understand and deliver our equality and diversity agenda • Prioritise excellent communication that allows the voice of our staff to be heard and acted on • Focus on the staff of the future by developing our education and training capability for clinical and non-clinical staff • Work with our local education providers to offer excellent education opportunities and bring high calibre people into healthcare roles in our hospitals 4 Become a hospital without walls. We will: • Increase the number of patients we care for who are not inpatients within the hospital. Some of these will be cared for in another residential location or at home in partnership between ourselves and other organisations • Be clear about services where we wish to provide end-to-end integrated care, and those where we wish to work with partners to integrate care across organisations • Work with health and social care partners (public, private and third sector), where necessary using new organisational models, to ensure that patients are always cared for in the right setting • Work more closely with general practices and support innovation being led by primary care 13 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT 5 Specialised services. We will: • Engage with commissioners to plan changes in service models according to national service specifications • Continue to plan and manage the ongoing drift of sub-specialist work particularly in paediatrics and complex surgical services • Maintain and develop the critical mass that is increasingly required to care for complex and specialist patients • Work with Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, the University of Southampton and other partners to play our part in the genomic revolution, building on the Genomic Medicine Centre and seeking to become a Genomics Central Laboratory Hub for the region • Develop our clinical informatics ability to ensure that we can take advantage of new information available for the benefit of patients 6 Preventative care. We will: • Continue to expand our screening programmes as national policy and commissioning intentions develop • Take every opportunity to further support and improve the health of our staff • Ensure that our clinical translational research programme, much of which is directly relevant to health promotion, accelerates translation of research into benefit for the local population 7 Discovery. We will: • Develop a detailed plan to continue increasing the number of UHS patients who are offered access to clinical trials and maximise the impact of the research we undertake • Work with the University of Southampton to submit a strong bid for the next round of Biomedical Research Centre / Biomedical Research Unit funding opportunities • Support the University of Southampton to create an international centre for cancer immunology to accelerate the development of new immune therapies to treat cancer 8 All stages of life. We will: • Continue to expand our paediatric services in partnership with community and local acute paediatrics and develop the physical infrastructure of a modern children’s hospital as quickly as finances allow • Continue to improve transition and the care of teenagers and young adults • Develop elderly care services that are integrated across the acute and community sectors • Continue to develop our end of life care 14 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Key issues and risks 1 Failure to deliver national access targets, which impacts patient experience and patient safety. Whilst we are meeting some of the national constitutional standards in waiting times, we are not meeting them all. A number of actions have been taken in relation to improving responsiveness and working with local health and social care partners to reduce delayed transfers of care. The Trust will continue to work to reduce delayed transfers of care, as well as reviewing the efficiency of discharge processes during 2019/20. 2 Capacity and occupancy, which impacts on patient flow and the quality and timeliness of care. Operational risks have been identified across a number of services/specialties linking to issues around increasing referrals, system capacity and delayed transfers of care. We have mitigated this by implementing daily reviews to assess system capacity and escalation requirements aligning capacity plans with the wider system, developing plans to reduce length of stay with strong clinical leadership and oversight and working with local health and social care partners to reduce delayed transfers of care. 3 Staffing, both in terms of recruitment and retention. To mitigate this risk we will continue to focus on making UHS an attractive employer by: • developing band four posts and apprentices • leveraging the ‘Think UHS’ recruitment brand • continuing to recruit within Europe and further afield • working with universities to increase student nurses • enhancing medical overseas fellows posts • reviewing all junior doctor rotas in light of the new contract • using flexible and temporary staff when needed • creating different roles linked to our research agenda • reviewing training and education to enhance retention. 15 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Performance report Going concern disclosure After making enquiries, the directors have a reasonable expectation that the Trust has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. For this reason, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the accounts. Reporting structure As a large NHS university hospital foundation trust, UHS monitors performance within individual teams throughout the year with feedback processes in place to escalate issues to more senior management teams. At a corporate level we have an established executive reporting structure. Monthly Trust Board Public meeting where executive directors present high level summary to chairman and non-executive directors. For further information see page 31. Audit and risk committee Strategy and finance committee Quality committee Trust executive committee (TEC) Review performance/issues/risks in greater depth For further detail on role of these committees please refer to the annual governance statement section on page 70. Trust Board study sessions Trust Board members meet to focus on a specific issue. Performance meetings Operational management team (led by chief operating officer) and division and care group management teams focus on individual patient and service pathways to develop improvement plans. 16 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Key performance indicators (KPIs) The Trust publishes a monthly integrated KPI Board report on our website which provides both the Board and the public with an overview of our performance. This report is constantly evolving as new areas of monitoring are developed and new areas of national focus become apparent. For 2018/19 the format of the monthly report followed the five key Care Quality Commission (CQC) questions: • Are we safe? • Are we effective? • Are we caring? • Are we responsive? • Are we well-led? The monthly report features the following sections: • Overview – Aggregation of commentary supporting all sections of the report • Safe • Effective • Caring • Activity • Emergency access • Referral to treatment and diagnostics • Cancer waiting times • Flow • Staffing • Research and development • Estates • Digital This report also includes summary versions of quarterly reports submitted to the Trust executive committee, which go into greater detail about patient experience, patient safety, clinical effectiveness outcomes, and infection prevention. In addition, a separate finance Board report is submitted to Trust Board on a monthly basis. The Emergency Access, Activity and Flow section have several KPI’s that are relevant to the key risk of delivering the national access target. Some of the KPI’s are: • Number of attendances • Time to initial assessment • Hospital red/black alerts • Delayed transfers of care • Non-elective length of stay The Activity and Flow section have several KPI’s that are relevant to the key risk of capacity and occupancy. Some of the KPI’s are: • Length of stay • New referrals • Number of attendances • Bed occupancy • Hospital red/black alerts The Staffing (HR) section has several KPI’s that are relevant to the key risk of Staffing. Some of the KPI’s are: • Staff turnover • Nursing vacancies • Friends and Family Test – percentage of staff who recommend UHS as a place to work You can see full copies of the monthly report by visiting www.uhs.nhs.uk 17 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT How we monitor performance In addition to reviewing the data submitted to the Trust Board in these papers, we have a suite of tools available to compare UHS performance to that of comparable trusts around the country. Depending on the measures being monitored, UHS has a number of peer groups to benchmark against including other local providers, major trauma centres and university hospital teaching trusts. Each NHS trust will service a different size and type of population and will offer a slightly different range of services so it is important to understand that this benchmarking provides an initial indication of performance rather than an absolute guide to our position nationally. In 2018/19 we continue to review the National Model Hospital data as it is published from NHS Improvement. The data and ability to compare our performance has helped to highlight areas of excellent practice and areas where there is potential to improve. The Trust is engaging with the model hospital team and has a member of staff on the ‘model hospital ambassador program’, as well as reviewing areas highlighted as having potential opportunities alongside finance and operational teams. Detailed analysis and explanation of the development and performance of UHS Activity, capacity and occupancy Over the past three years we have seen significant increases in all types of activity. This is linked to demographic growth, new specialist techniques and services transferring from other providers, including vascular services from Portsmouth. In addition, UHS now has responsibility for surgical services at Lymington. The graph and table below demonstrate this increase in activity. UHS growth in activity – 2016/17 to 2018/19 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 Inpatient spells (inc. day cases) 2013/14 2016/17 Outpatient appointments 2017/18 2018/19 ED attendances (type one) Referrals (excl March) Inpatient spells (inc. day cases Outpatient appointments ED attendances (type one) Referrals (excl March) 2016/17 160,000 630,045 99,273 189,194 2017/18 157,993 658,147 104,616 197,522 2018/19 168,791 695,343 110,771 207,209 Increase 2016/17 to 2018/19 5.5% 10.4% 11.6% 9.5% 18 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Hospital alert status The hospital alert status is decided by the operations centre after assessing the bed and staffing position, and is recorded twice daily at the Trust bed meetings (though the status may change at any time). Black alert is the highest level of alert and is issued when there are no empty beds available across the Trust with no expected discharges, the emergency department is full, and if actions are not taken several ambulances are likely to be delayed for long periods of time, stopping them from responding to 999 calls (this is based on a national definition of escalation). Red alert is when the majority of the hospital is under significant operational pressure and is likely to include a mismatch between supply and demand of beds and/or there are no beds available, with patients waiting more than three hours in the emergency department, and patients with a clinical decision for admission but no bed identified for them to move to. The Trust will undertake a wide range of actions in response to this, including the opening of additional overnight beds (usually within day wards), the redistribution of staff or bed capacity to support areas under most pressure, Trust-wide communication to request a focus on actions which will enable patients to be discharged or the admission avoided and the potential review of less urgent elective operations to maintain bed availability for patients with more urgent needs. In 2015/16 a black alert was recorded seven times at the twice daily bed meetings. In 2016/17 this was increased to eleven, in 2017/18 this increased to twenty, however in 2018/19 there were no black alerts. The chart below shows red alerts logged during 2018/19. Red alerts 2018/19 60 Number of AM and PM alerts 45 30 15 0 4/1/18 6/1/18 8/1/18 10/1/18 12/1/18 2/1/19 Contributing to this change has been an increase in day cases and an increase in length of stay (LoS) for elective patients linked to a more complex case mix. UHS delayed transfers of care 2018/19 The chart below shows the total bed days attributable to delayed transfers of care at UHS in 2018/19. 3,600 Percentage of bed days lost 3,200 2,800 2,400 2,000 April 2018 June 2018 August 2018 October 2018 December 2018 February 2019 19 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Referral to treatment (18 weeks) performance National target: 92% of all patients on 18 week pathway and not yet treated should have waited 18 weeks or less at the end of the month (incomplete pathways target). How did we do? UHS did not meet the target this year. Achievement of this target in 2018/19 should be set against a rise in patient referrals, which highlights the increased demands being placed on the Trust. The Trust has finished the financial year with no patients waiting greater than 52 weeks, and a total referral to treatment waiting list lower than in March 2018. Emergency department (ED) performance There are three types of emergency departments: Type Type Type ONE TWO THREE 3 24 hour with full resuscitation facilities 3 Consultant-led 3 Designated accommodation for patients admitted via ED 3 Single specialty emergencies (eye or dental) 3 Consultant-led 3 Designated accommodation 3 Minor injuries/walk-in centres 3 Doctor or nurse-led 3 Can be routinely accessed without appointment 3 May be co-located within an ED or sited in the community We run all three types of departments and all three types are subject to the national target and are therefore reflected in our figures. National target: The constitutional standard states that 95% of patients should be treated and either admitted or discharged within fours of arrival into ED. However, NHS Improvement set local targets for all NHS organisations with an ambition that the NHS would return to meet the 95% target by March 2019. The local targets set by quarter (to allow for seasonal variations) for UHS were: Quarter 1 - 90% Quarter 2 - 91.4% Quarter 3 - 90% Quarter 4 - 90-95% How did we do? 2018/19 was another challenging year for emergency patients for the whole Hampshire and Isle of Wight area. Whilst we had a positive start to the year achieving quarter 1 and 2 targets, we did not meet quarter 3 or 4 targets. We did, however, meet out local delivery system targets. 20 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT The graph below shows our performance against the four hour target over the last year (including all UHS types and Lymington). National 4 hour access target – UHS performance 100% 95% 90% 87.1% 85% 80% 82.1% 82.3% 87.4% 87.4% 93.0% 90.5% 84.7% 82.9% 85.7% 90.7% 88.9% 84.8% 77.9% 81.1% 75% Jan 2018 Feb 2018 Mar 2018 Apr 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 Aug 2018 Sep 2018 Oct 2018 Nov 2018 Dec 2018 Jan 2019 Feb 2019 Mar 2019 The graph below shows our local delivery system performance against the four hour target over the last year (including all SGH types, Lymington and Southampton Treatment Centre). National 4 hour access target – Local delivery system 100% 95% 91.0% 90% 91.1% 95.1% 92.8% 88.7% 87.1% 89.2% 91.5% 85% 92.9% 88.4% 83.3% 85.9% 80% 75% Apr 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 Aug 2018 Sep 2018 Oct 2018 Nov 2018 Dec 2018 Jan 2019 Feb 2019 Mar 2019 21 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Cancer waiting times There are nine separate cancer waiting times standards (below), each of which can then be split into tumour site specific performance groups. Measures Urgent GP referrals seen in two weeks Breast symptoms referral seen in two weeks Treatment started within 62 days of urgent GP referral Treatment started within 62 days of referral (breast, cervical and bowel screening) 62 day consultant upgrades Treatment started within 31 days of decision to treat Second or subsequent treatment (surgery) started within 31 days of decision to treat Second or subsequent treatment (anti-cancer drugs) started within 31 days of decision to treat Second or subsequent treatment (radiotherapy) started within 31 days of decision to treat Target > 93% > 93% > 85% > 90% > 86% > 96% > 94% > 98% > 98% 18/19 YTD (up to and including Feb 19) 86% 50% 74% 80% Achieved 8 8 8 8 86% 3 93% 8 85% 8 100% 3 100% 3 The number of patients referred under the two week wait urgent suspected cancer protocol seen within two weeks of their referral, rose by 7.7% in 2018/19. The chart below shows the rise in demand for UHS cancer services over the past three years UHS growth in cancer actvity – 2016/17 to 2018/19 (up to and including month 11) 18,000 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 Two week waits 2016/17 up to and incl Feb 62 day target patients 31 day target patients 2017/18 up to and incl Feb 2018/19 up to and incl Feb For staffing performance, please refer to page 58. For financial performance please see page 177. Paula Head, chief executive officer 28 May 2019 22 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Regulatory body ratings Single Oversight Framework NHS Improvement’s Single Oversight Framework provides the framework for overseeing providers and identifying potential support needs. The framework looks at five themes: 1. Quality of care 2. Finance and use of resources 3. Operational performance 4. Strategic change 5. Leadership and improvement capability (well-led) Based on information from these themes, providers are segmented from one to four where ‘4’ reflects providers receiving the most support, and ‘1’ reflects providers with maximum autonomy. A foundation trust will only be in segments three or four where it has been found to be in breach or suspected breach of its licence. Segmentation During 2018/19 the Trust was confirmed as being placed within segment ‘2’. This segmentation information is the Trust’s position as at 31 March 2019. Current segmentation information for NHS trusts and foundation trusts is published on the NHS Improvement website. Finance and use of resources The finance and use of resources theme is based on the scoring of five measures from ‘1’ to ‘4’, where ‘1’ reflects the strongest performance. These scores are then weighted to give an overall score. Given that finance and use of resources is only one of the five themes feeding into the Single Oversight Framework, the segmentation of the Trust disclosed above might not be the same as the overall finance score here. Area Financial sustainability Financial sustainability Financial sustainability Overall scoring Care Quality Commission ratings: Metric Capital service cover Liquidity Income and expenditure margin Distance from financial plan Agency spend Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Overall rating for this trust Are services at this trust safe? Are services at this trust effective? Are services at this trust caring? Are services at this trust responsive? Are services at this trust well-led? Good Requires improvement Outstanding Good Requires improvement Good 23 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT In December 2018, the CQC inspected four core services; urgent and emergency care, medicine, maternity and outpatients. It also looked at management and leadership, and effective and efficient use of resources. The CQC report (published on the 17 April 2019) rated the Trust as ‘good’ overall and ‘outstanding’ for providing effective services. “Our inspectors found a strong patient-centred culture with staff committed to keeping their people safe, and encouraging them to be independent. Patients’ needs came first and staff worked hard to deliver the best possible care with compassion and respect. Inspectors saw many areas of outstanding practice, with care delivered by compassionate and knowledgeable staff. Several teams led by example with a continuous focus on quality improvement. The Trust did face some challenges especially with the ageing estates. Some patient environments were showing significant signs of wear and tear – but again staff were doing their utmost to deliver compassionate care”. Dr Nigel Acheson Deputy chief inspector of hospitals (South) Environmental matters We recognise that the Trust’s business has an impact on the environment. As a large hospital we undertake a wide range of activities and use a large amount of resources, for example: • The Trust generates approximately 3,000 tonnes of waste yearly, half of which is clinical waste. If not properly treated this huge amount of waste can cause soil, water and air pollution depending on the disposal route. • Due to the large number of visitors and deliveries we attract every day, traffic congestion is regularly experienced on and around the site, which impacts the air quality around the hospital. We are committed to environmental sustainability and consider it as part of the business culture. We acknowledge that reducing waste and minimising the consumption of scarce resources is consistent with financial sustainability. Our sustainability disclosure section on page 80 provides greater detail on the steps we are taking to reduce our activities’ impact on the environment. 24 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Social, community, anti-bribery and human rights issues We recognise our responsibilities under the European Convention on Human Rights (included in the Human Rights Act 1998 in the UK), which are relevant to health and social care. These rights include the: • right to life • right not to be subjected to torture, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment • right to liberty • right to respect for private and family life The Trust is committed to ensuring it fully takes into account all aspects of human rights in our work. At University Hospital Southampton we value our reputation for top quality care and financial probity and conduct our business in an ethical manner. The Bribery Act 2010 was introduced to make it easier to tackle the issue of bribery which is a damaging practice. Bribery can be defined as ‘giving someone a financial or other advantage to encourage them to perform their duties improperly or reward them for having done so’. To limit our exposure to bribery we have in place an Anti-Fraud, Bribery and Corruption Policy, a Standards of Business Conduct Policy and a Freedom to Speak Up (formerly Raising Concerns) Policy. These apply to all staff and to individuals and organisations who act on behalf of UHS. We also employ a local counter fraud specialist who will investigate, as appropriate, any allegations of fraud, bribery or corruption. The success of our anti-bribery approach depends on our staff playing their part in helping to detect and eradicate bribery. Therefore, we encourage staff, service users and others associated with UHS to report any suspicions of bribery and we will rigorously investigate any allegations. In addition, we hold a register of interest for directors, staff, and governors and ask staff not to accept gifts or hospitality that will compromise them or the Trust. The Board of Directors carries out its business in an open and transparent way. We are committed to the prevention of bribery as well as to combating fraud and expect the organisations we work with to do the same. Doing business in this way enables us to reassure our patients, members and stakeholders that public funds are properly safeguarded. There are no important events since the year end affecting the foundation trust. No political donations have been made. The Trust has no overseas branches. 25 FR STAND BODY ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT Members of the Trust Board Board member Name Title Paula Head Chief executive officer David French Deputy chief executive officer and chief financial officer Gail Byrne Director of nursing and organisational development Jane Hayward Director of transformation and improvement Biography Declarations Paula joined the Trust as chief executive in September 2018, having been chief executive at the Royal Surrey County NHS Foundation Trust in Guildford and before that at Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust. She began her career as a pharmacist working in the community, hospitals and at health authorities before moving into general management and her first board position at Kingston Hospital. Since then she has spent time on the boards of commissioners and providers, including director of transformation at Frimley Park Hospital NHS FT. Paula lives in Hampshire and has a daughter studying medicine at the University of Southampton. Daughter is a medical student at University of Southampton; Member of Hampshire & Isle of Wight Sustainability and Transformation Partnership Executive Delivery Group David joined the Trust in February 2016 and led on finance, procurement, estates and commercial development until March 2018, when he became interim chief executive officer. He read Economics and Social Policy at the University of London before joining ICI plc, where he qualified as a chartered management accountant. David has extensive healthcare experience from the pharmaceutical industry, mostly Eli Lilly and Company where he held many commercial and financial roles in the UK and overseas. He joined the NHS in 2010 as chief financial officer of Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. He also serves as a non-executive director for Vivid Housing Limited, a social housing provider across Hampshire and the Solent. Non-executive director and chair of audit and risk committee, Vivid Housing Limited; Director, UHS Estates Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHSFT; Director, Southampton Commercial Estates Development Partnership (CEDP) Project Company Limited, a whollyowned subsidiary of UHSFT; Member of Solent Acute Alliance; Member of Hampshire & Isle of Wight Counter Fraud Board; Member of Hampshire & Isle of Wight Sustainability and Transformation Partnership Capital Planning Panel (from May 2018) Gail joined the Trust in 2010 as deputy director of nursing and head of patient safety. Prior to this, she has worked at the Strategic Health Authority as head of patient safety, and director of clinical services at Portsmouth Hospital. Gail has also worked in Brisbane, Australia as a hospital Macmillan nurse, and as general manager of a special purpose vehicle company for the private finance initiative at South Manchester Hospitals. Husband is a consultant surgeon in the Trust; Daughter is a midwife at UHS (from March 2019) Jane joined the Trust in 2000 as a clinical services manager for the cardiothoracic directorate after spending two years in Hertfordshire as director of performance and 11 years at Barts and the London Hospitals in various roles including planning, finance and commissioning. Jane has led on human resources, information management and technology, improvement and modernisation and has been chief operating officer. Jane joined the Trust Board in February 2008 and became director of transformation and improvement in January 2014. Director, UHS Estates Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHSFT; Father and mother are UHSFT simulated patients (voluntary position) Dr Derek Medical Sandeman director Dr Caroline Marshall Chief operating officer Derek was appointed to the Trust as a consultant physician in 1993 and went on to develop a regional endocrine service. Throughout his career he has had extensive clinical leadership experience, most recently serving eight years as clinical director. Derek’s leadership roles have also included programme director for postgraduate education and the Wessex Endocrine Royal College representative. He has a strong history of wider system engagement, working collaboratively with partners to improve systems resilience and pathways. Caroline joined the Trust in 1997 as a consultant hepatobiliary and neuroanaesthetist. She has held the posts of college tutor for the Royal College of Anaesthetists and UHS mentoring and coaching lead. In 2008, she became clinical service director for critical care, and then divisional clinical director for division A between 2010 and 2013. Caroline served as interim chief operating officer between January to December 2014, and was then appointed to the substantive post. Her portfolio includes the executive lead for cancer and the executive lead for major trauma. Director of UHS Pharmacy Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHSFT; Member of Hampshire & Isle of Wight Sustainability and Transformation Partnership Clinical Executive Group Daughter is employed within the emergency department at UHS (from 1 August 2018) 27 ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT Non-executive directors Name Title Peter Hollins Chair Simon Porter Senior independent director and deputy chair Dr Mike Non-executive Sadler director Biography Declarations Peter graduated in chemistry from Hertford College, Oxford. Joining Imperial Chemical Industries in 1973, he undertook a series of increasingly senior roles in marketing and then general management. Following three years in the Netherlands as general manager of ICI Resins BV, he was appointed in 1992 as chief operating officer of EVC in Brussels – a joint venture between ICI and Enichem of Italy. He played a key role in the flotation of the company in 1994, returning in 1998 to the UK as chief executive officer of
Url
/Media/UHS-website-2019/Docs/About-the-Trust/Annual-reports-and-quality-accounts/annual-report-2018-19.pdf
States of Jersey patient accommodation leaflet
Description
ocean village 32 channel way southampton hampshire so14 3ja in partnership with x2 x2 P e enquiries@esa-ltd.co.uk t +44 (0)1635 233000 patient accommodation - southampton ocean village Mistral and Sirocco apartments are located in the idyllic waterfront setting of Ocean Village Marina. All apartments are spacious, stylish and comfortable with all the facilities you require for a real home from home environment, some with balconies and panoramic views of the Marina. Our ground floor apartment offer patios with communal gardens, great for families. example apartment floor plans guest charter As part of our ongoing commitment to improve and maintain the service that we offer to our Guests, esa have developed a Guest charter that we strive to adhere to at all times. Our Guest charter is made up of a number of our core principles that we promise to observe when we have Guests in-house. our commitment to our guests � personal meet and greet on arrival � airport collection service � organise return transfer to airport � 24 hour emergency support � complimentary welcome pack � high speed broadband access and IT support � exceptional service and support � fast response to guest requests � privacy of guests � safe and secure accommodation � guest portal - login provided prior to arrival t +44 (0)1635 233000 patient accommodation - southampton e enquiries@esa-ltd.co.uk the local area Situated in the heart of Southampton, Ocean Village is one of the most attractive and vibrant marinas on the South Coast. Surrounded by a superb selection of shops, cafes and cinemas, this popular city centre marina offers excellent recreational facilities for guests. WestQuay shopping centre is nearby and a number of waterfront bars and restaurants on the doorstep, including Pitcher and Piano, Banana Wharf, Bacaro and Steak of the Art. For guests who prefer to prepare their own meals and relax in the comfort of their apartment, a Tesco Express store with an ATM is located just inside the main entrance of Ocean Village. Further facilities for visitors can be found at the Royal Southampton Yacht Club and there is a 776 space multi-storey car park for additional convenience. you will be staying here H marina shops & facilities on the doorstep shops in town centre 20 minute walk 1 mile southampton train station 30 minute walk 2 miles southampton general hospital 20 minute drive 4 miles southampton airport 25 minute drive 5 miles t +44 (0)1635 233000 patient accommodation - southampton e enquiries@esa-ltd.co.uk quick reference guide: x2 x2 2 bedroom apartment lift access to all floors free wireless internet 2 bathroom apartment P allocated parking subject to availability Freeview TV t +44 (0)1635 233000 patient accommodation - southampton e enquiries@esa-ltd.co.uk
Url
/Media/UHS-website-2019/Docs/Services/Radiotherapy/States-of-Jersey-patient-accommodation-leaflet.pdf
Annual-report-201617
Description
ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2016/17 incorporating the quality account 2016/17 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Schedule 7, paragraph 25 (4) (a) of the National Health Service Act 2006 University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Annual report and accounts 2016/17 incorporating the quality account 2016/17 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Schedule 7, paragraph 25 (4) (a) of the National Health Service Act 2006 3 ©2017 University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust TABLE OF CONTENTS Performance report Statement from the chief executive 7 Statement of purpose and activities 9 History of UHS 9 Key issues and risks 10 Going concern disclosure 10 Performance reporting 11 Regulatory body ratings 15 Environmental matters 16 Social, community and human rights issues 16 Accountability report Directors’ report 18 Introducing the Board of Directors 20 The people 21 Audit and risk committee 25 Disclosures 28 Council of Governors 32 Annual remuneration statement 39 Remuneration and appointments committee 42 Governors’ nomination committee 44 Staffing data 48 Responding to the staff annual attitude survey 50 Statement of chief executive’s responsibilities as the accounting officer 55 Annual governance statement 56 Review of economy, efficiency and effectiveness of the use of resources 62 Equality, diversity and inclusion 66 Southampton Hospital Charity 67 Developments in informatics 68 Leading research into better care 68 Investing for the future 69 Environmental sustainability and climate change 70 Quality account and report Chief executive’s welcome 119 Our approach to quality assurance 121 Our commitment to safety 122 Our commitment to staff 125 Our commitment to education and training 126 Our commitment to technology to support quality 127 Our commitment to the Care Quality Commission 129 Progress against 2016/17 priorities 127 Priorities for improvement 2017/18 141 Review of quality performance 152 Conclusion 155 Responses to our quality account 156 Statement of directors’ responsibilities 163 Independent auditor’s report 164 Appendices Appendix one: Patient Improvement Framework (PIF) priorities 2017/18 168 Appendix two: Definitions of pressure ulcer grading 169 Appendix three: Quality performance data 170 Appendix four: CQUINS data 177 Appendix five: Clinical audit and confidential enquiries data 179 Appendix six: Outcome measures data 190 Appendix seven: Registration with the Care Quality Commission 191 Appendix eight: Pulse KPIs 192 Appendix nine: Glossary of acronyms 195 Annual accounts Statement from the chief financial officer 75 Foreward to the accounts 76 Independent auditor’s report 77 Financial statements 81 5 Statement from the chief executive More patients than ever before were treated at University Hospital Southampton (UHS) during 2016/17. And despite seeing an extra 41,000 patients than the previous year, we have continued to maintain our patient satisfaction scores with more than 95% recommending UHS. This is just one of many outstanding achievements across our hospitals which we are proud to highlight in this annual report. Our ongoing challenge now is tackling the high numbers of patients who could be at home, but who lack support from either health or social care to move out of hospital. There has been some hard work done in this area and we’re already seeing signs of improvement. The latest Friends and Family Test results - the survey which all UHS staff are asked to complete - said that 92% of staff would recommend UHS as a place to be treated, and 77% would recommend it as a place to work. Both these figures are the highest we have ever achieved, and are much better than the national average. We have been able to invest heavily in improved and expanded facilities for patients and for research. For instance, work has started on the radiotherapy bunker which will house the new linear accelerators used to treat cancer patients and the new Cancer Immunology Centre is also progressing well. The ongoing investment into diagnostics – particularly radiology but also more specific schemes such as hysteroscopy – should help patients right across the hospital. We recently received national recognition as a “global digital exemplar”; an award which we anticipate will bring an additional £10 million of national money. Historically, we have spent very little on information technology but, despite this, much has been delivered.This extra national money will make a real difference to patient care through some large-scale informatics projects and will also improve the day to day IT equipment our staff have available to them. Our new main entrance, which opened last summer, now feels like it has been here forever but I think it is still worth remembering what an improvement it is on the old entrance, and that it was rebuilt without spending any NHS money. We have been successful in renewing our NHS research funding, through both our Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) and Clinical Research Facility (CRF). This was a tough competition, as we were competing against every other academic medical centre in the country, and the rules were clear that only “world class research” would be funded. So the Southampton research team (UHS and the University of Southampton), led by Rob Read for the BRC and Saul Faust for the CRF, should be very proud that we were successful, and that Southampton research will continue to help patients receive better care across the world. Children’s services are very important to us and thanks to a combination of NHS funds and very generous donations, we have been able to refurbish and expand Piam Brown (paediatric cancer) ward and our paediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Despite a challenging time for NHS finances, UHS had a successful financial year, ending it with a surplus of £20.4m. This has enabled us to plan increased investment in our estate, particularly for the most vulnerable patients such as refurbishment of high dependency and intensive care facilities for patients of all ages, and theatre and interventional radiology rooms. This means that we will continue to have the facilities to look after the sickest patients in Hampshire and beyond. 7 In 2016/17 we launched our children’s emergency department campaign, alongside the Murray Parish Trust. We’re now well on our way to raising the £2 million needed, which will be fund matched by the Government. We hope to start building this summer. So, while there have been considerable challenges meeting uplifts in demand and managing discharges, there has also been much to celebrate and we look forward to 2017/18. Fiona Dalton Chief executive 23 May 2017 8 Statement of purpose and activities UHS is a large teaching hospital located on the south coast of England. We have a tripartite mission to provide clinical care, educate current and future healthcare professionals, and undertake research to improve healthcare for the future. Our clinical care encompasses local acute and elective care for 680,000 people who live in Southampton, the New Forest, Eastleigh and Test Valley. We also provide care for the residents of the Isle of Wight for many services. As the major university hospital on the south coast, UHS provides the full range of tertiary medical and surgical specialities (with the exception of transplantation, renal services and burns) to over 3.7 million people in central southern England and the Channel Islands. UHS is a centre of excellence for training the doctors, nurses and other healthcare professionals of the future. We work with the University of Southampton and Solent University to educate and develop staff at all levels, including a large apprenticeship programme, undergraduate and post-graduate education. Our role in research, developed in active partnership with the University of Southampton, is to contribute to the development of treatments for tomorrow’s patients. This work distinguishes us as a hospital that works at the leading edge of healthcare developments in the NHS and internationally. In particular we have nationally-leading research into cancer, respiratory disease, nutrition, cardiovascular disease, bone and joint conditions and complex immune system problems. We are one of the largest recruiters of patients into clinical trials in the country. Over 10,500 people work at the Trust, making it one of the area’s biggest employers. We also benefit from the contributions of over 1,000 volunteers. Our turnover in 2016/17 was more than £760m. History of UHS The Trust has its origins in the 1900s when the Shirley Warren Poor Law Infirmary was built on the site of what is now Southampton General Hospital. In the early half of the century, the site began to expand, including the opening of the school of nursing and the creation of the Wessex Neurological Unit. In 1971 a new medical school was opened in Southampton and the 1970s and 1980s saw a significant building programme encompassing the current footprint of Southampton General Hospital, Princess Anne Hospital and Countess Mountbatten House. During the 1990s, services were increasingly centralised at the general hospital, with the eye hospital and cancer services being relocated from elsewhere in the city. The Wellcome Trust funded a clinical research facility at the hospital in 2001 and this unit remains the foundation for much of the Trust’s groundbreaking medical research. In the last decade, development has continued with the opening of the North Wing Cardiac Centre in 2006, the creation of a major trauma centre with on-site helipad and the opening in 2014 of Ronald McDonald House for the relatives of sick children. Organisationally, Southampton University Hospitals Trust was formed in 1993, creating a single management board for acute services in Southampton. Eighteen years later, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (UHS) was formed (1 October 2011) when Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust was licensed as a foundation trust by the then regulator, Monitor (now known as NHS Improvement (NHSI)). 9 Key issues and risks 1. Failure to deliver national access targets, which impacts patient experience and patient safety. Whilst we are meeting some of the national constitutional standards in waiting times, we are not meeting them all. A number of actions have been taken in relation to improving responsiveness and working with local health and social care partners to reduce delayed transfers of care. The Trust will continue to work to reduce delayed transfers of care as well as reviewing the efficiency of discharge processes during 2017/18. 2. Capacity and occupancy, which impacts on patient flow and to the quality and timeliness of care. Operational risks have been identified across a number of services/specialties linking to issues around increasing referrals, system capacity and delayed transfers of care. We have mitigated this by implementing daily reviews to assess system capacity and escalation requirements aligning capacity plans with the wider system, developing plans to reduce length of stay with strong clinical leadership and oversight and working with local health and social care partners to reduce delayed transfers of care. 3. Staffing, both in terms of recruitment and retention. To mitigate this risk we will continue to focus on making UHS an attractive employer by: • continuing to recruit within Europe and further afield • working with universities to increase student nurses • developing band four posts and apprentices • leveraging the ‘Think UHS’ recruitment brand • enhancing medical overseas fellows posts • reviewing all junior doctor rotas in light of the new contract • using flexible and temporary staff when needed • creating different roles linked to our research agenda • reviewing training and education to enhance retention Going concern disclosure After making enquiries, the directors have a reasonable expectation that the Trust has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. For this reason, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the accounts. 10 Performance reporting Reporting structure As a large NHS university hospital foundation trust, UHS monitors performance within individual teams throughout the year with feedback processes in place to escalate issues to more senior management teams. At a corporate level we have an established executive reporting structure. This begins with the monthly Trust Board meeting where the executive directors of the Trust will present a high level summary to the chairman and non-executive directors, as well as providing greater detail on key performance changes, risks and issues. Below this are a number of executive sub-committees attended by a subset of executive and non-executive directors. These are the audit and risk committee, the strategy and finance committee, and the quality committee. These committees will review issues in greater depth, feeding back to Trust Board as appropriate. In addition, there are regular Trust Board study sessions which focus on specific individual issues with the entire Board present. The Trust executive committee (TEC) meets monthly and is made up of the executive board members and the divisional management teams. Performance and service issues are discussed in greater detail at this meeting. Finally, there are regular performance meetings between the operational management team (led by the chief operating officer) and the division and care group management teams. These meetings focus on the individual patient and service pathways and developing the detailed plans for improvement. Key performance indicators (KPIs) The Trust publishes a monthly Integrated KPI Board Report on its website which provides both the Board and the public with an overview of performance within the Trust. This report is constantly evolving as new areas of monitoring are developed and new areas of national focus become apparent. For the 2016/17 period the most notable development to the monthly report was a restructuring of the format in order to better align the reported metrics to five key Care Quality Commission questions: • Are we safe • Are we effective • Are we caring • Are we responsive • Are we well-led. The monthly report features the following sections: • Executive digest – a textual update on the previous month’s performance across the Trust written by the director of transformation and improvement. • Trust overview – the top KPIs identified by Trust Board, RAG-rates for the previous 13 months (see Appendix eight) • Performance • Activity • Capacity • Emergency department (ED) • Referral to Treatment (RTT/18 weeks) • Cancer waiting times • Finance • Patient experience • Patient safety • Outcomes • Staffing (HR) and estates • Education and training • Research and development 11 This report also includes summary versions of quarterly reports submitted to TEC which go into greater detail about patient experience, patient safety, clinical effectiveness and outcomes, and infection prevention. In addition, a separate Finance Board Report is submitted to Trust Board on a monthly basis. How we monitor performance In addition to reviewing the data submitted to the Trust Board in these papers, we have a suite of tools available to compare UHS performance to that of comparable trusts around the country. Depending on the measures being monitored, UHS has a number of peer groups to benchmark against including other local providers, major trauma centres and university hospital teaching trusts. Each NHS Trust will service a different size and type of population and will offer a slightly different range of services so it is important to understand that this benchmarking provides an initial indication of performance rather than an absolute guide to our position nationally. In 2016/17 we have reviewed the National Model Hospital data published by Lord Carter’s team at NHS Improvement, this includes the Getting it Right First Time Reports. This data and ability to compare our performance has helped to highlight areas of excellent practice and areas where there is potential to improve. This data is reported regularly to the Transformation Board. Detailed analysis and explanation of the development and performance of UHS Over the past three years we have seen significant increases in all types of activity. Some of this is due to an increase in the range of specialist services we offer, becoming a major trauma centre and the building of the helipad, but much of it is due to the increased and aging population in Southampton and the surrounding area. The graphs below demonstrate this increase in activity. Growth iUnHaSctGivritoyw-t2h01in4/A15cttiovi2ty01-62/10714/15 to 2016/17 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 100,000 - Inpatient Spells (inc Outpatient day cases) Appointments ED Attendances (type 1) Referrals 2014/15 Inpatient spells (inc day cases) 144,934 Outpatient appointments 536,949 ED attendance (type one and two) 94,376 Referrals 182,407 2015/16 146,066 562,972 95,217 191,888 2016/17 155,780 596,621 99,493 204,840 Increase 2014/15 to 2016/17 7.5% 11.1% 5.4% 12.3% 12 The hospital alert status is decided by the operations centre after assessing the bed and staffing position, and is recorded twice daily at the Trust bed meetings (though the status may change at any time). Black alert is the highest level of alert and is issued when there are no empty beds available across the Trust with no expected discharges, the emergency department is full, and several ambulances are likely to be delayed for long periods of time, stopping them from responding to 999 calls. In 2014/15 a black alert was recorded 91 times at the twice daily bed meetings. In 2015/16 this was reduced to seven. However, as result of the increasing demand for Trust services this increased to eleven in 2016/17. Contributing to this change has been the increase in Length of Stay (LoS) for elective patients and bed capacity being impacted upon by the increased number of patients requiring a complex package of care after their discharge. These patients can often have their discharges delayed while beds in community care homes are found and supporting community care packages are arranged. The chart below demonstrates the change in LoS for elective and non-elective (emergency) patients over the past three years. 2016/17 saw an increased focus on discharging patients earlier in the day and at the weekend. This will remain a major focus for the Trust in 2017/18. Each of the above metrics will have an impact on the Trust’s performance against the three primary nationally reported targets for Referral to Treatment (RTT, or 18 Weeks) performance, emergency department performance and cancer waiting times performance. Referral to Treatment (18 Weeks) performance Due to a change introduced by the Government in 2015 trusts are only required to achieve the Incomplete Pathways target: 1. Incomplete Pathways – 92% of all patients on 18 week pathway and not yet treated should have waited 18 weeks or less at the end of the month. UHS met the target in quarters one, two, and three of 2016/17. In quarter four the target was met in February and March but performance in January meant that the target was not met for the quarter as a whole. Achievement of this target in 2016/17 should be set against the aforementioned rise in patient referrals, which highlights the increased demands being placed on the Trust. It is only due to the increased efficiency shown by the Trust’s inpatient and outpatient services that it has been possible to meet these targets on an ongoing basis. This is an excellent result and goes against the national trend. 13 Emergency department (ED) performance We did not meet the national target of 95% of all ED attendances being treated and either admitted or discharged within four hours of arrival in any month in 2016/17, but we did achieve our nationally agreed trajectory target. This has been a challenging target nationwide with the winter period being the worst performance the NHS in England has ever recorded. There are three types of ED that can be included in these figures: Type one A consultant led 24-hour service with full resuscitation facilities and designated accommodation for the reception of accident and emergency patients. Type two A consultant led single specialty accident and emergency service (e.g. ophthalmology, dental) with designated accommodation for the reception of patients. Type three Other type of accident and emergency/minor injury unity (MIUs/Walk-in Centres, primarily designed for the receiving of accident and emergency patients. A type three department may be doctor led or nurse led. It may be co-located with a major ED or sited in the community. A defining characteristic of a service qualifying as a type three department is that it treats at least minor injuries and illnesses (sprains for example) and can be routinely accessed without appointment. UHS has type one and type two (ophthalmology) departments. The Trust also had a type three (MIU) department until July 2014. Due to the nature of the activity at the MIU, the transfer of this department to another provider reduced UHS performance against the four hour target by approximately 3%. When comparing performance over the long term, it is important to factor this change in. ED performance improved in quarters one, two, and three of 2016/17 compared to 2014/15 and in quarters one and two over 2015/16, despite the increases in activity. In quarter three performance decreased by 0.6% while activity increased by 1,795 attendances, a 7.5% rise. In quarter four performance was 1.2% better than in 2015/16 and matched 2014/15 performance. The graph below shows UHS performance against the four hour target over the past three years. 96.00% 94.00% 92.00% 90.00% 88.00% 86.00% 84.00% 82.00% 80.00% 78.00% 76.00% Year-On-Year ED Performance by Quarter Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 14 Cancer waiting times There are ten separate cancer waiting times measures that the Trust reports to the Department of Health on a monthly basis, each of which can then be split into tumour site specific performance groups. In 2016/17 the Trust met all but one of these measures. The performance against the targets should be set against the significant rise in activity seen on the cancer pathways. The number of patients referred under the ‘two week wait urgent suspected cancer protocol’ that were seen within two weeks of their referral, rose by 1,058 (6.9%) in 2016/17. The chart below shows the rise in demand for UHS services over the past three years. 18,000 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 - UHS Growth in Cancer Activity - 2014/15 to 2016/17 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 Two Week Waits 62-Day Target Patients 31-Day Target Patients Regulatory body ratings Single Oversight Framework NHS Improvement’s Single Oversight Framework provides the framework for overseeing providers and identifying potential support needs. The framework looks at five themes: 1. Quality of care 2. Finance and use of resources 3. Operational performance 4. Strategic change 5. Leadership and improvement capability (well-led) Based on information from these themes, providers are segmented from one to four where ‘4’ reflects providers receiving the most support, and ‘1’ reflects providers with maximum autonomy. A foundation trust will only be in segments three or four where it has been found to be in breach or suspected breach of its licence. The Single Oversight Framework applied from quarter three of 2016/17. Prior to this, Monitor’s Risk Assessment Framework (RAF) was in place. Information for the prior year and first two quarters relating to the RAF has not been presented as the basis of accountability was different. This is in line with NHS Improvement’s guidance for annual reports. Segmentation During quarter four of 2016/17 the Trust was placed within segment ‘2’ This segmentation information is the Trust’s position as at 31 March 2017. Current segmentation information for NHS trusts and foundation trusts is published on the NHS Improvement website. 15 Finance and use of resources The finance and use of resources theme is based on the scoring of five measures from ‘1’ to ‘4’, where ‘1’ reflects the strongest performance. These scores are then weighted to give an overall score. Given that finance and use of resources is only one of the five themes feeding into the Single Oversight Framework, the segmentation of the trust disclosed above might not be the same as the overall finance score here. Area Financial sustainability Financial efficiency Financial controls Overall scoring Metric Capital service capacity Liquidity Income and expenditure margin Distance from financial plan Agency spend 2016/17 Q3 score 2 2 1 1 1 1 2016/17 Q4 score 2 2 1 1 1 1 The Care Quality Commission (CQC) gave us an overall rating of ‘requires improvement’ as at December 2014. You can see further details on page 128 of the quality account or in full by visiting www.uhs.nhs.uk or www.cqc.org.uk. The CQC returned in January 2017 to conduct a follow up inspection. We are currently awaiting their full report. Environmental matters A number of projects were undertaken in 2016/17 to reduce our impact on the environment. We have replaced a significant proportion of our external lighting and much of our internal lighting with LED technology. A number of ventilation systems have been upgraded to enable heat recovery and we have launched an awareness programme to help staff work in more environmentally sustainable ways. In addition to these developments we have implemented a range of measures to ensure that we are using energy more efficiently. For example, we now review and ensure the efficiency of high energy consumption equipment. More information can be found within the environmental sustainability and climate change section of this report. Social, community and human rights issues We recognise our responsibilities under the European Convention on Human Rights (included in the Human Rights Act 1998 in the UK), which are relevant to health and social care. These rights include the: • right to life • right not to be subjected to torture, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment • right to liberty • right to respect for private and family life The Trust is committed to ensuring it fully takes into account all aspects of human rights in our work. 16 Directors’ report Composition of the Board The Board is currently comprised as follows: Non-executive directors: Peter Hollins chair Simon Porter senior independent director/deputy chair Professor Iain Cameron Lynne Lockyer Dr David Price Dr Mike Sadler Jenni Douglas Todd Executive directors: Fiona Dalton Gail Byrne Jane Hayward Dr Derek Sandeman Dr Caroline Marshall David French chief executive director of nursing and organisational development director of transformation and improvement medical director chief operating officer chief financial officer Each director confirms that at the time the annual report and accounts is approved: • so far as the director is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the NHS foundation trust’s auditor is unaware • the director has taken all the steps they ought to have taken as director in order to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the NHS foundation trust’s auditor is aware of that information. There are no important events since the year end affecting the foundation trust. No political donations have been made. The Trust has no overseas branches. Trust Board declarations of interest Peter Hollins Partner in the Jubilee Film Partnership; Chair of CLIC Sargent Cancer Care for Children (a company limited by guarantee); Council Member of University of Southampton. Iain Cameron Dean, Faculty of Medicine and Member, University Executive Board, University of Southampton; Board Member, Wessex Academic Health Sciences Network; Director (Chair), Medical Schools Council (until 1 July 2016); Director, Medical Schools Council Assessment (until 1 July 2016); Director, UK CAT (Clinical Aptitude Test) (until 1 July 2016); Trustee, Wessex Medical Trust; Joint Chair, University Hospital Southampton/University of Southampton Joint Research Strategy Board; Joint Chair, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) Southampton Executive Board. Simon Porter Former Partner in Ernst & Young LLP; Non-executive Director and Chair of Audit Committee, Radian Group; Non-executive Director and Chair of Audit Committee, Octavia Housing. 18 Lynne Lockyer Board member/trustee of the Brendoncare Foundation. David Price Chair of RTL Materials Ltd; Chair of Telesoft Technologies Ltd; Chair of Optitune Plc; Chair of Symetrica Ltd; Member of Advisory Board, Silverstream Technologies BV; Treasurer, University of Southampton; Chair of Lontra Ltd (from 1 May 2016). Michael Sadler GP Specialist Advisor for the Care Quality Commission (until 31 May 2016); External Clinical Associate for PricewaterhouseCoopers. Jenni Douglas-Todd Managing Director, Diversa Consultancy Limited; Member of the Judicial Conduct Investigative Office; Non-Executive Director, Hampshire Cricket Board (from 2 May 2016). Fiona Dalton NHS representative on Office for the Strategic Co-ordination of Health Research (OSCHR) Board; Director, Southampton Commercial Estates Development Partnership (CEDP) Project Company Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHSFT. Gail Byrne Husband is a consultant surgeon in the Trust; Trustee of Naomi House Children’s Hospice. Caroline Marshall Nil. Jane Hayward Director, UHS Estates Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHSFT; Father is Mental Health Act Manager, Southern Health Foundation Trust (voluntary position), member of Assessment Committee for Clinical Excellence Awards South and Public Health England (lay member), a UHSFT Simulated Patient (voluntary position); Mother is a UHSFT Simulated Patient (voluntary position). Derek Sandeman Director of UHS Pharmacy Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHSFT. David French Non-executive director and chair of audit and risk committee, Sentinel Housing Association (renamed Vivid Housing Limited on 23 April 2017); Governor and chair of Audit Committee, South Wilts Grammar School for Girls (until 8 December 2016); Chair of Hampshire and Isle of Wight NHS Counter Fraud Board; Director, UHS Estates Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHSFT; Director, Southampton Commercial Estates Development Partnership (CEDP) Project Company Limited, a joint venture between UHS and Interserve Prime. Approved by the Trust Board 23 May 2017. Chief executive 23 May 2017 19 Introducing the Board of Directors Trust Board The Board is made up of the chair, six non-executive directors and six executive directors including the chief executive. Together they bring a wide range of skills and experience to the Trust, such that the board achieves balance and completeness at the highest level. The non-executive directors, including the chair, are people who live or work in the local area and have shown a genuine interest in helping to improve the health of local people. The non-executive directors are determined by the Board to be independent in both character and judgement. The chair, executive directors and non-executive directors have declared any business interests that they have. The Board is satisfied that no conflicts of interest are indicated in any external involvement. The register of Board members’ interests is updated at least annually and is maintained by the company secretary and associate director of corporate affairs. It is available for public inspection from the company secretary and associate director of corporate affairs. The ‘reservation of powers to the Board and delegation of powers policy’ sets out the business to be conducted by the Board, or by one of its committees. Any enquiries should be made to: company secretary and associate director of corporate affairs, Trust Headquarters, Mailpoint 18, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD or telephone 023 8120 6829. Senior independent director The senior independent director role provides a channel through which foundation trust members and governors are able to express concerns, other than the normal route of the chair or chief executive. Appointments Non-executive directors are appointed via open advertisement in accordance with the ‘Appointment of a foundation trust non-executive director good practice guide’ procedure adopted by the Trust. The process is managed through the governors’ nomination committee, a sub-committee of the Council of Governors. This committee also determines the remuneration and terms and conditions of the non-executive directors. For further details on the appointment of non-executive directors please see page 42-43. Development of the Board The Board held monthly study sessions during 2016/17 where strategic issues, along with emerging issues, were discussed. Meetings of the Board The Board meets once a month in public. Additional private meetings with only the Board, and associated employees of the Trust making presentations to the Board in attendance, are held as required. Other committees of the Board include: remuneration and appointment committee; audit and risk committee, strategy and finance committee; quality committee and charitable funds committee. Generally the other committees of the Board meet monthly with the exception of the audit and risk committee, which meets five times a year and the appointments and remuneration committee which meets every other month. The frequency of the meetings is set out in each committee’s terms of reference. These terms of reference are reviewed at least annually. The performance of individual Board members is reviewed as set out on page 24 of this report. 20 Engagement with Council of Governors The Trust Board engages with the Council of Governors through the chair and senior independent director. Non-executive and executive directors engage with sub-groups of the council where these are related to their portfolios. Board members meet regularly with governors and have an open invitation to attend formal Council of Governor meetings. The people Non-executive directors Peter Hollins, chair Peter graduated in chemistry from Hertford College, Oxford. Joining Imperial Chemical Industries in 1973, he undertook a series of increasingly senior roles in marketing and then general management. Following three years in the Netherlands as general manager of ICI Resins BV, he was appointed in 1992 as chief operating officer of EVC in Brussels – a joint venture between ICI and Enichem of Italy. He played a key role in the flotation of the company in 1994, returning in 1998 to the UK as chief executive officer of British Energy where he remained until 2001. From 2001, he held various chairmanships and non-executive directorships. In 2003, he decided to return to an executive role as chief executive of the British Heart Foundation in which post he remained until retirement in March 2013. He joined Southampton University Hospital Trust as a Nonexecutive director in 2010, became senior independent director and deputy chairman of UHS in 2014, and was appointed chair in April 2016. He has also been the chair of CLIC Sargent Cancer Care for Children and Young People, and a Council Member of Southampton University, since 2014 and 2016 respectively. Simon Porter, senior independent director and deputy chair Simon was born and educated in Southampton and then Oxford, graduating with a degree in modern languages (Italian and French). He is a qualified chartered accountant, having spent most of his career with the London office of Ernst & Young, where he specialised first in audit, then in transactions and finally risk management. He was a partner with Ernst & Young from 1994 to 2010. He joined the Trust Board on 1 January 2011 as a designate non-executive director and became non-executive director from 1 June 2011. He is chair of the audit and risk committee and a member of the strategy and finance committee. He also holds non-executive board positions in the social housing sector. Professor Iain Cameron Iain is professor of obstetrics and gynaecology and dean of the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Southampton. After graduating in medicine at the University of Edinburgh, he underwent postgraduate clinical and research training in Edinburgh, Melbourne and Cambridge. He held the regius chair of obstetrics and gynaecology at the University of Glasgow from 1993 and moved to Southampton in 1999. His main clinical and research interests are reproductive endocrinology and investigation of the impact of the maternal environment on early pregnancy. Iain was chair of Medical Schools Council from 2013-16 and is a member of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration board and the Wessex Academic Health Science Network board. He was appointed as a non-executive director of the MDDUS (Medical and Dental Defence Union Scotland) in April 2017. Lynne Lockyer Lynne’s background is in human resource management and strategic management. She became a nonexecutive director for Southampton and South West Hampshire in 1996 and the vice chair in 2000. She was chair of Eastleigh and Test Valley South PCT from its inception in 2002 until its disestablishment in 2006. She has taken many roles in the local health economy including being a member of Hampshire’s Local Area Agreement Board and nationally was a member of the NHS Confederation Council and the National NHS Leaders Steering Group. She was until recently a course director at the University of Portsmouth and is now an organisation development consultant. She is a trustee of the Brendoncare Foundation. 21 Dr David Price David is a former chief executive of a FTSE-250 company with broad experience within the electronics, chemical, aerospace, defence, marine, and nuclear industries. He has a successful track record of developing highly complex companies in international markets. He is currently non-executive chairman of Symetrica Ltd, Telesoft Technologies Ltd, RTL Materials Ltd, Lontra Ltd and Optitune Plc. He is treasurer of the University of Southampton and a member of the advisory board of Silverstream Technologies BV. David is a chartered engineer and chartered scientist. He has a degree in electronic engineering, a PhD from University College London and, in 2001 he was awarded an honorary doctorate by Cranfield University for his services to science and engineering. David was made a Commander of the Order of the British Empire (CBE) for his services to industry. Dr Mike Sadler Mike joined us as a clinical non-executive director in September 2014, from a similar position at an NHS Foundation Trust providing mental health, learning disability and community services. He has chaired our quality committee since June 2016. He works as an advisor and consultant on health and social care services, recently advising on health reform in the Middle East, and in Ireland. He has been chair and technical adviser to the Diabetes Professional Care Conference since 2015, and also worked for the CQC as a specialist adviser in primary care. Mike graduated from Nottingham University, and was a GP principal in Hampshire before moving into public health medicine. Having achieved an MSc with distinction at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, he joined Portsmouth and South East Hampshire Health Authority, holding the joint posts of deputy director of public health and medical adviser. He has since held a series of senior clinical leadership roles in national organisations in both the public and private sector, including as a chief operating officer at NHS Direct and Serco’s health division. His last full time role, up until July 2013 when he commenced his portfolio career, was as director of health and social care at West Sussex County Council. Jenni Douglas-Todd Jenni is a former chief executive of Hampshire Police Authority and the office of the Hampshire police and crime commissioner. After beginning her career in the probation service, she was headhunted into the civil service, at the Home Office, where she spent four years before being becoming director of policy and research for the Independent Police Complaints Commission. In the latter role she was responsible for establishing governance of the new police complaints system. She then spent two-and-a-half years as a resident twinning adviser for the UK, based in Turkey to help set-up a law enforcement complaints system before taking up the role of chief executive of the county’s Police Authority. During her three years in the post, she supported the authority in developing effective governance processes to increase accountability and transparency. She also helped the organisation deliver cost-savings whilst still improving performance and developing closer working relations with neighbouring forces. In 2012, she became chief executive and monitoring officer for the Hampshire police and crime commissioner, where she led the development of the office’s vision, mission, values and organisational strategy. She took on the role of investigating committee chair for the general dental council in 2014 and, in April that year, founded the Diversa Consultancy, which supports organisations with changes in business, culture and behaviour. She is also a member of the Judicial Conduct Investigating Office, a public appointment. Executive directors Fiona Dalton, chief executive Fiona was appointed as chief executive in 2013. Prior to re-joining the Trust she held the combined position of deputy chief executive and chief operating officer at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children. Fiona joined the NHS management training scheme after graduating from Oxford University with a degree in human sciences and began her career in hospital management at Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust in 1996. She then spent four years at UHS as director of strategy and business development before moving to Great Ormond Street Hospital. 22 Gail Byrne, director of nursing and organisational development Gail joined the Trust in 2010 as deputy director of nursing and head of patient safety. Prior to this, she has worked at the Strategic Health Authority as head of patient safety, and director of clinical services at Portsmouth Hospital. Gail has also worked in Brisbane, Australia as a hospital Macmillan nurse, and as general manager of a special purpose vehicle company for the private finance initiative at South Manchester Hospitals. Jane Hayward, director of transformation and improvement Jane joined the Trust in 2000 as a clinical services manager for the cardiothoracic directorate after spending two years in Hertfordshire as director of performance and 11 years at Barts and the London Hospitals in various roles including planning, finance and commissioning. Jane has led on human resources, information management and technology, improvement and modernisation and has been chief operating officer. Jane joined the Trust Board in February 2008 and became director of transformation and improvement in January 2014. Dr Derek Sandeman, medical director Derek was appointed to the Trust as a consultant physician in 1993 and went on to develop a regional endocrine service. Throughout his career he has had extensive clinical leadership experience, most recently serving eight years as clinical director. Derek’s leadership roles have also included programme director for postgraduate education and the Wessex Endocrine Royal College representative. He has a strong history of wider system engagement, working collaboratively with partners to improve systems resilience and pathways. Dr Caroline Marshall, chief operating officer Caroline joined the Trust in 1997 as a consultant hepatobiliary and neuroanaesthetist. She has held the posts of college tutor for the Royal College of Anaesthetists and UHS mentoring and coaching lead. In 2008, she became clinical service director for critical care, and then divisional clinical director for division A between 2010 and 2013. Caroline served as interim chief operating officer between January to December 2014, and was then appointed to the substantive post. Her portfolio includes the Executive lead for cancer and the executive lead for major trauma. David French, chief financial officer David joined the Trust in February 2016 and leads on finance, procurement, estates and commercial development. He read Economics and Social Policy at the University of London before joining ICI plc, where he qualified as a chartered management accountant. David has extensive healthcare experience from the pharmaceutical industry, mostly Eli Lilly and Company where he held many commercial and financial roles in the UK and overseas. He joined the NHS in 2010 as chief financial officer of Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. He also serves as a non-executive director for Vivid Housing Limited, a social housing provider across Hampshire and the Solent. Board effectiveness On the basis of the expertise and experience described above, the Trust is confident that the necessary range of knowledge and skills exists within the Board of Directors and that its balance, completeness and appropriateness to the requirements of the NHS Foundation Trust constitutes a high performing and effective Board. A register of interests of Board members is outlined within this report and is also available from the associate director of corporate affairs. The effectiveness of the Board of Directors meetings is reviewed at the end of each meeting. Effectiveness of Board sub-committees is monitored through monthly board reports and annual evaluation/review of the terms of reference and work programmes. Schedule of Decisions Reserved to the Board The NHS Foundation Trust Code of Governance requires that there should be a formal schedule of matters specifically reserved for decision by the Board. The Scheme of Delegation shows the ‘top level’ of delegation within the Trust. The Scheme should be read in conjunction with Trust’s Standing Financial Instructions and Standing Orders. A copy of the Schedule of Matters Reserved for the Board can be obtained from the associate director of corporate affairs. 23 Attendance at board meetings in 2016/17 Board member 12 28 24 Apr Apr May Extra Extra CS CS 26 May 20 Jun Extra CS 28 26 27 11 27 29 16 26 28 28 Jun Jul Sep Oct Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Extra CS CS only Peter Hollins chair 3 33 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 Simon Porter 3 non-executive director 33 3 telecon 3 333 3 telecon 3 3 3 33 3 Iain Cameron 3 non-executive director 35 35 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 5 Lynne Lockyer 3 33 55 non-executive director telecon 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 David Price 5 non-executive director 33 3 telecon 3 333 3 telecon OS only 3 3 5 33 3 Mike Sadler 3 non-executive director 33 3 telecon 3 333 5 telecon 3 3 3 33 5 OS OS only only Jenni Douglas-Todd 3 non-executive director 33 3 telecon 3 3 53 3 telecon OS only 3 3 3 53 3 Fiona Dalton Chief executive 3 33 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 David French 3 Chief financial officer 33 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 Derek Sandeman Medical director 5 33 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 Gail Byrne Director of nursing and organisational development 3 33 35 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 Caroline Marshall 3 Chief operating officer 33 33 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 33 5 Jane Hayward Director of transformation and improvement 3 35 33 333 3 telecon 3 3 3 33 3 Telecon = telephone conference OS only = open session only 24 Audit and assurance committee (until May 2016) Board member Peter Hollins NED chair Simon Porter non-executive director senior independent director and deputy chair Iain Cameron non-executive director Lynne Lockyer non-executive director David Price non-executive director Mike Sadler non-executive director May 2016 3 5 3 5 3 3 Audit and risk committee (formerly audit and assurance committee) (from June 2016) Board member Simon Porter non-executive director senior independent director and deputy chair David Price non-executive director Mike Sadler non-executive director David French Chief financial officer 18 Jul 3 3 3 3 17 Oct 3 16 Jan 3 20 Mar 3 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 Audit and risk committee The audit and risk committee (formerly known as the audit and assurance committee) is a non-executive committee of the Trust Board with delegated authority to review the establishment and maintenance of an effective system of integrated governance, risk management and financial and non-financial control, which supports the achievement of the Trust’s objectives. As part of the Trust’s on-going commitment to continuous improvement the role and responsibilities of the audit and risk committee were subject to in-year review and revision. The principle change arising from the review was the transfer of responsibilities with regards to ‘clinical quality assurance’ to the quality committee. Composition and meetings There are three non-executive director members of the committee. The committee is chaired by Simon Porter. Further information on the chair is available on pages 21. Executive directors attend by invitation, and there is a standing invitation to the chief financial officer. Other executive directors and staff with specialist expertise attend by invitation. The audit and risk committee met five times between May 2016 and March 2017 in relation to matters covered in this annual report. 25 Purpose and remit The committee purpose is the remit of a ‘traditional’ audit committee, including an oversight function in relation to financial reporting, systems of internal control, risk management, effective use of resources, appointment and effectiveness of external and internal auditors. Major topics considered by the committee
Url
/Media/UHS-website-2019/Docs/About-the-Trust/Annual-reports-and-quality-accounts/annual-report-2016171.pdf
Annual report 20-21
Description
2020/21 Incorporating the quality report University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Annual Report and Accounts 2020/21 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Schedule 7, paragraph 25(4)(a) of the National Health Service Act 2006 © 2021 University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Table of contents Welcome from our chair and chief executive 6 Overview and performance 8 Performance report 9 Overview 10 Accountability report 29 Directors’ report 30 Remuneration report 53 Staff report 65 NHS Foundation Trust Code of Governance 81 NHS Oversight Framework 81 Annual governance statement 84 Quality report 95 Statement on quality from the chief executive 96 Priorities for improvement and statements of assurance from the board 99 Other information 153 Annual accounts 180 Statement from the chief financial officer 181 Auditor’s report 182 Foreword to the accounts 188 Statement of Comprehensive Income 189 Statement of Financial Position 190 Statement of Changes in Taxpayers’ Equity 191 Statement of Cash Flows 192 Notes to the accounts 193 5 Welcome from our chair and chief executive 2020/21 was undoubtedly the most challenging year in the history of the NHS, and we have felt the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic here at University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (UHS) in full. Responding to this has meant there isn’t a single part of our organisation that hasn’t changed in some way over the last year and we have all had to adapt to a rapidly changing environment. Our staff have been unwavering in their dedication, hard work and commitment to keeping our hospitals running, our patients cared for, and their colleagues supported. Every single member of the UHS family has played their part. The loss of life from COVID-19 has been devastating, and at UHS we stand shoulder-to-shoulder with everyone affected by this tragedy, including the families of staff members whom we lost. We must recognise the incredible work of Southampton Hospital Charity, which has funded boost boxes, wellness rooms, a helpline and so much more to support staff at a time when their wellbeing is more important than ever. As the nationwide vaccination programme continues to offer hope of life more like pre-pandemic times, we are proud to have been at the forefront of these efforts - from being part of early research for the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine, to the opening of one of the largest vaccination hubs in the region on our site in December 2020. We will continue to play a key role in vaccination development by leading the world’s first clinical trial into the effectiveness of COVID-19 booster vaccines, as well as taking part in a study involving pregnant people. Our response to COVID-19 has prompted innovation and new ways of working across the Trust, to the benefit of patient experience. At the start of the pandemic we faced real challenges of capacity and increases in waiting times, which led to us working with Spire Southampton so cancer treatment and surgery could continue for patients at highest risk. We also increased the number of outpatient attendances which took place by telephone or video call, and our patient support hub was set up to provide a single point of support for patients who had been advised to shield. We are immensely proud of the record of the Trust during the pandemic, exemplified by the number of patients we were able to take into our care from well outside the local area. The Trust is in a strong financial position as a result of careful spending and efficiencies, which has allowed us to invest significantly in upgrading our estate. These improvements have seen the opening of the general intensive care unit, and the new cancer ward, which was built in just six months. These formed part of overall capital expenditure of £80 million during the year. The last year has seen us say goodbye to two members of our executive leadership team. Paula Head left the chief executive officer role in November to join the national response to COVID-19, before becoming a senior fellow at The King’s Fund. Derek Sandeman moved on from being our chief medical officer to take the same position at the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Integrated Care System. We are grateful to both for their efforts on the Trust leadership team during the most challenging of years. One of our non-executive directors, Jenni Douglas-Todd, also left the Trust to take on the important role of director of equality and inclusion with NHS England and NHS Improvement. 6 Looking ahead to the future, UHS will play a key role in the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Integrated Care System. Our commitment is to deliver services with partners through clinical networks, collaboration and integration across geographical and organisational boundaries for seamless patient care. We as a Trust board are looking forward to implementing our own five year strategy, which sets out ambitions for what we want the hospital to be in 2025, for both patients and staff. Our focus will always be on enabling world class people to deliver world class care. Peter Hollins David French Chair Chief Executive Officer 7 OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE Performance report Introduction from our chief executive Over the last year, the way in which the Trust has worked and performance it has achieved, has been transformed by the COVID-19 pandemic. • UHS saw a number of large surges in demand for inpatient care, and for intensive respiratory support in particular, due to COVID-19 infection rates. Our capacity to deliver intensive care had to be increased, and many of our staff moved from other services such as our elective theatres in order to meet this need for care. • We have introduced and continue to maintain a number of changes to reduce the risk of COVID-19 being transmitted, or adversely affecting patient outcomes, within the Trust. Changes have included the wearing of additional personal protective equipment by our staff (especially when caring for patients who might have COVID-19 or undertaking higher risk procedures), reducing the number of patients coming to our outpatient departments and increasing the number of telephone and video consultations, separating elective and emergency patients within our departments and regular testing of our staff and all patients on or prior to their admission to hospital for treatment. • Public concerns about safety, government restrictions and the efforts of community services actually contributed to reductions in the total number of patients who sought hospital care this year. • Treatment plans have been modified by a number of services, in partnership with patients, to reduce the risk posed by COVID-19 to those patients. This was often appropriate in those circumstances in which the normal treatment would significantly reduce the patient’s own resistance to infections. Our performance has, in many cases, been strongly influenced by these profound changes. We have responded well to the need to provide the most urgent care, and the adverse impacts on elective care have been slightly less than the average across the NHS. However, we remain very concerned by the significant increase in the numbers of patients waiting longer than they should for elective care. It will take concerted and sustained action within both the Trust and the wider NHS in order to return elective performance to levels achieved before the pandemic whilst also continuing to meet urgent care needs as the restrictions that have been implemented within our society are progressively relaxed. 9 Overview About the Trust Our services University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust is one of the largest acute teaching trusts in England with a turnover of more than £1 billion in 2020/21. It is based on the coast in south east England and provides services to over 1.9 million people living in Southampton and south Hampshire and specialist services, including neurosciences, respiratory medicine, cancer care, cardiovascular, obstetrics and specialist children’s services, to more than 3.7 million people in central southern England and the Channel Islands. The Trust is also a designated major trauma centre, one of only two places in the south of England to offer adults and children full major trauma care provision. As a leading centre for teaching and research, the Trust has close working relationships with the University of Southampton, the Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Wellcome Trust and Cancer Research UK. UHS is consistently one of the UK’s highest recruiting trusts of patients to clinical trials and in the top ten nationally for research study volume as ranked by the NIHR Clinical Research Network. 12,000 Every year over staff at UHS: treat around 160,000 inpatients and day patients, including about 75,000 emergency admissions see over 650,000 people at outpatient appointments deal with around 150,000 cases in our emergency department deliver more than 100 outpatient clinics across the south of England, keeping services local for patients The Trust provides most of its services from the following locations: • Southampton General Hospital – the Trust’s largest location, where a great number of specialist services are based alongside emergency and critical care and which includes Southampton Children’s Hospital. • Princess Anne Hospital – located across the road from Southampton General Hospital and providing maternity care and specialist care for women with medical problems during pregnancy and babies who need extra care around birth across the region. • Royal South Hants Hospital – although the Trust does not operate this site near the centre of Southampton it provides a smaller number of services from this location. • New Forest Birth Centre – located at Ashurst on the edge of the New Forest and run by experienced midwives and support staff it offers a safe, ‘home away from home’ environment for women having a healthy pregnancy and expecting a straightforward birth. The services provided by the Trust are commissioned and paid for by local clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) and, in the case of more specialised services (such as treatments for rare conditions), by NHS England. Over 50% of UHS services are paid for by CCGs and approximately 48% by NHS England. We provide these under a standard NHS contract, which incorporates ongoing monitoring of the Trust and the quality of the services provided. 10 Our structure UHS gained foundation trust status on 1 October 2011. A foundation trust is a public benefit corporation providing NHS services in line with the core NHS principles: that care should be universal, comprehensive and free at the point of need. The Trust is licensed as a foundation trust to provide these services by Monitor (the independent regulator, now part of NHS England and NHS Improvement) and the healthcare services we provide are regulated by the Care Quality Commission. Being a foundation trust has enabled greater local accountability and greater financial freedom and has supported the delivery of the Trust’s mission and strategy over a number of years. The diagram below provides an overview of the overall organisational structure of the Trust. Public and foundation trust members Council of Governors Board of Directors Executive Directors Division A Surgery Critical Care Opthalmology Theatres and Anaesthetics Division B Division C Cancer Care Emergency Medicine Helicopter Emergency Medical Services Medicine and Medicine for Older People Pathology Specialist Medicine Women and Newborn Maternity Child Health Clinical Support Division D Trust Headquarters Division Cardiovascular and Thoracic Neurosciences Trauma and Orthopaedics Radiology Corporate Affairs Communications Estates, Facilities and Capital Development Finance Human Resources Informatics Patient Support Services Procurement and Supply Transformation and Improvement (‘Always Improving’) Research and Development Strategy and Business Development 11 The Trust is also part of an integrated care system in Hampshire and the Isle of Wight, which is a partnership of NHS and local government organisations working together to improve the health and wellbeing of the population across Hampshire and the Isle of Wight. Our values Our values describe how we do things at UHS and act as a guide to all staff working with colleagues to deliver high quality patient care and a great patient experience every day. Our values are: Patients, their families and carers are at the heart of what we do. Their experience of our services will be our measure of success. Partnership between clinicians, patients and carers is critical to achieving our vision, both within hospital teams and extending across organisational boundaries in the NHS, social care and the third sector. We will ensure we are always improving services for patients through research, education, clinical effectiveness and quality improvement. We will continue to incorporate new ideas, technologies and create greater efficiencies in the services we provide. 12 Our strategy 2021-25 The Trust’s strategy was updated during 2020/2021 to take account of everything our staff had experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic and what we had learnt from this. The vision for UHS is to continue on its journey to become an organisation of world class people delivering world class care. Our strategy is organised around five themes and for each of these describes a number ambitions we aim to achieve by 2025. Theme Ambitions Outstanding patient outcomes, • We will monitor clinical outcomes, safety and experience of our experience and safety patients regularly to ensure they are amongst the best in the UK By 2025 we will strengthen our and the world. national reputation for outstanding • We will reduce harm, learning from all incidents through our patient outcomes, experience and proactive patient safety culture. safety, providing high quality care • We will ensure all patients and relatives have a positive experience and treatment across an extensive of our care, as a result of the environment created by our people range of services from foetal and our facilities. medicine, through all life stages and conditions, to end-of-life care. Pioneering research • We will recruit and enable people to deliver pioneering research and innovation in Southampton. We will continue to be a leading teaching hospital with a growing, reputable and innovative research and development portfolio • We will optimise access to clinical research studies for our patients. • We will enable innovation in everything we do, and ensure that ‘cutting edge’ investigations and treatments are delivered in Southampton. that attracts the best staff and efficiently delivers the best possible treatments and care for our patients. World class people • We will recruit and develop enough people with the right Supporting and nurturing our knowledge and skills to meet the needs of our patients. people through a culture that values • We will provide satisfying and fulfilling roles, growing our talent diversity and builds knowledge and through development and opportunity for progression. skills to ensure everyone reaches • We will empower our people, embracing diversity and embedding their full potential. We must provide compassion, inclusion and equity of opportunity. rewarding career paths within empowered, compassionate, and motivated teams. Integrated networks and collaboration We will deliver our services with partners through clinical networks, collaboration and integration across geographical and organisational boundaries. • We will work in partnership with key stakeholders across the Hampshire and Isle of Wight integrated care system. • We will strengthen our acute clinical networks across the region, centralising when necessary and supporting local care when appropriate. • We will foster local integration with primary and community care as well as mental health and social care services for seamless delivery across boundaries. • We will build on our successful partnership with University of Southampton (UoS), growing our reputation as a national leading university teaching hospital. 13 Theme Foundations for the future Making our enabling infrastructure (finance, digital, estate) fit for the future to support a leading university teaching hospital in the 21st century and recognising our responsibility as a major employer in the community of Southampton and our role in broader environmental sustainability. Ambitions • We will deliver best value to the tax payer as a financially efficient and sustainable organisation. • We will support patient self-management and seamless care across organisational boundaries through our ambitious digital programme, including real time data reporting, to inform our care. • We will expand and improve our estate, increasing capacity where needed and providing modern facilities for our patients and our people. • We will strengthen our role in the community as an employer of choice, a partner in delivery of services to our population and by leading the Greener NHS agenda locally. During each year of the strategy the Trust will set out a more detailed series of objectives to achieve and progress towards the delivery of its ambitions. In 2020/21 these objectives included: • Recovery, restoration and improvement of clinical services • Implementing the ‘Always Improving’ strategy • Restoring a full research portfolio • Continuing our focus on staff wellbeing including the long-term effects of coronavirus (long COVID) • Working in partnership with the newly established integrated care system • Creating a sustainable financial infrastructure • Making our corporate infrastructure (digital, estate) fit for the future to support a leading university teaching hospital in the 21st century, including an estates masterplan. Performance against these objectives will be monitored and reported to the Trust’s board of directors on a quarterly basis. Principal risks to our strategy and objectives The board of directors has identified and manages the principal risks to the delivery of its strategy and objectives through its board assurance framework. The principal risks to the delivery of its strategy and objectives identified by the Trust during 2020/21 were that: • it would be unable to form effective partnerships that achieve networked care for patients; • it could not develop the estate in line with the ambitions set out in the strategy; • it would fail to restore and increase capacity following the COVID-19 pandemic to meet waiting times for elective care and cancer care needs; • it would fail to introduce and implement new technology for the transformation of care; • it would be unable to retain, recruit, develop and train a diverse and inclusive workforce necessary to meet the strategic goals; • it could not develop a sustainable model within the new financial regime that preserves quality care; • it would fail to provide vulnerable service users with timely and high quality and appropriate care; • it would not reach the ambition of outstanding compliance and quality standards; • it could not sufficiently engage with key stakeholders and system partners to support effective interventions and maintain the health of the local population; • it would be unable to respond to the needs of the NHS in order to deliver our strategy; • it would fail to capitalise on its relationship with the universities in Southampton and other health education providers in line with our strategy; • it would not develop innovative education and training approaches. 14 While the COVID-19 pandemic presented the Trust with new risks as it introduced more stringent infection control processes, stopped certain types of activity and responded quickly to care for large numbers of seriously ill patients who had tested positive for COVID-19, it also prompted innovation across a wide range of areas. However the ongoing impact of the pandemic on both our staff, patients who have had COVID-19 and patients who have waited longer than expected for treatment as a result, added to the risks facing the Trust. National targets for performance have not been amended as a result of the pandemic, although the national plan has focussed on the recovery of activity levels as the first stage in a restoration of elective services. Capacity – The initial and subsequent waves of the COVID-19 pandemic have led to increases in the waiting times for patients and the number of patients waiting more than 52 and 78 weeks has increased significantly. While the Trust was able to recover capacity quickly between waves of the pandemic, its ability to reduce the overall waiting list and the length of time patients are waiting for treatment remains one of the key risks for the Trust. This may be compounded by the reduction in the number of referrals from GPs during the pandemic, leading to a potential future increase in the number of patients being referred as people visit their GPs for the first time with more advanced disease. During the pandemic the Trust utilised the support available from the independent sector to continue cancer treatment and surgery for those patients at highest risk. It also increased the number of outpatient attendances which took place by telephone or video call. The Trust developed a clinical assurance framework during the year to better assess the risk of harm to patients as a result of delays in treatment and this has been utilised in decision-making around the allocation of resources to those areas where there is the greatest risk of potential harm to patients. In addition to opening additional capacity during 2020/21 (described in the Estates section below), the Trust also committed expenditure and commenced construction works in 2020/21 in order to be in a position to open an additional endoscopy room and four further operating theatres during 2021/22 and prepared plans for a significant expansion in ophthalmology outpatient capacity. These initiatives will contribute to improvements in elective waiting times that needed following the pandemic. Quality and compliance – The Trust continued to monitor the quality of care delivered throughout 2020/21. During the COVID-19 pandemic the primary focus became infection prevention and control, with the launch of a successful COVID ZERO campaign that saw the Trust reduce the transmission of the virus in hospital (nosocomial transmission). The Trust also achieved its annual target for reduction in Clostridium Difficile infections, however, there was one MRSA Bacteraemia during March 2021, the only such event in 2020/21. The Trust continued to develop its proactive patient safety culture during 2020/21 with changes to the way in which patient safety incidents are investigated and the approval of its Always Improving strategy, which will be launched in 2021. Reporting and investigation of incidents continued during 2020/21. Partnerships – During 2020/21, the Trust and its partners worked together very effectively to discharge patients safely and provide ongoing support to patients who had tested positive for COVID-19, to ensure patients requiring urgent cancer treatment and surgery were able to continue their treatment in the independent sector and to develop a COVID-19 saliva testing pilot with the University of Southampton and local authorities. Work to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, however, meant that as a system we were unable to progress the Hampshire and Isle of Wight strategic plan delivery at the pace we would have wanted or had set out to achieve, particularly the development of networks. Nonetheless the application for Hampshire and Isle of Wight to become an integrated care system was approved with effect from 1 April 2021. 15 Existing networks continued to develop and improve. The Trust also became the Wessex Cancer Surgical Hub during 2020 as a result of a national initiative with the aim of maximising the number of patients receiving curative surgery. Both the Wessex Cancer Alliance and the Trust ended the year as the second highest performing among their respective peers for cancer treatment. Workforce – While additional staff were recruited to specifically assist the Trust during the pandemic, the Trust continued to recruit nurses from overseas during 2020/21 meaning that the number of vacancies has reduced compared to the position prior to the pandemic. Changes to recruitment processes were approved in 2020/21 to improve the fairness, transparency and quality of these. The Trust also continued to work with its staff networks and specific focus groups to increase diversity in leadership roles. While workforce capacity continues to be one of the biggest challenges faced by the Trust, during 2020/21 our main focus has been on supporting our staff to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic and providing both the tools and time to help staff recovery. We are incredibly proud of the way that staff responded to the pandemic and continue to recognise this in whatever ways we can, however, we also want to ensure that staff continue to be able to contribute to patient care at their best and want to stay and develop with the Trust. Technology was also used at levels not previously achieved to continue to deliver training to staff and enable staff to work from home where possible, ensuring a safer environment for patients and staff in the hospitals. Estate – The Trust continued to invest in and develop its estate during 2020/21 including the opening a new general intensive care unit (GICU), a new operating theatre and a new cancer care ward, built in just six months. These were part of £80 million of capital expenditure in 2020/21. The Trust has also established a programme to reduce backlog maintenance in addition to continuing to add to and improve the environment in which services are provided to patients and the working environment for staff. Innovation and technology – There have been exceptional levels of achievement in relation to COVID-19 related research activity, including in partnership with the universities. You can read more about these from page 167 of the quality report. The board of directors also supported the funding of an expansion of research and innovation activity to allow the continued delivery of the Trust’s ambitions to innovate and improve and transform its services. Sustainable financial model – The Trust achieved its forecast breakeven position in 2020/21. Income was more predictable in 2020/21 as block contract arrangements were put in place in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and ensured that costs were covered. The Trust continues to maintain a strong cash position and to implement improvements and efficiency savings, allowing it to continue to invest in its services. 16 Summary of performance COVID-19 bed occupancy UHS has experienced two distinct peaks in inpatient care for patients with COVID-19 infection, with smaller numbers of patients continuing to receive care outside these peak times. Bed occupancy reached a maximum of 173 in the first peak in April 2020, and 322 in the second peak in January 2021. All bed types Intensive care/higher care beds 17 Emergency access through our emergency and eye casualty departments Public concerns about safety, government restrictions on the activities people were able to do, and the efforts of community services contributed to significant reductions in the total number of patients who presented to our departments. All patients presenting to the emergency department Many changes were introduced within our departments in the course of the year to ensure that emergency assessment and treatment could be provided safely, including wearing of protective equipment by staff and patients, providing care in separate areas for patients suspected or known to have COVID-19, and using rapid laboratory tests to identify infection and confirm/exclude COVID-19 as a cause. Emergency access performance (measured as the percentage of patients discharged from emergency department care or admitted to a hospital bed within four hours of arrival to the department) improved significantly in 2020/21 compared to previous years. The national target of 95% was not achieved, however, the performance of our departments compared favourably with the average for acute trusts in England. 18 Emergency access four hour performance 19 Elective Waiting times Demand We saw a significant reduction in the number of elective referrals to hospital in the early part 2020/21, though they had returned close to pre-pandemic levels by the end of the year. It is likely that this pattern relates to a range of factors including reluctance from members of the public to attend healthcare facilities at that time, changes to the ways in which primary care was accessed, and efforts made within primary and community to avoid hospital referrals needing to be made. Accepted referrals The number of patients referred to hospital with suspected cancer also reduced during 2020/21; 7% fewer patients were seen across the year as a whole, though referrals returned to pre-pandemic levels or higher from July 2020 onwards. Patients seen following ‘Two week wait’ urgent referral for suspected cancer 20 Activity UHS hospital appointments, diagnostic tests and elective admissions were all significantly reduced during 2020/21 due to the impact of COVID-19. • During periods of higher bed occupancy with COVID-19 it was necessary to significantly reduce the number of elective admissions undertaken in order that additional staff could work in intensive care. Less clinically urgent and therefore longer waiting patients were primarily those affected. • Throughout the year, additional infection prevention measures have reduced the number of patients that can be seen in each session, particularly when higher risk ‘aerosol generating’ procedures are planned, but also as a result of additional PPE being worn or to enable greater distancing of patients attending outpatient departments. UHS was offered additional capacity at local independent sector hospitals and used this effectively to minimise these adverse impacts. Approximately 30% of outpatient appointments are now undertaken by telephone or video, helping to maintain the capacity for patient care whilst reducing the infection risk for those patients and helping to maintain distancing measures for those patients still attending our outpatient departments. The graphs below show 2020/21 activity levels as a percentage of those achieved in the previous year. Elective admissions (including daycase) 21 Outpatient attendances Performance The average waiting time for first outpatient appointments has remained close to nine weeks for the majority of the year. UHS has however experienced very significant deteriorations in the waiting times our patients experience for diagnostic tests to be undertaken and elective treatment to be provided. The reduced number of new patients referred to hospital early in 2020/21 has moderated the extent of the growth in the total numbers of patients waiting, and the greatest rate of growth has unfortunately been amongst those groups of patients already waiting longest. 22 Diagnostics Our performance measures for diagnostics report on a total of 15 different frequently used tests. The waiting list is approximately 50% bigger than it was before the pandemic and stable through the second half of the year. At the end of the year 28% of patients were waiting more than six weeks to receive their investigation compared to the national target of 1%. The tests with the largest numbers of longer waiting patients include non-obstetric ultrasound, MRI and endoscopies, and further recovery will be driven through a combination of recruitment, independent sector capacity and an additional endoscopy room which opened at the start of April 2021. Patients waiting for a diagnostic test to be performed (sum of 15 different frequently used tests) Percentage of patients waiting over 6 weeks for a diagnostic test to be performed 23 Referral to Treatment Our waiting list from referral to treatment increased in size by 6% (2,220 patients) during 2020/21, rising when the recovery in referral numbers exceeded the recovery in clinical activity, the total increase in waiting list size would have been significantly higher had it not been for the significant reduction in the referrals received by the hospital especially during the early months of the pandemic. Looking forward, we anticipate referrals numbers returning to pre-pandemic levels, and being able to maintain the total size of our waiting list by delivering an equivalent number of treatments each month. Number of patients waiting between referral and commencement of a treatment for their condition The national target is that at least 92% of patients should be waiting for treatment no more than 18 weeks from their referral to hospital. Our performance against this measure is now 12% worse than one year ago, at 66%. Our performance continues to be typical of the major teaching hospital trusts that we benchmark with and the trend has been similar to that experienced across trusts in England. Percentage of patients waiting up to 18 weeks between referral and treatment 24 Unfortunately, the number of patients waiting significantly longer than the 18 week target has increased at a faster rate than the size of the waiting list as a whole. The graph below shows how the percentage of patients who have waited more 52 weeks increased. The number of patients who have waited more 52 weeks increased from 40 in March 2020 to 3,419 by March 2021 (of these 445 patients had waited more than 78 weeks). Such patients often require surgical treatment, particularly in the orthopaedic, ear nose and throat and oral surgery specialities. The impact on surgical care has been greater than that in outpatients during the pandemic, and it is also more challenging to increase capacity due to the need for additional operating theatres and a combination of different healthcare professionals to work within them. UHS opened an additional operating theatre in 2020/21, and has a further four theatres scheduled to open during 2021/22, which will make a significant contribution to our capacity to treat more patients. Unfortunately, the number of patients waiting significantly longer than the 18 week target is likely to continue to grow further in the short term, due to diagnostic investigations having been progressed less quickly than usual during the pandemic, the need to prioritise our increased treatment capacity according to the clinical urgency of conditions and because our scheduled capacity increases will not be completed before the autumn of 2021. Percentage of patients waiting more than 52 weeks, between referral and commencement of a treatment for their condition 25 Cancer Waiting Times UHS has been mostly successful in maintaining the timeliness of urgent services for patients with suspected cancer through the pandemic, and our performance has been amongst the best in both the south-east and nationally. UHS prioritised the theatre and intensive care capacity we were able to provide during the pandemic in order to meet the needs of those patients with the greatest clinical urgency, used capacity offered by independent sector hospitals to supplement that available within NHS, and operated a hub through which hospitals in Wessex were able to collaborate to continue critical cancer surgery during periods of peak COVID-19 demand. The national target is to provide the first definitive treatment to at least 85% of patients with cancer with 62 days of referral to hospital. Whilst UHS performance remained below this level in the majority of months, our performance has been significantly better than the national average, and has improved relative to other trusts. Treatment for Cancer within 62 days of an urgent GP referral to hospital 26 The national target is to provide the first definitive treatment to at least 96% of patients within 31 days of a decision to treat being made and agreed with the patients; both for the first and any subsequent treatments for cancer. UHS achieved this level on average across the year, and in the majority of months. The treatments provided are typically by means of surgery, chemotherapy/immunotherapy or radiotherapy. The most significant performance challenge this year has been in radiotherapy, where more sophisticated treatment plans improve patient outcomes but take longer to prepare, and there was also reduced treatment capacity whilst we replaced one of our ‘Linear Accelerator’ treatment machines with a new model. First definitive treatment for cancer within 31 days of a decision to treat Equality in service delivery Identifying and addressing health inequalities have been the central part of the Trust’s approach to improving the experience of care for our patients, families and carers. Over the past year, new initiatives have augmented progress on existing work to ensure there is appropriate support, due regard and recognition of those patients and their families and carers who are most at risk of poor experiences, outcomes and access to services. In 2020 we added two questions to our patient surveys, asking first if patients felt themselves to have a disability or require a reasonable adjustment, and, if yes, whether the Trust met this need. In 2020/21, the results were: TOTAL Had a disability / required a reasonable adjustment 27% Had this need met by the Trust (positive response) 95% This question was added to our major Friends and Family Test surveys as well as our local service-specific patient surveys. In June 2020 the Trust launched the sunflower lanyard scheme for hidden disabilities, participating in the national initiative to ensure that people whose disabilities are not visible are able to access further support and reasonable adjustments by means of a nationally recognised indicator (the sunflower). In 2020/21, 618 lanyards were issued with those needs recorded to ensure future reasonable adjustments are made for those individuals. 27 Carers have always been essential partners in the care that we provide, and having introduced a new post at the end of 2019 to focus solely on carer experience, this work has culminated in a Trust strategy for improving the involvement, support and experience carers have of our services. We have, over the past year, introduced carers cards, virtual peer support and carer-specific information about services while actively participating in local and regional work on carers. In January 2021 we realised our ambition of becoming an accredited ‘Veterans Aware’ hospital, with our submission of evidence being recognised as ‘strong’ and indicative of an organisation that has made great progress in helping to provide enhanced support for the armed forces community. Towards the end of 2019 we worked with the disability organisation AccessAble to produce accessibility guides for all of our services and estate. These online guides allow patients and visitors with disabilities to plan their journey and identify potential challenges to the environment. In 2020/21 our guides had 5,000 unique visits per month. One of our COVID-19 initiatives, a patient support hub, was set up in May 2020 to provide a single point of support for our patients who had been advised to shield. The service has grown and now offers support to patients and carers who are vulnerable, disabled or with additional needs. This includes coordinating community transport, arranging companions to assist with attending appointments, hosting a technology library to support those who are digitally excluded in accessing virtual appointments and information, and most recently receiving funding to pilot volunteer-led support for diabetes patients. Across the Trust, we continue to actively promote the importance of asking patients and carers about disabilities and reasonable adjustments, flagging needs on our patient administrative system to prompt our services to take proactive steps to ensure that any needs or adjustments are met on each and every visit. This has been of vital importance for meeting accessible information and communication needs. We are currently one of first trusts to pilot a new translation app that provides immediate interpretation into different languages, and we have worked closely with our communication support partners to ensure that where virtual appointments are needed, people with communication needs (BSL, foreign language) are supported to access care virtually. Our specialist nursing liaison teams continued to support access to services throughout the pandemic, ensuring that patients with dementia, with learning disabilities and autism, were supported to attend hospital where necessary. Further information about the Trust’s work in relation to equality, diversity and inclusion can be found on page 69 and pages 106 and 160 in the quality report. Going concern After making enquiries, the directors have a reasonable expectation that the services provided by the Trust will continue to be provided by the public sector for the foreseeable future. For this reason, the directors have adopted the going concern basis in preparing the accounts, following the definition of going concern in the public sector adopted by HM Treasury’s Financial Reporting Manual. David French Chief Executive Officer 28 June 2021 28 Accountability report Directors’ report Board of directors The board of directors is usually made up of six executive directors and seven non-executive directors, including the chair. Since 1 January 2021 the number of non-executive directors has been reduced by one as Jane Bailey’s reappointment as a non-executive director was deferred to allow her to lead the Hampshire and Isle of Wight saliva mass testing programme. Jane is expected to return to the board of directors in her non-executive director role by 1 July 2021. Paragraph B.1.2 of the NHS foundation trust code of governance provides that at least half the board of directors, excluding the chair, should comprise non-executive directors determined by the board to be independent. Pending the reappointment of Jane Bailey as a non-executive director, the Trust has been operating with one fewer non-executive directors than is required by the Trust’s constitution and the Trust has been non-compliant with this paragraph of the code. During this period the provisions of the Trust’s constitution that a quorum for meetings of the board of directors requires at least one non-executive director and one executive director to be present and for the chair to have a second and casting vote in the case of an equal vote continued to apply. The board of directors has given careful consideration to the range of skills and experience it requires to run the Trust. Together the members of the board of directors bring a wide range of skills and experience to the Trust, such that the Board achieves balance and completeness at the highest level. The chair was determined to be independent on his appointment and the other non-executive directors have been determined to be independent in both character and judgement. This included specific consideration of Jane Bailey’s continued independence following her role leading the Hampshire and Isle of Wight saliva mass testing programme. The chair, executive directors and non-executive directors have declared any business interests that they have. Each director has declared their interests at public meetings of the board of directors. The register of interests is available on the Trust’s website. 30 The current members of the board of directors are: Non-executive directors Peter Hollins Chair Peter graduated in chemistry from Hertford College, Oxford. Joining Imperial Chemical Industries in 1973, he undertook a series of increasingly senior roles in marketing and then general management. Following three years in the Netherlands as general manager of ICI Resins BV, in 1992 he was appointed as chief operating officer of EVC in Brussels – a joint venture between ICI and Enichem of Italy. He played a key role in the flotation of the company in 1994, before returning in 1998 to the UK as chief executive officer of British Energy where he remained until 2001. From 2001, he held various chairmanships and non-executive directorships. In 2003, he decided to return to an executive role as chief executive of the British Heart Foundation in which post he remained until retirement in March 2013. He joined Southampton University Hospital Trust as a non-executive director in 2010, became senior independent director and deputy chairman of UHS in 2014 and was appointed chair in April 2016. Trust roles: • Chair of remuneration and appointment committee • Chair of governors’ nomination committee Jane Bailey Non-executive director In 1985, Jane joined the pharmaceutical company Glaxo as a management trainee, having graduated from London University with a degree in environmental science and pharmacology. Here she rose to senior commercial vice-president, gaining experience of a broad range of disease areas across different regions of the world. She specialised in leading global research and development teams in the formation of strategies to bring new medicines to patients. She also worked to ensure that the medicines developed were supported by robust evidence demonstrating their clinical and cost-effectiveness. In delivering this she gained extensive experience of leading large diverse teams across a complex global organisation. For five years, Jane ran her own strategy development consultancy, working across a breadth of healthcare organisations. In 2017 Jane gained an MSc in public health, with distinction, at King’s College, London University. Her studies focused on how to ensure the public are engaged in development of healthcare services and how social theories can help inform effective disease prevention and management. Jane is a director of Wessex NHS Procurement Limited, a joint venture between the Trust and Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and a director of Healthwatch Portsmouth. Trust roles: • Deputy chair and senior independent director • Chair of finance and investment committee • Audit and risk committee member • Charitable funds committee member • People and organisational development committee member • Remuneration and appointment committee member • Wellbeing Guardian 31 Non-executive directors Dave Bennett Non-executive director Dave graduated in chemistry from the University of Southampton before entering management consulting, becoming a partner in Accenture’s strategy practice. In 2003 he joined Exel Logistics (later acquired by DHL), managing the company’s healthcare business across Europe and the Middle East. During this time, he established NHS Supply Chain, a UK organisation responsible for procuring and delivering medical consumables for the NHS in England, as well as sourcing capital equipment. Dave joined the board of Cable & Wireless as sales director in 2008. He later set up his own strategy consulting practice serving the healthcare sector, completing numerous projects in the UK and the US. Dave has also served as a non-executive director at The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust between 2009 and 2016, where he chaired the Trust’s quality committee. Dave is a non-executive director at the Faculty of Leadership and Medical Management and a director of Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Enterprises Ltd and RCGP Conferences Ltd. Trust roles: • Chair of charitable funds committee • Chair of finance and investment committee (from 1 January 2021) • Audit and risk committee member (from 9 February 2021) • Quality committee member • Remuneration and appointment committee member • Chair of Trust’s organ donation committee 32 Non-executive directors Cyrus Cooper Non-executive director Cyrus Cooper is professor of rheumatology and director of the MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit. He is also vice-dean of the faculty of medicine at the University of Southampton and professor of epidemiology at the Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics (rheumatology and musculoskeletal sciences, University of Oxford). He leads an internationally competitive programme of research into the epidemiology of musculoskeletal disorders, most notably osteoporosis. His key research contributions have been: • discovery of the developmental influences which contribute to the risk of osteoporosis and hip fracture in late adulthood • demonstration that maternal vitamin D insufficiency is associated with sub-optimal bone mineral accrual in childhood • characterisation of the definition and incidence rates of vertebral fractures • leadership of large pragmatic randomised controlled trials of calcium and vitamin D supplementation in the elderly as immediate preventative strategies against hip fracture. He is president of the International Osteoporosis Foundation, chair of the BHF Project Grants Committee, an emeritus NIHR senior investigator, a director of The Rank Prize Funds and associate editor of Osteoporosis International. He has previously served as chairman of the Scientific Advisors Committee (International Osteoporosis Foundation), the MRC Population Health Sciences Research Network and the National Osteoporosis Society of Great Britain. He has also been president of the Bone Research Society of Great Britain and has worked on numerous Department of Health, European Community and World Health Organisation committees and working groups. Cyrus has published extensively on osteoporosis and rheumatic disorders and pioneered clinical studies on the developmental origins of peak bone mass. In 2015, he was awarded an OBE for services to medical research. Trust roles: • Quality committee member • Remunerati
Url
/Media/UHS-website-2019/Docs/About-the-Trust/Annual-reports-and-quality-accounts/annual-report-20-21.pdf
1
to
10
of
114
Previous
1
2
3
4
5
…
Next
Site policies
Report a problem with this page
Privacy and cookies
Site map
Translation
Last updated: 14 September 2019
Contact details
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Tremona Road
Southampton
Hampshire
SO16 6YD
Telephone: 023 8077 7222
Useful links
Home
Getting here
What to do in an emergency
Research
Working here
Education
© 2014 University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Browser does not support script.
Browser does not support script.