Browse site A to Z

Search results

Go To Advanced Search

Report of Voting_UHS

Description: Report of Voting UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SOUTHAMPTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST ELECTION TO THE COUNCIL OF GOVERNORS CLOS
Url: /Media/UHS-website-2019/Docs/About-the-Trust/Governors/report-of-voting-uhs.pdf

Wessex teenage and young adult cancer service - patient information

Description: This booklets introduces Wessex teenage and young adult (TYA) cancer service which is here to help support young people diagnosed with
Url: /Media/UHS-website-2019/Patientinformation/Cancercare/Wessex-teenage-and-young-adult-cancer-service-2796-PIL.pdf

Report of Voting_UHS

Description: Report of Voting UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SOUTHAMPTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST ELECTION TO THE COUNCIL OF GOVERNORS CLOS
Url: /Media/UHS-website-2019/Docs/Council-of-Governors/Report-of-Voting-UHS.pdf

Report of voting - UHS - 2022

Description: Report of Voting UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SOUTHAMPTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST ELECTION TO THE COUNCIL OF GOVERNORS CLOS
Url: /Media/UHS-website-2019/Docs/About-the-Trust/Governors/Report-of-voting-UHS-2022.pdf

Handling concerns and complaints policy

Description: Handling Complaints Policy, Version 13.0 Trust reference PET003 Version number 13.0 Description Policy to explain how University Hospital Southampton implements the framework for the NHS Complaints (England) Regulations 2009. It clarifies what people should expect when then complain, in accordance with Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman’s complaint standards. Level and type of document Target audience Trust-wide corporate policy – controlled document. Staff, patients, relatives, and carers. Author(s) (names and job titles) Policy sponsor Shona Small, Complaints Manager Jenny Milner, Associate Director of Patient Experience This is a controlled document. Whilst this document may be printed, the electronic version posted on Staffnet is the controlled copy. Any printed copies of this document are not controlled. As a controlled document, this document should not be saved onto local or network drives but should always be accessed from Staffnet. All documents must remain watermarked as ‘draft’ until they have been approved by the Expert Group. 1 Date Version control Author(s) Version Approval created committee 6.9.2024 Shona Small 6.9.2024 Experience of care committee Date of approval 10/7/24 Date next review due 10/7/27 Key changes made to document To bring in line with Ombudsman’s new complaint standard terminology. PET003 Handling Complaints Policy version 13. Issued 10.7.24 Page 1 2 Index 1 Version control ............................................................................................................... 1 2 Index.............................................................................................................................. 2 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 2 4 Quick References .......................................................................................................... 3 5 Scope and purpose ........................................................................................................ 3 6 Definitions ...................................................................................................................... 4 7 Details of policy.............................................................................................................. 5 8 Roles and responsibilities ............................................................................................ 15 9 Communication and training plans ............................................................................... 15 11 Document review...................................................................................................... 16 12 Process for monitoring compliance ........................................................................... 16 13 Appendices .............................................................................................................. 17 • Appendix A ................................................................................................................. 17 • Appendix B................................................................................................................. 18 • Appendix C................................................................................................................. 18 • Appendix D................................................................................................................. 21 • Appendix E ................................................................................................................. 22 • Appendix F ................................................................................................................. 23 • Appendix G................................................................................................................. 24 • Appendix H................................................................................................................. 31 • Appendix I .................................................................................................................. 33 • Appendix J ................................................................................................................. 34 • Appendix K - Audit tool to monitor policy compliance ............................................. 35 • Appendix L ................................................................................................................. 36 14 References ............................................................................................................... 36 3 Introduction The purpose of this policy is to explain how University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (UHS) implements the statutory legal framework for the local authority, social services and National Health Service Complaints (England) Regulations 2009, and how the Trust meets the requirements of the NHS Constitution. The policy makes clear what people should expect when they complain (NHS Constitution) and supports a culture of openness, honesty and transparency (duty of candour). Trust practice is informed by the Parliamentary and Health Services Ombudsman (PHSO) Complaint Standards and Principles of Remedy, including the Scale of Injustice. The policy deals with the handling of concerns and complaints (regarding Trust services, buildings or the environment) received from patients, patient’s relatives, carers, visitors and other service users. In most circumstances the quickest and most effective way of resolving a concern or complaint is to deal with the issues when they arise or as soon as possible after this (early resolution). PET003 Handling Complaints Policy version 13. Issued 10.7.24 Page 2 In circumstances where early resolution is not possible, this policy describes the processes in place to ensure that complaints are handled efficiently and investigated thoroughly. Patient and Family Relations (P&FR) are responsible for the overall management of complaints. P&FR combines the patient advice and liaison service (PALS) and the complaint handling functions, to provide a flexible approach to resolving complaints. The policy promotes the use of people’s experience of care to improve quality. By listening to people about their experience of healthcare, the Trust can resolve mistakes faster, learn new ways to improve the quality and safety of services, and prevent the same problem from happening again in the future. The reporting and monitoring of trends, themes and lessons learnt is undertaken through divisional governance structures, quality committee and the quality governance steering group and is used to ensure compliance with commissioner, regulatory and good practice requirements. The Trust is committed to providing safe, effective and high-quality services. However, it is recognised that things can occasionally go wrong. When complaints are raised, the Trust has a responsibility to acknowledge the complaint, put things right as quickly as possible, prevent reoccurrence and identify service improvements. Written information regarding how the Trust deals with complaints will be made available in all departments, the main reception, patient support services, the Trust website and through the local Integrated Care Bureau (ICB), The Advocacy People and other patient forums. 4 Quick References None 5 Scope and purpose The purpose of the policy is to: • Outline the Trust policy on handling complaints • Describe the procedure followed to respond to complaints • Confirm the roles and responsibility associated with this process • Provide staff with guidance on how to respond to a complaint • Describe how this policy links to the National Complaint Handling Framework o Promotes a learning and improvement culture o Positively seeks feedback o Is thorough and fair o Gives a fair and accountable decision The aim is to explain how UHS implements the statutory legal framework for the local authority social services and NHS Complaints (England) Regulations 2009, meets the requirements of the NHS Constitution and duty of candour, and ensures compliance with commissioners, regulatory and good practice requirements. The aims and outcomes of this policy promote early, local and prompt resolution involving the complainant in deciding how their complaints are handled. Likewise, good complaint handling and continuous learning is endorsed throughout the policy, promoting improvements in the quality and safety of services at UHS and facilitating positive patient experiences. PET003 Handling Complaints Policy version 13. Issued 10.7.24 Page 3 Aims • To listen, to acknowledge mistakes, explain what went wrong and to consider prompt, appropriate and proportionate remedy to put things right. • To provide a consistent approach to the timely and efficient handling of complaints and establish an agreed plan with the complainant with an emphasis on early resolution, sharing learning and improving our services. • To ensure organisational openness and an approach that is conciliatory and fair to people both using and delivering services. • To respect the individual’s right to confidentiality and treat all users of this policy with respect and courtesy. Outcomes • The policy and procedure will, as far as is reasonably practical, be easy to understand, accessible, publicised in ways that will reach all service users and include information about support and advocacy services, if relevant. • All staff will receive an appropriate level of training to enable them to respond positively to complaints, and endeavour to resolve issues quickly. • The Trust will ensure that service users and carers can raise a complaint without their care, treatment or relationship with staff being compromised. • Investigations will be thorough, fair, responsive and appropriate to the seriousness of the complaint. They will also be conducted within the timescales agreed with the complainant. • The format of the response to the complaint will be agreed with the complainant. This may be verbal, by phone or at a meeting, or written, by email or letter. • The Trust will strive to resolve all complaints locally, while reminding people of their right to take the matter to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman if they are not satisfied. • Within divisions and care groups, local leadership and accountability will facilitate early resolution and ensure complaints are responded to promptly and used to initiate actions and opportunities for service and staff improvement. • Divisional governance structures will be used to ensure organisational learning from complaints and the sharing of best practice. 6 Definitions Please see Appendix A for flow chart. For the purpose of this policy, the following definition will apply: Term Everyday Conversations Early Resolution Definition Defined as every-day issues that with help can be resolved there and then (within 24 hours), without the person becoming dissatisfied and wanting to make a complaint. Defined as a more straightforward complaint that can be resolved fairly quickly (within 10 days), e.g., appointment issues, staff attitude, services not provided to expected standards. PET003 Handling Complaints Policy version 13. Issued 10.7.24 Page 4 Closer Look Defined as an expression of dissatisfaction, or a perceived grievance or injustice, that needs a closer look. Timescale for resolution is agreed with the complainant. 7 Details of policy 7.0 Details of complaints process – refer to Appendix B for process overview. 7.1 Making a complaint Service users and the public who contact P&FR to make a complaint will receive appropriate assistance from the Trust to enable them to understand the procedure and, if required, will be signposted to complaint advocacy. 7.1.1 How to make a complaint – Stage 1 Information on how to raise a concern or make a complaint can be found on both our internal and external webpages. Complaints may be made about any matter reasonably connected with the exercise of the functions of the Trust, both clinical and non-clinical. They can be made verbally, in person or via telephone, or in writing either in a letter or electronically. A complaint may be raised with any member of Trust staff, P&FR (PALS or complaints team) or the chief executive. Alternatively, the complainant may choose to address their complaint to their local commissioner, NHS England, a member of parliament or another third party, such a health advocate. 7.1.2 Who may make a complaint – Stage 1 Complaints may be made by a patient, their representative, or any persons who are affected by or likely to be affected by the action, omission or decision of the Trust. This includes family, carers, advocates, care home/nursing homes, MPs, Integrated Care Bureau (ICB) and NHS England. When complaints are made by persons other than the complainant, the need for consent will be assessed. In the above circumstances where the Trust does not intend to consider a complaint, the complainant will be notified of the reasons for this decision in writing. Complainants will be made aware of independent complaints advocacy for help and support to make a complaint. Other specialist advocacy agencies covering areas such as mental health, learning disabilities, elderly or disadvantaged groups, and independent mental capacity advocacy (IMCA) are also available for general support. Details are available from PALS and the complaints team. 7.1.3 Consent if the complainant is not the patient – Stage 1 In cases where a patient’s representative makes a complaint, consent will be obtained from the patient, or person legally responsible for the patient, for permission to access their health records for the purpose of the investigation, where required, and to release the details of the investigation to the representative. If the patient is unable to act for themselves, the nominated first contact, or an individual who holds Power of Attorney (POA) for Health and Welfare can make a complaint on the patient’s behalf and will be able to provide consent for this to be investigated and the details released PET003 Handling Complaints Policy version 13. Issued 10.7.24 Page 5 to them. If the complainant is not the patient’s nominated first contact or does not hold POA, we will inform the complainant that the nominated first contact, or POA holder needs to confirm they are happy for the outcome of the investigation to be shared with another party. If the patient has died, the Trust will respect any known wishes that had been expressed by the patient. This includes sharing the outcome of an investigation with parties who are not the nominated first contact or POA holder, but in these circumstances, we will contact the nominated first contact, or POA holder to ensure they are happy for the details to be shared. In circumstances where a complaint is made by a third party when the patient has not authorised the complainant to act on their behalf, this does not preclude the Trust from undertaking a full and thorough investigation into the concerns raised. Specifically, if the complaint raises concerns about patient safety or the conduct of staff, the relevant Trust policies will be evoked. Without consent, a response to the third party will be limited and the reasons for this explained to the complainant. 7.1.4 Complaints relating to Private Patient Services For complaints relating to private patient services at UHS, the patient should refer to the private patient policy, which includes the private patient complaint’s procedure for patients wishing to raise a concern regarding their private treatment at the Trust. 7.1.5 Complaints excluded from the scope of this policy The Trust is not required to consider the complaint in the following circumstances. However, the Trust will consider each case individually and, as soon as reasonably practicable, notify the complainant in writing of its decision and the reason for the decision. a) A complaint made by a responsible body (local authority, NHS body, primary care provider or independent provider who provides care under arrangements made with an NHS body). b) A complaint by an employee of a local authority or NHS body about any matter relating to that employment. c) A complaint which has been investigated previously or either has been or is currently being investigated by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman. d) A complaint arising out of the alleged failure to comply with a request for information under the Data Protection Act 2018, or a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Please refer to the UHS information governance policy. e) Complaints about private treatment provided in the Trust. However, any complaint made about the Trust’s staff or facilities relating to care in their private bed will be investigated under this policy. f) Lost property claims, which are investigated and handled directly by the care group manager. However, any claim for lost property made as part of a complaint will be dealt with under this policy. g) Complaints concerning incidents or events which occurred over 12 months from the date the complaint is submitted. These are seen as out of time in the NHS complaints process – see 3.2.8. PET003 Handling Complaints Policy version 13. Issued 10.7.24 Page 6 7.2 Specific considerations when dealing with complaints 7.2.1 Complaints involving a vulnerable adult or child protection Where it is known that the complaint involves a vulnerable adult or child, the executive lead for child protection or vulnerable adults will be informed. The name nurse for safeguarding children or adults (as appropriate) will be consulted and contribute to the decision as to the most appropriate route of investigation agreed. This may not be the complaints procedure. The named nurse will support with advice on additional notifications and communication with the complainant. 7.2.2 Complaints that include a Patient Safety Incident Investigation (PSII) If the content of the complaint is only about the ‘event’, the patient safety team (PST) will lead and co-ordinate the PSIRF investigation, explain duty of candour and respond to the complainant. If there are matters that need to be investigated outside of PSIRF, agreement will be made between the PST and the complaints team about which elements of the investigation will not be covered by PSIRF and will need to be investigated through the complaints process. In these circumstances, the PST will notify P&FR of appropriate timescales for completion and release of their investigation. P&FR will then agree the timescale for the final complaint response with the complainant and will usually continue to be the main point of contact for the complainant. This is dependent on the nature of the incident and sometimes different arrangements are agreed at the patient safety case review meeting. If there is a need for a dual approach to the investigation, this will be explained to the complainant. Usually, a written response to the whole complaint (i.e., including both investigations) will be offered, explaining the extended period of time required for the Trust to respond. Where a written response is required, this will be produced by the P&FR with support from the PST. Where the investigation has uncovered significant failings in care and treatment, oversight of this process will be provided by the head of P&FR working in partnership with legal services, head of patient safety and Trust medical lead for complaints as appropriate. The complainant will also be offered the opportunity to meet with Trust staff to discuss the findings of the PSII and provide opportunity for Trust staff to respond to any outstanding queries. Alternatively, the complainant may choose to receive the outcome of the two investigations in separate written responses. 7.2.3 Complaints that are relating to Overseas Visitors If a patient considers that they have been charged incorrectly, they should raise this with the Overseas Visitor Manager (OVM) in the first instance to discuss on what basis they have been found to be chargeable and whether the provision of further documentary evidence is required. Where there continues to be a disagreement about how the Charging Regulations have been applied to a particular patient, the patient may want to seek the services of PALS. Where a patient is unhappy with the healthcare they have received, they or someone on their behalf and with their consent, can use the NHS complaints procedure as set out in this policy. The OVMs will ensure that the chargeable patients are aware of the complaint’s procedure. Complaints regarding charging will be fairly heard by an impartial person who is independent of the overseas visitors charging operation within the Trust. 7.2.4 Clinical negligence, personal injury or another claim. PET003 Handling Complaints Policy version 13. Issued 10.7.24 Page 7 If the complainant indicates a clear intention to bring legal proceedings for clinical negligence, personal injury or other claim, the use of the complaint’s procedure is not necessarily precluded. The complaints team will discuss the nature of the complaint with the litigation and insurance services department or Trust solicitor, if required), to determine whether the progression of the complaint might prejudice subsequent legal or judicial action. If there is no legal reason why the complaint should not be investigated, the complaints team will continue to investigate the complaint in accordance with Trust policy. In cases where there are legal reasons why a complaint should not be dealt with under this policy, the complaint investigation will cease. The complainant will be advised of this fact and requested to ask their legal representative to contact the claims department. The complaints team can continue to investigate any issues raised within the complaint that are not part of the claim. 7.2.5 Disciplinary or professional investigation or investigation of a criminal offence Cases regarding professional conduct where a complaint is found to be justified may require an internal disciplinary investigation to be undertaken. Such an investigation may result in the involvement of one of the professional regulatory bodies and/or police/counter fraud team depending on the nature of the allegations. Appropriate action will be taken in accordance with the Trust disciplinary procedure. In such circumstances, the complainant will be informed that a disciplinary investigation will be undertaken but that they have no right to be informed of the outcome of the investigation. Any other issues raised in the complaint which do not form part of the disciplinary or criminal investigation may continue to be dealt with under the complaints policy. 7.2.6 Coroner’s inquest In complaints involving a death that is referred to the coroner, the PST will lead and co-ordinate the investigation. This ensures clear lines of communication and investigation for clinicians and families. The complaints team will advise the family that their concerns will be investigated by the PST in preparation for the inquest hearing and that HM coroner’s office (HMCO) will endeavour to include all concerns raised. Any separate issues can be investigated by the complaints team under the NHS complaint regulations. 7.2.7 Allegations of fraud or corruption Any complaint concerning possible allegations of fraud and corruption is passed immediately to the NHS counter fraud service for action. 7.2.8 Media interest In cases where a complainant has contacted, or expresses their intention to contact, the media, the head of communications will be informed and will take appropriate action regarding Trust communication and media management. 7.2.9 Time limit for making a complaint Normally a complaint should be made within 12 months of the date on which the matter occurred, or 12 months of the date on which the matter came to the notice of the complainant. PET003 Handling Complaints Policy version 13. Issued 10.7.24 Page 8 Where a complaint is made after this time, the complaint may be investigated if the complainant had good reasons for not making the complaint within the above time limits and where, given the time lapse, it is still possible to investigate the complaint effectively and efficiently. In circumstances when a complaint is not being investigated on this basis, the complainant will be informed of the reason for that decision and advised that they may still ask the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman to consider their complaint. 7.2.10 Handling of joint complaints between organisations In cases where a complaint involves more than one NHS provider, commissioner, local authority or third-party independent provider, and the complainant so wishes, the Trust will work with the other relevant organisations in seeking resolution. There is a jointly agreed protocol for the ‘Handling of NHS Inter-organisational Complaints in Hampshire and the Isle of Wight’, (Appendix C). This provides a framework for the handling of joint complaints between organisations, clarifies roles and responsibilities of organisations, enhances inter-organisation co-operation and reduces confusion for service users. The lead organisation will provide a single response on behalf of all organisations involved, ensuring that the complainant receives a seamless, effective service. The procedure for dealing with multi-agency complaints involving third party independent providers can be found at Appendix D. 7.3.11 Complaints received from nursing and care homes on behalf of their residents See Appendix E 7.3.12 Harassment and vexatious/intractable complainants Harassment Violence, racial, sexual or verbal harassment towards staff will not be tolerated; neither will language that is of a personal, abusive or threatening nature, either written or verbal. If staff should encounter this behaviour, they should seek support from their line manager and complete an adverse event form (AER). Where appropriate, the complainant will be informed in writing that their behaviour is unacceptable. Please see the UHS eliminating bullying and harassment policy. Abuse will be reported to the police. In the event that the complainant has harassed or threatened staff dealing with their complaint, all personal contact with the complainant will be discontinued. The complaint thereafter can only be pursued through written communication. Vexatious or intractable complainants In a minority of cases, people pursue their complaints in a way that can either impede the investigation of their complaint or can have a significant resource issue for the Trust and cause undue stress for staff. Unfortunately, despite patience and sympathy there are times when there is nothing further that can reasonably be done to assist them to rectify a real or perceived problem. PET003 Handling Complaints Policy version 13. Issued 10.7.24 Page 9 Judgement and discretion must be used when considering potential persistent, habitual or vexatious complainants. The criteria and procedure can be found at Appendix F and authorisation of vexatious status will be made by the head of P&FR. 7.3 Responding to complaints of patients, their relatives or carers 7.3.1 Local resolution Early resolution is the first line of investigation and response to a complaint and is undertaken within the Trust. Local resolution enables the Trust to provide the quickest opportunity for a full and thorough investigation and respond with the emphasis on a positive outcome rather than the process. The local resolution response will: • Acknowledge failures. • Apologise. • Quickly put things right when they have gone wrong. • Use the opportunity to improve services. Complaints are often raised directly to the staff involved. This is often frontline staff in wards, clinics or reception. All Trust staff, as a means of improving service provision, will welcome the complainant’s concerns or complaint positively. In most circumstances, the quickest and most effective way of resolving a complaint is to deal with the issues when they arise or as soon as possible after this (early local resolution). Upon raising a complaint, the complainant will be listened to, treated courteously and have their confidentiality assured. Discussions should include seeking an understanding of how they would like their complaint managed and what outcomes they are seeking. Every opportunity should be taken to resolve complaints at the outset and deescalate the complaint. If the staff member approached is unable to deal with the issue, they will refer the matter to a more senior member of staff on duty at the time, such as ward sister, matron, head of department or site manager. A complainant may simply require an apology, explanation, clarification of a misunderstanding or remedial action to be taken and therefore should not be automatically referred to P&FR, unless this is the complainant’s wish. 7.3.2 Early resolution All complaints are first assessed by our PALS team. If possible, they will agree with the complainant to investigate to achieve early resolution, in a sooner timescale. The PALS team will investigate via the NHS complaints process and provide a written response. 7.3.3 Taking a closer look If it is not possible to achieve early resolution, the complaint is passed to the complaints team to take a closer look. PET003 Handling Complaints Policy version 13. Issued 10.7.24 Page 10 • 7.3.3 Complaint assessment and acknowledgement On receipt of a complaint in the PALS or complaints team the first responsibility is to ensure that the patient’s immediate health needs are being met; ideally this will occur within 24 hours. In cases where a complaint that is being investigated under the NHS Complaint Regulations is received verbally, a transcript of the concerns should be made and sent to the complainant for agreement before the start of the investigation. The nature, complexity and seriousness of the complaint are assessed and graded using the complaint assessment tool (Appendix G). Any immediate actions are undertaken which may include, but are not restricted to, contact with Trust directors or divisional leads, PST, claims, communications, child protection, vulnerable adults, infection prevention and human resources. An assessment will also be made as to the requirement for consent to be sought before any investigation can proceed. Complaints are acknowledged within three working days, and this includes details of advocacy services and ‘Raising a concern or complaint’ (previously ‘Have your say’) leaflet detailing the Trust’s complaint process. Complaints received via email out of hours will receive an automated acknowledgement of receipt of email. The complaint handler will establish a relationship, offer an apology or empathy, clarify issues for investigation and seek to understand what resolution looks like for the complainant. They will also discuss and agree the management of the complaint, including any opportunity for early resolution, the timescales and the method of response. 7.3.4 Complaint investigation planning The nature and grade of the complaint will influence the level of investigation and the level of notification or cascade throughout the organisation. This is based on the complexity and severity score of the complaint (minimum, minor, moderate, major or severe) and the primary focus or professional group who are the subject of the complaint (medical, nursing, allied professionals, managerial or administrative). Higher graded complaints require prompt action, more robust investigations and may require the involvement of investigation contributors: • external to the division but internal to the organisation • external to the organisation The complaint handler will assess the complaint and plan the scope and approach to the investigation. This includes identifying the key staff required to contribute to the investigation (complaint investigation contributors). Where the contributors are adversely commented upon in the complaint, care is taken to ensure they are informed of the complaint by the complaint lead or line manager to ensure they receive support throughout the process. The complaint lead (CL) can add an additional level of scrutiny and modify or validate the complaint investigation plan prior to the start of the investigation, usually within three days. Staff directly involved in the complaint will not be allocated the role of complaint lead. 7.3.5 Complaint investigation Complaints will be thoroughly investigated in a manner appropriate to resolving the issues speedily and efficiently within the agreed timeframe. The complaint handler remains responsible for keeping the complainant up to date with the progress of the investigation and negotiates any necessary extensions to the agreed timeframe. PET003 Handling Complaints Policy version 13. Issued 10.7.24 Page 11 For all complaints assessed as ‘severe’, if appropriate, and where possible a scoping meeting will be held by the PST to identify any immediate actions and to support investigation planning. This meeting may be virtual or face-to-face, involving the complaint lead, complaint handler and care group clinical lead or matron. The complaint lead will oversee the quality and timeliness of the investigation and validate the conclusions, outcome and actions agreed for inclusion in the complaint response. On completion of the investigation the complaint handler will review the complaint investigation to ensure that it has been thorough and addresses all the issues raised by the complainant. The complaint lead will support the complaint handler to scrutinise the findings, draw conclusions, agree the complaint outcome and consider whether there is evidence of service failure or maladministration. The compliant lead will also ensure that a robust action plan is formulated to cover all upheld elements of the complaint. 7.3.6 Complaint Response When responding to a complaint staff will give a clear, balanced account of what happened based on the established facts. Staff will be open and honest when things have gone wrong and where improvements can be made. All complaints will receive a fair and honest response. The complainant may prefer to receive this via letter, email, at a meeting or as a telephone call. The latter will usually be followed up in writing or via email. The response will address all issues raised, provide a full explanation, an apology as appropriate, any decisions regarding remedy and any actions that have or are planned to be undertaken to put the matter right. Details will also be given of what actions should be taken should the complainant believe the response has not adequately answered the issues raised. Where possible, the response will be in a format suitable for the complainant, such as large font or translation into another language. The complaint handler is responsible for producing a draft response for validation by the complaint lead once all contributors have had the opportunity to comment. The written response may take the form of a complaint response letter or a letter of apology, together with a separate investigation report or recorded audio disc. A final internal quality assurance check is undertaken before sending the response letter to the CEO or delegated deputy for signing and sending out by registered mail or secure email. A main complaint category is identified with the complainant, and this is used to determine the status of the complaint on closure by the complaint handler. Where the main category is found to be upheld, the complaint is recorded as upheld. If the main category is not upheld but some or all of the remaining categories are upheld, the complaint is closed as partially upheld. 7.3.7 Remedy If a complaint is upheld or partially upheld, the Trust will decide whether the maladministration or service failure has caused an injustice (Health Service Ombudsman’s Principles of Remedy). The Trust should, as far as is possible, put the individual back into the position they would have been in if the maladministration or service failure had not occurred. If that is not possible, the Trust should compensate appropriately. PET003 Handling Complaints Policy version 13. Issued 10.7.24 Page 12 The Trust will consider suitable and proportionate financial and non-financial remedies for the complainant and, where appropriate, for others who have suffered the same injustice. An appropriate remedy may be an apology, an explanation or remedial action. Financial compensation will not be appropriate in every case but should be considered. Appropriate and proportionate financial remedy will be considered by the CGM (budget holder for the service complained about) and complaint handler in the first instance. If an agreement cannot be reached, the head of P&FR will review, make comparisons to similar cases and reach agreement for any financial remedy with the director of nursing and, where appropriate, the key internal stakeholders involved. This provides consistency in evaluating the amount of financial remedy that is fair, reasonable and proportionate to the injustice suffered. On agreement with the CGM, any financial remedy is then offered to the complainant explaining the amount, why this has been offered and who to contact to accept the offer. The governance framework includes monitoring of the decision-making processes and recording payments of financial remedy offered to complainants. This will be reported quarterly to the patient experience and engagement steering group. This policy does not relate to medico-legal claims for compensation which will be dealt with through the legal services department in conjunction with the NHSLA. 7.3.8 Re-investigation of a complaint – Stage 2 In cases where the complainant is not satisfied with the Trust response, the complaint will be re-opened, also called Stage 2. This may be because the complainant considers the initial investigation to be inadequate, incomplete or unsatisfactory, or the complainant believes that their issues have not been addressed, fully understood or new questions have been raised. The complaint will be reassessed and the issues that remain unresolved for the complainant will need to be clarified and a new complaint investigation plan agreed. The same investigative procedure will be followed. However, the Trust can decline a Stage 2 investigation if the team feel that there is nothing more to investigate, add or clarify, and believe that the Stage 1 investigation is complete. Independent advice or a second opinion may be considered on the element of the complaint that has been re-opened for investigation. Meeting with the complainant is encouraged to aid resolution of the complaint. In some circumstances, and in agreement with all parties, conciliation or mediation could also be considered. If early resolution has been completely exhausted and the complainant still remains dissatisfied, the complainant is informed of their right to go to the PHSO. 7.3.9 Stage 3: Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) & The Independent Sector Adjudication Service (ISCAS) PHSO: In cases where the Trust has been unable to resolve a complaint to the complainant’s satisfaction, the complainant has the right to refer their complaint to the PHSO for independent review. The PHSO is independent of the NHS and is appointed by the government and will undertake an independent investigation into complaints where it is considered that the Trust has not acted properly, fairly or has provided a poor service. PET003 Handling Complaints Policy version 13. Issued 10.7.24 Page 13 The Trust will fully comply with all PHSO requests for information. As appropriate, divisional management teams and directors will be notified by P&FR of any complaint that is being investigated by the PHSO, or any recommendations made by them. The PHSO can be contacted at: www.ombudsman.org.uk Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Millbank Tower 30 Millbank Westminster London SE1P 4QP Telephone: 0345 015 4033 ISCAS: Is a scheme that provides independent adjudication on complaints about independent healthcare providers. ISCAS CEDR, 3rd Floor 100 St Paul’s Churchyard London EC4M 8BU www.iscas.cedr.com Telephone: 0207 7536 6091 7.4 Confidentiality and record keeping 7.4.1 Confidentiality and ensuring patients, their relatives and carers are not treated differently as a result of raising a concern or complaint Information about complaints and all the people involved is strictly confidential, in accordance with Caldicott principles. Information is only disclosed to those with a demonstrable need to know or a legal right to access those records under the Data Protection Act 2018. All data will be processed in accordance with Trust policy. Complaints will not be filed on health records but maintained in a separate case file subject to the need to record any information that is strictly relevant to their health record. Complaints must not affect the patient’s/complainant’s treatment and the complainant must not be discriminated against. Any identified discrimination will be reported to HR and managed as per Trust policies. 7.4.2 Record keeping A complete documentary record will be maintained for each complaint on the Ulysses database. This will include all written or verbal contacts with the complainant, staff involved in the investigative process and all actions taken in investigating the complaint. The complaint file is a confidential record. It will be stored securely and should be easily retrieved and understood in the event of further enquiry. In accordance with the UHS records management policy 2010, complaint files are kept and disposed of confidentially. Complaint files are retained for eight years. 7.5 Support for complainant and staff See Appendix H describing roles and responsibility of staff who can provide support. 7.3.6 Process by which the organisation aims to improve as a result of concerns and complaints being raised PET003 Handling Complaints Policy version 13. Issued 10.7.24 Page 14 Every complaint received should be regarded as an opportunity to learn and improve services. 7.6.1 Development of action plans P&FR will request a completed action report (Appendix I) from the complaint investigation contributors involved in all complaints that are upheld or partially upheld. In some cases, the actions required may already be completed and documented within the complaint response. In this situation the complaint lead should inform P&FR that a separate plan is not required, and this should be recorded on the complaints database. The complaint lead or divisional governance team is responsible for validating the action plan identified within the report. The divisional director of operations (DDO), or delegated person, is responsible for ensuring the action plans arising from concerns and complaints are completed within the agreed timescales and processes are in place for the action plan to be reviewed and monitored by the local governance groups. The DDO, or delegated, is supported by the divisional governance manager (DGM). 7.6.2 P&FR - support of learning The P&FR team will support divisional complaint information hubs, allowing real time information to be accessed by divisions and care groups as to number of complaints for each clinical area and identified key themes. Each division will have an identified lead within P&FR to support development of their individual approaches to learning and they will attend divisional and care group governance with the division. See Action Plan (Appendix I). 7.6.3 Complainant feedback The P&FR will ensure every complaint response is sent out with a patient satisfaction survey and the results are monitored, reported annually to QGSG and used to consider quality improvements. 8 Roles and responsibilities Roles and responsibilities See Appendix H describing roles and responsibilities of staff involved in resolving complaints. 9 Communication and training plans Communication plan This policy will be displayed on the Trust website and Staffnet and sent to divisional management teams to ensure dissemination throughout each division to all staff groups. An introduction to complaints is provided within the staff induction programme and further training is available via the Trust VLE portal in electronic format. Bespoke face-to-face training will be provided by the P&FR team on request to all staff groups. Monitoring of this policy by P&FR team will be used to identify areas where further training may be required. 10 Equality impact assessment (for all policies only) See Appendix L and J Equality and diversity are at the heart of our Trust values. Throughout the development of the policy, we give regard to the need to eliminate discrimination, harassment and victimisation, PET003 Handling Complaints Policy version 13. Issued 10.7.24 Page 15 to advance equality or opportunity, and to foster good relations between people who share a relevant protected characteristic (as cited in under the Equality Act 2010) and those who do not share it. As part of its development this Complaints policy and its impact on equality has been analysed and approved as being appropriate. The Policy & Guidance Team hold all equality impact assessments centrally. These are available upon request from Policy&Guidance@uhs.nhs.uk 11 Document review All Trust policies will be subject to a specific minimum review period of one year; we do not expect policies to be reviewed more frequently than annually unless changes in legislation occur or new evidence becomes available. The maximum review period for policies is every three years. The author of the policy will decide an appropriate frequency of review between these boundaries. Where a policy becomes subject to a partial review due to legislative or national guidance, but the majority of the content remains unchanged, the whole document will still need to be taken through the agreed process as described in this policy with highlighted changes. This Complaints policy will be reviewed in three years’ time in 2027. This policy will be reviewed every three years or earlier if any amendments to the NHS complaints regulations are made, or if any aspect of the policy is found to be inadequate. 12 Process for monitoring compliance The purpose of monitoring is to provide assurance that the agreed approach is being followed. This ensures that we get things right for patients, use resources well and protect our reputation. Our monitoring will therefore be proportionate, achievable and deal with specifics that can be assessed or measured. Key aspects of this policy will be monitored: Element to be monitored Lead (name/job title) Tool Frequency Reporting arrangements Compliance to NHS Complaints (England) Regulation 2009 and Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman’s Complaints Standards. Shona Small Measure against policies Every three years Reporting to Jenny Milner Where monitoring identifies deficiencies actions plans will be developed to address them. PET003 Handling Complaints Policy version 13. Issued 10.7.24 Page 16 13 Appendices • Appendix A Managing complaints Processing complaints in the PALS and complaints team. Complaint received into PALS & complaints team. The role of patient support officers (PSOs) and the complaint coordinator is to listen, understand concerns and risk assess situation. PSOs and/or administrator to register issue on Ulysses, consider whether consent is required, categorise concern and discuss with complainant how they would like the matter resolved. Low level to medium level of seriousness and can be resolved in 24 hours or up to 10 days Categorise as a COMPLAINT (Early Resolution) Managed by PALS manager and Patient Support Officers (PSO). • Identify actions needed. Provide feedback to care group if issues are for feedback only • Escalate any concerns to B6/B7/Matron/Consultant • Signpost to other teams/bodies where relevant, such as The Advocacy People • Investigate • Find resolution • Respond to complainant at the earliest opportunity and within 10 working days • Identify learning and share with care group Resolved – Yes • Record outcome and close case Resolved – No • Review whether complaint needs to be passed to the complaints team to take a closer look. Medium to high level of seriousness and requires investigation via the NHS complaints process. Categorise as a COMPLAINT (Taking a Closer Look) Managed by complaints team • Further risk assessment such as PST or safeguarding • Investigate in accordance with the complaints policy • Respond within agreed timescale with a Trust letter or hold complaint resolution meeting to share outcome of investigation • Identify learning and share with care group and divisional governance Resolved – Yes • Record outcome and close case on Ulysses. Resolved – No • Re-open case on Ulysses • Discuss and agree further actions or investigation plan with complainant • Respond within agreed timescale with a Trust letter or share outcome with complainant at resolution meeting Resolved – Yes • Record outcome and close case on Ulysses Resolved – No • Direct complainant to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) or litigation PET003 Handling Complaints Policy version 13. Issued 10.7.24 Page 17 • Appendix B Making a Complaint process There are different ways to make a complaint. It is usually easier to resolve concerns close to the time they occur by talking to the staff who are looking after you. This may be the ward manager, or matron for the department. They can discuss the things you are not happy with and will try to resolve them for you. If your concerns have not been resolved by talking to the department, you can contact the Patient Advice and Liaison Service (PALS). Their contact details are: Telephone: 023
Url: /Media/UHS-website-2019/Docs/Policies/Handling-concerns-and-complaints-policy.pdf

portsmouth_hospitals_health_survey_08

Description: <!-- Hide from scriptless browsers snapAddEvent(window, 'load', snapInit); // Global settings var pageNumber=0; var lastPageNumber=0; var pBars=12; var hasSubm
Url: /suhtapps/Surveys/portsmouth_hospitals_health_survey_08.htm

Papers Trust Board 27 May 2021

Description: Date Time Location Chair Agenda Trust Board – Open Session 27/05/2021 9:00 - 13:00 Microsoft Teams Peter Hollins 1
Url: /Media/UHS-website-2019/Docs/About-the-Trust/Trust-governance-and-corporate-docs/2021-Trust-document/TB-papers/Papers-Trust-Board-27-May-2021.pdf

Aria ePrescribing v13.6 MR1.2 user training guide

Description: Aria E-Prescribing v13.6 MR1.2 User Training Guide Every effort has been made to ensure that the material in this manual was correct at the time of publication but cannot be held responsible for any errors or inaccuracies. We reserve the right to change or replace information contained in the manual without notice. For the most up to date version please refer to the UHS website. All references made to patient records are fictitious for the purpose of training only. Page 1 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager CONTENTS This training guide has been produced as a generic document for the 6 Trust of the former Central south coast cancer NETWORK (CSCCN); it can be used as an aid to producing cascade training guides either by role or profession at each individual trust if required.1 ................................................................General Course Information 2 2 Information Governance....................................................... 5 3 Logging on to Aria ................................................................ 7 4 Creating and Modifying a New Patient ................................. 9 5 Adding Patient History........................................................ 16 6 Patient EXAM..................................................................... 29 7 patient Vital Signs .............................................................. 53 8 PRESCRIBING .................................................................. 60 nb Once prescription Approved by prescriber and pharmacy either prescriber/nurse/pharmacy can move the date without the need to re-issue the prescription. By moving the date this will not produce a different pharmacy order number (yellow file) because no clinical amendments have been made. ................................................... 95 9 Pharmacy........................................................................... 96 10 nurse drug administration ................................................. 115 11 scheduling........................................................................ 127 12 Patient journal .................................................................. 149 13 Logging Off ...................................................................... 151 14 re-setting your Password.................................................. 152 15 Icon Glossary ................................................................... 153 16 Fault Reporting................................................................ 157 17 Help with using Aria ......................................................... 158 18 Version Control LoG ............................................................ 160 Varian have produced two reports for the SACT data; 182 SACT – Public Health Data – Patient Drug Administration Details – 2015 182 SACT – Public Health Date – Patient Drug Dispensed Details - 2015 182 THIS TRAINING GUIDE HAS BEEN PRODUCED AS A GENERIC DOCUMENT FOR THE 6 TRUST OF THE FORMER CENTRAL SOUTH COAST CANCER NETWORK (CSCCN); IT CAN BE USED AS AN AID TO PRODUCING CASCADE TRAINING GUIDES EITHER BY ROLE OR PROFESSION AT Page 2 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager EACH INDIVIDUAL TRUST IF REQUIRED. Page 3 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager 1 GENERAL COURSE INFORMATION COURSE TITLE METHOD OF TRAINING DURATION PRE-REQUISITES E-PRESCRIBING ABOUT THE COURSE The Aria E-Prescribing software is a computer system that is used across the 6 Trusts of the former Central South Central Cancer Network (CSCCN). This course is intended for users who will be prescribing chemotherapy to patients, approving and dispensing chemotherapy in pharmacy and recording the administration of chemotherapy by nursing staff within the Aria application. SUITABLE FOR This manual is suitable for any user requiring access to the Aria system. This includes Clerical and Administration staff, Nursing Staff, Pharmacy staff and Clinicians. OBJECTIVES This course will enable the student to perform the following: 1. To be able to log on and off of the system 2. To record relevant patient history, diagnosis and vital signs 3. To prescribe specific chemotherapy regimens 4. To approve and dispense drugs in pharmacy 5. To be able to record the administration of chemotherapy to patients 6. To be able to enter patients into the scheduling system Page 4 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager 2 INFORMATION GOVERNANCE Information Governance (IG) sits alongside the other governance initiatives of clinical, research and corporate governance. Information Governance is to do with the way the NHS handles information about patients/clients and employees, in particular, personal and sensitive information. It provides a framework to bring together all of the requirements, standards and best practice that apply to the handling of personal information. Information Governance includes the following standards and requirements: Information Quality Assurance The NHS Confidentiality Code of Practice Information Security The Data Protection Act 1998 Records Management The Freedom of Information Act 2000 Caldicott Report December 1997 What can you do to make Information Governance a success? Keep personal information secure Ensure confidential information is not unlawfully or inappropriately accessed. Comply with the Trust ICT security policy and Staff Code of Confidentiality. Do not share your password with others. Ensure you "log out" once you have finished using the computer. Do not leave manual records unattended. Lock rooms and cupboards where personal information is stored. Keep personal information confidential Only disclose personal information to those who legitimately need to know to carry out their role. Do not discuss personal information about your patients/clients/staff in corridors, lifts or the canteen Ensure that the information you use is obtained fairly Inform patients/clients of the reason their information is being collected. Organisational compliance with the Data Protection Act depends on employees acting in accordance with the law. The Act states information is obtained lawfully and fairly if individuals are informed of the reason their information is required, what will generally be done with that information and who the information is likely to be shared with. Make sure the information you use is accurate Check personal information with the patient. Information quality is an important part of IG. There is little point putting procedures in place to protect personal information if the information is inaccurate. Page 5 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Only use information for the purpose for which it was given Use the information in an ethical way. Personal information which was given for one purpose e.g. hospital treatment, should not be used for a totally separate purpose e.g. research, unless the patient consents to the new purpose. Share personal information appropriately and lawfully Obtain patient consent before sharing their information with others e.g. referral to another agency such as, social services. Comply with the law The Trust has policies and procedures in place which comply with the law and do not breach patient/client rights. If you comply with these policies and procedures you are unlikely to break the law. Page 6 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager 3 LOGGING ON TO ARIA Access to Aria is via a Citrix connection. However local Trust policy will govern how much you see of this login process. Most trusts will have an Icon on the desktop which will take them to the login boxes below. Type in your user ID in the User ID field Type password in to the Password field Select the appropriate institutions in the ‘From’ and ‘Login To’ drop down boxes. The ‘From’ field will always need to be CSCCN The ‘Login To’ field will define what work location you are logging into. For example, what Ward or Clinic do you wish to work in? Click OK On subsequent logins the above ‘From’ and ‘Login to’ fields will be pre-filled as the system remembers what you last logged into. This can be changed at any point. On your first login you will be required to change your password from the one issued to you with your username. The following box will display: Page 7 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager There are certain parameters that need to be observed when creating a new password. These are: The password must be between 6 and 10 characters long have a letter as the first character be mixed case contain at least 2 numeric's be unique from the previous 5 passwords Examples of how acceptable passwords may look are below: Sunsh1ne1 Sunshine01 sunSh11ne On your first login you will also be required to confirm your details are correct within the Aria System. DO NOT CHANGE any details in this box. If there are any changes that need to be made contact your local IT Support who will look into it. Click ok. Page 8 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager 4 CREATING AND MODIFYING A NEW PATIENT When logging into Aria Manager, the first window you see is the ‘Open Patient’ window. It is also possible to add patient status icons to appear attached to the patient record on the open patient window and other screens. Select Patient Workup – Patient Status icon from drop down menu Two icon that may be useful would be C/R (Concurrent Chemo-Rad) and Ambulance that could be used to indicate transport. Page 9 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Eg Chemo-Rad and Transport have been added to this patient and the icons appear on the top right of the screen The ‘open patient window’ shows all the patients who have been entered into Scheduling or who have had a ‘chart’ opened today. By highlighting a patient and then clicking on blue tick the following Patient Tracking window opens (actual Institution list may vary). Page 10 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager By highlighting a patient and then right clicking on it a brief Patient Information window appears By clicking on the clipboard icon (to right next to bar code) a list will appear of the last 15 patient charts opened by the user. Page 11 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager In this window you can add New patients or Modify an existing patient – click on the relevant button on right of screen. Either New, Modify or View. In most cases within the network the requirement to add new patients to the Aria system will not be needed as there will be a data feed from the local Patient Administration System that will populate it. However, to create a new patient click ‘New’ on the right hand side of the screen. This will open the Modify Patient Window. DO NOT create a patient on Aria if there is a PAS data feed within your Trust as this may create duplicates on the Aria database. In the event of duplicate patient entry found please contact system administrator (d.kimber@nhs.net or Debbie.wright@uhs.nhs.uk) who will investigate and contact Varian if required. Page 12 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Patient Modify window The Tabs are: General – Where name, DOB etc… is stored Patient IDs – contains NHS, Hospital etc… Temporary Address Contacts – Next of Kin details etc… Demographics – Patient personal details for example Ethnicity and Religion. This screen is useful to record Advance Directives such as ‘Organ Donor’ and Feeding Restriction alerts. Providers - Details of patient’s Consultant – needed for SACT report Referrals – Details of referring clinician unlikely to be used Photograph – Unlikely to be used within the NHS General Tab To enter a New Patient the same will appear but it will be a blank template You can enter details in any of the tabs, much of this information will be imported by the PAS interface, but anything can be updated or amended. Page 13 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Patient IDs Tab In this window the NHS number will always appear along with any internal hospital ID. If appropriate you can also add a CDF PT ID, a Private PT ID or a Study #. Temporary Address and Contacts can be amended as necessary. Demographics Tab Demographics – any of these can be amended, the down arrow on right of a field means a drop-down list will appear. Advance Directives, if yes then you can tick any of these and they will appear later on. Page 14 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Provider Tab Providers must be completed, top box is the consultant and the bottom box is the GP – this may, or may not, come over from PAS. When the Provider is added in this window it will automatically populate the Visit Provider in Scheduling. This field is required in many reports. NB Relationship must be entered as Consultant for GMC number to populate in SACT and other reports Page 15 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager 5 ADDING PATIENT HISTORY Once you have your patient in the system then you need to add some History. Highlight the patient, you can change the first window you view by amending the ‘Proceed to’ button on the top right of screen (next to bar code) e.g. Patient History. Click Open…button on top right The patient has opened in the Patient History window because that is what was selected under Proceed To. The second tool bar has now become available to use (starts Chart, History etc). If history wasn’t the default page then it can be selected by clicking on History (3rd button from left on top tool bar). The main sections to be completed are: Medical Procedure / surgical Family Social Allergies – this is essential Medications – this is essential Page 16 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager As information is entered the tab will change to blue in colour. Medical – this shows and then can be amended as necessary. Procedure/Surgical can also be entered here. Page 17 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Family – this window opens and then can be updated. Page 18 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Social – following window opens to be updated Allergies and Medications can be entered and this will then work in conjunction with the First Data Bank to look at drug interactions. Allergies – following window opens to be updated Page 19 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Click on New, select the Type eg Drug Page 20 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager For Drug allergy, start typing the drug name in the Allergy box eg asp and then click on the torch button (right of screen) Page 21 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager A list will of drugs will appear, select drug required eg penicillin V (tablet oral), OK Page 22 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Page 23 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Tick the Response or Other which will give a text box for comments. Click OK or Save – New to add another drug if necessary. The allergies will now appear on the Allergies window Page 24 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager If no allergies tick “No Known Allergies” – these icons will be seen in numerous screen indicating whether an allergy has been recorded, no known allergy or no allergy information has been recorded. Medications – following window opens to be updated Page 25 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Click New (bottom left) to add new medication, the following window will open Type in the start of the drug and then click the torch to search the First Data Bank and enter all relevant details, those will down arrows contain drop down selections. It is sufficient to only add the drug name because this is used to Page 26 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager check for drug interactions, contra indications etc, dose and frequency is not necessary. Click OK and drug now appears, this screen will also show any chemotherapy agents the patient is/has received. Page 27 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Page 28 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager 6 PATIENT EXAM Once the patient has History updated the following stop is to enter Exam. Open the patient, from Open Patient window, you can change the Proceed To to Exam and then Exam window will open or if you Proceed To another window e.g. Patient History, the second Tool Bar will be highlighted and then select Exam (6th button from right), the following window will open. NB if you add Diagnosis/Problems via the History window you will not see the prompt for Performance Status, therefore it is recommended that you always use the Exam window when entering a diagnosis. Click New.., the following window opens Page 29 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager In the Code section, click the magnifying glass on the right and the following window opens Page 30 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager This code type is ICD-10. In the search criteria select either Code or Key words, by selecting Keywords and typing lung the following appears Select the correct Clinical Description eg C34.2 Malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lung, unspecified and the following appears Page 31 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager The Definition page has now opened, and any of the white boxes can now be updated. There are also four other “tabs” now available Pathology – includes Cell Histology which is required to populate morphology in the SACT report Lesions Staging – required for SACT report Tumour Markers Pathology – following window opens Page 32 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Pathology Item Select Cell History (morphology for SACT) – following window opens to be updated Page 33 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Cell Category – drop down menu Cell Type drop down will populate once cell category has been selected Page 34 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Cell Grade drop down Page 35 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Lesions – open the following window Click New in either Local Lesions or Metastatic Lesions and the following window opens Local – Page 36 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Metastatic – Page 37 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Staging – opens the following window Click New (left of screen), some disease site staging will also have G (grade), all Criteria must to be completed to give Stage of the disease Page 38 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Select Tumour eg T1 and add a date into the Date Staged box To get a complete staging also enter assessments for both nodes and metastasis; ensure a date is entered into the Date Staged box. Page 39 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Nodes Metastasis Page 40 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Click Approve and the information now appears as follows Click Save (left of screen). If you click Close you will be asked it you want to save changes as well. Page 41 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Click Close (right of screen) and the information appears on the Diagnosis / Problems window Page 42 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager RoS/PE – Review of Symptoms/Physical Exam – review of symptoms window opens Page 43 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Click Assess and the following window opens Select system(s) and disease site(s), click OK. It is advisable to tick all as normal and then only tick Abnormal to those that apply, as below Page 44 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Click Approve and the following appears on the ROS/PE window. You will see that the abnormal symptom appears with a red A. Page 45 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Physical Exam – following window opens Click Assess and the following window opens Page 46 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Select system(s) and disease site(s), click OK. It is advisable to tick all as normal and then only tick Abnormal to those that apply, as below Page 47 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Click Approve and the following appear in the Physical Exam window, again showing any abnormal PE with a red circle. Page 48 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager NB: Both RoS/Physical Exam list can be customised by each Provider to show a shorter list if required. This is carried out in Manager (System AdminProvider/RoS Exam Defaults – select the Provider then Sites) Performance Status – the following window will appear Select Scale from drop down Page 49 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Select Performance Status from drop down Page 50 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager The following appears Click Approve and the information now appears on the Performance Status window Page 51 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Page 52 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager 7 PATIENT VITAL SIGNS Once Exam has been completed the next step is Vital Signs. In ‘Open Patient Window’ click to Open a highlighted patient, the second Tool Bar will then be available and click on Vital Signs, the following window will open. Enter the information; ALWAYS enter height and weight to calculate the BSA required to calculate drug doses. If a result is entered that is outside of the range set (see values in brackets) then alerts will be show; H = high value L = low value LL = very low value Alarm bell icon – can view extra information by clicking on it Page 53 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager See window below By clicking on the “pen” icon to the right of each line you can view Result History (selected from the drop down menu) Results can also be viewed in the Flow Sheet (click icon in second row) Page 54 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager If you right click on any of the results you can also View Details eg BMI shows Page 55 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager You can also see the doses of each drug administered and the toxicities recorded. NB Each drug has to be administered in the Drug Admin window to appear in the Flow Sheet Dose Recordings, therefore it is important that nurses do complete the drug administration. With a pathology interface you will also be able to view results in this window. Page 56 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager If a result has been entered incorrectly and then “errored” you can view the results by selecting Assessments from the top row, then Tests from the drop down menu and select the required date eg Dec 23, 2015 Select View from the Results section at the bottom of the screen Page 57 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Click ERR Result Set (top right of screen) to view the errored result Click on the E to view Reason For Error By clicking on the “pen” icon in the Results View window and selecting Result History from the drop down menu you can also view history eg Result History: Height Page 58 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Once all the details for the patient have been entered then treatment can be allocated. You must check you have completed the following data before you can enter any treatment for the patient; Modifying patient details/ entered new patient details History – including allergies Exam – including diagnosis / morphology / staging / performance status Vital Signs Once all the above have been entered then open the patient , change ‘Proceed To’ to Medication and open the patient, the following window will appear you can then select the treatment required, from the diagnosis already entered the list will then filter by disease site e.g. lung, breast etc and show the regimens entered in those disease areas. Page 59 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager 8 PRESCRIBING The system will default to regimens assigned to patient diagnosis No BSA (right of screen) indicated that no Vital Signs have been entered Eg for a lung diagnosis the following will appear in top box with sub folders, if applicable eg SCLC, NSCLC and mesothelioma Page 60 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Click the folder to show the regimens for lung NSCLC Select the regimen required, the following will appear Page 61 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager You can see that this is the first cycle, see Cycle on right of screen. NB: Information page (right of screen below Cycle box) – this is the protocol summary, however from October 2010 protocol summary will no longer be shown here. You can view protocols by clicking Applications – Protocols (top row of the screen) this will then open the UHS website page which contains protocols. Alternatively you need to view the protocol please refer to UHS website (http://www.uhs.nhs.uk/HealthProfessionals/Extranet/Services/Cancercare/Chemotherapy-protocols/Chemotherapy-protocols.aspx ) Select Blue square in select box on right of screen to select all the Order button will be available and a tick will appear in the Day 1 and Day 8 box (or manually tick Day 1 and/or Day 8). Day 1 + 8 can be ordered at the same time as two separate files will be produced for pharmacy orders. Page 62 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Click Order…, if no value is present for creatinine the following message will appear NB although creatinine result might be available via pathology interface it needs to appear after height and weight have been entered to be able to calculate the dose, therefore at cycle 1 it may be necessary to enter the result manually. Click CrCl button on right of screen and enter the Creatinine result in this window, then Approve Page 63 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Now select Order on top right of screen you will see the Dose Calculation Management pop up box to enable the height, weight and BSA to be reviewed Page 64 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Enter consultant in Ordered by, and complete Line of Tx, Tx Intent and Tx Use (these are required for SACT report) Page 65 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager By highlighting one of the drugs more buttons will become available on the right of the screen, as below To change the date for the whole regimen – click on the calendar page next to Start on below the Ordered by box. To change the date for an individual agent – click Adjust Start on right of the screen, and then select the required date. Page 66 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager By highlighting an agent and then clicking on the up and down arrows on the bottom right of the screen you can change the order of an agent. OR By clicking the “pen” icon (next to the Approve box) you can change the order of an agent eg move pre-medication to the top of the list, change the Rx Seq # to the correct order. You can now add any support eg extra antiemetic support (that are not already included as part of the regimen) or favorites eg antibiotics, as required. Click Favorites and the following window appears Page 67 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager A list of files will appear eg antiemetics, antibiotics, skin care etc, click the file to open and the list of drugs in that file will appear. Page 68 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Select the drug required and click Add to add it to the regimen. Support – click the support tab on top right, and the following window appears The support regimens have been set up in files. Click the yellow file and a drop down will appear (the same way treatment is allocated) Click on TTO Levomepromazine and the support regimens will appear. Page 69 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Tick the regimen (the same way treatment is allocated) and click Add to add to the regimen. NB – some support regimens selected here need to be added to each cycle individually they have not all been set up for cycles of treatment only courses eg 21 days. (see Appendix 2 and 3). You can Adjust Dose, Adjust Start etc. It is advisable NOT to adjust any drug dose using the Modify button only use the Adjust Dose button. Any dose banding will be removed if the dose is amended in the Modify window. Dose banding is only applied when using Adjust Dose button. Click Adjust Dose and the following window appears Page 70 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager You can select Dose Modification from the top line eg 75%, 50% etc however this will reduce all agents including any antiemetics that have been prescribed unless you select Change Chemo. Therefore it is advised to dose reduce per agent and remember to include a reason in the Modification Reason, either by clicking on the drop down arrow or entering text in the bottom right text box. In the Calculation / Rounding column the red dots denote dose rounding and the red circle dose banding has been applied to that particular agent. You will see that gemcitabine has been reduced to 75% of the original dose and the reason given was infection. Page 71 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager This message will appear when agent appears in more than one day of the cycle. The Order / Rx page now shows the dose reduction to 75% in red and at the end of the drug line the Dose Mod. Reason has a page with lines on it. Page 72 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager If the drug has been set up with dose banding (eg gemcitabine) when you Adjust Dose a red circle appears next to the Calculation/rounding dose Page 73 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager By clicking on the red circle you can view the dose banding table set up for the drug dose eg gemcitabine The red dot with a number indicated the agent is rounded to the nearest eg carboplatin in this regimen is rounded to the nearest 50mg If no “rounding” match is found for an agent then the default rounding is used; Up to the nearest 1 for calculated doses > =10 Up to the nearest 1/100th (0.01 decimal place) for calculated doses <10 Page 74 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager When ordering subsequent cycles you can view the previous doses from the last cycle Click on the note pad to the left of Last Ordered This shows the dose of current order at the top and the dose of the last order at the bottom. Once all drug doses are correct then the prescription has to be approved. Page 75 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Click the Approve button on the bottom of the screen and the following User Authentication will appear – this is the prescriber electronic signature Click Ok the First Databank Interaction Screening window appears Click Accept the printing window will appear select Internal to print agents for administration in hospital, select Pickup-Internal for TTOs or both as appropriate. Page 76 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager If you click Cancel at this point the prescription is put as “pending” in the Orders/Rx window, and a prescription will not be printed despite the printing box just having appeared on the screen. However when the treatment is “approved” the prescription will print (along with any that you “cancelled” at this point previously eg if you clicked Cancel twice 3 prescriptions will print one for each of the cancelled actions and the actual approved one – they will however all be the correct version) Although you can only see the oral dexamethasone all the drugs have been approved. In this window you are approving the prescription to be printed either to pharmacy, in clinic etc. Click Approve and the following window appears (Treatment) Page 77 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager By clicking on the pen in the Treatment box (next to 4 x 21 days) you can Modify / Delay / Discontinue / View Regimen decisions Modify – This currently shows the Active treatment days. Page 78 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Day 8 treatment can be omitted by clicking Inactive on the required drug Page 79 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Alternatively by clicking Custom you can state which cycle to Inactivate You need to click the speech bubble (next to Ordered By) before this action can be approved (NB the speech bubble only appears for a non-prescriber). Page 80 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager NB: Any notes that are entered when using the “speech bubble” do not show again anywhere on the screen in Aria but are kept in the database, they can only be viewed by a Varian database analyst if requested to do so for a full patient history audit. Therefore Varian suggests using the patient Journal (see section 12) which is aimed at being a running commentary of patient events. Click Ok and then Approve button will appear so that any modification can be approved. Page 81 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager This message will appear if no reason for making change is entered When back in the Treatment window the Inactive days will be shown in red. Page 82 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Delay – If a prescription has been Approved and Dispensed then use Delay here to move treatment date. You cannot Re-issue the prescription once dispensed. Also add a comment to the patient journal to record this action (see section 12). Page 83 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Ordered by must be selected and again the speech bubble (top right) must be completed before this action can be approved eg delay for 1 week Click OK then approve, the delayed regimen will show “delayed” in red against it Page 84 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager If any agent has been missed off or there is a need to add another agent after the treatment has been approved, click New (top right of screen) and then add the Favorite/Support as required. Page 85 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager This will now show as “Other Drugs Ordered”. Page 86 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager If you need to add any additional information to an agent eg actual start date for GCSF – highlight agent Click Modify The Admin Instructions box on the bottom left of the screen contains the information that will print of any prescription. Therefore enter the start date in the Admin Instructions box. Page 87 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Click OK Discontinue – the following message will appear By clicking yes the following box will appear, as above click the speech bubble before approving. Page 88 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager NB – If you are discontinuing a regimen but there are still agents to be administered ensure you select the correct dose recordings you wish to discontinue. It may be that you need to select “Starting from effective date ... “ to enable to the remaining agents from the cycle to be administered. Once approved the following will appear Page 89 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager By clicking on the medication history you will see all previous treatment. Page 90 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager A patient must have treatment discontinued before any new treatment can be allocated. NB – any extra antiemetic support medication associated with the treatment must also be discontinued BEFORE the treatment, it will not automatically be discontinued with the treatment, you need to select each regimen and discontinue as above. To delete an agent in a regimen: By highlighting an agent the Delete button becomes available (NB it is preferable to delete rather than discontinue to enable ability to “undelete” the agent in future cycles if necessary). This confirmation message will appear. Page 91 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager The deleted agent appears on the Orders/Rx window scored out and also when Approved in the Treatment window Page 92 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Another useful way of finding information about the current treatment is in the Treatment window; by clicking on the pen icon at the end of each line you can view information about each drug for each specific day of each cycle, the same information can also be found in Flow Sheet (see section 7). For example, gemcitabine - shows dose given, the red cross indicates not Dispensed For example gemcitabine - indicates a drug modification any Dose Mod Reason can be viewed by clicking on page to show any reason entered. Page 93 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager NB a red star appears next to Ordered if the dose administered in Drug Admin differs from that Approved by the prescriber, the reason for this may be that pharmacy made an amendment when dispensing the drug, which would follow through to the Drug Admin window but would not change the original prescribed dose. For this amended dose to appear in future cycle the prescriber would need to adjust the dose in the Treatment window. If a prescriber has Approved treatment and then wishes to amend any part of the prescription, in the Orders Rx window the order can be re-issued (5th button down on right of screen) causing the treatment to be put back into a Pending state for the prescriber to amend and then Approved in the usual. Page 94 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager However a prescription cannot be re-issued if pharmacy has already dispensed it, it would need to be discontinued or ‘un-dispensed’ by pharmacy. If only the dates need changing this could be carried out in the Drug Admin window (see section 10). NB Once prescription Approved by prescriber and pharmacy either prescriber/nurse/pharmacy can move the date without the need to re-issue the prescription. By moving the date this will not produce a different pharmacy order number (yellow file) because no clinical amendments have been made. Page 95 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager 9 PHARMACY Suggested order for pharmacy screening; Check patient journal to look at any relevant information entered by doctor, nurse, pharmacy etc Check bloods in flow sheet Check doctor approval time Pharmacy approve – check doses, can “review” prescription and screen Pharmacy dispense Once all the treatment has been approved pharmacy then need to review and approve the prescription. Click the Orders / Rx tab to open the following window (NB at this point the prescription can be re-issued back to the prescriber should any amendments be necessary – click Reissue button) You will now see that this treatment has been approved, if you click on the A after Approved you will see who prescribed (created), approved, signed (electronic authorisation box) and last modified the treatment (Prescription Order Audit Report). Page 96 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Click on the yellow folder in the Order # column to open the treatment Click Review tab on the right to review the prescription details in pharmacy Page 97 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager View on the top tool bar will show all users who have accessed the patient record (select View - Access Log from drop down menu) – it shows user with date and time. Page 98 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager By clicking on the Rx button (right of screen) you can show the BSA (Dose Calculation Management) If “Cap” appears because Aria has capped the dose at 2.4m² you can click “Actual” OR “Cap” to switch between them should you have a large patient that you do not want to cap at 2.4m². You cannot reduce the capped dose to 2m² at this point the prescriber would need to “modify” the dose in the treatment window. By clicking the Screen… button on the right of the screen the following window appears, this links to the First Data Bank drug system showing interactions, contraindications, warnings etc. Page 99 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Once pharmacy has reviewed the prescription it then needs to be approved and dispensed by pharmacy. Page 100 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Click on Pharmacy Approve button on the right of screen, following window appears Click on the yellow file to open the treatment, as below Tick the box next to the prescription and then click the Checked Approve button. Page 101 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager A button = Ordered by Audit eg prescriber By clicking on the Rx √ button you can see who approved the treatment in pharmacy This is for all agents you cannot select individual agents therefore when you see the Rx √ it means that the whole prescription will be approved and therefore OK to dispense. To dispense the prescription in pharmacy click the Pharmacy Dispense button, the following window appears Page 102 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Click on each yellow folder to open each drug, the Admin Date will appear Click the Dispense button on bottom left of the screen, the following window appears Page 103 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager At this point, if necessary, a pharmacy batch number can be added in the Drug Lot # field eg 124578 This can then be viewed by nurses in the drug admin window Any additional dispensing comments can be added in the note pad at the end of each agent, this can also be view by nurses in the drug admin window by clicking on the page icon next to Dispensing Page 104 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager At this point, if necessary, a drug dose could be modified by pharmacy, click Modify Dose button for the specific drug to be modified and the following window will appear. However this function should only be used as a last resort ie for compounding error so that the nurse drug administration screen is correct for the agent/vehicle supplied by pharmacy eg prescribed volume was 250ml but 500ml has been made or needs to be substituted to reduce wastage. It would be better to re-issue the prescription back to the prescriber to make any amendments. Page 105 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager When this Aria message box appears select No – this is because may agents have been set up as non standard Form/Route when dose banding was applied and if you click Yes you will be selecting a non dose banded agent. The reason for the dose modification can be entered and then will appear with a red star against each modified line. Page 106 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager The modification information can be viewed by clicking on the page button next to the red star and the following will appear as Dispensing Comments. Click Approve button on button right of screen this will return to the Prescription Dispensing window and the Dispensing details modified star now appears and the treatment is now showing as Dispensed Page 107 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager A button = the audit button in this window shows who has “dispensed” each agent Page 108 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager You can print the prescription from this screen by clicking on the printer button at the botton, the following window appears, select Prescription Type You can check the printer by clicking on the yellow folder/printer icon on top right Page 109 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Pharmacy can view all treatment for a day or date range by clicking on Pharmacy button on the top Tool Bar, select Pharmacy Dispensing on the drop down that appears and the following window appears This is colour code to show when orders have been approved. Page 110 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Select Show Prescription Details at the bottom to show order and administration date and pharmacy status Click the “magnifying glass” icon to show the treatment Page 111 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Highlight the line below the patient name if the Rx box is showing then the following window will appear showing the Pharmacy Approval Details. If a patient is highlighted by clicking on the yellow file with red arrow on the far right of the screen that patient’s treatment window will open and the following will appear which takes you straight to the Orders / Rx details. Page 112 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Where patient scheduling is being used for patients prescribed treatment in Aria then Pharmacy can also view a list of treatment by selecting Pharmacy on the top Tool Bar, and then Schedule Drug Orders from the drop down list, the following window appears Page 113 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager There are several different filters on the top of the screen that can be applied e.g. date, Sort By and Drug To View either by Ordered, Pending or Planned e.g. select Ordered and click Show Orders the following list appears This can be printed off in pharmacy if necessary. Page 114 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager 10 NURSE DRUG ADMINISTRATION Once the pharmacy have dispensed the medication then the nurse needs to do the drug administration, to open click the Drug Admin button on the second Tool Bar, the following window appears The patient Date of Birth can be seen after the name and gender on the top right of screen above Dose Recordings tab By clicking View on the top bar you can check patient demographics. By highlighting an agent and then clicking on the up and down arrows on the bottom right of the screen you can change the order of an agent. The days of administration can be amended by clicking Adjust or Adjust All buttons on the bottom on the screen, the following window appears. However this should not be used routinely but only as a last resort if not previously adjusted by the prescriber. Page 115 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager This can be adjusted by Days or Date, if Date is selected the current date and a calendar will appear next to the Days to Adjust box. Page 116 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Click Adjust (top right of screen) and the Admin date will change Click OK and the screen will return to the Drug Administration window Page 117 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager Highlight the drug to be administered and click Record button on bottom left of screen, the following appears Page 118 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager You will see any Drug Lot # if entered by pharmacy when dispensing. If you click on page icon next to dispensing you can also view any pharmacy comments. Enter the time of administration and click OK, the screen will return to the Drug Administration window and a C will appear to the left of the date, showing the treatment has been started but not completed. Page 119 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network e-Prescribing System Manager To enter the end of administration, highlight drug, click Record and enter the end time and click Approve the Drug Administration window is now only showing agents still to be administered. Page 120 of 182 Version 1 December 2015 D Kimber Network
Url: /Media/UHS-website-2019/Docs/Chemotherapy-SOPs1/User-guides/Aria-ePrescribing-v13.6-MR1.2-user-training-guide.pdf

Total body irradiation (TBI) - patient information

Description: This factsheet explains what to expect at your TBI treatment appointments.
Url: /Media/UHS-website-2019/Patientinformation/Cancercare/Total-body-irradiation-TBI-1332-PIL.pdf

Papers Trust Board - 13 January 2026

Description: Date Time Location Chair Apologies Agenda Trust Board – Open Session 13/01/2026 9:00 - 13:00 Conference Room, Heartbeat Education Centre Jenni Douglas-Todd Diana Eccles 1 Chair’s Welcome, Apologies and Declarations of Interest 9:00 Note apologies for absence, and to hear any declarations of interest relating to any item on the Agenda. 2 Patient Story The patient story provides an opportunity for the Board to reflect on the experiences of patients and staff within the Trust and understand what the Trust could do better. 3 Minutes of Previous Meeting held on 11 November 2025 9:15 Approve the minutes of the previous meeting held on 11 November 2025 4 Matters Arising and Summary of Agreed Actions To discuss any matters arising from the minutes, and to agree on the status of any actions assigned at the previous meeting. 5 QUALITY, PERFORMANCE and FINANCE Quality includes: clinical effectiveness, patient safety, and patient experience 5.1 Briefing from the Chair of the Finance, Investment & Cash Committee 9:20 David Liverseidge, Chair 5.2 Briefing from the Chair of the People and Organisational Development 9:30 Committee Jane Harwood, Chair 5.3 Briefing from the Chair of the Quality Committee 9:40 including Maternity and Neonatal Safety 2025-26 Quarter 2 Report Tim Peachey, Chair 5.4 Chief Executive Officer's Report 9:50 Receive and note the report Sponsor: David French, Chief Executive Officer 5.5 Performance KPI Report for Month 8 10:20 Review and discuss the report Sponsor: Andy Hyett, Chief Operating Officer 5.6 11:00 5.7 11:15 5.8 11:25 5.9 11:30 5.10 11:45 5.11 11:55 5.12 12:05 5.13 12:15 6 6.1 12:25 7 12:35 8 Break Finance Report for Month 8 Review and discuss the report Sponsor: Ian Howard, Chief Financial Officer ICB System Report for Month 8 Receive and discuss the report Sponsor: Ian Howard, Chief Financial Officer People Report for Month 8 Review and discuss the report Sponsor: Steve Harris, Chief People Officer Learning from Deaths 2025-26 Quarter 2 Report Review and discuss the report Sponsor: Paul Grundy, Chief Medical Officer Attendee: Jenny Milner, Associate Director of Patient Experience Infection Prevention and Control 2025-26 Quarter 2 Report Review and discuss the report Sponsor: Natasha Watts, Acting Chief Nursing Officer Attendees: Julian Sutton, Clinical Lead, Department of Infection/Julie Brooks, Deputy Director of Infection Prevention and Control Medicines Management Annual Report 2024-25 Receive and discuss the report Sponsor: Paul Grundy, Chief Medical Officer Attendee: James Allen, Chief Pharmacist Annual Ward Staffing Nursing Establishment Review 2025 Discuss and approve the review Sponsor: Natasha Watts, Acting Chief Nursing Officer CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, RISK and INTERNAL CONTROL Annual Assurance for the NHS England Core Standards for Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response (EPRR) Review and discuss the report Sponsor: Andy Hyett, Chief Operating Officer Attendee: John Mcgonigle, Emergency Planning & Resilience Manager Any other business Raise any relevant or urgent matters that are not on the agenda Note the date of the next meeting: 10 March 2026 Page 2 9 Resolution regarding the Press, Public and Others Sponsor: Jenni Douglas-Todd, Trust Chair To agree, as permitted by the National Health Service Act 2006 (as amended), the Trust's Constitution and the Standing Orders of the Board of Directors, that representatives of the press, members of the public and others not invited to attend to the next part of the meeting be excluded due to the confidential nature of the business to be transacted. 10 Follow-up discussion with governors 12:45 Page 3 Agenda links to the Board Assurance Framework (BAF) 13 January 2026 – Open Session Overview of the BAF Risk 1a: Lack of capacity to appropriately respond to emergency demand, manage the increasing waiting lists for elective demand, and provide timely diagnostics, that results in avoidable harm to patients. 1b: Due to the current challenges, we fail to provide patients and their families / carers with a high-quality experience of care and positive patient outcomes. 1c: We do not effectively plan for and implement infection prevention and control measures that reduce the number of hospital-acquired infections and limit the number of nosocomial outbreaks of infection. 2a: We do not take full advantage of our position as a leading University teaching hospital with a growing, reputable, and innovative research and development portfolio, attracting the best staff and efficiently delivering the best possible treatments and care for our patients. 3a: We are unable to meet current and planned service requirements due to the unavailability of staff to fulfil key roles. 3b: We fail to develop a diverse, compassionate, and inclusive workforce, providing a more positive staff experience for all staff. 3c: We fail to create a sustainable and innovative education and development response to meet the current and future workforce needs identified in the Trust’s longer-term workforce plan. 4a: We do not implement effective models to deliver integrated and networked care, resulting in sub-optimal patient experience and outcomes, increased numbers of admissions and increases in patients’ length of stay. 5a: We are unable to deliver a financial breakeven position, resulting in: inability to move out of the NHS England Recovery Support Programme, NHS England imposing additional controls/undertakings, and a reducing cash balance impacting the Trust’s ability to invest in line with its capital plan, estates/digital strategies, and in transformation initiatives. 5b: We do not adequately maintain, improve and develop our estate to deliver our clinical services and increase capacity. 5c: Our digital technology or infrastructure fails to the extent that it impacts our ability to deliver care effectively and safely within the organisation, 5d: We fail to prioritise green initiatives to deliver a trajectory that will reduce our direct and indirect carbon footprint by 80% by 2028-2032 (compared with a 1990 baseline) and reach net zero direct carbon emissions by 2040 and net zero indirect carbon emissions by 2045. Agenda links to the BAF No Item Linked BAF risk(s) 5.5 Performance KPI Report for Month 8 5.7 Finance Report for Month 8 5.8 ICB System Report for Month 8 5.9 People Report for Month 8 5.10 Learning from Deaths 2025-26 Quarter 2 Report 5.11 Infection Prevention and Control 2025-26 Quarter 2 Report 5.12 Medicines Management Annual Report 2024-25 5.13 Annual Ward Staffing Nursing Establishment Review 2025 6.1 Annual Assurance for the NHS England Core Standards for Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response (EPRR) 1a, 1b, 1c 5a 5a 3a, 3b, 3c 1b 1c 1b 1b, 3a 1b Appetite (Category) Minimal (Safety) Current risk rating 4x5 20 Cautious (Experience) Minimal (Safety) 4x4 16 4x4 16 Open (Technology & Innovation) 3x4 12 Open (workforce) Open (workforce) Open (workforce) 4x5 20 4x3 12 4x4 16 Cautious (Effectiveness) 3x3 9 Cautious (Finance) 5x5 25 Target risk rating 4 x 2 Apr 6 27 3 x 2 Apr 6 27 2 x 3 Apr 6 27 3 x 2 Mar 6 27 4 x 3 Mar 12 30 4 x 2 Mar 8 30 3 x 2 Mar 6 29 3 x 2 Dec 6 25 3 x 3 Apr 9 30 Cautious (Effectiveness) Open (Technology & Innovation) Open (Technology & Innovation) 4x5 20 3x4 12 2x4 8 4 x 2 Apr 8 30 3 x 2 Apr 6 27 2 x 2 Dec 4 27 Does this item facilitate movement towards or away from the intended target risk score and appetite? Towards Away Neither x x x x x x x x x Minutes Trust Board – Open Session Date 11/11/2025 Time 9:00 – 13:00 Location Conference Room, Heartbeat Education Centre Chair Jenni Douglas-Todd (JD-T) Present Diana Eccles, NED (DE) Keith Evans, Deputy Chair and NED (KE) David French, Chief Executive Officer (DAF) Paul Grundy, Chief Medical Officer (PG) Steve Harris, Chief People Officer (SH) Jane Harwood, NED/Senior Independent Director (JH) Ian Howard, Chief Financial Officer (IH) Andy Hyett, Chief Operating Officer (AH) David Liverseidge, NED (DL) Tim Peachey, NED (TP) Alison Tattersall, NED (AT) Natasha Watts, Acting Chief Nursing Officer (NW) In attendance Craig Machell, Associate Director of Corporate Affairs and Company Secretary (CM) Lauren Anderson, Corporate Governance and Risk Manager (LA) (item 6.2) Martin de Sousa, Director of Strategy and Partnerships (MdS) (item 6.1) Lucinda Hood, Head of Medical Directorate (LH) (item 5.13) Diana Hulbert, Guardian of Safe Working Hours and Emergency Department Consultant (DH) (item 5.12) Vickie Purdie, Head of Patient Safety (VP) (item 7.3) Kate Pryde, Clinical Director for Improvement and Clinical Effectiveness (KP) (item 5.13) Scott Spencer, Health and Safety Advisor (SS) (item 7.3) 4 governors (observing) 2 members of staff (observing) 1. Chair’s Welcome, Apologies and Declarations of Interest The Chair welcomed attendees to the meeting. There were no interests to declare in the business to be transacted at the meeting. It was noted that no apologies had been received. The Chair provided an overview of meetings she had held and events that she had attended since the previous Board meeting. 2. Patient Story Item deferred to the next meeting. 3. Minutes of the Previous Meeting held on 9 September 2025 The draft minutes tabled to the meeting were agreed to be an accurate record of the meeting held on 9 September 2025, subject to a minor correction at 5.10. Page 1 4. Matters Arising and Summary of Agreed Actions The matters arising and actions were noted. • Actions 1281, 1283 and 1284 were closed. • Action 1282 was to be addressed through item 5.6 below. • In respect of action 1285, the Quality Committee would monitor progress on complaints response times. 5. QUALITY, PERFORMANCE and FINANCE 5.1 Briefing from the Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee Keith Evans was invited to present the Committee Chair’s Report in respect of the meeting held on 13 October 2025, the content of which was noted. It was further noted that: • In terms of the internal audit reports, which had been received by the committee, whilst there were a number of points for the Trust to address, no areas of significant concern had been identified. • There was a focus on ‘imposter fraud’ whereby individuals who had turned up to carry out a shift were not who they claimed to be. Whilst there had been no reported incidents at the Trust, the Trust had implemented controls at the ward level, which would be subject to testing during 2025/26. 5.2 Briefing from the Chair of the Finance, Investment & Cash Committee David Liverseidge was invited to present the Committee Chair’s Reports in respect of the meetings held on 22 September and 3 November 2025, the contents of which were noted. It was further noted that: • In September 2025, the Trust had reported that it was in line with its Financial Recovery Plan. Of the £110m Cost Improvement Programme (CIP) target, 76% had been fully developed. • The committee had reviewed the Finance Report for Month 6 (item 5.8), noting that the Trust had reported an in-month deficit of £5.4m, which was in line with the Financial Recovery Plan. • The committee had expressed concern that 17% of the CIP target was not fully developed and that the Trust was £2.5m off-track in terms of delivery of the target at Month 6. • Whilst progress had been made in terms of addressing patients with no criteria to reside and mental health patients, this remained an area of concern. • The committee considered the NHS England Medium Term Planning Framework, noting that the first submission by the Trust was due prior to Christmas 2025. 5.3 Briefing from the Chair of the People and Organisational Development Committee Jane Harwood was invited to present the Committee Chair’s Reports in respect of the meetings held on 22 September and 3 November 2025, the contents of which were noted. It was further noted that: • There continued to be little improvement in terms of the number of patients with no criteria to reside or mental health patients, which impacted staffing numbers. • The Trust was adopting a harder line in respect of its approach to violence and aggression, which included a greater willingness to exclude individuals. • The current participation rate in the Staff Survey was lower than the national average, which was likely indicative of staff morale and engagement. Page 2 • The Trust’s workforce numbers remained above plan, with limited options available to address this issue, especially in the absence of funding for restructuring costs. 5.4 Briefing from the Chair of the Quality Committee Tim Peachey was invited to present the Committee Chair’s Report in respect of the meeting held on 13 October 2025, the content of which was noted. It was further noted that: • The committee received an update in respect of mental health patients, noting that although there were significant issues in the Emergency Department, the whole pathway for these patients remained a problem. • The committee carried out a six-monthly review of the Trust’s progress against its Quality Priorities, noting that good progress had been made on four of the six priorities and two were slightly behind. 5.5 Chief Executive Officer’s Report David French was invited to present the Chief Executive Officer’s Report, the content of which was noted. It was further noted that: • NHS England had published the Medium Term Planning Framework, which was intended to encourage organisations to think beyond a 12-month time horizon and to progress the NHS 10-Year Plan. The Trust was expected to provide its first submission prior to Christmas 2025, but the detailed planning assumptions had yet to be received from NHS England. It was noted that a more detailed report on the Medium Term Planning Framework was to be received as part of the closed session of the meeting. • The Strategic Commissioning Framework had been published by NHS England, which provided welcome clarifications about the future role of integrated care boards. • The Trust had been placed into Tier 1 for both Urgent and Emergency Care and for Elective performance. There was a national expectation that trusts would have no patients waiting over 65 weeks for elective care by 21 December 2025. Where organisations had more than 100 such patients at the end of October 2025, they had been placed into Tier 1. The Trust was taking steps, including mutual aid, to attempt to address the number of long waiters, but there was insufficient capacity in the system. • Resident doctors were due to strike for a further five-day period commencing on 14 November 2025, having rejected the Government’s latest offer to resolve the ongoing dispute with the British Medical Association. • The Hampshire and Isle of Wight Integrated Care Board and NHS England South East Region had carried out a visit to the Trust’s paediatric hearing services in May 2025. The report, received in October 2025, had been positive about the service. • The Trust and the University of Southampton had been awarded £16.3m by the National Institute for Health and Care Research. The Trust was one of only four organisations out of 15 applications to receive an award. • The NHS Business Services Authority had announced the award of a £1.2bn contract to Infosys to deliver a new and enhanced workforce management system for the NHS to replace the existing Electronic Staff Record system. The 2030 target date for implementation was considered ambitious. Further details would be considered by the People and Organisational Development Committee when available. Page 3 5.6 Performance KPI Report for Month 6 Andy Hyett was invited to present the ‘spotlight’ report in respect of Diagnostics, the content of which was noted. It was further noted that: • Diagnostics performance was a key element of the pathway, as delays in diagnosis had a consequential impact on the overall length of pathways such as those for cancer and patients on a Referral To Treatment pathway. • Although there were some concerns with Diagnostics in the Trust, the Trust, generally, performed better than other organisations. The Board discussed the matters raised in the Diagnostics ‘spotlight’. This discussion is summarised below: • There had been a long-standing issue with waiting times for cystoscopy due to insufficient capacity. However, a plan was being developed to improve the situation, although it was considered appropriate that the plan should also address broader issues with urology as a whole. • There was concern regarding the availability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners, particularly as two scanners were out-of-action. It was noted that the current set-up in terms of MRI scanners was not fit for the longer term and a strategy for the future needed to be developed. • There was a disparity between capacity and demand in respect of the neurophysiology service, as this service had previously relied on outsourcing. • Generally, activity was increasing, but overall performance appeared to be declining. There was also the additional financial challenge that Diagnostics was funded under a ‘block’ contract arrangement which did not fully take into account the demand for these services. • There were concerns about the electrical supply capacity at the Southampton General Hospital site and the ability of the Trust to expand its Diagnostic capacity with this limitation. It was considered that a better longer-term model would be for scanners at local community diagnostics centres. Actions Andy Hyett agreed to work on and present at either a future Board meeting or Trust Board Study Session the Trust’s longer-term strategy with respect to MRI scanners and imaging. Andy Hyett agreed to develop a longer-term plan for cystoscopy/urology and to report back to the Board during Quarter 4. Andy Hyett agreed to develop a long-term solution to the neurophysiology service. Andy Hyett was invited to present the Performance KPI Report for Month 6, the content of which was noted. It was further noted that: • The Trust’s Emergency Department had recorded performance of 67.6% against the four-hour standard during September 2025. The department remained busy with c.450 patients and 120 ambulance attendances per day. • There had been some initial performance impacts with the roll out of the MIYA system in the Emergency Department, but this appeared to have now been addressed with performance up to previous levels. • A number of initiatives were being introduced into the Emergency Department in order to improve performance. These included the layout of the service, pathway re-designs, having General Practitioners in the department, and arranging with non-urgent patients to attend at a scheduled time rather than waiting in the department. Page 4 • In October 2025, the Trust had recorded 363 patients waiting over 65 weeks on a Referral To Treatment pathway against a national target of no such patients by the end of December 2025. • The Trust was making use of the independent sector, weekend working, and was requesting capacity from other providers to address the number of patients waiting over 65 weeks. • The planned industrial action by resident doctors posed a challenge, noting that the national expectation was that trusts maintain 95% of their capacity during this period. It was noted that, in contrast to previous instances of industrial action, resident doctors were apparently less forthcoming in terms of whether they intended to participate in the industrial action. • The Trust continued to report one of the lowest Hospital Standardised Mortality Rates in England. • The Trust’s cancer performance, based on a BBC article, was 21 out of 121 trusts. It was noted that whilst the number of patients being referred on a cancer pathway had increased significantly, the number of patients diagnosed with cancer had not materially changed. • There appeared to have been an increase in the number of pressure ulcers and ‘red flag’ incidents. Work was ongoing to address the findings of the pressure ulcer audit which had been presented to the Quality Committee on 2 June 2025. • The number of patients having no criteria to reside and mental health patients remained high. Actions Andy Hyett agreed to clarify the basis of the calculation of the ‘Watch & Reserve antibiotics usage per 1,000 adms’ metric. 5.7 Break 5.8 Finance Report for Month 6 Ian Howard was invited to present the Finance Report for Month 6, the content of which was noted. It was further noted that: • The Trust had submitted its Financial Recovery Plan to NHS England in August 2025, which committed to an additional £23m improvement in the Trust’s financial position to deliver a full-year position of a £54.9m deficit. In the absence of these additional improvements, the Trust had been forecasting a year-end position of a £78m deficit. The revised target was subject to a number of assumptions, including the need for demand management and improvements in non-criteria to reside and mental health patient numbers. • There were a number of risks to the achievement of the Financial Recovery Plan, including whether there would be improvements in mental health and non-criteria to reside and/or steps taken to manage demand, high levels of activity, and whether it would be possible to reduce the workforce and close theatres. The need for the Trust to focus on achieving the 65-week wait target in particular could impact the Trust’s ability to close capacity. • The Trust had reported an in-month deficit of £5.4m (£30.8m year-to-date), which was in line with the trajectory set out in the Financial Recovery Plan. The Trust’s underlying deficit had seen some marginal improvement during the period. • The Trust’s cash position remains an area of significant concern. Cash requests had been made to NHS England, but the latest request for November 2025 had been rejected. It was therefore likely that the Trust would need to manage its supplier payments in accordance with its available cash. Page 5 5.9 ICS System Report for Month 6 Ian Howard was invited to present the ICS System Report for Month 6, the content of which was noted. It was further noted that: • The Hampshire and Isle of Wight Integrated Care System had reported a year- to-date deficit of £48m. • A significant improvement in the run-rate would be required for the system to be able to deliver its 2025/26 plan. • The system was one of the worst in England in terms of the number of beds occupied by patients having no criteria to reside with approximately 23% of beds being occupied by such patients compared with a national average of 12%. • The system was also below plan in terms of its targets for access to General Practitioners and targets relating to mental health patients. It was noted that the performance in these areas had a consequential impact on the Trust’s performance in areas such as urgent and emergency care performance. 5.10 People Report for Month 6 Steve Harris was invited to present the People Report for Month 6, the content of which was noted. It was further noted that: • The overall workforce fell by 73 whole-time-equivalents (WTE) during September 2025 and was reported as being 54 WTE above the Trust’s 2025/26 plan. The reduction in workforce had been driven through a combination of the impact of the recruitment controls, mutually agreed resignation scheme (MARS) leavers, and a significant drop in use of temporary staff during the month. • On 15 October 2025, the Trust had heard the collective grievance brought by the Royal College of Nursing in respect of the removal of enhanced NHS Professionals rates. It was decided not to reverse the decision in order to maintain equity with the rest of the workforce and consistency across other local providers. A number of actions had been agreed following the hearing. • Sickness rates had increased to 3.8%, although the Trust still benchmarked well against peers. • There were concerns about the potential impact of influenza during the winter period and therefore the Trust was taking a number of actions to promote vaccination of staff. The Trust was currently third in terms of uptake in the Region. • The level of participation in the national Staff Survey remained a challenge with only 32% of staff having completed the survey compared with a national average of 38%. It was considered likely that the recent difficult decisions taken and the impact on staff was impacting staff experience and engagement. • The People and Organisational Development Committee would be examining statutory and mandatory training levels together with the latest proposed national changes. Page 6 5.11 NHSE Audit and review of 'Developing Workforce Safeguards' including UHS Self-Assessment Return Natasha Watts was invited to present the NHS England audit and review of ‘Developing Workforce Safeguards’ (2018), including the Trust’s Self-Assessment Return, the content of which was noted. It was further noted that: • ‘Developing Workforce Safeguards’ was published in October 2018 and included a range of standards to assure safe staffing across the workforce. NHS England had initiated an audit, review and improvement plan amidst concern about a national reduction in compliance. • The Trust had submitted a self-assessment as part of this NHS England review. This assessment showed that the Trust continued to comply with the majority of the standards. • The audit exercise has been used as an opportunity to identify opportunities for improvement. Twelve recommendations have been developed, of which nine were assessed as ‘green’ and three as ‘amber’. 5.12 Guardian of Safe Working Hours Quarterly Report and Update on 10-Point Plan Diana Hulbert was invited to present the Guardian of Safe Working Hours Quarterly Report and Update on the 10-Point Plan, the content of which was noted. It was further noted that: • Resident doctors were due to strike for five days from 14 November 2025. This would be the thirteenth strike in recent years. It was noted that, in addition to pay, the dispute also concerned working conditions and the shortage of posts and consequent risk to resident doctors of unemployment. • The Trust had performed a self-assessment against the 10-Point Plan and it was noted that the majority of the plan’s contents had been considered by the Trust for some time. There were also a number of dependencies on the part of NHS England in areas such as lead employer models. • A national review of statutory and mandatory training was expected to enable portability of training records to facilitate staff moving between NHS organisations. • There had been significant improvements in respect of gaps in rotas. 5.13 Annual Clinical Outcomes Summary Luci Hood and Kate Pryde were invited to present the Annual Clinical Outcomes Summary Report, the content of which was noted. It was further noted that: • The paper provided an overview of the clinical outcomes reviewed by the Clinical Assurance Meeting for Effectiveness and Outcomes (CAMEO) over the 12-month period to September 2025. • The majority of specialities provide reports to CAMEO, although outcome data can be more difficult in some areas to capture than in others. • The outcomes reviewed by the CAMEO and outputs from this body were also influencing the development of the Trust’s clinical strategy. • The strains on the capacity of services posed a risk to clinical outcomes. Page 7 • There was potential that a ‘quality’ override could form part of the NHS Oversight Framework in the future, operating in a similar manner to the ‘financial’ override by limiting the segmentations available to an organisation. 6. STRATEGY and BUSINESS PLANNING 6.1 Corporate Objectives 2025-26 Quarter 2 Review Martin De Sousa was invited to present the review of Corporate Objectives 2025/26 for the second quarter, the content of which was noted. It was further noted that: • Of the 12 objectives agreed for 2025/26, six were rated ‘green’, four were ‘amber’ and two were ‘red’. • The ‘red’ rated risks were that relating to the Trust’s financial performance and that relating to the Trust’s achievement of its workforce plan for 2025/26. 6.2 Board Assurance Framework (BAF) Update Lauren Anderson was invited to present the Board Assurance Framework update, the content of which was noted. It was further noted that: • BDO had completed its audit of the Trust’s risk maturity and had presented its report to the Audit and Risk Committee on 13 October 2025. The audit had highlighted a number of strengths including the Board Assurance Framework, risk definition, and use of risk in decision-making. In terms of opportunities for improvement, the audit report suggested some improvements in articulation of operational risks and use of ‘SMART’ methodology for actions. • The Board Assurance Framework had been reviewed by relevant executive directors and committees since it was last presented to the Board. There had been no changes to the ratings or target dates. 7. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, RISK and INTERNAL CONTROL 7.1 Feedback from the Council of Governors’ (COG) Meeting 28 October 2025 The Chair presented a summary of the Council of Governors’ meeting held on 28 October 2025. It was noted that the meeting had considered the following matters: • Chief Executive Officer’s Performance Report • Governor attendance at Council of Governors’ meetings • Review of the Council of Governors’ Expenses Reimbursement Protocol • Appointment of Jane Harwood as Deputy Chair with effect from 1 October 2025 • Membership engagement • Feedback from the Governors’ Nomination Committee It was noted that the Trust’s work on violence and aggression received particular attention from the Governors. 7.2 Register of Seals and Chair’s Action Report The paper ‘Register of Seals and Chair’s Actions Report’ was presented to the meeting, the content of which was noted. Page 8 It was further noted that one further item had been sealed on 7 November: Deed of Guarantee between University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (Guarantor) and CHG-Meridian UK Limited (Beneficiary) regarding the payment and due performance obligations of UHS Estates Limited (UEL) under the Guaranteed Contract and specifically the Stryker Power Tools delivered to UEL under the pre-contract open build period with CHG. Seal number 307 on 7 November 2025. Decision: The Board agreed to ratify the application of the Trust Seal to the documents listed in the ‘Register of Seals and Chair’s Actions Report’ and to the additional document referred to above. 7.3 Health and Safety Services Annual Report 2024-25 Spencer Scott was invited to present the Health and Safety Services Annual Report 2024/25, the content of which was noted. It was further noted that: • The number of incidents reportable pursuant to the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations (RIDDOR) had increased substantially to 68 such incidents compared to 39 in 2023/24. The majority of these incidents related to moving and handling or exposure to infectious diseases. • There was a concern that there had been a reduction in the number of health and safety related reports and escalations whilst at the same time the number of RIDDORs had increased. • Four areas of concern were highlighted: Entonox surveillance of maternity staff, display screen equipment compliance, the Southampton General Hospital loading bay, and workplace temperatures during the summer. 8. Any other business There was no other business. 9. Note the date of the next meeting: 13 January 2026 10. Items circulated to the Board for reading The item circulated to the Board for reading was noted. There being no further business, the meeting concluded. 11. Resolution regarding the Press, Public and Others Decision: The Board resolved that, as permitted by the National Health Service Act 2006 (as amended), the Trust’s Constitution and the Standing Orders of the board of directors, that representatives of the press, members of the public and others not invited to attend to the next part of the meeting be excluded due to the confidential nature of the business to be transacted. The meeting was adjourned. Page 9 List of action items Agenda item Assigned to Deadline Status Trust Board – Open Session 15/07/2025 - 5.11 Freedom to Speak Up Report 1267. Data Mbabazi, Christine 10/03/2026 Pending Explanation action item Christine Mbabazi to include data from other mechanisms for reporting concerns in future Freedom to Speak Up reports. Trust Board – Open Session 09/09/2025 - 8 Any other business 1286. Organ donation Machell, Craig 03/02/2026 Pending Explanation action item Craig Machell agreed to add organ donation to the agenda of a future Trust Board Study Session. Update: Scheduled for TBSS on 03/02/26. Trust Board – Open Session 11/11/2025 - 5.6 Performance KPI Report for Month 6 1293. MRI scanners and imaging Hyett, Andy 13/01/2026 Pending Explanation action item Andy Hyett agreed to work on and present at either a future Board meeting or Trust Board Study Session the Trust’s longer-term strategy with respect to MRI scanners and imaging. 1294. Cystopscopy/urology Hyett, Andy 13/01/2026 Pending Explanation action item Andy Hyett agreed to develop a longer-term plan for cystoscopy/urology and to report back to the Board during Quarter 4. Page 1 of 2 Agenda item Assigned to Deadline Status Trust Board – Open Session 11/11/2025 - 5.6 Performance KPI Report for Month 6 1295. Neurophysiology Hyett, Andy 13/01/2026 Pending Explanation action item Andy Hyett agreed to develop a long-term solution to the neurophysiology service. 1296. Watch & Reserve antibiotics usage Hyett, Andy 13/01/2026 Pending Explanation action item Andy Hyett agreed to clarify the basis of the calculation of the ‘Watch & Reserve antibiotics usage per 1,000 adms’ metric. Page 2 of 2 Agenda Item 5.1 i) Committee Chair’s Report to the Trust Board of Directors 13 January 2026 Committee: Finance, Investment and Cash Committee Meeting Date: 24 November 2025 Key Messages: Assurance: (Reports/Papers reviewed by the Committee also appearing on the Board agenda) Any Other Matters: • The committee received an update in respect of the Trust’s commercial activities, noting that the Trust had robust systems in place to maximise cost recovery for private patient and overseas visitor income. The Trust’s private patient unit project continued to progress. The Trust was also seeking a partner to manage its parking provision. • The committee received the Finance Report for Month 7. The Trust had reported a £5.1m in-month deficit (£35.9m year-to-date), which was in line with the trajectory contained in the Financial Recovery Plan. The underlying deficit remained flat at £6.4m. Whilst there had been a slight reduction in the number of mental health patients, there were c.240 patients having no criteria to reside at any point during the period. There was an increased level of scrutiny in respect of non-pay expenditure. • The committee reviewed an update on the Trust’s measures for financial improvement, noting that the Trust was forecasting achievement of £85-95m against its target of £110m Cost Improvement Programme delivery for 2025/26. • The committee noted the Trust’s approach and the timelines associated with the Medium Term Planning submission. It was noted that the framework set ambitious financial and performance targets. • The committee received an update in respect of the Trust’s Theatre Experience Programme, noting that there had been a 3% increase in utilisation and a 3% reduction in cancellations. • The committee reviewed the Trust’s productivity, noting that the Trust’s productivity had fallen by 3.3% compared to the prior year due to high-cost growth. • The committee received an update in respect of the Trust’s cash position and forecast and supported a proposal to request further cash support for January 2026. • The committee received an update on Capital Planning for 2026/272029/30. It was noted that it was expected that the Trust would be allocated c.£40m per annum, although there were concerns about the impact of the Trust’s cash position and the ability of the Trust to meet this level of expenditure. N/A N/A Page 1 of 2 Assurance Rating: Substantial There is a robust series of suitably designed internal controls in place upon Assurance which the organisation relies to manage the risk of failure of the continuous and effective achievement of the objectives of the process, which at the time of our review were being consistently applied. Reasonable There is a series of controls in place, however there are potential risks that Assurance may not be sufficient to ensure that the individual objectives of the process are achieved in a continuous and effective manner. Improvements are required to enhance the adequacy and effectiveness of the controls to mitigate these risks. Limited Assurance Controls in place are not sufficient to ensure that the organisation can rely upon them to manage the risks to the continuous and effective achievement of the objectives of the process. Significant improvements are required to improve the adequacy and effectiveness of the controls. No Assurance There is a fundamental breakdown or absence of core internal controls such that the organisation cannot rely upon them to manage the risks to the continuous and effective achievement of the objectives of the process. Immediate action is required to improve the adequacy and effectiveness of controls. Not Applicable Where assurance is not required and/or relevant. Risk Rating: Low Medium High Not Applicable Based on the report considered by the committee, there is little or no concern that the Trust will be unable to meet its stated objectives and/or plans. There is some concern that the Trust might not be able to fully meet its stated objectives and/or plans based on the information contained in the report considered by the committee. There is a significant risk that the Trust will not be able to meet its stated objectives and/or plans based on the information contained in the report considered by the committee. Where risk rating is not relevant. Page 2 of 2 Agenda Item 5.1 ii) Committee Chair’s Report to the Trust Board of Directors 13 January 2026 Committee: Finance, Investment and Cash Committee Meeting Date: 15 December 2025 Key Messages: • • • • • • The committee received the Finance Report for Month 8 (see below). The committee discussed the Trust’s future transformation programmes, noting that the areas of focus would be: urgent and emergency care, elective care, and automation of administrative processes. The committee was assured that the programmes were felt to be suitably ‘bold and ambitious’ and were grounded in realistic opportunities, rather than ‘blue sky’ ideas. The committee reviewed the draft capital plan for 2026/27 – 2029/30, noting that the Trust had been allocated c.£40m of capital departmental expenditure limit (CDEL) per year. It was noted that the Trust’s cash position could place constraints on the Trust’s capital programme. The opportunity to secure funding from national programmes outside of CDEL should be pursued vigorously. The plan was to be discussed in a Trust Board Study Session prior to submission in February 2026. The committee reviewed, challenged and discussed the Trust’s medium-term plan ahead of the first submission to NHS England on 17 December 2025. The committee provided feedback in respect of the proposed submission noting that some of the assumptions within the 2025/26 plan had not materialised with regard to matters such as reductions in non-criteria to reside numbers and the committee sought assurance that learnings had been applied to the development of the medium-term plan submission. The committee was assured that such assumed reductions within the 2026/27 plan were based purely on actions which were deemed to be within the Trust’s control. The committee suggested some changes with regard to the plan, particularly around growth assumptions in the cost base, and agreed to recommend the revised plan to the Board for approval. It was noted that more detail and reviews would be required prior to the final submission date in February 2026. The committee received an update in respect of the Trust’s cash position and supported a proposal to make a further request for cash support from NHS England for January 2026. The Trust reviewed and supported a proposal for transforming the Southern Counties Pathology network. Assurance: (Reports/Papers reviewed by the Committee also appearing on the Board agenda) 5.7 Finance Report for Month 8 Assurance Rating: Risk Rating: Substantial High • The Trust had reported an in-month deficit of £4.9m (£40m year-todate), which was consistent with the Trust’s Financial Recovery Plan. • November 2025 had been a challenging month due to costs associated with industrial action, patients with no criteria to reside and mental health patients. • The Trust had received c.£3m of income out of £6.1m for elective over-performance. • There had been a slight improvement in the Trust’s underlying deficit. Page 1 of 2 Any Other N/A Matters: Assurance Rating: Substantial There is a robust series of suitably designed internal controls in place upon Assurance which the organisation relies to manage the risk of failure of the continuous and effective achievement of the objectives of the process, which at the time of our review were being consistently applied. Reasonable There is a series of controls in place, however there are potential risks that Assurance may not be sufficient to ensure that the individual objectives of the process are achieved in a continuous and effective manner. Improvements are required to enhance the adequacy and effectiveness of the controls to mitigate these risks. Limited Assurance Controls in place are not sufficient to ensure that the organisation can rely upon them to manage the risks to the continuous and effective achievement of the objectives of the process. Significant improvements are required to improve the adequacy and effectiveness of the controls. No Assurance There is a fundamental breakdown or absence of core internal controls such that the organisation cannot rely upon them to manage the risks to the continuous and effective achievement of the objectives of the process. Immediate action is required to improve the adequacy and effectiveness of controls. Not Applicable Where assurance is not required and/or relevant. Risk Rating: Low Medium High Not Applicable Based on the report considered by the committee, there is little or no concern that the Trust will be unable to meet its stated objectives and/or plans. There is some concern that the Trust might not be able to fully meet its stated objectives and/or plans based on the information contained in the report considered by the committee. There is a significant risk that the Trust will not be able to meet its stated objectives and/or plans based on the information contained in the report considered by the committee. Where risk rating is not relevant. Page 2 of 2 Agenda Item 5.2 i) Committee Chair’s Report to the Trust Board of Directors 13 January 2026 Committee: People & Organisational Development Committee Meeting Date: 21 November 2025 Key Messages: • • • • The committee reviewed the People Report for Month 7 including progress against the workforce plan. During October 2025, the overall workforce grew by 14 whole-time-equivalents (WTE). Although the substantive workforce had reduced by 15 WTE, there had been lowerthan-expected turnover and increased temporary staffing usage due in part to high sickness levels. The Trust remained on track, however, with respect to its Financial Recovery Plan trajectory. There were concerns about the response rate to the Staff Survey, which was below the national average. The Trust’s vaccination campaign for staff had started well with the uptake rate for the flu vaccine amongst staff at 43%. The committee considered the outputs of the review by NHS England of statutory and mandatory training and the implications for UHS. It was noted that a revised framework would facilitate passporting of training between NHS organisations. The Trust was aligned to the Core Skills Training Framework across six out of eleven areas and ten out of eleven areas for the Utilising E-Learning for Health material. The committee received an update in respect of the Trust’s Inclusion and Belonging strategy. It was noted that resource constraints and the impact of the current financial and operational environment on staff morale had impacted progress towards achievement of the objectives set out in the strategy. The committee reviewed the People risks contained within the Trust’s Board Assurance Framework. Assurance: N/A (Reports/Papers reviewed by the Committee also appearing on the Board agenda) Any Other N/A Matters: Assurance Rating: Substantial There is a robust series of suitably designed internal controls in place upon Assurance which the organisation relies to manage the risk of failure of the continuous and effective achievement of the objectives of the process, which at the time of our review were being consistently applied. Reasonable There is a series of controls in place, however there are potential risks that Assurance may not be sufficient to ensure that the individual objectives of the process are achieved in a continuous and effective manner. Improvements are required to enhance the adequacy and effectiveness of the controls to mitigate these risks. Limited Assurance Controls in place are not sufficient to ensure that the organisation can rely upon them to manage the risks to the continuous and effective achievement of the objectives of the process. Significant improvements are required to improve the adequacy and effectiveness of the controls. Page 1 of 2 No Assurance Not Applicable Risk Rating: Low Medium High Not Applicable There is a fundamental breakdown or absence of core internal controls such that the organisation cannot rely upon them to manage the risks to the continuous and effective achievement of the objectives of the process. Immediate action is required to improve the adequacy and effectiveness of controls. Where assurance is not required and/or relevant. Based on the report considered by the committee, there is little or no concern that the Trust will be unable to meet its stated objectives and/or plans. There is some concern that the Trust might not be able to fully meet its stated objectives and/or plans based on the information contained in the report considered by the committee. There is a significant risk that the Trust will not be able to meet its stated objectives and/or plans based on the information contained in the report considered by the committee. Where risk rating is not relevant. Page 2 of 2 Agenda Item 5.2 ii) Committee Chair’s Report to the Trust Board of Directors 13 January 2026 Committee: People & Organisational Development Committee Meeting Date: 15 December 2025 Key Messages: Assurance: (Reports/Papers reviewed by the Committee also appearing on the Board agenda) • The committee reviewed the People Report for Month 8 (see below) including progress against the workforce plan and Financial Recovery Plan. • The committee considered the workforce implications of the Trust’s medium term plan submission, noting that there were a number of national expectations and targets, such as those relating to sickness rates and elimination of agency spend. In addition, the committee noted the risks associated with the plan, including those where the Trust was reliant on progress with respect to non-criteria to reside and mental health numbers. • The committee received an update regarding the Trust’s Violence and Aggression workstream, noting that the Trust had adopted a revised approach to violence, aggression and abuse directed at staff with a greater willingness to take action against violent/abusive patients and members of the public. A violence and aggression board had been established to provide executive oversight and leadership, and the Trust’s policy was being revised. This work would be accompanied by a comprehensive communication plan for both staff and members of the public. • The committee reviewed the Trust’s progress against its objectives for Year 4 of its People Strategy. 5.9 People Report for Month 8 Assurance Rating: Risk Rating: Substantial High • The overall workforce fell during November 2025, with substantive numbers falling by 52 whole-time-equivalents (WTE). However, temporary staffing use had increased during the month due to increased sickness and operational pressures, which offset much of the reduction in substantive numbers. • The Trust was over its original plan by 214 WTE despite a decrease of nearly 400 WTE since 31 March 2025. In order to hit the Trust’s Financial Recovery Plan target, the overall workforce would need to fall by a further 137 WTE (including a 72 WTE reduction in temporary staffing) by the end of March 2026. • A forecast based on the previous year’s temporary staffing usage for the remaining months of the year indicated that the Trust would end the year approximately 500 WTE above the Trust’s 2025/26 plan. • The Trust had submitted a baseline assessment against the 10 Point Plan to improve Resident Doctors’ working lives in August 2025, which indicated that the Trust compared favourably against other organisations in the South East. The main issues concerned space available for doctors to work in and timeliness of reimbursement of course-related expenses. • The Trust was expected to meet a target of 95% of job plans having been signed off prior to 31 March 2026. At the start of December 2025, 55% of job plans had been signed off. Page 1 of 2 Any Other Matters: • Sickness absence had increased in November 2025 to 4.2% in month due to seasonal illnesses. • The staff survey closed on 28 November 2025. The completion rate for the staff survey had been lower t
Url: /Media/UHS-website-2019/Docs/About-the-Trust/Trust-governance-and-corporate-docs/2026-Trust-documents/Papers-Trust-Board-13-January-2026.pdf

1 to 10 of 24

Previous 1 2 3 Next

Browse site A to Z

Search results

Report of Voting_UHS

Wessex teenage and young adult cancer service - patient information

Report of Voting_UHS

Report of voting - UHS - 2022

Handling concerns and complaints policy

portsmouth_hospitals_health_survey_08

Papers Trust Board 27 May 2021

Aria ePrescribing v13.6 MR1.2 user training guide

Total body irradiation (TBI) - patient information

Papers Trust Board - 13 January 2026

Site policies

Contact details

Useful links